Acting Minister of Oil and Gas meets Shell delegation to discuss future partnership opportunities
The Acting Minister of Oil and Gas, Khalifa Abdel Sadig, held a meeting yesterday with a senior delegation from Shell to discuss prospects for cooperation and investment opportunities in the Libyan oil and gas sector, especially in the fields of exploration and production and the expansion of strategic partnerships.
The Shell delegation included Andrew Smith, Head of Trading, Eugene Oakberry, Executive Vice President, Exploration and Portfolio, Thomas Gerges, Head of Corporate Relations for the Middle East and North Africa, Tarek El Hassan, General Manager of Trading, and Alex Battalia, Director of Business Development.
During the meeting, the minister stressed Libya's openness to cooperation with major international companies and the importance of investing in the development of fields, increasing production and transferring technology, which contributes to achieving the country's goals in enhancing economic stability and developing national resources.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
New Mexico appeals court rejects lawsuit against oil and gas regulators
A New Mexico appeals court rejected a lawsuit alleging that the nation's No. 2 oil-producing state failed to meet constitutional provisions for protecting against oil and gas industry pollution, in an opinion Tuesday. Environmental advocates vowed to appeal the matter to the state's top court. A panel of three judges on the New Mexico Court of Appeals found that it was beyond the judiciary's authority to weigh whether the pollution controls are adequate, writing that they'll defer to the Legislature to balance the benefits of environmental regulation with natural resources development. The 2023 lawsuit from a coalition of environmental groups was the first to invoke the constitution's pollution-control clause, a 1971 amendment requiring that New Mexico prevent the contamination of air, water and other natural resources. 'While plaintiffs correctly observe that, as the 'Land of Enchantment,' the state's beauty is central to our identity, we cannot ignore the long history of permitting oil and gas extraction within our borders," the panel wrote, invoking the state motto. 'If anything, the law, history, and tradition of our state demonstrates that resource extraction must be considered alongside, and must coexist with, pollution control legislation.' Gail Evans, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity and lead counsel on the case, said Tuesday's opinion would dismiss the case entirely if unchallenged and 'displays a fundamental misunderstanding of our constitution and constitutional rights.' She said plaintiffs intent to appeal to the state Supreme Court. 'Fifty years ago, New Mexico voted to amend the constitution and to provide protections from industry pollution and the court has found today that the amendment — the pollution control clause — is essentially meaningless, and that has to be wrong,' Evans said. The court challenge comes as New Mexico's state government rides a wave of record income from development in the Permian Basin, one of the world's most productive, oil-producing regions. Oil-related revenue collections underwrite a considerable amount of the state's budget, including public education. Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham's administration is policing the industry with regulations that target methane and other emissions. But the Center for Biological Diversity and other groups say these efforts are not enough and that the state is failing to enforce existing pollution-control measures. Attorneys for the Democratic-led Legislature and environmental regulators said the lawsuit threatened their constitutional authority. Appeals Judge Katherine Wray issued an additional concurring opinion, expressing further limitations of the pollution control clause.
