‘Playing with fire': Beijing warns Manila after Marcos makes Taiwan remarks
In an interview with Indian media outlet Firstpost on Wednesday, Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr said: 'To be very practical about it, if there is confrontation over Taiwan between China and the United States, there is no way that the Philippines can stay out of it simply because of our physical, geographic location.'
The Chinese foreign ministry protested on Friday, saying such rhetoric violated international laws and undermined regional peace, stability and the fundamental interests of the people.
The Taiwan issue was an internal affair and 'no external interference is tolerated', the ministry said.
Beijing views Taiwan as part of China to be reunified by force if necessary. Most countries, including the Philippines and the US, do not recognise the island as independent. However, Washington opposes any unilateral change to the status quo and is committed to supplying arms to Taipei.
'The Philippines is reneging on its promises, disregarding the consequences, persistently engaging in erroneous and provocative words and actions, continuously undermining and hollowing out the one-China principle, and damaging China-Philippines relations,' the foreign ministry said.
'We urge the Philippines to strictly abide by the one-China principle ... and to refrain from playing with fire on issues concerning China's core interests.
'It must be further emphasised that 'geographical proximity' or 'a large diaspora community' is no excuse for any country to interfere in another's internal affairs or encroach on its sovereign matters.'
About 200,000 Filipinos live in Taiwan, according to the Manila Economic and Cultural Office, the Philippines' de facto embassy on the island. In his interview, Marcos referred to these residents as another reason for his country to get involved if a conflict broke out across the Taiwan Strait.
'That would immediately be a humanitarian problem, because we will have to get involved, because we will have to go in there, or find a way to go in there and to bring our people home,' Marcos said.
Tensions have escalated between Beijing and Manila in recent years over their continuing disputes in the South China Sea.
Amid the all-out rivalry between Beijing and Washington, the Philippines has also strengthened its security and defence alliance with the US and increased its ties with Taipei – further worsening relations with the Chinese mainland.
In April, Marcos eased a 38-year travel restriction to allow most of the country's government officials to visit Taiwan. Days later, Rear Admiral Roy Vincent Trinidad said the Philippines Navy was in talks with Taipei over joint naval patrols in the Luzon Strait.
The interview, with television channel TaiwanPlus News, was the first time that a senior Philippine military official had acknowledged potential cooperation with Taipei – though Trinidad later clarified that he was referring to 'international cooperation'.
That did not stop a frustrated Beijing from summoning Manila's ambassador Jaime FlorCruz to lodge 'solemn representations over a series of negative moves recently made by the Philippines concerning Taiwan and security-related issues'.
Ahead of Marcos' trip to New Delhi, the Philippines and India conducted their first joint naval exercises near the contested Scarborough Shoal in the South China Sea on Sunday and Monday.
At the same time, the People's Liberation Army carried out 'routine patrols' in the strategic waterway, which it said were in response to joint patrols organised between the Philippines and 'non-regional countries'.
Meanwhile tensions appeared to flare up on other fronts.
On Friday, Beijing's embassy in Manila said it had lodged further representations following the detention of nine Chinese citizens on July 14 by a special task force in Bulacan province in the central Luzon region of the Philippines.
According to Philippine news outlet GMA News Online, the special task force is under investigation for alleged irregular operations.
The embassy urged local authorities to conduct a thorough investigation and ensure a 'safe, fair, and non-discriminatory' environment for Chinese nationals living and working in the country. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
34 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
UK arrests 365 backing banned pro-Palestine group
LONDON: Police in London arrested at least 365 people Saturday for supporting Palestine Action, at the latest and largest protest backing the group since the government banned it last month under anti-terror laws. The Metropolitan Police said it made the hundreds of arrests, thought to be one of the highest ever at a single protest in the UK capital, for "supporting a proscribed organisation". It also arrested seven for other offences including assaults on officers, though none were seriously injured, it added. The government outlawed Palestine Action in early July days after it took responsibility for a break-in at an air force base in southern England that caused an estimated £7 million (US$9.3 million) of damage to two aircraft. The group said its activists were responding to Britain's indirect military support for Israel amid the war in Gaza. Britain's interior ministry reiterated ahead of Saturday's protests that Palestine Action is also suspected of other "serious attacks" that involved "violence, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage". But critics, including the United Nations and NGOs like Amnesty International and Greenpeace, have lambasted the move as legal overreach and a threat to free speech. A group called Defend Our Juries, which organised Saturday's protests and previous demonstrations against the ban, said "unprecedented numbers" had risked "arrest and possible imprisonment" to "defend this country's ancient liberties". "We will keep going. Our numbers are already growing for the next wave of action in September," it added. Attendees began massing near parliament at lunchtime bearing signs saying "oppose genocide, support Palestine Action" and other slogans, and waving Palestinian flags. Psychotherapist Craig Bell, 39, was among those holding a placard. He branded the ban "absolutely ridiculous". "When you compare Palestine Action with an actual terrorist group who are killing civilians and taking lives, it's just a joke that they're being prescribed a terrorist group," he told AFP. As police moved in on the demonstrators, they applauded those being arrested and shouted "shame on you" at officers. "Let them arrest us all," said Richard Bull, 42, a wheelchair-user in attendance. "This government has gone too far. I have nothing to feel ashamed of." Defend Our Juries had claimed only a "fraction" of the hundreds who turned out had been detained, but the Met insisted that "simply isn't true" and that all those showing support for Palestine Action would be arrested. The London force noted some of those there were onlookers or not visibly supporting the group. The Met also detailed how the hundreds arrested were taken to temporary "prisoner processing" points, where their details were confirmed and they were either instantly bailed or taken into custody elsewhere. Police forces across the UK have made scores of similar arrests since the government outlawed Palestine Action on July 5, making being a member or supporting the group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Police announced this week that the first three people had been charged in the English and Welsh criminal justice system with supporting Palestine Action following their arrests at a July 5 demo. Seven people have so far been charged in Scotland, which has a separate legal system. Amnesty International UK Chief Executive Sacha Deshmukh wrote to Met Police chief Mark Rowley this week urging restraint be exercised when policing people holding placards expressing support for Palestine Action. The NGO has argued arrests of such people are in breach of international human rights law.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
