logo
Trump Order Encourages Controversial Deep-Sea Mining for Critical Minerals

Trump Order Encourages Controversial Deep-Sea Mining for Critical Minerals

Newsweek25-04-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday to promote mining of the deep-sea floor, a controversial way to get critical minerals that are used in a wide range of electronics and other products.
"Our nation must take immediate action to accelerate the responsible development of seabed mineral resources," the order states.
Terrestrial mines and the processing facilities for many critical minerals are dominated by China, and the Trump administration is eager to develop alternatives. Large swathes of the deep-sea floor contain nodules of the critical minerals cobalt, copper, manganese and nickel.
"This is an exciting opportunity for the U.S.," Gerard Baron, CEO of The Metals Company, told Newsweek. "It's an amazing way of catching up from what is a very distant second place to China when it comes to critical minerals."
Deep-sea mining equipment being deployed by The Metals Company during a test expedition. The company hopes to extract nodules of critical minerals from the seabed.
Deep-sea mining equipment being deployed by The Metals Company during a test expedition. The company hopes to extract nodules of critical minerals from the seabed.
Richard Baron/Courtesy of The Metals Company
The Canada-based company is seeking U.S. permits to mine the sea floor after expressing frustration with an international process on mining. A United Nations body, the International Seabed Authority, has been debating a set of standards for deep-sea mining intended to minimize harm to marine environments.
Brazilian oceanographer Leticia Carvalho has been Secretary General of the Seabed Authority since January. At a Washington D.C. conference on critical minerals this month, Carvalho emphasized that her organization is the only body legally authorized to regulate activity beyond national boundaries and that there was clear agreement among partner nations.
"No exploitation may commence until a regulatory framework is in place," she said.
Baron said his company has spent millions of dollars on environmental assessments of their mining but has not seen progress on mining standards from the Seabed Authority.
"The system has been overtaken by environmental activists," Baron complained.
The U.S. has never ratified the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea, and legislation from the 1990s established a national permitting framework for seabed mining.
Trump's order calls on U.S. agencies to expedite seabed mineral permits "in areas beyond national jurisdiction," essentially ignoring the international process and mining unilaterally.
A deep-sea crab observed during an expedition using equipment from Victor Vescovo's company.
A deep-sea crab observed during an expedition using equipment from Victor Vescovo's company.
Courtesy of Caladan Oceanic and the University of Western Australia
The order drew immediate condemnation from ocean conservation groups who say deep sea mining risks a fragile and barely explored environment.
"Areas of the U.S. seafloor where test mining took place over 50 years ago still haven't fully recovered," Jeff Watters, Ocean Conservancy's vice president for external affairs, said in a statement. "The harm caused by deep-sea mining isn't restricted to the ocean floor: it will impact the entire water column, top to bottom, and everyone and everything relying on it."
Duncan Currie, international legal advisor to the Deep Sea Conservation Coalition, which represents more than 100 groups, warned that unilaterally mining in international waters would risk upsetting other fragile agreements on shipping and fishing on the high seas.
"To be taking a bulldozer through the Law of the Sea Convention would really be treated with enormous alarm by any country that has a need to rely on the ocean," Currie told Newsweek.
Currie also questioned the economic rationale for seafloor mining.
"It's a very shallow analysis of the issue," he said. The main bottleneck to critical mineral supplies, he said, is the lack of a refining and processing infrastructure for the minerals, and pulling rocks from the depths will not change that.
Victor Vescovo, CEO of the investment company Caledon Capital, is a deep ocean explorer and one of the very few people to have visited the Challenger Deep, the deepest spot on Earth. Vescovo said he has deep doubts about the mining companies' claims about their ability to operate profitably under such difficult conditions.
"I've operated heavy equipment below 4000 meters as much as anyone, and they are completely underestimating the absolute hellish and brutal nature of operating at those depths," Vescovo told Newsweek. "It's deeper than the Titanic. Nothing could be harder, except maybe going into space."
Deep-sea organisms often make use of mineral nodules to anchor themselves on the sea floor. Ocean conservation groups argue that mining the deep sea puts the environment at risk.
Deep-sea organisms often make use of mineral nodules to anchor themselves on the sea floor. Ocean conservation groups argue that mining the deep sea puts the environment at risk.
Courtesy of Caladan Oceanic and the University of Western Australia
Minerals extracted from the seabed would not make a significant difference in the global supply, he argued, and many of the crucial rare earth minerals in shortest supply are not found in the deep-sea nodules.
"They treat deep sea mining as a cornucopia of critical metals, like it's the solution to all of our metals problems," he said. "It is nothing of the kind."
Vescovo said deep sea expeditions frequently find previously unknown species, many with unique biochemistry and other properties that could yield important scientific and medical breakthroughs.
Mining not only produces deep scars on the sea floor and a plume of sediment in the water column, he said, it also removes the hard substrate that many organisms need as an anchor on the abyssal plain.
Baron, of The Metals Company, countered that damage from mining the sea floor must be balanced against the impacts of terrestrial mining. New mining and processing of nickel, for example, is now largely taking place in Indonesian rainforests, where it has become a leading cause of deforestation.
"We should carry out extractive industry in parts of the planet where there is the least life," Baron said, "not the most life."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SEPC secures Rs 650 crore solar EPC contract from Parmeshi Urja
SEPC secures Rs 650 crore solar EPC contract from Parmeshi Urja

