Calgary Stampede police advisory published in Canada's official languages
The post includes a screenshot of an article with the headline: "Police warned Stampede-goers of sexual assault in Arabic, Hindi."
The screenshotted text says the Calgary Police Service (CPS) issued written warnings in the two languages as part of a public safety campaign before the Calgary Stampede, an annual rodeo exhibition and festival in Alberta's largest city.
Similar claims appeared on X and Facebook, with some posts implying that the advisories were not presented in English or French.
Image
Screenshot of an X post taken July 14, 2025
Image
Screenshot of a Facebook post taken July 14, 2025
The posts spread after a series of stabbings disrupted the event July 8, according to a press release and local media reports (archived here). Previously, a 2023 class-action lawsuit alleging that Calgary Stampede allowed a performance school staffer to sexually abuse students prompted lawmakers to call for more accountability from all levels of government.
As Canada's years-long immigration consensus has broken down, AFP has repeatedly debunked misinformation accusing newcomers of committing crimes or unfairly exploiting social benefits.
The latest posts claiming that police specifically urged Arabic and Hindi speakers to avoid committing sexual assault are similarly misleading.
The headline in the posts comes from an article from Juno News, a current-events blog founded by leaders from the conservative alternative media outlets True North and The Counter Signal -- the latter of which has previously propagated misleading claims (archived here).
In the article, the word "Arabic" links to a series of messages CPS shared on X covering event safety and predatory behavior.
The first post in the thread is written in English, however (archived here). The connected posts repeat the same information in 11 other languages, including Arabic, French, Spanish, Ukrainian and Vietnamese.
Image
Screenshot of an X thread taken July 15, 2025
Despite the claims online, a message in Hindi does not appear in the thread. Punjabi -- which uses similar characters and is also widely spoken in India -- is featured.
The mention of "Hindi" in the article links to a personal X account that reshared a separate CPS information campaign, which was also broadcast in English, Punjabi and Arabic (archived here).
The Juno News article is behind a paywall, so AFP was not able to review whether the text goes on to explain that the campaign was also shared in Canada's official languages. But the social media posts sharing the headline did not include this context.
CPS told AFP it often translates social media posts to reach as many residents as possible with its messaging.
"We typically translate communications in English and 12 additional languages, which are chosen based on the literacy rates of Calgarians," the service said in a July 14 email.
AFP found other CPS information campaigns covering sexual assault, a police impersonation scam and elder abuse, all shared in several languages including English and French (archived here, here and here).
CPS also told AFP it shared the messaging about sexual consent in an effort to raise awareness during large events, which can create higher risk for assault.
Read more of AFP's reporting on misinformation in Canada here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
10 hours ago
- LeMonde
US court upholds order blocking immigration agents' patrols in California
A US appeals court has upheld an order blocking immigration agents from carrying out patrols in California. The patrols have led to indiscriminate detentions without reasonable grounds to suspect people of being undocumented immigrants. The ruling, delivered by a three-judge panel late on Friday, August 2, denies the federal government's appeal to overturn a temporary July order to halt "roving patrols" in Los Angeles, which immigration rights groups have described as illegally using racial profiling. California residents and advocacy groups sued the Department of Homeland Security over the detentions. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong had ordered an end to the arrests. She had argued that such actions by agents violate a person's constitutional rights, which safeguard against unreasonable seizures by the government. She had said the detentions were being made "based upon race alone," on whether a person was speaking Spanish or English with an accent or because of their place of work, and ordered them stopped. The Jason Gavidia case Friday's ruling by the US Ninth Circuit Court of appeals described the case of plaintiff Jason Gavidia. A US citizen, born and raised in East Los Angeles, Gavidia was arrested outside a tow yard in Montebello by agents carrying military-style rifles on June 12. "The agents repeatedly asked Gavidia whether he is American – and they repeatedly ignored his answer: 'I am an American,'" the ruling said. Agents asked what hospital he was born in, and Gavidia responded he did not know, but said he was born in "East LA." The court said Gavidia told the agents he could show them his government-issued ID. "The agents took Gavidia's ID and his phone and kept his phone for 20 minutes. They never returned his ID." A victory against ICE raids Los Angeles and the surrounding suburbs have been ground zero for President Donald Trump's aggressive immigration crackdown. He ordered the US military deployed there for weeks, and agents have rounded up migrants at car washes, bus stops, stores and farms. The ruling said the government's defense team argued that "certain types of businesses, including car washes, were selected for encounters because (...) they are likely to employ persons without legal documentation." Help us improve Le Monde in English Dear reader, We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you. Rights groups hailed the order as a victory for those seeking to bar the Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents from conducting the raids. "This decision is further confirmation that the administration's paramilitary invasion of Los Angeles violated the Constitution and caused irreparable injury across the region," said attorney Mohammad Tajsar of the ACLU Foundation of Southern California. "We look forward to holding the federal government accountable for these authoritarian horrors it unleashed in Southern California."
