Trump pardons PG Sittenfeld, ex-Cincinnati councilman convicted of bribery
An "executive grant of clemency" signed May 28 by Trump directs the Attorney General to sign and grant a "full and unconditional pardon."
Sittenfeld's convictions derailed a promising political career where he once was the frontrunner for mayor. He was arrested months after announcing his campaign for Cincinnati mayor in 2020.
The case against Sittenfeld centered on donations to his political action committee, which prosecutors said he solicited from an informant for the FBI and FBI agents posing as developers of a downtown Cincinnati project. Prosecutors said Sittenfeld's actions went beyond campaign fundraising and crossed the line into bribery.
A jury found him guilty in 2022. After a lengthy post-conviction legal battle, Sittenfeld was sentenced to 16 months in prison, although he only served about four and a half months. In May 2024, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals released him while his appeal was pending.
Earlier this year, the 6th Circuit, in a 2-1 decision, upheld the convictions at the same time as all three Trump-appointed judges appeared to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.
Two of the judges said they believed the Supreme Court should review it. The third judge, who authored the majority opinion, said it "may be time for the (Supreme Court) to revisit or refine" its previous holdings.
Former U.S. Attorney Kenneth Parker, who oversaw Sittenfeld's trial, told The Enquirer that the pardon "undermines the dutiful work that was done by my office at the time, along with our federal law enforcement partners."
It also "casts aside the deliberative work of the jury, the district court judge, and the judges of the (6th Circuit)."
"Corruption is a crime that knows no political lines and should be addressed wherever and whenever it happens," Parker said. "This case was prosecuted because of the criminal behavior that clearly occurred as decided by the jury. Remember, to even reach a pardon, one first has to acknowledge that a crime was actually committed. That is definitely the case here and a pardon is inappropriate, to say the least."
Sittenfeld has taken his case to the U.S. Supreme Court in an effort to overturn his convictions. It's not clear if Sittenfeld will continue to challenge his convictions. The lead attorney for the Supreme Court case did not respond to messages seeking comment.
Sittenfeld did not respond to The Enquirer's attempts at seeking comment. His wife told a reporter who went to their East Walnut Hills home that she would not comment.
Staff writer David Ferrara contributed to this report.
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: PG Sittenfeld: President Trump pardons former Cincinnati councilman
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
13 minutes ago
ABC News Live Prime: August 21, 2025
Menendez brothers plead for parole; Hurricane Erin batters East Coast; appeals court throws out Trump fraud case; Trump vows to end mail-in ballots. August 21, 2025
USA Today
13 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump declares victory in Washington DC after takeover of metro police
WASHINGTON - President Donald Trump declared victory in the nation's capital, 10 days after announcing the federal takeover of the Washington metro police force to 'rescue' the city from crime. Trump on Aug. 21 met with law enforcement officers who had been deployed to patrol the city he recently described as rampant with 'crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor.' The president arrived at the United States Park Police facility in Anacostia Park Thursday evening and offered words of encouragement to law enforcement officers. He brought hamburgers and pizzas for the crowd. 'The numbers are down like we wouldn't believe, but we believe it,' he told the crowd. Among those who attended were officers from the National Guard, FBI, U.S. Marshals and the Washington DC Metropolitan Police Department. 'We've had some incredible results. The results have come out and it's like a different place. It's like a different city." "To me, I feel very safe now," he added. On Aug. 11, Trump deployed 800 National Guard troops in Washington DC, declaring a public safety emergency. Several Republican states including Ohio, Mississippi, West Virginia and Louisiana have sent guardsmen to the capital to support the Trump Administration's efforts. The troops are deployed at tourist-heavy locations such as the National Mall and transit hubs such as Union Station and Metro stops to aid local law enforcement. Since the deployment of the troops, carjackings have decreased by 83%, robberies by 46%, car thefts by 21%, and overall violent crime by 22% compared to the previous seven days, according to Metropolitan Police Department's police union. But crime had already been on the decline. Violent crime in Washington, DC, dropped 26% through Aug. 8, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, according to data from the Metropolitan Police Department. However, the city had the fourth-highest homicide rate among U.S. cities, after St. Louis, New Orleans and Detroit, at 27.3 per 100,000 residents in 2024. 'It's the capital. It's going to be the best in the world,' Trump said. 'We're going back to Congress for some money, and we're going to redo a lot of the pavement, a lot of the medians…the graffiti's all coming off real fast,' he said. He then pivoted to his latest passion project: building a 90,000 square foot ballroom in the White House. 'They've been after a ballroom for 150 years, but they never had a real estate guy,' he said. 'As a president, I've done a lot of ballrooms and we're going to make this one the best of them all.' Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House Correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal
Chicago Tribune
13 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Appeals court throws out massive civil fraud penalty against President Donald Trump
