logo
Potential Medicaid cuts would be ‘devastating' for Hawaii

Potential Medicaid cuts would be ‘devastating' for Hawaii

Yahoo05-05-2025
When Amy Feeley-Austin of Kona was going through a tough time, Medicaid was a lifesaver that provided health care for her two young children.
Twelve years ago her husband died, leaving her and the children with no health insurance. It was a sudden and unexpected turn of events, and in a time of grief, she had to scramble to get health care insurance.
Thanks to Medicaid, she was able to get coverage for her two children to continue their regular doctor visits, as well as specialized services her son needed for a disability. She worked for a social services organization at the time, but the cost of employer insurance was three-quarters of her salary.
She worked her way to a higher-paying job, eventually, with employer-­provided health coverage and no longer needed Medicaid after two years. She also went on to earn several advanced degrees and is now chief operating officer at Kona Community Hospital.
Looking back, Feeley-­Austin, 42, will never forget how Medicaid was there when she needed it.
'This was a very real need, ' she said. 'It was a way to make sure my kids were safe and healthy while I figured out how to address this horrible, traumatizing thing, and we were able to move forward from there.'
But Medicaid is under threat, with Republicans in Congress to the program as part of a wide-ranging budget package.
Congress is targeting up to $880 billion in cuts over 10 years, according to KFF, a health policy think tank. Some possibilities include adding new work requirements for eligibility and scaling back the federal share of Medicaid costs.
Although details remain up in the air, KFF said any reduction in federal Medicaid would leave states with tough choices on how to offset reductions.
Nationally, Medicaid provides health care coverage for more than 80 million Americans.
Gov. Josh Green ran through the numbers on his whiteboard in a recent social media post, saying federal cuts to Medicaid would result in increased medical debt for residents and potentially affect Hawaii's rural hospitals.
It would mean fewer people getting their high blood pressure diagnosed or their medication for diabetes.
'A cut to Medicaid is a cut to all of our care in the country, basically, and we won't let that happen without a fight, ' said Green. 'Please know we're going to continue to work hard to make sure all our people are well cared for.'
A safety net In Hawaii, Medicaid is administered as Med-QUEST, and provides health care coverage for more than 400, 000 residents. It provides health care for 1 in 3 keiki and covers 1 in 3 births in the state.
It covers low-income children and adults, pregnant women and aged, blind and disabled people, among others, for doctor visits, inpatient hospital services, prescription drugs and more. It also provides nursing home coverage and home-based care to those who qualify.
In Hawaii, federal funds cover 73 % of the $3 billion spent annually on Medicaid.
At this time there have been no changes to Medicaid funding in Hawaii, according to the state Department of Human Services, which runs Med-QUEST.
'We continue to monitor the debate over Medicaid funding that is happening at the federal level, ' said DHS in an announcement posted to its website. 'Please be assured that no changes have been made at this time to Hawaii's Medicaid program, Med-QUEST. We encourage you to continue to access healthcare by making and keeping appointments with your health care professional and picking up any medications that are prescribed.'
Francoise Culley-Trotman, CEO of AlohaCare, is also watching developments closely.
AlohaCare is nonprofit health plan that has provided coverage for QUEST beneficiaries since its founding in 1994. It is Hawaii's second-­largest Medicaid health plan, behind HMSA, with more than 70, 000 members.
Culley-Trotman said Medicaid serves as a vital safety net for individuals and families who cannot afford private health insurance or have limited access to employer-­sponsored coverage.
Any cuts to Medicaid funding would be 'very devastating ' for Hawaii, she said.
'The difficulty of thriving in an expensive state itself is a challenge, ' she said. 'When you remove those resources, you're challenging the household and people's ability to take care of themselves. There's going to be disruption in caregiving.'
If access to health care is reduced, she said, the whole ecosystem of care is affected. Oftentimes, people without routine health care resort to using emergency rooms, which is costly and strains the hospital system.
AlohaCare celebrated Medicaid Awareness Month in April by collecting stories such as Feeley-Austin's, and will continue to do so until federal and state Medicaid budgets are finalized.
She expects to know more this fall, when final decisions are made. But the uncertainty from not knowing the details is also extremely stressful, she said.
