New disputes emerge ahead of US-China trade talks in London
BEIJING (AP) — U.S.-China trade talks in London this week are expected to take up a series of fresh disputes that have buffeted relations, threatening a fragile truce over tariffs.
Both sides agreed in Geneva last month to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession.
Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, 'rare earths' that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London.
Technology is a major sticking point
The latest frictions began just a day after the May 12 announcement of the Geneva agreement to 'pause' tariffs for 90 days.
The U.S. Commerce Department issued guidance saying the use of Ascend AI chips from Huawei, a leading Chinese tech company, could violate U.S. export controls. That's because the chips were likely developed with American technology despite restrictions on its export to China, the guidance said.
The Chinese government wasn't pleased. One of its biggest beefs in recent years has been over U.S. moves to limit the access of Chinese companies to technology, and in particular to equipment and processes needed to produce the most advanced semiconductors.
'The Chinese side urges the U.S. side to immediately correct its erroneous practices,' a Commerce Ministry spokesperson said.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick wasn't in Geneva but will join the talks in London. Analysts say that suggests at least a willingness on the U.S. side to hear out China's concerns on export controls.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
China shows signs of easing up on rare earths
One area where China holds the upper hand is in the mining and processing of rare earths. They are crucial for not only autos but also a range of other products from robots to military equipment.
The Chinese government started requiring producers to obtain a license to export seven rare earth elements in April. Resulting shortages sent automakers worldwide into a tizzy. As stockpiles ran down, some worried they would have to halt production.
Trump, without mentioning rare earths specifically, took to social media to attack China.
'The bad news is that China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump posted on May 30.
The Chinese government indicated Saturday that it is addressing the concerns, which have come from European companies as well. A Commerce Ministry statement said it had granted some approvals and 'will continue to strengthen the approval of applications that comply with regulations.'
The scramble to resolve the rare earth issue shows that China has a strong card to play if it wants to strike back against tariffs or other measures.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Plan to revoke student visas adds to tensions
Student visas don't normally figure in trade talks, but a U.S. announcement that it would begin revoking the visas of some Chinese students has emerged as another thorn in the relationship.
China's Commerce Ministry raised the issue when asked last week about the accusation that it had violated the consensus reached in Geneva.
It replied that the U.S. had undermined the agreement by issuing export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China and saying it would revoke Chinese student visas.
'The United States has unilaterally provoked new economic and trade frictions,' the ministry said in a statement posted on its website.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a May 28 statement that the United States would 'aggressively revoke visas for Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.'
More than 270,000 Chinese students studied in the U.S. in the 2023-24 academic year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
29 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Will visa delays and border fears keep international fans away from the Club World Cup in the US?
As the United States readies for the FIFA Club World Cup, concern over such things as international travel, fan safety and even economic uncertainty threaten to diminish enthusiasm for the tournament. The United States will see the arrival of 32 professional club teams from around the globe to 11 cities for the tournament. There's a $1 billion prize pool. The Club World Cup is considered in many ways to be a dress rehearsal for the big event, the 2026 World Cup to be hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico. But there seems to be little buzz for the Club World Cup at home or abroad. The expansion of the field from seven to 32 teams has diminished the exclusivity of the event, and ticket sales appear slow. At the same time, the tournament is being played amid reports of foreign tourists being detained and visa processing delays. Chaotic U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement activities and President Donald Trump's travel bans aren't exactly reassuring international fans, either. Wary travelers, visa woes Trump's policies appear to have already impacted travelers. The National Travel and Tourism Office released data showing visitors to the U.S. from foreign countries fell 9.7% in March compared to the same month last year. The travel forecasting company Tourism Economics has predicted that international arrivals would decline 9.4% this year. The U.S. Travel Association, a nonprofit group that represents the travel industry, has urged the Trump administration to improve such things as visa processing and customs wait times ahead of a series of big sporting events on U.S. soil, including the Club World Cup beginning June 14, the Ryder Cup later this year, next summer's World Cup, and the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. Association President Geoff Freeman said, for example, that the wait in Colombia for a visa interview appointment is upwards of 18 months — already putting the 2026 World Cup out of reach for some travelers. He said his organization is working with the White House's World Cup Task Force to address issues. 