What is devil's breath? The truth behind the notorious drug
It's a drug with a terrifying reputation for leaving 'zombified' victims at the mercy of criminals.
So-called devil's breath has allegedly been used to swiftly incapacitate people who are targeted for sexual assault and robbery.
The latest report came in the UK when a woman told how she believed she was targeted with the substance – also known as scopolamine – as she travelled on the Tube.
Deborah Oscar, 30, described how she felt 'high' and 'sleepy' as a woman sitting beside her slowly waved a newspaper in an empty carriage.
The content creator, from south east London, feared she was being targeted for robbery after running into two suspicious men in another carriage as she fled.
However, a former British drugs intelligence head told Metro that the notion of devil's breath being used as a potent airborne incapacitant is likely to be an urban myth.
Dr Les King said: 'Scopolamine is strictly called hyoscine as a medicine and it's allegedly used in Colombia for criminal purposes.
'But the evidence is very, very thin and there's no toxicology, blood or urine analysis, or any other body analysis, to show that people have been attacked with this substance. It all seems a bit unlikely to me.
'I've heard stories of business cards being impregnated with this substance and the recipient falling ill.
'That's really not just on.
'Although this substance is present in skin patches you can buy for travel sickness, it takes hours to absorb into your skin.
'My attitude as a scientist and a forensic scientist is: Where's the evidence for this? There is no evidence, it's all rumour.'
Derived from plants native to South America, including the Brugmansia, the drug does have potent effects on humans.
Stories abound of victims in Colombia and Ecuador being 'zombified' by criminals who then assault, rob or even kill their human prey.
In 2012, the US State Department cited unofficial estimates of 50,000 scopolamine incidents a year in Colombia.
More commonly known as burundanga in South America, it's even been called 'the world's scariest drug' by the UK Addiction Treatment Centres.
The folklore surrounding the drug includes stories of it being used as a Nazi interrogation tool and in ancient Colombian times when it was said to have been given to the mistresses of dead leaders who were willingly buried alive with their lovers.
The myth forms part of a fabric of well-documented ritual or shamanic use of such plants in the country.
The name refers to the drug stealing someone's soul.
In more recent times, the CIA trialled the drug unsuccessfully as a 'truth serum' in Cold War interrogations and it has taken on a number of medical uses, including for the relief of motion sickness.
However, the clinically documented effects of the drug come from it being absorbed in liquid or powder form rather than being blown into someone's face or planted on a business card.
In high doses scopolamine is incapacitating.
Someone who has taken the substance will feel drowsy and might not remember what had taken place.
Scopolamine has been associated with short and long-term memory loss and been used in research into Alzheimer's disease.
Used for travel sickness, it comes in patches or tablets that prevent vomiting. NHS advice for this form of the drug says side effects can include blurred vision, dizziness and being unable to concentrate.
One documented poisoning made UK headlines when Joel Osei used a fake dating app profile to entrap 43-year-old Irishman Adrian Murphy before killing him with an overdose of scopolamine.
A can of Coca-Cola was found to contain traces of the substance and Osei's fingerprints were discovered on a bottle of whisky left at the scene.
Osei was jailed for life with a minimum of 32 years in 2021.
A published academic paper in 2013 did find that 'scopolamine has become a drug of common use for recreational and predatory purposes'.
Jorge Sáiz and his co-authors found that devil's breath 'has become a drug of increasing use in Europe'.
However, Dr King, who was the head of drugs intelligence at the former Forensic Science Service, is sceptical.
In a response to the paper along with four scientific peers, he found: 'There is little doubt that when used in sufficient quantity, and added to food or drink, scopolamine has the ability to incapacitate.
'In Norway in 2008, there was an epidemic of poisoning caused by tablets containing scopolamine sold and used under the impression that they were Rohypnol tablets.
'On the other hand, suggestions that scopolamine can be unwittingly absorbed by skin contact with impregnated cards are considered to be a myth.'
The NHS said it had 'no info or data on the usage of hyoscine/scopolamine.'
Metro has contacted the European Drugs Agency to ask if there is any evidence of devil's breath use on the continent. More Trending
'The stories of people being hit in the back of taxis are pretty unlikely,' Dr King said. 'To begin with, where would you get such a concentrated amount of the drug from?
'Hospitals might have it, pharmaceutical companies might make it, but I've never seen any suggestion of it being stolen or diverted.
'This is not to say I'm not open-minded, but there's just no real evidence that any criminal activity is taking place.'