Hospital strain All of Hawaii's hospitals would be affected by Medicaid cuts, as all care for Medicaid patients, according to Hilton Raethel, president and CEO of the Healthcare Association of Hawaii.
A reduction in Medicare reimbursements would increase the financial burden for hospitals, many of which are already struggling.
'Our hospitals already operate on very, very narrow margins, ' said Raethel. 'It's a very challenging health care environment, and labor costs are going up.'
Additionally, Medicaid covers about 60 % of patients at skilled nursing facilities in Hawaii and is the single largest payer for long-term care in the state.
Raethel said he expects the state Legislature to address federal cuts during a special session in November and that by then Hawaii should know how much and where the cuts will be.
For now it's a waiting game.
'The state has been very careful to put aside some dollars so if they do need to close some of these gaps, they have the ability to do that in the short term, ' he said, 'but they still have limited ability depending on how draconian these cuts might be.'
There also would be other cuts to address, including cuts to education.
Hawaii's congressional delegation is aware of the pending threats, and advocating for their fellow Congress members, including Republicans, to think about the devastating impact to their states.
U.S. Sen. Mazie Hirono condemned the impending cuts to a critical program such as Medicaid, warning that it could affect thousands of residents in Hawaii.
'President Trump and Republicans are working to cut over $800 billion in Medicaid funding, which would impact hundreds of thousands of people in Hawaii, ' said Hiro ­no in a statement. 'As costs continue to rise for working families, Republicans are jeopardizing health care access for millions of Americans in order to pay for trillions in tax cuts for their billionaire buddies. Medicaid is an essential resource that helps rural communities, people with disabilities, keiki, and kupuna access health care, and I will do everything in my power to protect this crucial program.'
U.S. Sen. Brian Schatz recently met with The Queen's Medical Center to discuss growing demands for its emergency department and the potential impact of Med-QUEST cuts. A significant share of Queen's patients are Med-QUEST recipients, he said.
AlohaCare's Culley-­Trotman said part of her campaign is to battle the misconception that Medicaid recipients are lazy or unwilling to work.
Nationally, nearly two-thirds of adult Medicaid enrollees work either part or full time, according to KFF, while the rest are students, caregivers, disabled or ill.
AlohaCare's Culley-­Trotman said about 60 % of adults on Med-QUEST in Hawaii have a job, and in some cases multiple jobs. Some have jobs without consistent hours, which leaves them unqualified for health insurance coverage.
Feeley-Austin says both her children are doing well now, with one about to graduate from high school and the other attending college—and she is grateful Medicaid was there when she needed it.
'It's very humbling, ' she said. 'I keep going back to there's this concept, especially with everything happening at a national level, that people can just do it themselves. That's not always what happens.'
Sometimes there are sudden job losses, she said, or accidents that result in disabilities and serious illnesses—and Medicaid is a safety net, especially for children.
Based on an earlier analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Hawaii would have to raise taxes or cut other parts of its budget by an estimated $3 billion over 10 years to maintain Med-QUEST, including the Medicaid expansion to low-income adults.
'Cutting Medicaid by taking away coverage and shifting costs to states will have long-term and expensive repercussions, including worse health outcomes, greater costs to hospital systems, and straining state and local economies, ' said the center. 'Cutting Medicaid is ill-advised and should be rejected.'
The cuts would be the most severe, the center said, to states like Hawaii that have expanded Medicaid to low-income adults.
MEDICAID IN HAWAII—Medicaid is administered as Med-QUEST in Hawaii as a joint federal-state program.—Provides health insurance for more than 400, 000 Hawaii residents.—Covers 1 in 6 adults ages 19-64, and 1 in 3 keiki in Hawaii.—Covers 1 in 3 births in Hawaii, and 4 in 7 nursing home residents.—Hawaii is among 41 states that expanded Medicaid coverage under the Affordable Care Act.—Hawaii spends about $3 billion annually on Med-icaid (federal share, 73 %; state share, 27 %). Most of it, 88 %, goes to managed care.—Med-QUEST health plans are offered by managed-care organizations AlohaCare, HMSA, Kaiser Permanente, Ohana Health Plan, UnitedHealthcare Community Plan.—The Children's Health Insurance Program, or CHIP, implemented in 2000 in Hawaii, is part of the Med-icaid program.
AlohaCare invites residents to share their stories following Medicaid Awareness Month in April at alohacare.org (share story at ).
Sources : KFF, Med-QUEST
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

