logo
Bhopal gas disaster convicts seek retrial citing flawed investigation

Bhopal gas disaster convicts seek retrial citing flawed investigation

Time of India15-07-2025
Bhopal: Appearing in the court of the Principal District Judge for two convicts in the Bhopal gas disaster criminal case, J Mukund and S P Chaudhary, senior counsel Anirban Roy on Tuesday presented a compilation of several cases in which the high courts and the Supreme Court of India allowed a retrial of a case under section 464 of the CrPC.
All seven Indian officials of Union Carbide accused in the Bhopal gas disaster criminal case were sentenced to two years of rigorous imprisonment by the CJM court in 2010 and were released on bail from the court itself. They later appealed against the CJM court order in the sessions court in 2011, and the hearing in the case has continued since.
Anirban Roy, who appeared for J Mukund and S P Chaudhary, maintained through the hearings that the investigation by the CBI in the gas disaster case was "malafide, malicious, motivated and fraudulent."
He moved an application under section 468 of the CrPC seeking a retrial in the case, as the charges framed against the accused by the trial court were based on a botched-up CBI investigation.
Following lengthy arguments over days during hearings of the case in support of his argument for a retrial, Roy on Tuesday presented a compilation of cases in the court in which various high courts and the Supreme Court allowed a retrial in cases under section 464 of the CrPC. The hearing in the case would continue on Wednesday.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya Foundation Launches Three Landmark Social Initiatives to Drive Empowerment, Dignity and Cultural Revival
Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya Foundation Launches Three Landmark Social Initiatives to Drive Empowerment, Dignity and Cultural Revival

Business Standard

time29 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya Foundation Launches Three Landmark Social Initiatives to Drive Empowerment, Dignity and Cultural Revival

NewsVoir Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], July 28: The Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya Foundation (MKB), established on May 10, 2019, by noted philanthropist and social activist Mohit Kamboj, has announced three transformative social initiatives aimed at bringing meaningful change to Indian society. Guided by the philosophy of Bharatiya, which stands for unity, dignity, and empowerment, the Foundation remains committed to eliminating social discrimination and uplifting communities that have been historically marginalized. The newly launched initiatives focus on three key areas: empowering the transgender community, ensuring dignity for the unclaimed deceased, and restoring culturally significant temples across the country. As part of its Transgender Upliftment initiative, the Foundation is launching postgraduate education opportunities, skill development programs, and incubation support to prepare individuals for meaningful participation in the workforce. Complemented by dignity-led awareness campaigns, the initiative is designed to promote true inclusion and economic self-reliance for the transgender community, one of the most underserved and marginalized groups in the country. In a deeply humanitarian gesture, the Foundation's Dignified Dead Bodies initiative ensures that unclaimed or neglected deceased individuals are given respectful last rites. With this effort, the MKB Foundation strengthens its belief that every human life, regardless of status, identity, or circumstance, deserves dignity, even in death. To implement this initiative effectively, the Foundation is collaborating with municipal corporations, the police department, and trusted NGOs across cities. With its third initiative, the Foundation is working to restore temples of spiritual and cultural significance. This effort not only aims to preserve India's rich heritage but also to promote communal harmony and reawaken pride in shared traditions. Speaking about the social initiatives, Mr. Mohit Kamboj, Founder of Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya Foundation, said, "True nation-building begins when every citizen feels seen, respected, and empowered, regardless of background, identity, or circumstance. These initiatives move us beyond short-term aid toward lasting pathways for inclusion, dignified livelihoods, and cultural pride. By enabling the transgender community to gain skills and earn meaningful work, honouring the unclaimed deceased with respectful last rites, and restoring our ancient temples so heritage can inspire future generations, we are embedding dignity, equality, and cultural confidence at the heart of India's progress." With a relentless focus on grassroots impact and community transformation, the Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya Foundation continues to serve as a beacon of hope, driving positive change across India. The Mohit Kamboj Foundation (MKB), founded on May 10, 2019, by philanthropist and social activist Mohit Kamboj Bharatiya, is committed to creating lasting social impact across India. Inspired by the spirit of Bharatiya, the Foundation promotes equality, dignity, and unity by empowering the transgender community, offering respectful last rites for unclaimed deceased individuals, and restoring culturally significant temples, preserving heritage while fostering inclusion and pride. For further details, please visit Instagram Facebook:

Why wait until now to challenge inquiry in cash row: SC to Justice Varma
Why wait until now to challenge inquiry in cash row: SC to Justice Varma

Business Standard

time29 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Why wait until now to challenge inquiry in cash row: SC to Justice Varma

The Supreme Court on Monday asked Allahabad High Court judge Justice Yashwant Varma why he had waited until now to challenge the procedure adopted after half-burnt Indian currency notes were discovered in an outhouse of his residential premises. 'Did you take a chance of a favourable finding? You are a constitutional authority. You cannot say, 'I don't know',' the judges told senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who appeared for Varma. Varma, who was a judge of the Delhi High Court when the cash was found, told the court that former Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna's recommendation, based on a three-judge enquiry report, cannot form the basis for his removal. He also contended that a sitting judge's conduct cannot be part of public discourse before the legislative process begins—a constitutional mandate that was defied in his case. CJI Khanna had set up the three-member committee following the discovery of the cash at Justice Varma's official residence. The fact-finding committee was constituted under the in-house inquiry procedure to assist the CJI in acting on complaints against High Court or Supreme Court judges. The three-member panel, in its report, said the cash found at Justice Varma's residence was unaccounted for and that he was unable to explain its source—grounds that justified impeachment. This led CJI Khanna to advise Justice Varma to resign, which he refused to do. The CJI then forwarded the report to the President and the Prime Minister for further action. 'The entire case has become political,' Sibal told the court on Monday, adding that Justice Varma, a sitting judge, had been declared guilty even before the commencement of statutory proceedings—under which only Parliament can remove a sitting judge. During the hearing, the bench also asked Sibal why he believed that former CJI Khanna's decision to forward the report to the President and Prime Minister was not constitutionally valid. Sibal argued that the CJI, under the in-house procedure, was not authorised to recommend a judge's removal. The court reasoned: 'The President is the appointing authority and, therefore, the matter was placed before it (the President's office). Since the President acts as per the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, and the Prime Minister is the leader of the Council of Ministers, forwarding to the Prime Minister is also not problematic.' The court also said that the former CJI's approach did not imply he was 'trying to persuade the House (Parliament) to act based on his recommendation.' Sibal, however, clarified that Justice Varma had not moved against the judgment but was aggrieved by how the entire investigation had unfolded. The bench then fixed Wednesday to hear the case again and asked Justice Varma to place the three-member in-house enquiry panel report on record for its perusal.

‘Red lines were crossed': Jaishankar calls Operation Sindoor a new normal in India's counter-terror doctrine
‘Red lines were crossed': Jaishankar calls Operation Sindoor a new normal in India's counter-terror doctrine

First Post

time29 minutes ago

  • First Post

‘Red lines were crossed': Jaishankar calls Operation Sindoor a new normal in India's counter-terror doctrine

Operation Sindoor is a new era in India's counter-terror response, External Affairs Minister Jaishankar said in Lok Sabha, outlining robust actions and global diplomatic support after the Pahalgam attack. read more External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Tuesday said that Operation Sindoor reflects a transformative shift in India's counter-terrorism policy, calling it 'a new normal' in how the country responds to terror threats. Speaking in the Lok Sabha, Jaishankar highlighted the government's firm stance following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack and highlighted the role of diplomacy in rallying global support. 'It was important to send a clear, strong and resolute message after the Pahalgam attack. Our red lines were crossed and we had to make it very apparent that there would be serious consequences,' he said. He said that the Cabinet Committee on Security decided to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960 until Pakistan irreversibly ends its support for cross-border terrorism. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Jaishankar also detailed how Indian diplomacy helped build international consensus. 'Multilateral forums such as the Quad and BRICS condemned the attack. Countries like Germany, France and the EU stated clearly that India had every right to defend itself,' he added. He rejected claims that his visit to China was part of any backdoor arrangement. 'I went to China to make our stand very clear about terrorism. I didn't go for the Olympics or secret deals,' he clarified. India's firm diplomatic messaging was reinforced by 7 parliamentary delegations that visited 33 countries to communicate the zero-tolerance approach to terrorism. 'Thanks to our diplomacy, the TRF, which claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam attack, has now been designated a global terrorist organisation,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store