HC Pune Action Committee to submit representation to CJI in 10 days
, on Tuesday.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The action committee was set up by the Pune Bar Association (PBA) in July this year. Jain said a delegation of lawyers led by the bar association submitted a memorandum to the CJI conveying the demands of the legal fraternity to set up a bench in the city. The CJI advised the PBA to conduct a study explaining why Pune deserves a bench and submit a representation in due course.
Quoting a book by lawyer Abhinav Chandrachud in 2023, Jain claimed the information collected by the committee revealed that after the British launched the judicial system during the colonial era, a circuit bench was set up at the council hall in Pune in the early 1940s.
"We don't know why the bench was closed," he said.
The city has legal talent, good infrastructure, transport connectivity, and a rise in population due to geographical reasons, which merits setting up of a circuit bench, he said. Jain added that the committee met state chief minister Devendra Fadnavis, among other ministers, and took letters of support from all MPs and MLAs, as well as local civic bodies and passed a resolution supporting the demand for a circuit bench.
PBA president Hemant Zanzad said the lawyers in the general body meeting held at the sessions court, Shivajinagar, unanimously decided to appeal to the members of the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa to write individual letters in support of their demand for opening the bench.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
Journalism must uphold truth, says CM
Bhopal: CM Mohan Yadav on Wednesday said journalism carries a responsibility to uphold truth and guide society, stressing that students pursuing journalism courses must remain alert, ethical and dedicated to strengthening democracy through accurate information. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now He said journalism has been a form of communication from Ramayana to Mahabharat be it Lord Hanuman's dialogues in Ramayan or Yaksha questions in Mahabharata. He added that the true spirit of journalism was to pursue truth. Yadav was addressing 'Abhyuday 2025', the orientation and inaugural programme for the 2025–26 academic session of Makhanlal Chaturvedi National University of Journalism. He said in journalism, 'Abhyuday' signifies not merely a beginning, but an ongoing journey of awareness, pursuit of truth, and the responsibility to guide society. He noted that Narad Ji is regarded as the pioneer of journalism. He said it's a matter of pride for Madhya Pradesh that Pt Makhanlal Chaturvedi was born in Babai and made Khandwa his Karmabhoomi. "Through journalism, Pt Chaturvedi not only united society against British oppression but also played a vital role in taking up social causes and spearheaded the revival of the Hindi language. He also led movements in Sagar for the protection of cow shelters against British rule."
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
Judge denies US Justice Department request to unseal Epstein grand jury transcripts
NEW YORK: A US federal judge who presided over the sex trafficking case against financier Jeffrey Epstein has joined two other judges in rejecting the government's request to unseal grand jury transcripts related to the decades-long sexual abuse suffered by girls and young women who fell into his orbit. The ruling on Wednesday by Judge Richard Berman in Manhattan came after the judge presiding over the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's former girlfriend, also turned down the government's request. Barring reversal on appeal, Berman's decision forecloses the possibility of grand jury testimony being released now that three judges have reached the same conclusion. A federal judge in Florida declined to release grand jury documents from an investigation there in 2005 and 2007. The rulings are a collective repudiation of the Justice Department's effort to divert attention away from its stated refusal to release a massive trove of records in its possession and make clear that the still-sealed court documents contain none of the answers likely to satisfy the immense public interest in the case. President Donald Trump had called for the release of transcripts amid rumors and criticism about his long-ago involvement with Epstein. During last year's presidential campaign, Trump promised to release files related to Epstein, but he was met with criticism — including from many of his own supporters — when the small number of records released by his Justice Department lacked new revelations.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
States will be at whims of governor if nod to Bills withheld: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Wednesday said that the power of the governor to permanently withhold assent to bills would leave the state government, which is elected with majority, at his 'whims and fancies'. 'Would we not be giving total powers to the governor to sit in over an appeal. The government elected with the majority will be at (the) whims and fancies of (the) governor,' Chief Justice of India(CJI), Justice B R Gavai, said. The court was hearing the maintainability of the reference made by President Droupadi Murmu under Article 143. The reference was concerning the April 8 ruling of the top court that set timelines for governors and the President to grant assent to bills passed by the legislature. In the April 8 judgment, a bench of Justice J B Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan invoked its special powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to fix deadlines for the President and governors to act on state bills. Replying to the query of the CJI, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the Centre, told the Constitution Bench of CJI B R Gavai, Justice Surya Kant, Justice Vikram Nath, Justice P S Narasimha, and Justice Atul S Chandurkar that everyone derives power from the Constitution. On the powers of the governor under Article 200, Mehta said the governor has four options- assent to the bill, withhold assent, reserve the bill for consideration of the President or send it back to the legislature. He said that when the governor withholds assent, the bill falls through. Article 200 of the Indian Constitution outlines the governor's powers regarding assent to bills passed by the state legislature. If a bill is returned, the legislature can pass it again with or without amendments, and the governor is then bound to give assent. The bench, however, remarked that the governor has to communicate his or her decision and that the focal point of the debate would be whether withholding is temporary or permanent. Mehta said the power to withhold is to be used rarely and only in the first instance, as it leads to the death of the bill. 'The governor is not just a postman. He represents the Union of India, appointed by the President. The President is elected by the entire nation by way of the entire election and that is also a way of democratic expression,' Mehta said. After the April 8 judgment, the President invoked Article 143(1) of the Constitution of India to consult the Supreme Court. This Article, commonly referred to as the power of 'Presidential Reference', empowers the President of India to seek the Supreme Court's opinion on questions of law or fact of public importance. President Murmu, on May 13, posed 14 questions to the Supreme Court of India on several aspects of law, including the ambit of the powers under Article 142. In response, the states of Kerala and Tamil Nadu filed an application questioning the maintainability of the reference. It urged the Supreme Court to return the reference unanswered and said it was an attempt by the Centre to indirectly overrule binding judgments without disclosure. Meanwhile, the central government supported the reference, arguing that the power of governors and the President to act on bills cannot be bound by judicial timelines. The hearing will continue on Thursday.