MAGA, MAHA split on pesticides
MAGA, MAHA split on pesticides

The Hill

time9 hours ago

  • The Hill

MAGA, MAHA split on pesticides

MAHA, a movement aimed at tackling the nation's chronic disease epidemic through food, health and environmental reforms, has been deeply skeptical of Big Pharma, Big Agriculture, and Big Chemical. MAHA groups have been strongly aligned with the Trump administration's actions to date on vaccines and food. But cracks are beginning to form. MAHA-aligned groups and influencers are raising alarms about provisions in a House appropriations bill they say will shield pesticide and chemical manufacturers from accountability — and ultimately make Americans less healthy. Meanwhile, a draft of the administration's 'MAHA Report' on children's health reportedly omits any calls to prevent pesticide exposure, also disappointing advocates. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and his disciples espouse stricter environmental protections, while also bucking mainstream science on vaccine safety. Conservatives have traditionally sided with big business, supporting fewer regulations on potentially toxic substances. So far, business interests appear to be winning. The industry-friendly draft of a report from a commission run by Kennedy shows just how much the White House has been able to rein him in. 'It's obvious that there are tensions within this newfound coalition between MAHA and MAGA, and there are some big issues there,' said Mary Holland, CEO of Children's Health Defense, an anti-vaccine group founded by Kennedy. While the pesticide issues have generated some sparks between MAHA and MAGA, the administration has taken a number of other actions to also reduce restrictions on the chemical industry more broadly. Trump himself exempted from environmental standards more than 100 polluters, including chemical manufacturers, oil refineries, coal plants and medical device sterilizers. The EPA, meanwhile, has put chemical industry alumni in leading roles and has said it wants to loosen restrictions on emissions of various cancer-linked chemicals. 'Those factions, if you will — more protective of corporate and more challenging to corporate — are both striving to get the president's ear, and I don't think they've come to a complete, sort of settlement agreement,' Holland said.

Vaccine-Preventable Disease: Could the Sky Fall?
Vaccine-Preventable Disease: Could the Sky Fall?

Medscape

time9 hours ago

  • Medscape

Vaccine-Preventable Disease: Could the Sky Fall?

