Doctor uses robot to remotely perform surgery on patient thousands of miles away
Vipul Patel, the medical director of the Global Robotic Institute at Orlando's Advent Health, recently performed a prostatectomy, which removes part or all of the prostate, on Fernando da Silva of Angola, ABC News reported in an exclusive story from medical correspondent Dr. Darien Sutton on Tuesday.
Da Silva, 67, was diagnosed with prostate cancer in March, and in June, Patel cut out the cancer using transcontinental robotic telesurgery. The surgery was a success, according to ABC News.
Prostate cancer is very prevalent in Africa, Patel told the network, adding, 'In the past, they really haven't monitored it well or they haven't had treatments.'
The doctor said this surgery was a long time coming.
'We've been working on this really for two years,' Patel said. "We traveled the globe, looking at the right technologies."
Da Silva was the first patient in a human clinical trial approved by the Food and Drug Administration to test this technology.
Surgeons have used a multimillion-dollar robot to operate on patients using 'enhanced visuals and nimble controls' before, ABC News reported, but they are often near their patients when operating the machine.
Patel used fiber optic cables to test the technology at a long distance from his patient. 'There was no perceptible delay in my brain,' the doctor said.
His surgical team was in the operating room with Da Silva just in case they had to jump in.
"We made sure we had plan A, B, C, and D. I always have my team where the patient is," the doctor said.
In case something went awry with the telecommunications, "the team would just take over and finish the case and do it safely,' he said.
Reflecting on the surgery, Patel called it 'a small step for a surgeon, but it was huge leap for health care.'
He said the 'humanitarian implications are enormous.'
"Internationally, obviously, there's so many underserved areas of the world,' the doctor said, adding that rural communities in the U.S. could also benefit from the technology.
He continued: "Emergency room physicians will have technology that can be remotely accessible to surgeons, maybe even in the ambulance, where people can get remote interventions if they can't make it to the hospital.'
Patel said he will submit the data he collected from the surgery to the FDA with the hopes that he can do more telesurgeries in the future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
You've met 'Lucy.' Now ASU scientists unearth another clue to the origin of humans
Though she works thousands of miles from home, Arizona State University research scientist Kaye Reed is used to 110-degree heat. For days at a time, Reed and her colleagues walk through Ethiopia's baking Awash Valley, scanning the ground with their eyes. It's uncomfortable, Reed said, but it's all worth it when they make the kind of discovery revealed in a paper released on Aug. 13. Reed and a team of international scientists believe they have added a new member to humanity's family tree — a yet undocumented species of hominid, or upright ape, that walked the east African grasslands more than 2.6 million years ago. She and the team made the discovery when they found three collections of ancient primate teeth lying on the ground during fossil searches at the Ledi-Geraru Research Project Area led by ASU. Scientists believe the new species could offer clues about the conditions that produced humanity's ancestors, though this species was likely not a direct predecessor to homo sapiens. The species lived in an area and time at which future humans may have first emerged, according to the fossil record. Scientists know very little about the new species so far, Reed said. A collection of teeth is useful for understanding the animal's diet, but arms, legs, and skulls provide a fuller picture of how it moved around its habitat. Those clues help researchers understand the conditions in which the species survived. 'Evolution doesn't work like that' Those insights could shine light on a critical, but poorly understood, chapter in human evolution. The new species may have been one of the last members of a dying family of human ancestors known as the australopithecus genus, which includes the famous 'Lucy,' whose fossil was unearthed in 1974. As its relatives were dying out, this new species would have watched the rise of humanity's genus, homo, which was the first to commonly use stone tools and eat meat. 'If it's a different species of Australopithecus… that means (Lucy) either went extinct or somehow evolved into this new species,' said Reed, part of the Institute of Human Origins at ASU. 