NEW YORK — A New York appeals court on Thursday threw out President Donald Trump's massive financial penalty while narrowly upholding a judge's finding that he engaged in fraud by exaggerating his wealth for decades. The ruling spares Trump from a potential half-billion-dollar fine but bans him and his two eldest sons from serving in corporate leadership for a few years. Trump claimed 'TOTAL VICTORY' in the case, which stemmed from a civil lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James. 'They stole $550 million from me with a fake case and it was overturned,' Trump said, echoing his earlier social media post as he addressed police in Washington, D.C. 'They said this was a fake case. It was a terrible thing.' James, a Democrat, focused on the parts of the decision that went her way, saying in a statement that it 'affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court: Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud.' The ruling came seven months after Trump returned to the White House, his political fortunes unimpeded by the civil fraud judgment, a criminal conviction and other legal blows. A sharply divided panel of five judges in the state's mid-level Appellate Division couldn't agree on many issues raised in Trump's appeal, but a majority said the monetary penalty was 'excessive.' A lower-court judge, Arthur Engoron, had ordered Trump last year to pay $355 million in penalties after finding that he flagrantly padded financial statements provided to lenders and insurers. With interest, the sum has topped $515 million. Additional penalties for executives at his company, the Trump Organization, including sons Eric and Donald Trump Jr., have brought the total to $527 million with interest. 'While harm certainly occurred, it was not the cataclysmic harm that can justify a nearly half billion-dollar award' to the state, Judges Dianne Renwick and Peter Moulton wrote in one of three opinions shaping the appeals court's ruling. They called the penalty 'an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution.' Both were appointed by Democratic governors. Engoron's other punishments, upheld by the appeals court, have been on pause during Trump's appeal, and the president was able to hold off collection of the money by posting a $175 million bond. Donald Trump Jr. celebrated the decision by mocking James, who had periodically posted a running tally of the fraud penalty, with interest. Over a post from James in February 2024, when the tally was nearly $465 million, Trump Jr. wrote: 'I believe you mean $0.00. Thank you for your attention to this matter.' The five-judge panel, which split on the merits of the lawsuit and Engoron's fraud finding, dismissed the monetary penalty in its entirety while also leaving a pathway for an appeal to the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals. In the meantime, Trump and his co-defendants, the judges wrote, can seek to extend the pause to prevent any punishments from taking effect. While the Appellate Division dispatches most appeals in a few pages in a matter of weeks, the judges weighing Trump's case took nearly 11 months to rule after oral arguments last fall and issued 323 pages of concurring and dissenting opinions with no majority. Rather, some judges endorsed parts of their colleagues' findings while denouncing others, enabling the court to rule. Two judges wrote that they felt James' lawsuit was justifiable and that she had proven her case but the penalty was too severe. One wrote that James exceeded her legal authority in bringing the suit, saying that if any lenders felt cheated, they could have sued Trump themselves, and none did. Another wrote that Engoron erred by ruling before the trial that James had proven Trump engaged in fraud. In his portion of the ruling, Judge David Friedman, appointed by a Republican governor, was scathing in his criticism of James for bringing the lawsuit. 'Plainly, her ultimate goal was not 'market hygiene' … but political hygiene, ending with the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction of his real estate business,' Friedman wrote. 'The voters have obviously rendered a verdict on his political career. This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business.' Trump and his co-defendants denied wrongdoing. At the conclusion of the civil trial in January 2024, Trump said he was 'an innocent man' and the case was a 'fraud on me.' The Republican has repeatedly maintained the case and the verdict were political moves by James and Engoron, both Democrats. Trump's Justice Department has subpoenaed James for records related to the lawsuit, among other documents, as part of an investigation into whether she violated the president's civil rights. James' personal attorney Abbe D. Lowell has said investigating the fraud case is 'the most blatant and desperate example of this administration carrying out the president's political retribution campaign.' Trump and his lawyers said his financial statements weren't deceptive, since they came with disclaimers noting they weren't audited. The defense also noted bankers and insurers independently evaluated the numbers, and the loans were repaid. Despite such discrepancies as tripling the size of his Trump Tower penthouse, he said the financial statements were, if anything, lowball estimates of his fortune. During an appellate court hearing last September, Trump's lawyers argued that many of the case's allegations were too old and that James had misused a consumer protection law to sue Trump over private business transactions that were satisfactory to those involved. State attorneys said that while Trump insists no one was harmed by the financial statements, his exaggerations led lenders to make riskier loans and that honest borrowers lose out when others game their net worth numbers. The civil fraud case was just one of several legal obstacles for Trump as he campaigned, won and segued to a second term as president. On Jan. 10, he was sentenced in his criminal hush money case to what's known as an unconditional discharge, leaving his conviction on the books but sparing him jail, probation, a fine or other punishment. He is appealing the conviction. And in December, a federal appeals court upheld a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her, affirming a $5 million judgment against him. The appeals court declined in June to reconsider. Trump still can try to get the Supreme Court to hear his appeal. Trump also is appealing a subsequent verdict that requires him to pay Carroll $83.3 million for additional defamation claims.