It's been a tempestuous 2025 for the nation's healthcare infrastructure. I think the worst is yet to come, given cutbacks to Medicaid eligibility and coverage and the devolving recommendations by government healthcare agencies. Concern is also arising that third-party payers (Medicaid, Medicare, and private insurance) and Vaccines for Children may not cover some scientifically proven vaccines or some parts of scientifically based schedules. Vaccination rates and public trust in vaccines had been dropping since the pandemic, and only 69% of families trusted CDC vaccine recommendations in January 2025, even before recent shakeups in CDC committees. Declining postpandemic national vaccine rates now hover just above thresholds for losing herd immunity (Figure 1) also in part because of increasing vaccine exemptions (Figure 2). However, some local rates have dipped below thresholds in what I call 'vaccine deserts,' those geographic pockets where vaccine deniers comprise larger parts of the population — the measles outbreak being the poster child for this. In addition, discussions are emerging about limiting or removing school vaccine requirements or expanding exemptions. Other factors that imperil herd immunity have always reduced vaccine uptake, even in families that want to vaccinate their children: time and resource limitations for working parents, language barriers, limited or no medical care coverage, limited transportation, rural or inner-city residence, and uncovered vaccines. Some may say, 'So what?' We still have more than 90% uptake for most vaccines. Evidence suggests that even with relatively high uptake, vaccine-preventable disease still occurs in subpopulations, including vulnerable children. For example, a Boston group recently reported that, even before the drop in vaccination rates over the past 5 years, vulnerable children were more likely have more invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). So, cracks in the proverbial dam existed in populations (those with comorbidities or lower socioeconomic status) even pre-pandemic and before current cutbacks. Massachusetts IPD data (ie, Optum Clinformatics DataMart and Merative MarketScan Medicaid Multi-State Database) from a time of Medicaid expansion (January 2015 through December 2019) were analyzed by insurance type and comorbidities. As expected, children younger than 2 years and particularly those younger than 1 year had the highest IPD rates regardless of insurance status, but children with Medicaid had higher IPD rates than commercially insured children. Of concern, these differences occurred despite statewide pneumococcal conjugate vaccine vaccination rates reported previously as being fairly high (92% with three or more doses by 2 years of age). Relative IPD rates for children with Medicaid vs those with commercial insurance were higher in infants (1.3, 95% CI, 0.9-1.9) and adolescents (3.4, 95% CI, 1.5-7.1). Among children with comorbidities, the IPD rate was about four times higher in infants and 10 times higher in 6- to 10-year-olds, regardless of insurance type. The authors cite three prior studies showing lower vaccine uptake in Medicaid recipients, suggesting that, among factors affecting Medicaid patients' IPD burden, lower vaccine uptake likely has a role. It seems logical that these prepandemic, pre-cutback data foreshadow darker times ahead due to a combination of increasing postpandemic public distrust, vaccine fatigue, and cutback-era policies. Not only is vaccine confidence still dropping and Medicaid becoming more restrictive at the federal level, but states may change Medicaid coverage when more costs are reassigned to them. The bottom line is that vaccine availability and access will likely decrease, even in non-economically vulnerable children. So, all children could be exposed to increased types of circulating infectious disease — resulting in increased IPD, particularly in vulnerable children. And here we are only considering one among many vaccine-preventable diseases. As pediatric providers, can we close the anticipated vaccine gaps as vulnerable families deal with healthcare cutbacks and likely become more economically vulnerable? One way is to rededicate ourselves to getting as many children as possible vaccinated (eg, reminder texts, emails, phone calls before vaccine due dates) according to schedules recommended by organizations that are politically independent and science-driven, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Family Physicians, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. It's not a time for 'business as usual.' We need to proactively confirm our belief in scientifically based vaccine schedules to the families of our patients. While I strongly believe in patient medical homes, there may be room for flexibility if vaccines become available from alternative sources that are economically helpful to families. We can hope charitable organizations, foundations, and some altruistic individuals will ramp up funding to fill the evolving voids. The answers are not simple nor are potential fixes easy. Yet, pediatric providers have always answered the call when children are in jeopardy. Let's keep as many children safe as possible.

Bring on the ‘MAHA Boxes'
Bring on the ‘MAHA Boxes'

Atlantic

time9 hours ago

  • Atlantic

Bring on the ‘MAHA Boxes'

