3.0 Magnitude Earthquake Rumbles New York City Less than 2 Years After the Last One
The earthquake, which occurred at 10:18 P.M. local time, was centered near Hasbrouck Heights, N.J., about 10 miles from downtown Manhattan, at a depth of about six miles, according to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). Neither New York City nor Bergen County, N.J., where Hasbrouck Heights is located, reported major damage or injuries, according to the New York Times.
Earthquakes large enough to be felt are uncommon in the eastern U.S. 'It's a pretty quiet part of the country,' Benjamin Fernando, a seismologist at Johns Hopkins University, told Scientific American in 2024.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
However, small earthquakes, with magnitudes of 2.5 or lower, are quite common in the region. The earthquake magnitude scale is logarithmic, with each whole-number increase in magnitude representing a 10-fold increase in the size of the seismic waves it produces. That means the 2024 earthquake was 63 times bigger than the August 2 event. (The massive earthquake that rattled Russia just days ago, a magnitude 8.8 event, produced seismic waves a stunning 630,000 times larger in amplitude than the August 2 New Jersey quake.)
In turn, the August 2 event created seismic waves with about three times the amplitude of a 2.5 magnitude event that represents the high end of typical activity in the region.
The August 2 earthquake occurred nearly 40 miles away from the 2024 earthquake, which is too far away for it to be considered an aftershock of the previous event, although the 2024 quake does continue to spur aftershocks, according to the USGS.
The USGS attributed the August 2 earthquake to 'faulting at shallow depths in the crust' and noted that it did not occur near a plate boundary. The region has many faults, but these fractures in Earth's crust are very old—they date to the era when the Appalachian and Blue Ridge Mountains were built, hundreds of millions of years ago.
Although the East Coast is not prone to large earthquakes like the West Coast, the rattling of an East Coast quake is felt more broadly because the hard bedrock of the region transfers seismic energy more efficiently than the heavily faulted West Coast bedrock.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scientific American
a day ago
- Scientific American
Spellements: Friday, August 8, 2025
How to Play Click the timer at the top of the game page to pause and see a clue to the science-related word in this puzzle! The objective of the game is to find words that can be made with the given letters such that all the words include the letter in the center. You can enter letters by clicking on them or typing them in. Press Enter to submit a word. Letters can be used multiple times in a single word, and words must contain four letters or more for this size layout. Select the Play Together icon in the navigation bar to invite a friend to work together on this puzzle. Pangrams, words which incorporate all the letters available, appear in bold and receive bonus points. One such word is always drawn from a recent Scientific American article—look out for a popup when you find it! You can view hints for words in the puzzle by hitting the life preserver icon in the game display. The dictionary we use for this game misses a lot of science words, such as apatite and coati. Let us know at games@ any extra science terms you found, along with your name and place of residence,
Medscape
a day ago
- Medscape
ADHD: Not a Diagnosis but a Warning Label
The title of a recent article in The New York Times asks, 'Have We Been Thinking About A.D.H.D. All Wrong?' How would you answer this question? My response would be a robust 'You're darn right we have!' I am a member of a shrinking cohort of primary care pediatricians who practiced before the phenomenon of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) appeared on the landscape. I have always been troubled by how the handful of hyperactive grade schoolers I was seeing in the 1970s could mushroom into something that prompted the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention to report last year more than 11% of American children had been diagnosed with ADHD. I don't include myself in the 'we' to whom the writer refers. I have never been able to imagine that a seismic genetic shift could explain the sudden emergence of a new disease that lacks solid diagnostic criteria or a biophysical marker. Radiation from solar flares and chemicals leached from the nonstick surfaces on our pots and pans just don't seem to be likely answers. William Wilkoff, MD The New York Times article comes the closest to encapsulating an explanation I have constructed over the past 50 years of observing the ADHD phenomenon unfold. Clearly, something has changed. But it has eluded those looking for some biophysical cause. Although stimulant medications have been associated with observable changes in behavior in some situations, these have usually been temporary. The effectiveness of the medications has never seemed to warrant the millions of stimulant pills that are prescribed to children and young adults every year in this country. Professor Edmund Sonuga-Barke, a neuroscience and psychiatry researcher at King's College London, was quoted in the article as saying, 'We have a clinical definition of A.D.H.D. that is increasingly unanchored from what we are finding in our science.' He goes on to say that clinicians can't objectively measure and define a natural category of individuals with ADHD. His observation makes one wonder how much of the ADHD research has been valid. Some of the new thinking