'The fact that it also occurs at roughly the same time as the genus Homo suggests to us that there was a change in the climate and the habitats, which you had to change to survive.' With the new species, Reed believes at least four species of upright apes were living in east Africa at the same time, including two australopithecus, one homo, and a species from an offshoot called paranthropus. Scientists don't know much about the transition from Australopithecus to homo because the fossil record during that period is surprisingly slim, Reed said. But this new discovery makes at least one thing clear: As with much of evolution, this transition was not a straightforward line. The process of human evolution is full of dead ends and overlaps, with multiple species of upright apes evolving alongside each other, some successful and some not. 'Everybody always posts that thing where there's a hunched over ape, and then there's a kind of upright ape, and then something with a bigger brain, and it's just from one to one to one," Reed said. "Evolution doesn't work like that.' Even the distinctions between ancestors and descendants is sometimes unclear. Reed had to grapple with this complexity when she and her colleagues attempted to identify the teeth they had found. The team considered multiple alternatives, including the possibility that the teeth belonged to transitional forms of already known species. While some species distinctions are obvious, Reed said, some are almost a matter of opinion, pointing out that some scientists might have classified the new teeth as a variant of the 'Lucy' species. 'Another scientist that I know might put these teeth into (Lucy's species). He doesn't care about what he would consider the minor differences,' Reed said. A famous discovery: On a November day 50 years ago, a scientist found 'Lucy' and rewrote our origin story Still searching for more clues The appearance of the new species could also help scientists better understand why humanity's closest ancestors, the homo group, emerged when they did. Some scientists have argued that homo species evolved partially as a response to a drier habitat with more grasslands, but this new species shows that an Australopithecus species could also survive in that new, dry environment. 'You have longer dry seasons, so animals are stressed. Many that we see in Lucy's time are eating trees, but then they switch to grass, and in that time period we find the Australopithecus is different from what it was,' Reed said. More clues about the new species' diets will help Reed and other researchers understand how it interacted with other walking apes and whether this was a case where humanity's ancestors had to out-compete their relatives to grab hold of the future. 'If they ate the same thing, it's going to be tough for one of them to survive … and so maybe one of them out-competed the other,' Reed said. 'But maybe they weren't eating the same thing, and that's how they split when it got really dry.' Traces of carbon and nitrogen in ancient teeth can indicate what kinds of plants or meat the animal ate. To discover that an australopithecus was scavenging meat would make it a much more direct competitor with human ancestors, Reed said. Otherwise, scientists have many miles to walk before they can fully understand the new creature they might have brought to light. That will mean many more hours searching for the right sediments and pacing, meticulously, in the east African heat. 'To find this stuff is really exciting,' Reed said. 'We just have to find more information to put the puzzle together.' Austin Corona covers environmental issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral. Send tips or questions to Environmental coverage on and in The Arizona Republic is supported by a grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust. This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: ASU scientists may have found a new species related to humans Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
'It makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens': How the evolutionary record of Asia is complicating what we know about our species