Reuters
7 hours ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Shell-BP merger's key ingredient is time
LONDON, June 3 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Wael Sawan must feel like it's Groundhog Day. In recent weeks Shell's (SHEL.L), opens new tab chief executive has been fielding one question over and over again: whether he's considering merging his $198 billion group with struggling UK rival BP (BP.L), opens new tab. Drill down into whether a swoop for the $77 billion oil major makes any sense, and Sawan's lack of enthusiasm is understandable. Yet a year from now, conditions could look more favourable. Shell-BP would be a seriously big beast. At around 5.4 million of daily barrels of oil equivalent output, it would create a European giant that dwarfs even U.S. peer Exxon Mobil (XOM.N), opens new tab, the biggest Western oil major. The same would apply to its 3.1 million barrels of daily refining capacity, putting it second behind Exxon. Extensive overlap of oil fields, especially in the United States, implies scope for big cost savings. Even so, the market likes the cost cuts and deleveraging Sawan has managed since joining in January 2023. Shell has outperformed even U.S. giants like Exxon and Chevron (CVX.N), opens new tab, and BP's market capitalisation now lies below 40% of its domestic rival's – the level at which managers internally start to feel it's worth seriously considering a merger, according to a person familiar with the matter. Even so, the M&A math still has to be convincing. Right now, it isn't. Assume Shell offered a typical 30% premium, valuing BP's equity at $100 billion. Add in BP's $27 billion of net debt, $13 billion of leases and $17 billion of hybrid bonds, and BP's enterprise value would be $157 billion. Going forward, Goldman Sachs analysts expect BP to make less than $17 billion of operating profit in 2026, which factors in expected hits from lower oil prices. Taxed at the 40% tax rate BP guides to, that's a 6% return on invested capital – less than BP's cost of capital of around 8%, as estimated by Morningstar. That number admittedly doesn't include the synergies. Cost savings of anything between 25% and 50% of the target's distribution and administrative expenses – which include rents and other overheads – are possible on big fossil fuel mergers, according to a person familiar with deals in the industry. Assume that Shell can strip out 25% of BP's $16 billion of such costs in 2024 – roughly in line with synergies from Exxon's landmark Mobil swoop in 1999 and Chevron's 2023 offer to buy Hess – and BP's operating profit would expand to the tune of $4 billion. Even then the overall return would still be less than 8%. Given the execution and antitrust risks inherent in such a deal, plus chunky one-off transaction costs, that's not a juicy enough return. Sawan is gaining plaudits simply by buying back $3.5 billion of his shares each quarter, and reckons Shell's free cash flow per share will grow 10% or more annually out to 2030. An all-share swoop for BP – which is probably the main option given the sums involved – would inflate Shell's share count by 50% and might imperil this cash gusher. Even so, by the second half of 2026 things may look different. For one thing, Shell's shares may continue to rise. Bank of America estimates for 2026 suggest the group is trading on a 12% free cash flow yield, way above the 8% European oil sector average – implying the group is undervalued. For another, in a year's time Sawan might be keener on a fresh growth story. While he has already hit 'first sprint' ten-quarter efficiency targets launched in June 2023, and promised further self-help by 2028, mega-M&A that takes 18 months to bed down could provide it. BP, meanwhile, could look worse. It may take too long to replace a management team and chair that have become associated with previous strategic missteps, or stumble into another crisis. Oil prices upended by excess supply and the shock from U.S. tariffs could also hit BP relatively harder, given 90% of its 2024 operating profit came from exploration and production and it has a more leveraged balance sheet. If oil prices languish at $60 a barrel, BP is expected to cut annual buybacks by 70% in 2026 compared to 2024 levels, per JPMorgan analysts. In contrast, Shell can maintain its dividend and buybacks in such a scenario, Bernstein analysts reckon. Imagine that Shell's shares rise another 10% from their current level so the company is worth $220 billion, while BP's slump 10% to $69 billion. In a year's time BP's divestment push to cut net debt to between $14 billion and $18 billion by end-2027 should be well underway, given progress in a potential sale of Castrol, which could be valued at $10 billion. If the $18 billion of BP operating profit estimated for 2027 by Goldman transpires, and BP's net debt is trimmed by $10 billion, Shell could achieve a 10% return in that year even if it only extracted the same $4 billion of synergies. These synergies, meanwhile, are a movable feast. While analysis by McKinsey found, opens new tab that 50% of fossil fuel deals in the exploration and production segment of the sector destroyed value, Exxon's Mobil merger captured $10 billion in synergies within five years, far outpacing the $2.8 billion flagged by the acquirer at the time. Shell itself upgraded its synergy estimate from buying BG Group in 2016 from $2.5 billion to $4.5 billion. If Sawan thought he could strip out 50% of BP's D&A costs, his return would rise to 12%. Shell's boss may still resist the bother of a major deal. And BP may end up getting a new management team in double quick time, egged on by 5% activist shareholder Elliott Investment Management. That might prompt it to re-rate, messing up the favourable deal math. Still, many of Shell's shareholders are also BP investors. If they start to think BP-Shell is the new Exxon-Mobil, then they will likely make that clear. Follow Yawen Chen on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
Reuters
10 hours ago
- Reuters
Shell greenlights Aphrodite gas project offshore Trinidad, company says
June 3 (Reuters) - Energy producer Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab has made a positive final investment decision on is Aphrodite gas project offshore Trinidad and Tobago, the company said on Tuesday. The project is expected to produce first gas in 2027 and have a peak production of 18,400 barrels of oil equivalent per day, it added in a release.