about ADHD comes from a re-examination of the landmark MTA study, which demonstrated that the effects of the medication were statistically significant at 14 months. However, they had lost their significance at 36 months. Even more interesting is the more recent observation that 40% of the control group in that study who did not qualify for an ADHD label in 1999 were later diagnosed with ADHD in adolescence, suggesting that something extrinsic had changed over time. Other studies referred to in the New York Times article have shown that although stimulant medication improved behavior and the speed of work, there was no demonstrable improvement in learning. Margaret Sibley, PhD, clinical psychologist and professor at the University of Washington School of Medicine, in an attempt to explain the later diagnosis of ADHD in the MTA control group, says that what changed for these children was their environment. The world of an adolescent is much different from that of an 8- or 9-year-old, and is often more turbulent. Joel Nigg, PhD, a clinical psychologist at Oregon Health & Science University, says that for a large percentage of individuals diagnosed with ADHD, 'there is nothing neurobiologically notable about them. Instead, their symptoms are situational or conditional.' What are those conditions that can trigger behavior commonly associated with the ADHD label? Instead of a condition or group of conditions, it is probably better to consider situations in which there is 'a misalignment between a child's biological makeup and the environment in which they are trying to function' says Sonugo-Barke. Take, for example, the kindergarten student who didn't attend preschool and who has just turned 5 at the start of the school year. Or the 13-year-old hands-on learner who did 'okay' in grade school but now finds himself thrust into the college track in high school with a heavy emphasis on reading and classroom lectures. Or a 30-something who has found himself in a job in which he is struggling to keep up with his supervisor's demands. This view of ADHD symptoms, not as a single condition but as an expression of a mismatch between a person's capabilities (both physical and emotional) and their environment, includes the assumption that the population is made up of individuals with a wide range of vulnerabilities. Some are more easily tipped into demonstrating ADHD-like symptoms at times of stress, whereas others are more resistant. At one end of this spectrum is a small group of children who were born with a neurochemical makeup that makes them highly likely to exhibit ADHD symptoms. Individuals with fetal alcohol syndrome are probably the best example of a group that may have an identifiable biomarker. Although it is likely that research will identify a mechanism to explain the ADHD-like symptoms in this very small subset, it is much less likely that a similar mechanism or structure will explain the spectrum of vulnerabilities in the general population in the short term. However, if and when a biomarker is discovered in the general population, we must be careful about the chicken-and-egg situation. Was the environment-individual mismatch a result of altered structure or chemistry, or did the stress associated with the mismatch trigger the observed change? Finally, let's consider what may be the most common example of a mismatch between the individual's biological makeup and their environment: sleep deprivation. When people are made sleep-deficient, they exhibit symptoms often linked with ADHD, such as slower reaction times, attention difficulties, mood changes, and irritability, to name just a few. It has been my observation over five decades of observing children and adults that very often sleep deprivation is a major, if not the most potent, contributor to what others have labeled as ADHD. Then it is not surprising that a stimulant medication in an individual who is sleep deprived will cause a dramatic, although not long-lasting, improvement. One of the most common complaints voiced by persons labeled as having ADHD is that they find school or their job boring. Individuals with boring jobs, such as truck driving or assembly line work dominated by repetitive tasks, can be more productive when they are given a stimulant. If we are looking for a change in the environment that has occurred over the past three quarters of a century to explain the ADHD phenomenon, we need look no further than the well-documented observation that individuals of all ages are getting significantly less sleep. The reasons are too numerous to document in this short column, but the popularity of television and personal electronic devices are obvious examples. Yes, we must look at our educational system to make sure we are creating learning environments in which children who have a variety of skills and vulnerabilities can thrive. Yes, that school environment should be stimulating without being distracting and provide an abundance of physical activity. But we must remember to make sure that families are taught to identify when their child is overtired and how to take appropriate measures to ensure they arrive at school well rested. View ADHD not as a diagnosis but rather a collection of observations of a patient's behavior that should serve as a warning label. This doesn't mean we should completely rule out stimulants as a therapeutic option. However, medication should be considered a temporary step while more definitive steps are being taken to narrow the discrepancy between children's own resources and the environment in which they find themselves.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
What to know about earthquakes in the Northeast