Business Upturn

time7 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

SEPC secures Rs 650 crore solar EPC contract from Parmeshi Urja

By Aman Shukla Published on June 12, 2025, 15:55 IST SEPC Limited (NSE: SEPC | BSE: 532945), a leading player in the Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) space, has been awarded a prestigious contract worth ₹650 crore by Parmeshi Urja Ltd, a Kolkata-based subsidiary of India Power Corporation Limited. The project entails the full EPC scope — including Design, Engineering, Supply, Installation, Testing, and Commissioning — of a 133 MW Solar Power Project. The solar infrastructure will be spread across four key districts in Maharashtra: Sambhaji Nagar, Dhule, Solapur, and Nanded. This green energy initiative falls under the Government of India's PM-KUSUM Yojana, which aims to boost solar adoption for agricultural and rural development. With an estimated execution timeline of 12 to 18 months, the project is a strategic leap for SEPC, marking its return to the renewable energy sector. The company, known for its past projects in Wind, Biomass, and Thermal power, is poised to deliver high-quality, large-scale infrastructure solutions. This major order almost doubles SEPC's domestic order book and strengthens its portfolio across the renewable energy domain. It also reinforces SEPC's commitment to supporting India's clean energy mission and showcases its expertise in executing technically complex infrastructure projects across multiple regions. Aman Shukla is a post-graduate in mass communication . A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication ,content writing and copy writing. Aman is currently working as journalist at

Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling
Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling

Business of Fashion

time11 minutes ago

  • Business of Fashion

Surprise! Why Apparel Prices Are Actually Falling

A little over a month into President Donald Trump's new tariff regime, the verdict is in: Clothes are getting cheaper. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics on Wednesday reported that apparel prices fell 0.4 percent between April and May, and were down 0.9 percent from a year prior. Inflation overall was estimated at 2.4 percent, in line with expectations. The data likely reflects pain delayed rather than avoided. Many retailers stocked up before Trump announced a 10 percent tariff on all imports, as well as an additional 30 percent levy on Chinese goods. Inflation figures also don't account for hikes that were announced but have yet to kick in. E.l.f. Cosmetics, LVMH, Nike and many others have said they plan to raise prices this summer. But the downward trend speaks to another truth about fashion's approach to pricing: The tariffs came at a time when brands were already working overtime to convince reluctant shoppers to keep spending. Rather than pass along costs, many companies' instinct is to explore every other option first. Urban Outfitters, Gap and Abercrombie & Fitch fall in that camp, saying they'll hold off on increasing prices even as they warn of shrinking margins. And for brands that engaged in years of post-pandemic price hikes, discounting even in the face of tariffs is still the best way to win back customers. Many luxury labels fall in this category, though plenty of mass-market brands are more expensive than they used to be, too. 'Retailers don't want to scare consumers or the market and suggest they're [raising] prices,' said Sonia Lapinsky, partner at retail consultancy Alix Partners. 'They're refraining as much as possible, they're not talking as much as possible.' Fashion's Falling Prices Apparel prices fell month on month between April and May, and nearly 1 percent in May year on year. The rate of price increases began slowing in 2023, and then declining early this year. This doesn't account for the full impact of tariffs on retailers' margins, which won't be realised until late summer or fall. That is when prices could get 'wildly volatile,' because of brands' individual approaches to pricing in the face of rising costs, said Michael Prendergast, managing director of Alvarez & Marsal Consumer and Retail Group. Some brands will look at this moment as a time to sacrifice margin to gain market share. With expanded margins, thanks to years of rising prices, many retailers are well positioned to absorb the impact. For now brands are doing everything in their power to keep people shopping and drive traffic, said Lapinsky, including upping discounting throughout April and May. Beyond categories like footwear that are highly susceptible to tariffs, brands will get specific about where they raise prices — fashion items may have elasticity, but shoppers would see a more obvious change in basic pieces, for example. Likely, after years of experimenting, brands have learned where their limits are. Planning for the rest of the year is filled with extra risk. Raise prices too much, and kill demand; plan for lower demand and potentially end up with empty shelves. That conundrum will likely come to a head for retailers during back-to-school shopping season. 'We're likely going to have an inventory issue on one end or the other,' said Lapinsky. 'Either we've got inventory in the stores that had to be priced at a point that they can't clear, or retailers may have pulled back and just don't have what customers are looking for.' Mood-Swing Shopping As they make inventory and pricing decisions for the rest of the year, retailers are watching consumer sentiment closely to try to determine whether they'll have the appetite to spend — and to what degree. 'You have to be cautious of exactly what inventory you're taking in, given consumer sentiment and how much they're shopping,' said Jessica Ramírez, co-founder of research firm The Consumer Collective. 'If you're just churning inventory that isn't a priority on your consumers' list, you're not going to do very well.' After falling to its lowest point in years, consumer sentiment got a slight boost in May. Part of that may be thanks to a comparative settling of the news cycle from April, when Trump first announced, and then temporarily paused, levies. But even just the feeling of rising prices and uncertainty can put a damper on shoppers' moods. Plus, more generally, price inflation in other categories will have an impact on consumer appetite to spend on apparel. 'Food and gas prices affect discretionary income,' said Prendergast. 'Gas prices are coming down, that's the good news. The not great news is food continues to rise — that pinches the wallet.' Trouble is Brewing Elsewhere The picture of softened demand is clearer in China, the second biggest fashion market after the US. Earlier this month, China reported consumer prices overall — not just apparel — fell for a fourth consecutive month in May, raising concerns that deflation is here to stay. Meanwhile, wage shrinkage and property value slumps continue. It's already having an impact on fashion, reported Reuters: Amid raging price wars, stores are putting merchandise on steep discount — $30 for a Coach handbag at Super Zhuanzhuan, for example. US-based apparel companies operating in China will face more uncertainty in an already challenged market. Trouble abroad could even be felt back home. 'The more that's happening in the macro, the more concerned the consumer in America is going to be,' said Lapinsky. 'We don't see any end to that in the next few months.' Though, starting in March, China began ramping up fiscal stimulus. And much remains to be seen about how the Chinese consumer will react, said Ramírez. Fashion is still in a wait-and-see phase when it comes to price hikes and planning, but the moment of truth could be getting closer. 'Overall retailers are underplaying the effect of what tariffs and inflation are going to do to their sales and EBITDA,' said Prendergast. 'We're advising clients, take the next two years of your revenue and margin plans down, like, take them down and again, use this opportunity to cut costs internally.'