Millions of Americans might soon have mail from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The health secretary—who fiercely opposes industrial, ultraprocessed foods—now wants to send people care packages full of farm-fresh alternatives. They will be called 'MAHA boxes.' For the most part, MAHA boxes remain a mystery. They are mentioned in a leaked draft of a much-touted report the Trump administration is set to release about improving children's health. Reportedly, the 18-page document—which promises studies on the health effects of electromagnetic radiation and changes in how the government regulates sunscreen, among many other things—includes this: 'MAHA Boxes: USDA will develop options to get whole, healthy food to SNAP participants.' In plain English, kids on food stamps might be sent veggies. The idea might seem like a throwaway line in a wish list of policies. (Kush Desai, a deputy White House press secretary, told me that the leaked report should be disregarded as 'speculative literature.') But MAHA boxes are also referenced in the budget request that President Donald Trump sent Congress in May. In that document, MAHA boxes full of 'commodities sourced from domestic farmers and given directly to American households' are proposed as an option for elderly Americans who already get free packages of shelf-stable goods from the government. When I asked the Department of Health and Human Services for more information about MAHA boxes, a spokesperson referred me back to the White House; the Department of Agriculture, which runs the food-stamp program, did not respond. MAHA boxes are likely to come in some form or another. Some of the packages might end up in the trash. Lots of people, and especially kids, do not enjoy eating carrots and kale. Just 10 percent of U.S. adults are estimated to hit their daily recommended portion of vegetables. But if done correctly, MAHA boxes could do some real good. For years, nutrition experts have been piloting similar programs. A recent study that provided diabetic people with healthy meal kits for a year found that their blood sugar improved, as did their overall diet quality. Another, which provided people with a delivery of fruits and vegetables for 16 weeks, showed that consumption of these products increased by nearly half a serving per day. It makes sense: If healthy food shows up at your door, you're probably going to eat it. 'Pretty much any American is going to benefit from a real healthy food box,' Dariush Mozaffarian, the director of the Tufts Food Is Medicine Institute, told me. Sending people healthy food could be a simple way to deal with one of the biggest reasons why poor Americans don't eat more fruits and veggies. The food-stamp program, otherwise known as SNAP, provides enrollees with a debit card they can use for food of their choosing—and a significant portion of SNAP dollars go to unhealthy foods. Research finds that has less to do with people having a sweet tooth than it does the price of a pound of brussel sprouts. Several studies have found that, for food-stamp recipients, price is one of the biggest barriers to eating healthy. Many states already have incentives built into SNAP to encourage consumption of fruits and vegetables. MAHA boxes would be an even more direct nudge. Most nutrition experts I spoke with for this story were much more supportive of MAHA boxes being sent to Americans in addition to food stamps than as a replacement for them. Exactly how the care packages would fit into other food-assistance programs isn't yet clear. Despite its shortcomings, SNAP is very effective at limiting hunger in America. Shipping heavy boxes of produce to the nation's poor is a much bigger undertaking than putting cash on a debit card. There's also the question of what exactly these MAHA boxes will include. If the 'whole, healthy food' in each care package includes raw milk and beef tallow —which Kennedy has promoted—that would only worsen American health. (His own eating habits are even more questionable: Kennedy once said that he ate so many tuna sandwiches that he developed mercury poisoning.) In May, after the Trump administration mentioned MAHA boxes in its budget request, a White House spokesperson told CBS News that the packages would be similar to food boxes that the first Trump administration sent during the pandemic in an effort to connect hungry families with food that would otherwise go to waste. According to a letter signed by Trump that was sent to recipients, each box was supposed to come with 'nutritious food from our farmers.' News reports at the time suggested that wasn't always the case. One recipient reportedly was shipped staples such as onions, milk, some fruit, and eggs, along with seven packages of hot dogs and two blocks of processed cheese. Another described their box as 'a box full of old food and dairy and hot dogs.' The COVID-era program did eventually deliver some 173 million food boxes. But it was still a failure, Gina Plata-Nino of the Food Research & Action Center, an organization that advocates for people on food-assistance programs, told me. The logistics were such a mess that they prompted a congressional investigation. Nonprofits, which helped distribute the packages, received 'rotten food and wet or collapsing boxes,' investigators were told. And the setup of the program was apparently so rushed that the government did not bother to check food distributors' professional references; investigators concluded that a 'company focused on wedding and event planning without significant food distribution experience' was awarded a $39 million contract to transport perishables to food banks. This time around, the White House doesn't have to navigate the urgency of a sudden pandemic in its planning. But questions remain about who exactly will be responsible for getting these boxes to millions of Americans around the country. The White House will likely have to partner with companies that have experience shipping perishable items to remote areas of the country. And although the White House budget says that MAHA boxes will replace a program that primarily provides canned foods to seniors through local food banks, it remains to be seen whether these organizations would have the resources to administer a program of this size. Perhaps the Trump administration has already thought through all these potential logistical hurdles. But trouble with executing grand plans to improve American health has been a consistent theme throughout Trump's tenures in office. In 2020, for example, he pledged to send seniors a $200 discount card to help offset rising drug costs. The cards never came amid questions about the legality of the initiative. Americans do need to change their eating habits if we hope to improve our collective problems of diet-related disease. Getting people excited about the joys of eating fruits and vegetables is laudable. So, too, are some of Kennedy's other ideas on food, such as getting ultraprocessed foods out of school cafeterias. But Kennedy still hasn't spelled out how he will deliver on these grand visions. The government hasn't even defined what an ultraprocessed food is, despite wanting to ban them. The ideas are good, but a good idea is only the first step.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store