logo
A flawed peace deal would not end the war in Ukraine

A flawed peace deal would not end the war in Ukraine

Al Jazeera24-02-2025

Today, we mark three years of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine. For three years, the Ukrainian people have demonstrated remarkable resilience, foiling Russian plans to conquer Kyiv and forcing its army to retreat from Kharkiv and Kherson.
Ukrainians continue to resist against the onslaught of the Russian army, but the war has inevitably entered a grinding phase in which every territorial gain comes at an enormous cost, testing Ukraine's endurance and the West's willingness to maintain support.
At this critical stage, a new administration in the United States has signalled a dramatic shift in its policy on Ukraine, demanding that a swift peace agreement be reached. Last week, US and Russian officials met in Saudi Arabia for direct negotiations without Ukraine at the table. This meeting and the rhetoric coming from Washington have raised fears that President Donald Trump's administration is laying the groundwork for broader concessions in the name of de-escalation with Russia.
For Ukraine, the fundamental issue is not whether diplomacy should be pursued – any war eventually ends at the negotiating table – but what terms those negotiations will involve. If the priority is simply to stop the fighting as quickly as possible, there is a risk of Ukraine being pressured into accepting a settlement that does not address its long-term security concerns and that temporarily freezes the war rather than putting an end to it.
Recent history provides a clear warning against such flawed 'peacemaking'. In February 2014, Russia invaded Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula and occupied it; two months later, its troops along with local pro-Russia forces launched an operation in eastern Ukraine's Donbas region, taking control of some territory. In August, Kyiv was forced into negotiations brokered by France and Germany that aimed to put a stop to the fighting under unfavourable terms.
What came to be known as the Minsk I agreement, signed in September of that year, lasted no more than six months. In January 2015, forces loyal to Moscow and regular Russian army units renewed their attacks on Ukraine to force it into more concessions. In February 2015, what came to be known as the Minsk II agreement was negotiated and signed, stipulating that Kyiv had to recognise the 'special status' of two regions in the Donbas in effect occupied by Russia.
The Minsk agreements ultimately failed to secure a durable peace. Structured to freeze the conflict rather than resolve it, they allowed Russia to consolidate control over the occupied territories while keeping Ukraine politically and militarily constrained. Moscow never adhered to its commitments, using the diplomatic process to buy time, regroup and prepare for further aggression.
The failed Minsk agreements serve as a cautionary tale: Settlements that ignore Ukraine's security realities and societal expectations do not lead to lasting peace but merely postpone the next conflict.
Any settlement must reflect the will of the people who have endured this war for three years. Polls conducted in Ukraine show clearly what the Ukrainians want.
War fatigue is real, as illustrated by a poll conducted by Gallup in November, in which 52 percent of respondents said they supported negotiations. However, when it comes to any territorial concessions, only 27 percent said Ukraine should consider such a step. A clear majority of Ukrainians reject giving up any land as part of a peace agreement.
These figures highlight an inescapable political reality: There is no broad support in Ukraine for a peace agreement that legitimises Russian territorial gains. Any Ukrainian leadership attempting to negotiate such terms would face enormous public pressure. And even if an agreement were reached at the diplomatic level, attempts to implement it would be met with fierce resistance domestically.
That is why US and other Western policymakers advocating for an expedited resolution cannot ignore the will of the Ukrainian people. If they do want a peace deal to hold, they should consider continuing support for the Ukrainian army. Ukraine's ability to negotiate from a position of strength depends on continued military success and a unified stance from its allies.
In making decisions on their Ukraine policy, Western countries should not fall for Russia's flawed narrative. Moscow has been trying to create the illusion of strength while concealing its growing vulnerabilities.
Russian officials have insisted the Russian economy is stable despite sanctions, their military operations are sustainable and time is on their side. At the Riyadh talks, Russian representatives reportedly suggested that businesses in Moscow are thriving, restaurants are full and only Western economies are suffering from prolonged engagement in Ukraine.
The message was clear: Russia can fight for as long as it takes while the West faces diminishing returns. This framing has led some in the West to conclude that a quick peace deal – one based on Ukrainian concessions – may be the most pragmatic way forward.
But it is not. Appeasing Russia would only increase its appetite for more aggression.
The way to guarantee peace in Ukraine is by setting up a robust post-war security framework. Whether through NATO integration, bilateral defence agreements or a structured European-led security framework, Ukraine needs concrete security commitments. If these are absent in any peace settlement, the risk of renewed conflict would remain high.
The coming months will be critical as Washington reassesses its role in Ukraine. While much is unknown, one reality is clear: Ukraine's fight is not only about reclaiming lost territory but also about ensuring that its sovereignty is no longer in question. Whether Western policy continues to align with that goal or shifts towards a more transactional approach will shape the next phase of the war.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump travel ban on 12 countries comes into effect
Trump travel ban on 12 countries comes into effect