'They (the task force) recognize how important this event is: success is the only option. So we're eager to work with them to do whatever it is we need to do to ensure that we can welcome the millions of incremental visitors that we think are possible,' Freeman said. 'But these underlying issues of visa and customs, we've got to address.' Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a House Committee on Foreign Affairs hearing last month, suggested consular staff could be put on longer shifts and that artificial intelligence could be used to process visas. 'We want it to be a success. It's a priority for the president,' said Rubio. But the Trump administration may have added to the concerns for international visitors by issuing a ban on travelers from 12 countries, with restrictions on travel from nine more countries. Iran, one of the countries named, has qualified for the World Cup. The proclamation included an exemption for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.' It did not mention fans. Fan fears There are signs current immigration policies were already impacting soccer fans and spurring worries over safety. A Latin American supporters group in Nashville stayed away from a recent Major League Soccer game because of ICE activity in the city. The city's Geodis Park is set to host three Club World Cup matches. Danny Navarro, who offers travel advice to followers on his social media platforms under the moniker TravelFutbolFan, said the World Cup Task Force announcement did not allay fears about travel, especially when Vice President JD Vance said, 'We want them to come. We want them to celebrate. We want them to watch the game. But when the time is up, they'll have to go home. Otherwise, they'll have to talk to (Homeland Security) Secretary (Kristi) Noem.' That insinuated fans visiting the United States for the World Cup could use it to stay in the country, which is nonsensical, Navarro maintained. For many countries, fans traveling to the World Cup — an expensive travel plan with hiked flight and hotel prices — are broadly viewed as higher-spending and lower-risk for host nation security planning. Navarro put the onus on FIFA. 'They must know that there is an anxiety among international travelers wanting to come in. They must know there's an anxiety among the U.S. fan base that is multicultural and wanting to go to all these places. Are they going to? Are they going to be harassed by ICE?' Navarro said. 'There is just a lot of uncertainty, I would say, too much uncertainty, that the fan base doesn't want to think about.' If you build it, will they come? It remains to be seen how outside factors will ultimately impact the Club World Cup, which is not the global spectacle or draw that the World Cup is. Ticket sales, which were based on a dynamic pricing model, appear to be slow, with lowered prices from earlier this year and a slew of recent promotions. For a match between Paris Saint-Germain and Botafogo at the Rose Bowl on June 19, there were wide swaths of available seats going for $33.45. FIFA created an incentive program that says fans who buy two or more tickets to the Club World Cup 'may' be guaranteed the right to purchase one ticket to the World Cup next summer. Navarro said economic uncertainty and fears of inflation may make fans hesitant to spend their money on the Club World Cup — when the more desirable World Cup is looming. In some host cities, there's little sign the Club World Cup is happening. A light rail station in Seattle had a lone sign advertising the event. The Seattle Sounders are among the teams playing in the tournament. Hans Hobson, executive director of the Tennessee State Soccer Association, suggested part of the problem is that, unlike the national teams that play in the World Cup, some of the club teams playing in Nashville are just not known to U.S. fans. 'It's not leagues that they watch. If it was the Premier League or the Bundesliga or something like that, then they'd go, 'Oh, I know players there. Let's go check it out,' Hobson said. There were tickets available to LAFC's match against Esperance Sportive de Tunisie in Nashville on June 20 for $24.45. FIFA President Gianni Infantino has traveled to several host cities to gin up enthusiasm. He has promised 'the world will be welcomed.' But some say the United States isn't exactly rolling out the red carpet for visitors in the current climate. Thursdays Keep up to date on sports with Mike McIntyre's weekly newsletter. 'I could see trepidation for anyone looking to travel to the U.S. at this current political climate,' said Canadian national team coach Jesse Marsch. 'So it's a sad thing, I think, that we have to talk about visiting the U.S. in this way but I think everybody has to make decisions that are best for them and that fit best with what's going on in their life and their lifestyle.' ___ AP Sports Writer Teresa Walker contributed to this report ___ AP soccer:
CTV News
44 minutes ago
- CTV News
A father living in Canada faces indefinite separation from his son with Trump's travel ban