The recent, small earthquakes that rattled the New York metro area serve as a reminder that seismic activity does occur in the region, according to experts, who say it's actually quite common. Two minor earthquakes with an epicenter in Bergen County, New Jersey, occurred within just days of each other, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. On Tuesday, a magnitude 2.7 earthquake struck in Hillsdale, while a magnitude 3.0 quake centered northeast of Hasbrouck Heights shook the region on Saturday. MORE: 2.7 earthquake rattles New York City metro area, 2nd in 4 days The earthquakes caused a flurry of reaction from unsuspecting residents across the most densely populated region in the U.S., who raced to social media to compare experiences. But seismic activity is quite common in the region, even if the earthquakes are not as frequent or strong as the ones that occur on the West Coast, experts told ABC News. Hundreds of small earthquakes have occurred in the Northeast over the past year, Alexander Gates, a geologist at Rutgers University, told ABC News. However, scientists don't expect the general rate of earthquakes in the region to change, as the mechanisms that lead to earthquakes tend to be constant, Oliver Boyd, a research geophysicist at the USGS, told ABC News. "The push from the plate boundaries, the mantle, the convection, the topography ... those forces are relatively constant," he said. "Overall, we don't necessarily expect the rate of earthquakes to change." MORE: Russia earthquake has caused a 'parade of volcanic eruptions': Expert Why earthquakes in the Northeast aren't as strong or frequent Earthquakes in the Western U.S. tend to occur much more frequently and measure stronger than those in the Central and Eastern U.S., the experts said. California is located at the boundary of the North American and Pacific tectonic plates, Boyd said. "A lot" of strain and stress happens at plate boundaries, which causes the earthquakes to be stronger, he added. About 90% of earthquake activity happens at plate boundaries, Michael Steckler, a geophysicist and research professor at Columbia University's Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory, told ABC News. New Jersey is in the middle of the North American plate, where the stresses "aren't as great," Boyd said. The interiors of the plates are much more stable, leading to fewer earthquakes, Steckler said. "The hazard is definitely a lot higher in the Western U.S. because the rate of earthquakes is much higher," Boyd said. In addition, the earthquakes that occur in the Northeast are "very shallow," compared to the "deep" earthquakes in the West, Gates said. "A lot of times, people will say they actually heard the earthquake, and that's true," Gates said. "...Because they're so shallow here, especially in New Jersey, everyone hears the noise." Much more is known about earthquakes in the West due to the accessibility of the San Andreas Fault, Boyd said. Geologists are able to measure various aspects of deformation along the fault and gather valuable data on the earthquake activity. However, the earthquakes that occur in the New Jersey region tend to be more far-reaching from the epicenter, the experts said. The Earth's crust there is older than in California, but it's also colder and less fractured since it's not near a plate boundary. "When an earthquake does happen, it's felt over a much wider area, whereas in California, all the faults breaking things up means that the seismic energy doesn't go very, very far," Steckler said. It is not out of the realm of possibility that strong earthquakes can occur in the Northeast. In 2011, an earthquake near Mineral, Virginia, measured at 5.8 on the Richter scale. And in 1811, earthquakes in the upper Mississippi Embayment in what is now New Madrid, Missouri, measured between magnitude 7 and 8, Boyd said. An earthquake that struck Charleston, South Carolina, in 1886 measured at a magnitude 7.0, according to the USGS. "There's the potential for a damaging earthquake to occur in the Eastern U.S., but it's pretty rare -- every 100 or 200 years," Boyd said. MORE: Small earthquake rattles parts of New York City area, New Jersey There may be several unknown fault lines in the Northeast Faults that have been mapped in the Central and Eastern U.S. are "many, many millions of years old" -- many produced during the Mesozoic era, Boyd said. Those faults have had time to heal. And while some earthquakes may be originating from them, new cracks have likely been forming, Steckler said. Regions in the upper Mississippi embayment are probably reactivating older faults that formed when the rift basin was formed, Boyd said. In New Jersey, some of the faults from the Mesozoic rifting could be reactivating, he added. "When stress builds up, if there's a pre-existing weakness, the Earth will use it," Steckler said. "So, it will use older faults when it can." Earthquakes in the Northeast tend to be active for a short period of time before the activity shifts to another area, Gates said. "These faults get active for a year, and then they go dead," he said, adding that it could be 50, 100 years before they become active again. But since the earthquakes in the region don't tend to rupture to the surface, researchers can't pinpoint exactly where the faults they are occurring are, Boyd said. Gates believes the region is amid peak activity of a 40-year cycle and that an uptick of activity will likely continue for another couple of years. "Within a couple of years, we'll start getting less and less, and then there'll be a period where we won't get many earthquakes at all," Gates said.