Japan's Largest Companies 2025: Rare Interest Rate Hikes Lead To A Volatile Year
Japan's Largest Companies 2025: Rare Interest Rate Hikes Lead To A Volatile Year

Forbes

time11 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Japan's Largest Companies 2025: Rare Interest Rate Hikes Lead To A Volatile Year

Toyota and other Japanese automakers have been hampered by Trump's tariffs. Getty Images Japan's stock market has been on a roller-coaster ride over the past 12 months. Its benchmark Nikkei index reached an all-time high in July 2024, driven by corporate governance reforms and robust company earnings, then crashed more than 25% in less than four weeks on a surprise interest rate hike by the Bank of Japan. Though the index rebounded shortly after, its gains were trimmed in early 2025 as U.S. President Donald Trump ignited his trade war. Japan has 180 companies on this year's Forbes Global 2000 ranking of the world's largest public corporations, down slightly from 182 in 2024, making it the third most-represented country after the U.S. and China. The list weighs market value, revenue, profit and assets equally, using the latest 12 months of data as of April 25. Toyota Motor, the highest-ranking Japanese company, is in a sector particularly hard hit by Trump's sweeping tariffs. The U.S. in early April imposed a 25% tax on foreign-made cars, followed in early May by the same levy on auto parts, a blow to Japan's mainstay industry and its export-led economy. The world's top-selling carmaker slipped three places to No. 14 after its stock tumbled 22% over the year. Though its revenues and profits in the year through December were roughly flat at $309 billion and $34 billion, respectively, Toyota warned that the tariffs would result in a $1.3 billion hit to operating profit in April and May. Some of Toyota Motor's peers suffered even steeper declines. Nissan Motor, long plagued by deteriorating financials, sank 366 spots to No. 707 after its profit in the 12 months through December plunged 76% to $702.6 million. After the cut-off date for the list, the automaker posted a $4.7 billion loss for the three months ended March. Nissan is struggling to restructure after merger talks with larger rival Honda Motor collapsed in February. The failed tie-up, together with the tariffs, relegated Honda to No. 117 from No. 91 as its stock fell 17% over the year. Mitsubishi Motors, whose biggest shareholder is Nissan, tumbled 379 places to No. 1,562 as its shares skidded almost 10%. Companies in the AI space were a bright spot. Billionaire Masayoshi Son's SoftBank investment powerhouse climbed 331 spots to No. 130 on a 425% surge in 12-month profit through December to $5.6 billion, driven partly by increases in the value of portfolio companies such as ByteDance, the Chinese parent of TikTok. SoftBank is ramping up its AI bet, with plans to invest up to $30 billion in U.S.-based ChatGPT maker OpenAI while also investing $100 billion to build AI infrastructure stateside as part of its Stargate Project joint venture with OpenAI and Oracle. The AI boom also lifted Advantest, the world's largest semiconductor testing equipment maker by market share and a supplier to AI-chip giant Nvidia. It scaled 509 places to No. 1,231 as its profit in the year through March more than doubled to $1.1 billion on a 52% surge in sales to $5.1 billion. Other notable climbers included companies in the defense industry. IHI Corp, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) and Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) were among the best performers on the Nikkei over the year as Japan ramped up military spending. IHI, an engineering company that makes everything from turbines for power plants to rocket systems for space travel, debuted on the Global 2000 at No. 1,349 after its stock skyrocketed 176%. A more than doubling in MHI stock elevated the company 75 spots to No. 372 while KHI vaulted 513 places to No. 1,331 on a 52% share increase.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store