Noor, 19, lives in Michigan with his grandparents. His refugee claim was severed from his parents in 2019. He was deemed inadmissible because he was born in the U.S. After years of living in Canadian immigration limbo, a father fears that U.S. President Donald Trump's new travel ban will separate his oldest child from him. Mohammad Alshuwaiter is a Yemeni refugee living in Ottawa, but his son, Noor, lives in Dearborn, Michigan with his grandparents. Yemen is one of the 12 countries included in Trump's executive order banning its citizens from entering the U.S. The others are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia and Sudan. The U.S. president has accused the countries of insufficient vetting of travel documents, high visa overstay rates, and in some cases, of being state sponsors of terrorism. When it takes effect on June 9, immigration lawyers say there could be thousands of foreign nationals like Alshuwaiter in Canada who will be prevented from entering the United States. 'People who are not yet citizens of Canada will be affected deeply and be caught up in the sweeping breadth of this proclamation,' says Ottawa immigration lawyer Warren Creates. He says permanent residents from banned countries should expect to have their freedom curtailed at the border. 'Some who've already had their backgrounds vetted by our national security services, by outlaw enforcement and think that they're safe and in the past have been able to freely travel to the United States -- that will no longer be true,' Creates said. Such warnings are adding to the weight on Alshuwaiter's shoulders. The 49-year-old international law and human rights researcher says Trump's new policy will add a 'layer of suffering' to what he has experienced so far in the Canadian immigration system. Trump travel ban Trump's travel ban could prevent Alshuwaiter, a Yemeni National from crossing into the U.S. to visit his son. He last saw his 19-year-old son in March and worries that it could be years before he can embrace his son again. '(Noor) is studying abroad. How can I support him? I am broken-hearted,' said Alshuwaiter in an emotional interview with CTV News. Alshuwaiter's immigration challenges began under the first Trump administration. After he was awarded a U.S. Fullbright scholarship to study law at American University in Washington, D.C., Alshuwaiter moved his wife and two kids to the U.S. They arrived just three months before civil war broke out in Yemen. Because his wife was related to Yemen's deposed president Ali Abdullah Saleh, the couple, concerned about their safety, applied for asylum in the U.S. They were rejected in 2018, a year after Trump issued his first travel ban on countries with predominantly Muslim populations. That's when the family decided to claim refugee status in Canada. The threat of family separation has hung over the family since they began the process to get permanent residence status. In May 2019, the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada ruled that Noor, who was 13-years-old at the time, could not be part of his parent's asylum claim because he was born in the U.S. and was therefore 'neither a conventional refugee, nor a person in need of protection.' After being categorized as a failed refugee applicant, the possibility of deportation loomed over Noor. But Alshuwaiter was hopeful all would work out once their permanent residence application was approved. Alshuwaiter's immigration lawyer Jacqueline Bonisteel says in immigration cases in which a minor is born in another country, the child is usually granted PR status, once the parents' applications are approved. It's a process that usually takes about three years, but Alshuwaiter's PR application has dragged on for more than twice that length of time. Despite multiple requests for updates, Bonisteel says immigration authorities have refused to provide information as to what is causing the delays. Meanwhile Alshuwaiter could see the growing frustration in his eldest son as he entered high school. 'I'm happy to sacrifice my career to give my kids a better life - but when I'm screwed - my kids' (lives) are screwed too.' Trump travel ban Yemen is one of the 12 countries included in Trump's executive order banning its citizens from entering the U.S. As an American kid without status living in Canada, Noor couldn't do basic things that teenagers take for granted. He couldn't get a social insurance number, so he could not open a bank account. He couldn't get a job or get a driver's license. 'It made me feel different. More different than my parents. They didn't have (PR) status, but I was even less than that.' said Noor in a FaceTime interview from Detroit. Noor said he also wanted to start applying for college programs, but because he was born in the U.S., he would have to pay international student fees, which his parents could not afford. After Noor told his father that he 'felt like nothing,' Alshuwaiter and his wife made the decision to send Noor to Michigan to live with his grandparents in 2023 and to continue his schooling. Enrolled in a college construction engineering program, Noor would take a break from his studies every few months to return to Ottawa. His journey across the border by Greyhound bus would always involve being pulled aside for additional questioning. But after explaining to Canadian border officials his family's immigration status and showing them his American passport, Noor says he would usually be waived through. But those visits ended abruptly last month. In May, a CBSA agent decided to enforce the 2019 immigration ruling which labeled Noor a failed refugee applicant. He was denied entry into Canada and flagged for deportation should he return. He was only a half hour away from where his parents and younger brother were waiting for him in Windsor, Ont. Meanwhile his father is suing Immigration Refugees and Citizenship Canada in Federal Court to force the government to disclose the reasons for delay and to issue a decision on granting him permanent residence. It has been seven years since he first applied, and so far, no court date has been set. Even if Alshuwaiter gets permanent residence status, it won't be enough to get around Trump's new travel ban. For that, he needs to be a Canadian citizen. Until then, the Alshuwaiter family remain in a state of limbo, forced to separate by the immigration policies of two countries they had hoped to call home.