Visits to downtown Vancouver dropped in 2024, while the number of vacant storefronts rose
According to Downtown Van's Annual State of Downtown report, the decline is the first since 2020.
"This shift, along with changes in other indicators, signals the end of the post-pandemic recovery phase and the beginning of a new chapter: one that requires a proactive and strategic approach," the report says.
"More importantly, what lies ahead requires us to move beyond a mindset of recovery, and toward the goal of prosperity."
While one data point does not make a trend, there are others that indicate a general loss in the vibrancy of downtown.
The number of vacant storefronts is growing, up from 13.7 per cent in 2023 to 14.9 per cent in 2024. That's four points higher than the citywide rate of 9.9 per cent.
The report notes Granville Street continues to struggle with persistent storefront vacancies, "creating challenges for its success as an entertainment district." In 2024, almost a third of the Granville strip's storefronts were vacant at 29.3 per cent, up from 22.1 per cent a year earlier.
The report singles out the loss of The Bay, a downtown anchor and magnet for shoppers for over 110 years.
Vancouver's flagship store is set to be vacated by June 30 after the company filed for creditor protection last month —more bad news for retail and restaurant businesses in the downtown's central core.
"Smaller businesses tend to rely on the big drivers," retail business analyst David Ian Gray told CBC earlier. "If you're a little sandwich shop sort of tucked in there along Nordstrom (closed in June 2023) and the Bay, you're not going to be doing quite so well."
Retail businesses saw a decrease in average weekly sales in 2024 of 1.9 per cent. Restaurants fared even worse, with a 6.5 per cent drop versus 2023.
WATCH | Frustrated business owners weigh in on city revitalization plans:
City of Vancouver unveils plans to revitalize Granville Street
2 months ago
Duration 2:20
But not all numbers in the report were negative.
Taylor Swift's three concert stops in Vancouver last December sparked an average 26 per cent increase in downtown spending for the duration and helped fill the city's hotels.
Overall, downtown Vancouver's 2024 hotel occupancy rate matched pre-pandemic levels at 80.4 per cent, according to the report.
"Accelerated hotel project approvals by local governments would be essential for capitalizing on Vancouver's growing tourism demand," it says.
A strong transit system was cited as helping downtown Vancouver remain resilient, with a 2.1 per cent average increase in daily transit boardings across all services.
The president and CEO of Downtown Van said 2025 trade conflicts have resulted in an additional "unsettling layer of uncertainty" that requires the city and business community to rise to the challenge.
"This means reducing barriers to doing business in Vancouver, re-localizing supply chains, building new strategic partnerships both locally and globally, and investing in the economic, cultural, and social core of our region," said Jane Talbot.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
2 days ago
- Toronto Star
FTC sues ticket reseller, saying it illegally exceeded purchase limits for Taylor Swift, other shows
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit Monday against a ticket broker, alleging the company used illegal tactics to exceed purchasing limits for popular events and then resold tickets at significantly higher prices. In a lawsuit filed in federal court in Maryland, the FTC said Maryland-based ticket broker Key Investment Group has used thousands of fictitious Ticketmaster accounts and other methods to buy tickets for events, including Taylor Swift's Eras Tour.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
FTC sues ticket reseller, saying it illegally exceeded purchase limits for Taylor Swift, other shows
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit Monday against a ticket broker, alleging the company used illegal tactics to exceed purchasing limits for popular events and then resold tickets at significantly higher prices. In a lawsuit filed in federal court in Maryland, the FTC said Maryland-based ticket broker Key Investment Group has used thousands of fictitious Ticketmaster accounts and other methods to buy tickets for events, including Taylor Swift's Eras Tour. According to the FTC, Key Investment Group – which does business under brand names like Epic Seats and Totally Tix – purchased at least 379,776 tickets from Ticketmaster between Nov. 1, 2022, and Dec. 30, 2023. The company spent nearly $57 million to buy the tickets and resold them on secondary marketplaces for approximately $64 million. For just one Taylor Swift concert, Key Investment Group allegedly used 49 different accounts to purchase 273 tickets, dramatically exceeding the Eras Tour's 2023 six-ticket purchase limit per event, the FTC said. Fans were so frustrated by the difficulty getting tickets for Swift's tour that the U.S. Senate wound up grilling Ticketmaster in a 2023 hearing. In a statement released Monday, Key Investment Group said it will vigorously defend itself against the FTC's lawsuit. 'The case threatens to dismantle the secondary ticket market for live events, further consolidating power in the hands of the industry's largest monopoly,' the company said. Key Investment Group said the FTC is misapplying the Better Online Ticket Sales Act, a 2016 law which it said was meant to target malicious software, not legitimate resale businesses. Key Investment Group sued the FTC in July to try to prevent the agency from using the law against it, saying it uses human employees — not bots — to buy tickets. But the FTC said that law also prohibits anyone from circumventing security measures and other controls meant to enforce posted ticket limits. In March, with Kid Rock by his side in the Oval Office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing U.S. officials to ensure ticket resellers are complying with Internal Revenue Service rules. The order also directed the FTC to ensure 'price transparency at all stages of the ticket-purchase process' and to 'take enforcement action to prevent unfair, deceptive, and anti-competitive conduct in the secondary ticketing market.'
