SRCC, Hindu and BCom (Hons) top preferences at DU
According to the data released by the university on Tuesday, DU has received over 3.05 lakh registrations through the Common Seat Allocation System (CSAS), of which 2.39 lakh candidates have successfully submitted their college and programme preferences for admission to 71,642 undergraduate seats in 69 colleges and various departments.
SRCC alone received 38,795 first-preference applications, followed by Hindu College with 31,901, Hansraj College (15,902), St Stephen's (12,413), and Miranda House (11,403).
In terms of course choices, BCom (Hons) leads with nearly 20 lakh total preferences, followed by BCom (15.26 lakh), BA (Hons) English (12.23 lakh), B.A. (Hons) Political Science (9.96 lakh), and B.A. (Hons) History (7.72 lakh).
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
Among individual programme-college combinations, BCom (Hons) again topped the list with 48,336 first-preference entries. Political science (Hons) received 15,295, while BSc (Hons) zoology and DU's newly introduced BTech in mathematics and humanities drew 12,722 and 10,584 first preferences, respectively.
The data indicates a strong interest in humanities-based programmes, with 58.89% of applicants opting for them. Commerce and science-based programmes were preferred by 20.89% and 20.22%, respectively.
More than 16.8 million (1.68 crore) unique college-programme preferences were submitted on the portal, with one candidate listing 1,414 combinations out of a possible 1,549. On average, each candidate submitted 83 preferences.
This year also saw a significant participation from underrepresented categories. As many as 512 students applied under the orphan quota (221 female, 291 male), while 7,243 students applied under the single-girl child quota. Gender-wise, female applicants outnumbered male applicants, comprising 53.06% of the total applications.
The university released simulated ranks on candidates' dashboards, based on preferences submitted till July 14.
Applicants will then be allowed to revise their choices till 11.59pm on July 16. The first allocation list will be declared on July 19.
For performance-based programmes and supernumerary quotas like extracurricular activities (ECA) and sports, trials will begin from July 18 and July 25, respectively. Allocations under these categories will start in the third round of CSAS.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
How tough is Gaokao, the world's most intense exam? A comparison with India's JEE
College entrance exams occupy a pivotal place in the academic journey. The fierce competition, the vast range of subjects to master, and the anxiety of unpredictable challenges can leave students feeling overwhelmed. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Every year, millions of students navigate this exam frenzy, and studies have sought to rank these competitive tests, declaring which one reigns as the most gruelling. Factors such as subject variety, depth, scope, and competition are all measured to determine which exam takes the crown as the world's most intense. The winner? China's Gaokao, with India's Joint Entrance Examination (JEE) securing a spot in the top three and potentially competing to reign supreme in the list. Both exams share striking similarities, they attract millions of candidates, demand years of preparation, and offer life-changing opportunities to those who succeed. However, they differ fundamentally in their approach to academic assessment. Gaokao tests a broad knowledge base across multiple subjects, while JEE delves deep into mathematical and scientific understanding. Gaokao is a one-time test with no second chances, whereas JEE offers multiple attempts, albeit with intensifying competition each year. The question that captivates educators, parents, and students alike is both simple and complex: Which of these academic giants is truly more challenging? The answer not only reflects the nature of these exams but also provides insight into the educational philosophies and cultural values of two of the world's most populous nations. China's Gaokao: An exam that makes a nation hold its breath In China, the Gaokao is more than just a test, it's a national event. When exam day arrives, traffic gets diverted, construction work stops, and even flights are rerouted to keep noise levels down. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now That's how seriously the country takes this exam. The numbers tell the story. Over 12 million students sit for Gaokao each year, all competing for spots at top universities. The most prestigious institutions, like Peking University and Tsinghua University, accept barely 0.1% of applicants. To put that in perspective, getting into Harvard is actually easier. What makes Gaokao so tough? It's not just one subject, students must master Chinese, maths, and English, plus choose between science subjects (physics, chemistry, biology) or humanities (history, geography, politics). The exam runs for two full days, testing everything from complex equations to essay writing. Students spend their entire high school years preparing, with many undergoing continuous, rigorous training throughout their schooling. The preparation is so intense that it becomes a way of life. There's no second chance, your Gaokao score determines which university you can attend, which often shapes your entire career path. India's JEE: The engineering dream factory Meanwhile, in India, the JEE serves as the gateway to the country's most coveted engineering colleges. The Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) are so prestigious that getting in is considered a badge of honour for life. The competition is fierce. Around 1.5 million students take the JEE each year, but only about 200,000 make it to the advanced level. The dream is fulfilled for only 1% students. These odds make JEE one of the most competitive exams on the planet. Unlike Gaokao's broad approach, JEE focuses entirely on three subjects: maths, physics, and chemistry. But don't let that fool you—the questions are incredibly challenging. They test not just what you know, but how well you can think under pressure and solve complex problems. The exam format includes both JEE Main (held twice yearly) and JEE Advanced (for the top performers), creating a two-tier system that adds another layer of competition. Many students start preparing for JEE two to four years in advance, often attending special coaching classes alongside regular school. These coaching institutes have become a massive industry in India, with some charging hefty fees for their specialised programmes. The pressure is immense, as success can transform a student's life and their family's future. Which exam is tougher? Comparing these two giants isn't straightforward, they're difficult in different ways. Time structure Gaokao is like running a marathon. It covers many subjects over two days, requiring students to memorise vast amounts of information and write detailed answers. The mental and physical stamina needed is enormous. JEE is more like a sprint. Students get three hours to solve highly complex problems in maths, physics, and chemistry. The time pressure is intense, and there's no room for mistakes. Subjects Gaokao tests knowledge across multiple subjects, from literature to science to social studies. Students need to be good at everything. JEE goes deep into just three subjects. Students must understand concepts so well they can apply them to solve problems they've never seen before. Frequency and second chances Gaokao happens once a year, and that's it. Your score on those two days determines your future. JEE offers more flexibility, students can take the main exam twice a year and have multiple attempts. But this also means the competition keeps getting tougher as students retake the test. Global reputation Both exams are gaining international recognition. Some universities abroad now accept Gaokao scores for admission, particularly in Europe and the US. JEE Advanced scores are accepted by universities in Singapore, Australia, and the UAE for engineering programmes. So which is harder? The honest answer? Both are incredibly difficult in their own ways. Gaokao challenges students with its sheer scope and scale. Managing multiple subjects, memorising enormous amounts of information, and performing under pressure for two days straight is extraordinary. With 12 million students competing, the numbers alone make it daunting. JEE challenges students with its depth and complexity. The problems require years of practice to master, and the level of mathematical and scientific thinking demanded is exceptional. The 1% acceptance rate at IITs speaks volumes about the competition. What this means for students For the millions of young people taking these exams, the debate over which is harder misses the point. Both tests represent years of sacrifice, intense study, and enormous pressure. They're not just academic challenges, they're life-defining moments that can open doors to incredible opportunities. Whether it's a Chinese student hoping to study at Tsinghua or an Indian student dreaming of IIT, these exams represent the pursuit of excellence in education. They're tough because the rewards, access to world-class education and career opportunities, are so valuable.