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Vice President JD Vance Just Delivered Incredible News to Bitcoin Investors
On May 28, Vice President JD Vance gave the keynote speech at the Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) 2025 conference in Las Vegas. He offered a broad overview of what's coming next for crypto, as well as a few insights into how the White House is thinking about Bitcoin right now. Last year, President Donald Trump attended this same event, outlining the major pro-Bitcoin policies of his 2024 campaign platform. So now that top political leaders are openly embracing crypto, what should Bitcoin investors expect? Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Learn More » Pro-Bitcoin policies of the Trump administration A major focus of Vance's speech was a reiteration of the pro-crypto regulatory approach of the Trump administration. In just five months, the White House has already taken a number of big steps -- including a major shakeup at the Securities and Exchange Commission to make it more crypto-friendly, and the creation of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. All of this is good news for Bitcoin investors, of course. It opens the door to more innovation, economic growth, and wealth for everyday Americans. As Vance pointed out in his keynote, millions of Americans now own Bitcoin. So any moves that can help Bitcoin grow and prosper will help everyday Americans as they save for the future. And there's more good news on the way. Next up, says Vance, is new legislation for dollar-pegged stablecoins, as well as a comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto that will help to establish the official rules of the road for Bitcoin. Once that's in place, the mainstream adoption of crypto can really start. Institutions will no longer have an excuse not to get involved with Bitcoin. Bitcoin as a long-term strategic asset Vance also emphasized that the White House is thinking about Bitcoin as a long-term strategic asset. That was the stated purpose of creating the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve back in March. The next major step, says Vance, is new legislation that will codify the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve in law. Otherwise, the next administration could just as easily reverse the existing executive order with a new executive order of its own. There's a key reason the White House is thinking about Bitcoin as a "strategically important asset" these days. And that's because Bitcoin represents the sort of American values -- innovation, entrepreneurship, freedom, and lack of censorship -- that are anathema to countries such as China. In fact, as Vance pointed out, the U.S. should look to use Bitcoin as a source of competitive advantage against China. All of that should give hope to current Bitcoin investors. There's simply too much invested in Bitcoin for the U.S. government to back off now. The government is going all-in on Bitcoin. As a result, crypto has moved from the fringe to the mainstream. Potential conflicts of interest? All of that sounds great, of course. It's great to hear that the government is embracing Bitcoin. It's fantastic to hear that Bitcoin could become the answer to some of the economic and strategic problems currently facing the Trump administration. However, it has become impossible to ignore the potential conflicts of interest that may exist. Vance, by his own admission, holds close to $500,000 worth of Bitcoin. Just days before the conference, Donald Trump's media company announced that it was planning to buy $2.5 billion worth of Bitcoin. And Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. (both of whom showed up at the Bitcoin 2025 conference) are engaged in Bitcoin ventures of their own. Even if there is no wrongdoing involved, the optics aren't great. It's the reason many people now think that tighter safeguards should be imposed on politicians to prevent them from enacting certain policies or taking certain actions that could be used to enrich themselves. What's next for Bitcoin? The White House has given a strong signal of its support for Bitcoin. Crypto investors no longer need to worry about regulatory overreach, or about government policies specifically designed to limit innovation in the crypto sector. All of that is incredible news for Bitcoin. Suddenly, all the sky-high price forecasts for Bitcoin no longer seem so unattainable. As long as you are willing to buy and hold for the long haul, investing in Bitcoin right now might be the best way to turbo-charge the performance of your entire portfolio for years to come. Should you invest $1,000 in Bitcoin right now? Before you buy stock in Bitcoin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Bitcoin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