Do you have a story you would like to share? Contact josh.layton@metro.co.uk
MORE: British girls 'were spiked with Devil's Breath zombie drug' before being raped
MORE: Kids as young as 10 'being driven into county lines drug gangs by cost of living crisis'
MORE: 'I'm a reformed drug smuggler – this is how mules will be feeling on flights'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
US officials forced to share bald JD Vance meme by denying tourist's claim he was denied entry over photo
Customs and Border Protection has confirmed that, no, agents did not stop a Norwegian traveler who showed them a meme of a bald Vice President JD Vance. 'Fact Check: FALSE,' the CBP wrote on X. 'Mads Mikkelsen was not denied entry for any memes or political reasons, it was for his admitted drug use.' And no, the agency is not referring to Danish actor Mads Mikkelsen, but rather the similarly named 21-year-old who was denied entry at Newark Liberty International Airport on June 11. The story circulating online — first in Norwegian newspaper Nordlys and then picked up by British tabloids — claims that during Mikkelsen's encounter with the Department of Homeland Security, agents took his phone and found a meme depicting Vance as a bloated, smooth, bald man staring off into the distance. Mikkelsen claims that the officials threatened to fine him $5,000 or send him to prison for five years if he refused to provide them with his phone password. The tourist ultimately agreed to hand over his information, allowing agents to look through his phone. He says that's when they saw the meme. After the agents looked through his phone, he said he was denied entry to the United States and was sent back to Norway. The reports picked up enough steam in headlines and on social media to justify CBP putting out a statement denying parts of the story. Homeland Security deputy secretary Tricia McLaughlin called the story 'false' and 'BS' in a post on X. Like the CBP announcement, she insisted that Mikkelsen was denied entry after admitting to using drugs. Mikkelsen does acknowledge that he was questioned about his use of drugs during the incident. He said DHS agents saw a second photo on his phone, which was a wooden pipe that he'd made for himself. The agents also reportedly asked him about drug smuggling, terror plots, and right-wing extremism, and Mikkelsen claims he was forced to provide the agents with a blood sample. While Mikkelsen and CBP may not agree on what precisely caused his denial of entry to the country, both agree that there was an encounter. One question we do not have an answer to is why Mikkelsen was targeted in the first place for heightened scrutiny. President Donald Trump has effectively turned the entire federal government into an immigration enforcement agency and given DHS the flexibility to treat every foreign-born individual visiting the United States like a probable criminal threat. In April, DHS announced its agents would begin screening immigrants' social media accounts for so-called 'antisemitic activity,' which under the Trump administration could mean anything from neo-Nazi sentiments to voicing opposition to Israel's war in Gaza. All student visa applicants must now change the privacy settings on their social media profiles to 'public.' A recent State Department cable directs diplomats to review social media profiles for 'any indications of hostility towards the citizens, culture, government, institutions or founding principles of the United States.' In recent months, reports of increased denials, detentions, and heightened scrutiny of visitors by DHS agents have made headlines. In one instance, a French researcher was denied entry after customs agents found a 'personal opinion on the Trump administration's research policy' on his phone. The denial earned a public scolding by a French minister. Last week, an Australian writer was sent back to Melbourne after DHS agents in Los Angeles questioned him over his views on the Israeli treatment of Palestinians. The general political tension and instability dovetailing with heightened security screenings have led several nations — including China, Denmark, and Finland — to issue travel warnings advising its citizens to consider if a trip to the United States is worth the risk of harassment or violence.
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
I guarded Lucy Letby during her first night in prison - this is what she's really like
A former prison officer whose job it was to watch Lucy Letby during her first night in prison has opened up about his experience. Dave, who used to work at Styal Prison in Cheshire, revealed that he thought she was a 'very, very strange character'. The former British neonatal nurse was convicted of murdering seven infants and attempting to murder seven others at the Countess of Chester Hospital between June 2015 and June 2016. Letby, who is from Hereford, was arrested in July 2018 and later sentenced to life imprisonment with a whole-life order. Her trial revealed a disturbing pattern of harm inflicted on vulnerable babies under her care. Speaking on the Shaun Attwood True Crime podcast, Dave revealed Letby was kept in a segregation unit and he was tasked with 'constant watch'. He said: 'It was her first night and she has got her whole-life tariff now but it was her first night on remand. She had come from court that day and had been charged. 'I turned up, sat down on the segregation and the first thing that sort of hit me, you see her in all these photographs, this normal looking blonde woman, and I was surprised at how sort of dishevelled she looked. 'She didn't have blonde hair, brown hair, she just looked sort of drained. It was night time, I think she might have asked me what time it was at one point. There might have been a few words exchanged, not much.' Dave later noted that he was struck by how calm she appeared on her first night in prison. He explained: 'I was sat watching, thinking if I had have been accused of this I'd be climbing the walls I'd be saying ''Let me out I've not done this.'' 'But it was almost as if it was just a bit of a burden to her, just a bit like, ''I'm here, what time is it? What's happening?'' 