The risk of nuclear war waned after the Cold War. It's back with a vengeance
WHEN the first nuclear bomb test took place 80 years ago, the scientists who gathered to observe the explosion in the New Mexico desert recognised they were playing with fire. Physicist Enrico Fermi tried to break the tension by taking bets on whether the bomb would ignite the atmosphere and destroy the world. J. Robert Oppenheimer wagered US$10 the bomb wouldn't work at all, and Edward Teller conspicuously applied sunscreen in the predawn darkness, offering to pass it around. The bomb exploded in a fireball hotter than the surface of the sun, producing far more destructive power than the scientists anticipated. Within weeks, the United States nuked the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, hastening the end of World War II while killing more than 200,000 civilians. The bomb hasn't been used since, apart from test blasts, and after the Cold War ended in 1991, the risk of nuclear war mercifully declined. Now the risk is back on the rise, as an alarming new nuclear age dawns. Today, we are in a 'uniquely dangerous moment'. The nuclear landscape is changing for the worse. For starters, the main players are no longer two global superpowers. During the Cold War, the US and the Soviet Union largely controlled the potential for conflict, which made the risks relatively straightforward to analyse. These days, the politics of nuclear arms have become more complicated and unpredictable. Nine nations are said to possess the weapons today, including the rogue state of North Korea, and others could build them quickly. Most people have forgotten that South Africa once developed a bomb but gave up its programme voluntarily. Iraq and Libya also had active nuclear-weapon programmes that were stopped under intense international pressure. At the moment, the focus is on Iran's nuclear programme, which the US bombed on June 22, alongside Israel. The US launched its attack even though Iran continued to pursue diplomacy about its nuclear ambitions. Iran may conclude that it needs a nuclear capability for self-defence, to deter future attacks. The same could be said for other states threatened by nuclear- armed rivals. Consider Ukraine, which voluntarily gave up the nuclear arms based on its soil after the fall of the Soviet Union. Would Russia's 2022 invasion still have occurred against a Ukraine bristling with doomsday weapons? Doubtful. Besides the chilling political calculations, the weapons used to deliver nuclear warheads have become more dangerous. Hyper-sonic glide missiles could elude defence systems before striking their targets with practically no warning, while smaller, low-yield nukes threaten to blur the lines between conventional and nuclear warfare, making all-out war more likely. Defence spending is soaring across the globe, and with it, faster and deadlier weapons are likely to be deployed. At the same time, treaties restricting nuclear arms are in decline. The most impactful of them – the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons – was undermined in 2003 when North Korea withdrew from it and built an atomic arsenal. It's time for the targets of these terrible weapons – us, that is – to rise up and say, 'No!' The 1980s witnessed mass demonstrations demanding a nuclear freeze. Today, the threat of nuclear war is beginning to enter the public consciousness again. The movie Oppenheimer about the Trinity bomb test 80 years ago was a boxoffice hit. The 2024 book by journalist Annie Jacobsen, Nuclear War: A Scenario, became a bestseller. Star movie director James Cameron has committed to making Ghosts of Hiroshima , a Japan-set movie said to be a nightmarish look at the A-bomb blasts. During the Cold War, pop culture helped convince everyday people to stand against the march towards Armageddon, and here's hoping it can do so again. For 80 years, the world has lived with the threat of nuclear destruction. Let's act now to curb it, before it's too late. — Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Kedah MIC hits back at Umno over PN cooperation criticism
ALOR STAR: Kedah MIC has hit back at Kedah Umno over claims that its motion to cooperate with Perikatan Nasional (PN) signals the party's intention to quit Barisan Nasional (BN). Kedah MIC chairman S.K. Suresh said MIC does not need anyone's permission to make decisions regarding its political future. "The future of the nation and the Indian community is our priority, and we always welcome cooperation with all parties for the benefit of the party and the community," he said in a statement today. Earlier, Kedah Umno information chief Datuk Shaiful Hazizy Zainol Abidin said Kedah MIC's move was a clear indication that it no longer wished to be part of BN's efforts to rebuild its political strength. He said Kedah BN had never been intimidated by changes in the political landscape, including parting ways with any component party. Suresh, however, questioned Kedah Umno's stance on loyalty, pointing to its cooperation with DAP. "The message from Umno grassroots to your leadership is that they do not like Umno working together with DAP. Yet you are happy to enjoy all the privileges from the federal government and continue embracing them," he added. He also took aim at recent defections from the party, including Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Abdul Aziz, who joined PKR. "Tengku Zafrul left the party, and even Umno members themselves have left BN and Umno. You could do nothing about it, so what is there for you to say? Suresh cautioned Kedah Umno against provoking MIC further. "It would be better for you to remain silent before we start revealing past incidents that will only worsen the situation and when that happens, do not regret it," he said. Yesterday, Suresh announced that the party had approved the motion to work with PN and did not rule out the possibility of leaving BN. He said the final decision on the matter would be determined by the MIC central leadership, led by its president, Tan Sri S A. Vigneswaran.