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The story of our ancient ancestors began in Africa millions of years ago. But there are considerable gaps between the first and current chapters of that tale, and some anthropologists are looking to Asia to fill in missing information about how humans evolved. "The genus Homo evolved in Africa," Sheela Athreya, a biological anthropologist at Texas A&M University, told Live Science. But as soon as Homo left the continent, "all bets are off because evolution is going to treat every population differently." One bet Athreya is investigating is the notion that there wasn't a single origin of our species, Homo sapiens. Rather, the ancestors of today's humans living in different geographic regions took different evolutionary paths, before eventually coalescing into the human tribe we know today. Once humans left Africa, "you have so much complexity that it makes no sense to say there was only one origin of Homo sapiens," Athreya said. Key to this story is a different understanding of human evolution in Asia — and the possibility that Denisovans, a group of little-understood extinct human ancestors known from just a handful of fossils, were actually the same as a much earlier member of our family tree: Homo erectus, Athreya argues. Related: Strange, 300,000-year-old jawbone unearthed in China may come from vanished human lineage Early humans in ancient Asia There's a big gap in human evolutionary history. We know Homo evolved in Africa and that a human ancestor, Homo erectus, was already in Asia and parts of Europe by about 1.8 million years ago. But what happened in Asia between that point and the time when Homo sapiens arrived around 50,000 years ago? That picture is much less clear. To help fill it in, Athreya has considered the emergence of our species, Homo sapiens, during the Middle and Late Pleistocene epoch (780,000 to 11,700 years ago). Her "deep-dive" into the human fossil record of Asia has convinced her that there are evolutionary pathways in places like Java, Indonesia, that differ from the Pleistocene patterns seen in Africa and Europe. H. erectus reached Java at least 1.5 million years ago, and the species likely lasted there until 108,000 years ago. But the lack of more recent H. erectus bones doesn't necessarily mean they went extinct, Athreya wrote in a 2024 study with co-author Yousuke Kaifu, an anthropologist at the University of Tokyo. Instead, these Javanese H. erectus could have persisted until H. sapiens appeared in Sumatra as early as 73,000 years ago and interbred with them. The fossil record in China is similarly complicated. Around 300,000 years ago, there was a shift in what H. erectus fossils looked like, Athreya said. Skeletons in the Middle Pleistocene in China became more variable in form, and traits that were common in Western Eurasian groups like H. sapiens and Neanderthals, such as smoother bicuspid teeth, began to appear in these fossils. This means that — instead of completely dying out — H. erectus in China may have made a genetic contribution to populations living today, Athreya said, just as Neanderthals left genetic traces in people with European ancestry and Denisovans contributed DNA to people with Oceania ancestry. The idea isn't impossible, one expert told Live Science. Groups of ancient human relatives could have mated anywhere they met up, Adam Van Arsdale, a biological anthropologist at Wellesley College in Massachusetts, told Live Science. No matter where they lived, "I just think humans aren't that different" during the Pleistocene. What's more, anthropologists are starting to realize that many of these groups that looked very different could still have interbred. Twenty years ago, scientists would have said "there's no possible way" they could have interbred, Van Arsdale said. "And I just don't think we can assume that anymore." So far, no DNA has been recovered from H. erectus fossils, largely because most of their fossils are too old, so there's no genetic support for this idea. But emerging methods for extracting ancient proteins from fossils may soon make it feasible to identify some H. erectus genes. Another route to understanding the fate of H. erectus in Asia may be to look more closely at the enigmatic Denisovans. RELATED STORIES —Oldest wooden tools unearthed in East Asia show that ancient humans made planned trips to dig up edible plants —Ancient jawbone dredged off Taiwan seafloor belongs to mysterious Denisovan, study finds —140,000 year old bones of our ancient ancestors found on sea floor, revealing secrets of extinct human species Since the only known skull of a Denisovan looks similar, in many ways, to that of H. erectus, those two groups may actually be one and the same. "I don't think that genetics is going to find that Homo erectus was a separate dead-end lineage," Athreya said. "I would expect Denisovans to be Homo erectus." But until more work is done that combines DNA, artifacts and fossil bones in Southeast Asia, the full picture of human evolution cannot yet come into focus the way it has in places like Europe, Athreya said. Human evolution quiz: What do you know about Homo sapiens?