'She was a very, very strange character, [that] is my opinion of her,' he added. He revealed that Lucy was only kept in the prison he worked in for a matter of days before she was moved elsewhere. Dave added that he wasn't sure if the other inmates knew that Letby was even in the same prison with them. He claimed the female offenders would 'not have treated her well' if they had been aware of her presence, given that her crimes involved infants. Letby still maintains her innocence of the crimes that she has previously been found guilty of. She insists she has never harmed any baby in her care. Last month, a leading barrister called for the Lucy Letby case to be referred back to the Court of Appea l because her convictions are 'almost certainly' unsafe. Adam King, who prosecuted the Just Stop Oil climate protesters, is the latest respected figure to raise questions about the case against Letby. Since the nurse lost her appeal last year, a mass of evidence undermining the prosecution's case has been gathered by her new legal team, raising questions about the claim she was on duty for every suspicious incident and about the testimony of the main prosecution witness, Dewi Evans. Doubts have also been raised about the tests which purported to show Letby used various techniques – including insulin poisoning and injecting air into veins – to murder already sickly babies. Contradictory and incoherent notes written by Letby in post-arrest therapy sessions were also presented as a confession – even though she strongly denies murder. Letby's barrister Mark McDonald presented a 698-page report from 14 world-leading experts to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which deals with potential miscarriages of justice. The report concluded that the babies died from poor care, prematurity and natural causes. Since her conviction, dozens of doctors, nurses, statisticians, law experts and scientists have come forward to criticise the way in which evidence was presented to the jury. They include Lord Sumption, a former judge at the Supreme Court, who said he believes Letby is 'probably innocent'. Last week, Nigel Farage added his voice to growing concerns about the safety of Lucy Letby's murder convictions, saying that he is 'getting more and more doubts'. The Reform UK leader was responding to an article in the Daily Mail by Sir Jeremy Hunt, who was Health Secretary when the babies died at the Countess of Chester Hospital. Sir Jeremy called for an urgent re-examination of the case, saying: 'If Letby really did kill seven babies in their cots and attempted to kill seven more, no punishment short of the death penalty is too harsh. 'But if they were caused by professional shortcomings, we need to know why. 'More than anything else, we need to make sure other families don't have to go through the same tragedy.' He added that he had noted the findings of the international panel of paediatric specialists and neonatologists, and had also read a 'wide range of expert concerns about the conduct of the criminal case'. Sir Jeremy said: 'Taken together... this analysis raises serious and credible questions about the evidence presented in court, the robustness of expert testimony and the interpretation of statistical data.' Mr Farage told GB News: 'I'm just beginning to get more and more doubts about that issue.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Revealed: The ad to rope in children for British paedophile's 'fake Disneyland wedding' - where kids as young as five were offered 200 euros to take part
The disturbing advert used to rope in children for a convicted British paedophile's fake wedding to a nine-year-old girl at Disneyland Paris has been revealed. Londoner Jaskarn or 'Jacky' Jhaj, 39, was arrested after paying £111,000 to stage the vile fake event at the fairlytale Sleeping Beauty castle, featuring musicians, a cake and chairs for hundreds of 'guests'. Fantasist Jhaj, who has a track record of elaborate, bad taste hoaxes, was jailed for four years in 2016 for grooming and sexually assaulting two 15-year-old schoolgirls, MailOnline previously revealed. Now, a bizarre Facebook advert offering children as young as five 200 euros to take part in the Disneyland stunt has come to light, calling for 100 kids to attend the 'high-end wedding rehearsal'. The ad explicitly states that guests must maintain 'absolute confidentiality', and would have to 'stand up, sit, applaud and play their part in this prestigious gathering'. It was posted by a woman named Christelle Ka, who bills herself as 'actor and TV host' and runs firm Cristal Communications. Her link to Jhaj remains unclear. The offer included a private bus service to take 'guests' from the centre of Paris to the event. Those who attended were required to wear a 'very elegant evening outfit', such as a 'suit, evening dress or tuxedo', according to the ad. The disturbing advert used to rope in children for a convicted British paedophile's fake wedding to a nine-year-old girl at Disneyland Paris has been revealed Disneyland management allowed the 'wedding' bookers to privatise part of the site at Marne-la-Vallée at a cost of around £115,000. Pictured: A man stands beside flowers at the event Jhaj has been charged with fraud, breach of trust, money laundering and identity theft, French prosecutors said last night. Posing as the 22-year-old 'groom', Jhaj hired professional make-up artists to disguise his appearance, according to police sources in Paris. Jhaj was jailed for four years in 2016 for grooming and sexually assaulting two 15-year-old schoolgirls, MailOnline revealed last night. He lured them to parties by pretending to be a top Hollywood film producer and plying them with alcohol. Last year, he organised a mysterious fake funeral with an empty coffin, even hiring extras as mourners at the famous London Oratory in Brompton Road, Knightsbridge. The sex offender was also behind a similarly bizarre event in 2023 when a fake red carpet scene was shot in London's West End with 90 children and dozens more teenage extras hired to provide a crowd for the filming. Child actors as young as six were recruited as extras dressed in school uniforms and asked to pretend to faint as Jhaj paraded up and down wearing a red tuxedo as if he were a film star at a premier outside the Odeon Luxe cinema in Leicester Square. He was arrested following the phony movie premiere on suspicion of breaching a sexual harm prevention order and was released on bail. Jhaj, who poses as a film producer, was subsequently fined £1,500 at Isleworth Crown Court last July for breaching notification requirements and a sexual harm prevention order. The source of funding for his expensive set-ups is a mystery.