Qatar Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Trump travel ban on 12 countries comes into effect

dpa Washington A travel ban on 12 countries by US President Donald Trump has come into force. According to a White House statement, the regulation came into effect early on Monday (0401 GMT). Trump announced the ban on Wednesday, saying that he 'must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people.' The ban fully restricts the entry of nationals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Those from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted, Trump's proclamation adds. A fact sheet issued by the White House stated that some of the named countries had 'inadequate screening and vetting processes, hindering America's ability to identify potential security threats before entry.' Other countries 'exhibit high visa overstay rates,' or did not cooperate in sharing identity and threat information, it added. Trump placed travel restrictions on a group of predominantly Muslim nations as one of his first presidential acts after he first took office in 2017. Several federal courts tried to block the ban, before the Supreme Court ruled in 2018 that it was 'squarely within the scope of Presidential authority.'

Russia, Ukraine begin swap of young and wounded prisoners of war
Russia, Ukraine begin swap of young and wounded prisoners of war

Qatar Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Russia, Ukraine begin swap of young and wounded prisoners of war

agencies Kiev/Moscow Russia and Ukraine launched on Monday a new prisoner exchange, agreed earlier this month during direct negotiations in Istanbul between representatives from both countries. According to the Russian Defence Ministry, the first group of Russian soldiers under the age of 25 has been released from Ukrainian captivity. In return, a similar number of Ukrainian prisoners were handed over by Moscow. Neither side disclosed the exact number of individuals involved. Moscow said the repatriated Russian soldiers are currently in Belarus, where they are receiving medical assistance. 'Our people are home,' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky wrote on X. He confirmed the return of young soldiers and seriously injured individuals but did not provide specific figures. Zelensky said the exchange process is 'quite complex,' though he expressed hope that the Istanbul agreement would be fully implemented. He said the swaps would 'continue in several stages over the coming days.' Tensions had flared between Moscow and Kiev over the timing of the exchange. The families of missing Ukrainian soldiers gathered close to the border with Belarus on Monday, as a planned prisoner swap between Russia and Ukraine took place. As the bus carrying prisoners of war arrived, a crowd of relatives surged forward, many brandishing photos of missing fathers, brothers and sons. Faces were filled with apprehension. Few expected to be reunited, and most were just desperate for information after waiting years for any latest exchange stems from the second round of talks held in Istanbul a week ago. Both sides agreed to swap young soldiers aged 18 to 25, along with seriously wounded or ill prisoners of war, and to return the bodies of fallen soldiers. The arrangement could eventually involve over 1,000 individuals from each side. The first phase of the exchange had originally been scheduled for the weekend. Officials in Kiev said some of the Ukrainian prisoners who returned on Monday had been in Russian captivity since the beginning of the war. Tetiana, who had gathered with other Ukrainians in the Chernihiv region close to Belarus, carried a cardboard sign with photos of her father, Valentyn, and cousin, Mykola, both still missing. 'When my father went to fight, my biggest fear was that he would go missing,' she said, her eyes filling with tears. 'I hoped maybe he'd be wounded and come back.' The war has exacted a heavy toll on the family. Tetiana's uncle was killed last September, but his body was only recently returned for burial. When one of the returned prisoners appeared at an upstairs window, women waiting below hurled the names of regiments at him, hoping he might have news. He apologised, made a heart sign with his hands and called out 'slava Ukraini' - glory to Ukraine. 'Heroiam Slava' - glory to the heroes - the crowd replied in unison. Glimpsed briefly through the crowd as they were escorted inside, some of the soldiers looked gaunt.

Israeli forces seize Gaza aid boat
Israeli forces seize Gaza aid boat

Qatar Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Qatar Tribune

Israeli forces seize Gaza aid boat

Israeli naval forces boarded and seized a charity vessel carrying Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, which had tried to break the naval blockade of the Gaza Strip on Monday. The British-flagged yacht, Madleen, which is operated by the pro-Palestinian Freedom Flotilla Coalition, had aimed to deliver a symbolic amount of aid to Gaza later on Monday and raise international awareness of the humanitarian crisis there. 'If you see this video, we have been intercepted and kidnapped in international waters by Israeli occupational forces or forces that support Israel,' Thunberg, 22, said in a video released by the FCC, filmed before the vessel was captured. 'I urge all my friends, family and comrades to put pressure on the Swedish government to release me and the others as soon as possible.' The Israeli Foreign Ministry confirmed that the vessel was under Israeli control. (Agencies) page 3

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store