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Never-before-seen cousin of Lucy might have lived at the same site as the oldest known human species, new study suggests
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Roughly 2.6 million-year-old fossilized teeth found in Ethiopia might belong to a previously unknown early human relative, researchers say. The teeth are from a species of Australopithecus, the genus that includes Lucy (A. afarensis). But these newly discovered teeth don't appear to belong to any known species of Australopithecus, according to a new study published in the journal Nature on Wednesday (Aug. 13). What's more, at the same site the researchers found extremely old teeth from Homo, the genus that includes modern humans (Homo sapiens). These teeth may belong to the oldest known Homo species on record, which scientists haven't yet named, the study found. These new discoveries show that at least two lineages of early hominins — a group that includes humans and our closest relatives — coexisted in the same region around 2.6 million years ago, the researchers said. Discoveries at Ledi-Geraru archaeological site The researchers found the teeth at the Ledi-Geraru archaeological site in northeastern Ethiopia, which is known for earlier groundbreaking discoveries: a 2.8 million-year-old jawbone that's the oldest known human specimen, as well as some of the oldest known stone tools made by hominins, which date to 2.6 million years ago. Paleontologists and archaeologists hypothesize that the region was an open and arid grassy plain during this period, based on grass-eating animal fossils from that time. The area offered resources Homo and Australopithecus could use, Frances Forrest, an archaeologist at Fairfield University in Connecticut who was not involved with the new research, told Live Science in an email. Grasslands and rivers would have provided water to drink, plants to eat and large animals to hunt. Related: 'Huge surprise' reveals how some humans left Africa 50,000 years ago But the unusually rich fossil record in this area could also be because of excellent preservation of remains, due to volcanic eruptions, for example — not necessarily that this was a hominin hotspot, Forrest said. Australopithecus and Homo teeth In the new study, the researchers used layers of volcanic ash above and below the newly discovered fossils to determine their age. Of the 13 teeth discovered, the team found 10 are 2.63 million years old and belonged to an unidentified species of Australopithecus, which for now the researchers are calling the Ledi-Geraru Australopithecus. Previously, researchers had found remains in the region from A. afarensis and Australopithecus garhi. But the newfound teeth look different from the teeth of those species. "It doesn't match any of these, so it could be a new species," study co-author Kaye Reed, a paleoecologist at Arizona State University, told Live Science. However, the research team hasn't officially named it as a newly identified species because the teeth don't have any especially unique features. "In the fossil record, researchers usually define a new species by finding anatomical traits that consistently differ from those of known species," Forrest said, adding that the evidence from this discovery is too limited to define a new species. The researchers also identified two teeth that are 2.59 million years old, and one that is 2.78 million years old, all belonging to the genus Homo, which Reed believes are from the same species as the oldest known Homo specimen — the jawbone discovered in Ledi-Geraru — although this hasn't been confirmed. Image 1 of 2 Study authors J. Ramón Arrowsmith and Christopher J. Campisano examine the geology of the area near the new fossils. Image 2 of 2 An aerial view of the Ledi-Geraru excavation site, home of the newly discovered fossilized teeth, and where the oldest known Homo specimen has been uncovered. The new discovery means at least three hominin species were living in this region of Ethiopia before 2.5 million years ago: the Homo and Australopithecus species these teeth belong to, as well as A. garhi. At the same time, A. africanus lived in South Africa, and Paranthropus, another hominin genus, lived in what is now Kenya, Tanzania and southern Ethiopia. This evolutionary trial-and-error within the extended hominin family is why humans' evolutionary tree is considered "bushy" rather than linear. "It has become clear over the last decade or so that during most of our evolutionary history … there have been multiple species of human relatives that existed at the same time," John Hawks, an anthropologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who was not involved in the new research, told Live Science. "The new paper tells us this is happening in Ethiopia … [in] a really interesting time frame, because it's maybe the earliest population of our genus Homo." Next steps The research team is now studying the enamel on the newfound teeth, as their chemistry can reveal what these species were eating. This may shed light on whether these hominins were eating the same things and competing for similar resources. "Right now, we can say very little with certainty about direct interaction between Australopithecus and Homo," Forrest said. "We know that both genera sometimes overlapped in time and space, but there is no behavioral evidence linking the two." RELATED STORIES —300,000-year-old teeth from China may be evidence that humans and Homo erectus interbred, according to new study —78,000-year-old footprints from Neanderthal man, child and toddler discovered on beach in Portugal —Stunning facial reconstructions of 'hobbit,' Neanderthal and Homo erectus bring human relatives to life Chimpanzees and gorillas live in some of the same forests, Hawks pointed out, but they're mostly geographically separated from each other, not living side by side. The fact these early hominins may have lived closer together than primates typically do now is interesting, Hawks said. "They probably weren't eating the same things," Reed noted. "But right now we don't really know." The researchers are also searching for more information and fossils at the site. "Everything we find is a piece in the puzzle of human evolution," Reed said. Human evolution quiz: What do you know about Homo sapiens?