Local France
16 hours ago
- Local France
Prosecutors call for PSG's Achraf Hakimi to face rape trial
The Nanterre prosecutor's office told AFP that they had requested that the investigating judge refer the rape charge to a criminal court. "It is now up to the investigating magistrate to make a decision within the framework of his order," the prosecutor's office told AFP in a statement. Hakimi, 26, played a major role in PSG's run to their first Champions League title, the full-back scoring the opener in the 5-0 rout of Inter Milan in the final in May. Hakimi, who helped Morocco to their historic progress to the semi-finals of the 2022 World Cup, was charged in March, 2023 with raping a 24-year-old woman. Hakimi allegedly paid for his accuser to travel to his home on February 25, 2023, in the Paris suburb of Boulogne-Billancourt while his wife and children were away on holiday. The woman went to a police station following the encounter alleging rape and was questioned by police. Although the woman refused to make a formal accusation, prosecutors decided to press charges against the player. She told police at the time that she had met Hakimi in January 2023 on Instagram. On the night in question she said she had travelled to his house in a taxi paid for by Hakimi. She told police Hakimi had started kissing her and making non-consensual sexual advances, before raping her, a police source told AFP at the time. She said she managed to break free to text a friend who came to pick her up. Advertisement 'Attempted extortion' Contacted by AFP after Friday's development Hakimi's lawyer Fanny Colin described the call by prosecutors for a trial as "incomprehensible and senseless in light of the case's elements". "We, along with Achraf Hakimi, remain as calm as we were at the start of the proceedings. "If these requisitions were to be followed, we would obviously pursue all avenues of appeal," she continued. According to Colin, her client had "been the target of an attempted extortion". "Nothing in this case suggests an attempted extortion," Rachel-Flore Pardo, the lawyer representing the woman, said. "My client welcomes this news with immense relief," she told AFP. "We will not tolerate any smear or destabilisation campaign, as is unfortunately still too often the case for women who have the courage to report the rape of which they are victims," she added. The son of a cleaning lady and a street vendor, both Moroccans who have lived in Spain since the 1980s, Hakimi was born in Getafe, a southern suburb of Madrid. Hakimi came through the youth system at Real Madrid before joining Bundesliga side Borussia Dortmund in 2018. He went on to make 73 appearances for the German club. He moved to Inter Milan in 2020 and then on to PSG in 2021 where he has established himself as an integral part of the team. In Qatar, Hakimi was a cornerstone of the Morocco team that became the first African or Arab nation to reach the semi-finals of a World Cup.
LeMonde
a day ago
- LeMonde
Jury finds Tesla partly responsible for deadly Autopilot crash case
A Miami jury has decided that Elon Musk's car company Tesla was partly responsible for a deadly crash in Florida involving its Autopilot driver assist technology and must pay the victims more than $200 million in damages. The federal jury held that Tesla bore significant responsibility because its technology failed and that not all the blame can be put on a reckless driver, even one who admitted he was distracted by his cell phone before hitting a young couple out gazing at the stars. The decision comes as Musk is seeking to convince Americans his cars are safe enough to drive on their own as he plans to roll out a driverless taxi service in several cities in the coming months. The decision ends a four-year long case remarkable not just in its outcome, but that it even made it to trial. Many similar cases against Tesla have been dismissed and, when that didn't happen, settled by the company to avoid the spotlight of a trial. The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along − despite its repeated denials − by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. "Today's verdict is wrong," Tesla said in a statement, "and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement life-saving technology," claiming that the plaintiffs concocted a story "blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility." In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million in compensatory damages, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. Tesla said it will appeal. Help us improve Le Monde in English Dear reader, We'd love to hear your thoughts on Le Monde in English! Take this quick survey to help us improve it for you. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks − falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like "driver assist" and "copilot" to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. "Words matter," Schreiber said. "And if someone is playing fast and loose with words, they're playing fast and loose with information and facts."