Winnipeg Free Press
07-07-2025
- Winnipeg Free Press
Elbows up, even when you're holding a book
Opinion Taylor Swift recently made headlines when she purchased back her musical catalogue, after re-recording masters that shot to the top of the Billboard charts. Swifties collectively understand that ownership equals control, and that to be in a position of not having control over your work is somehow sad, and merits economic allyship. These headlines about the popstar coincided with anxieties about 'ownership' north of the border, too, as U.S. President Donald Trump began threatening annexation with his '51st state' comments. 'Canada is not for sale,' declared Prime Minister Mark Carney in a visit to the White House. Canadian book buyers who happily hem and haw over labels at the grocery store seem blissfully unaware of the elephant in the room— that 95 per cent of the Canadian book market is already controlled by foreign-owned multinational publishers. Russell Wangersky / Free Press Trying to keep from buying American products? Consider who is publishing the books you're reading. Mark Carney's Values was published by the Canadian branch of Penguin Random House (headquartered in New York City, themselves a holding of German-owned Bertelsmann), so was Wab Kinew's memoir, The Reason You Walk. I don't blame the authors. Multinational publishing houses offer them a megaphone that amplifies their work a thousandfold. For the biggest names, the most BookTok-worthy titles, and the lucky few who are published by the branch plants, their advances (money offered upon signing a contract, before a book is published) far exceed what Canadian independent publishers can offer. Books published by The Big Five (Penguin Random House, Harper Collins, Simon & Schuster, Hachette and Macmillan) are regular fixtures on awards and bestseller lists, so my quarrel isn't with the books themselves, or with their authors, or even with the people who work on those books in the glass towers of Toronto offices. It's with those Five's complete and utter dominance of the publishing industry. Roughly 115 independent English-language publishers operate in Canada. According to the BookNet report The State of Publishing in Canada 2023, Canadian companies published an average of 35 books in 2023, while multinationals published an average of 752 books — a few token Canadian-authored titles, and a veritable firehose of books authored elsewhere, distributed into Canada, and marketed with budgets that far exceed those of their Canadian-owned and operated 'competitors.' So why, when branch plants exist, are indies important at all? Indies push the envelope. As an industry, we have a collective track record of recognizing cultural and historic value before multinationals recognize the commercial potential of the same authors/topics. Debut authors are risky, while those with an existing platform represent a surer return on investment. University of Manitoba Press published John Milloy's A National Crime in 1999 — years before truth and reconciliation became part of the national discourse. Even working at a small university press, I've seen agents and editors browsing our digital review copies and buying from our website. I met a Big Five editor recently who came to our booth at a conference book fair, no doubt scoping out the university presses to see if any titles held trade-crossover appeal. I don't doubt the intentions of the editors and publishers working for the branch plants. They're doing good work. But at some point, the further up the chain you go, somebody's (likely New York-based) boss cares more about shareholders than readers. In the book business, which teeters on razor-thin margins, and in a country where the total population is roughly the size of a single U.S. state (California) — that's a dangerous problem. To be a branch is to be vulnerable. As any arborist will tell you, you don't make cuts from the trunk. To be sure, fears over foreign ownership are long-lived and perhaps easy to dismiss as nationalistic pearl clutching, but I question whether the C-suite has any sort of genuine concern for the cultural value of stories from Canada. Valuations are more central to their philosophies. The Big Five all have far-right imprints under their domain, suggesting that the corporate powers-that-be are equal opportunists when it comes to ideology. Just look at the websites of imprints Forum, Signal or Broadside Books: their author lists read like a veritable who's-who of American conservatism. If book buyers seek out a Canadian-authored book published by a branch plant — in the same spirit of 'sticking it to the man,' that one might select a Canadian alternative to Cheez-Its — I'm afraid they are putting their loonies far closer to the regime most of us are trying to resist than if they had indulged their cravings at the grocery store. I spent much of my 20s working in the Toronto office of an American-owned multinational education publisher. During my years of service, I watched that company shrink as subsequent restructurings designed to 'optimize' and 'introduce efficiency' shuttered first the warehouse, then the trade division, then accounting, then the Higher Ed Division's Canadian editorial department, and eventually closed the office leaving a handful of sales reps scattered across the country, whose job is now mostly to sell American textbooks to Canadian students. Talk to anyone at a multinational publisher — education or otherwise — you'd be hard pressed to find a branch plant that hasn't been restructured in the last decade. The once venerable bastion of Canadian literature, McClelland and Stewart — copyright holders of the works of Margaret Atwood, Leonard Cohen, Michael Ondaatje and Mordecai Richler (to name but a few) is now an imprint of Penguin Random House. They continue their rich tradition of publishing great Canadian writers, but they're doing so in much smaller numbers than they once did. Weekday Mornings A quick glance at the news for the upcoming day. Where once they published a list of more than 100 books per year and were leaders in publishing new Canadian voices, their fall catalogue boasts 17 currently announced Canadian-authored titles — nine of which are by Margaret Atwood. For the C-suite, valuations proceed values — and they always will. That imprint recently announced an exciting forthcoming title Elbows Up, ostensibly a collection of reflections about Canadian sovereignty from a collection of well-known Canadians (including Margaret Atwood — so make that 10/17). The irony of a multinational publisher issuing this work was lost on all who excitedly commented on the social media announcement, pledging their Canadian pride and promising to order a copy. Canadians do not own the bulk of their cultural output. Our stories are not our own. To be sure, the Big Five are unlikely to exit the Canadian marketplace any time soon. Their books (Canadian-authored and otherwise) will continue to dominate Indigo shelves, media coverage and bestseller lists. Indie publishers will continue to do the important work of lifting debut and midlist authors, and doing so in a marketplace that does them no favours. But if mention of the 51st state churns your stomach enough that you make choices at the grocery or liquor store, consider adding an independently published book to your summer reading list. Stephanie Paddey is the sales and marketing supervisor at University of Manitoba Press.