Scroll.in
7 hours ago
- Scroll.in
How India can escape the death valley of education
Having been a teacher for 30 years, it has been evident to me that students emerge from a mould shaped by school and college where they were discouraged to question, argue, disagree, to read beyond the syllabus and the prescribed texts, to express an opinion or think laterally. Most chose sociology, the subject I taught, not because they were interested in it, but because it was considered a 'soft' subject – easy to get admission into and pass. The convenient timing of sociology classes was an additional attraction. It would hardly be an exaggeration to state that many teachers and students, whom I came in close contact with, were bored, tired and disengaged from teaching and learning – both weighed down by the experience. My association with government schools in Mumbai highlighted similar concerns. Problems identified as attention deficit hyperactive disorder, indiscipline, aggression or learning disabilities are also rooted in the marginal socio-economic background of the majority of the children. Poverty, insecurity, filthy and congested living spaces, dysfunctional families, violence and low esteem leaves a mark. Problems with the education system have been apparent to educators for a long time, but perhaps few were more passionate in trying to address them than Ken Robinson, an English academic, author and advisor. The modern system of education the world over – with few exceptions – is deeply flawed, Robinson contended, because its basic premise is restrictive, unimaginative and disengaged from the needs and abilities of children – in fact, of human beings. Robinson's insights and concern have deeply resonated with my decades-long experience of teaching in a university. He believed in the need to reconstruct the entire educational system – a total 'paradigm shift'. His ideas are worth revisiting nearly five years since his death on August 21, 2020, at the age of 70. Learning creativity Robinson was dedicated to reforming the education system: he taught in universities, wrote and lectured extensively, conducted workshops and made policy recommendations. But, to our loss, he is little known in India. The titles of his talks and writings were upfront: 'School kills creativity', 'Bring on the learning revolution', 'I am a fan of home schooling', and the most provocative of them, 'How to escape education's Death Valley'. Each one a gem, sometimes a lucid and thought-provoking critique, sometimes caustic, on the school system, which he boldly argued destroyed creativity in children and adult learners. His analysis hinged on the argument that creativity and imagination are basic human qualities, expressed not merely in arts, music, literature, painting, dance, architecture, design, but in every activity that people undertake. Making a distinction between imagination, creativity and innovation, which are interconnected, he argued that creativity is not necessarily innate and that it can be taught provided, 'it is done well and in the right conditions'. I would add that family and community can also nurture creativity. The current model of education, Robinson believed, was designed for a different time: the 18th century with the economic imperatives of the Industrial Revolution and the intellectual tradition of enlightenment with its ideas of academic ability, deductive reasoning and intelligence. Education was modeled on industrialism: the production line mentality, the division of children as per age, separation of subjects, standardisation of curriculum, testing and so on. This model certainly benefited some who succeeded, but most suffered. Conformity, compliance and competition characterises education at all levels – school, college, university – whereas Robinson believed that human intelligence is characterised by 'diversity, collaboration and innovation'. This is most noticeable in children at an early age before they go through the rigour of routinisation and standardisation. What was also crucial to Robinson was that although education may succeed in helping children understand the world around them, it doesn't make them aware of the world within, their capabilities, potential and passion remaining undiscovered. Education, therefore, ought to make learners 'understand the world around them and talents within them so that they can become fulfilled individuals and active compassionate citizens', he said in his talk, 'Life is your talent discovered.' Education should enable the young to become economically responsible and inculcate the power of curiosity, cultural empathy, creativity, spirit of collaboration and historical understanding. The economic purpose should be tied up with social and cultural purpose. Instead, vast areas of human activity are viewed and lived as routine and uninspired. Good teachers can help learners recognise their talent, value it, pursue it systematically and take risks and face uncertainties, as well as provide all possible assistance to do so. 'Creative activities' should not just be an add-on to the school curriculum – a class or two on music, drawing and painting and storytelling are valuable in themselves – but embedded in the approach to the teaching-learning process. His book, The Element: How Finding Your Passion Changes Everything, draws from the phrase 'to be in one's elements' – at one's best, most authentic. This alone, he says, can provide fulfilment, a sense of purpose, meaning and happiness, in addition to the knowledge and skills required for livelihood, and more importantly, enrich one's life and that of others. It can be as uplifting as a spiritual experience. Where change begins The education system must recognise diversity, given that every child is different, hails from a specific social-economic-cultural background and has different abilities, likes and dislikes, attitudes and inclinations. Standardisation cannot become so rigid as to destroy all possibilities of divergent thinking, which allows for unorthodox, original and ingenious ways to interpret questions and find answers to them. In the present system of teaching and evaluation, more and more resources are invested in standardising testing. This creates a hierarchy of subjects: those related to economic opportunity and utility are valued while arts, humanities and the social sciences, remain less so. The division of subjects, Robinson points out, disregards the very purpose of education, which is to develop a holistic approach to connect the manifold dimensions of human life. In recent times, there is an even narrower definition, in preference of subjects that produce material value over those that emphasise social and cultural values. It is a pity that the need for original ideas is encouraged in management and technical studies, in business, and fields that are closely related to the economic sphere rather than in humanities, social sciences, and arts. These are disciplines that offer a deeper understanding of society and culture, human values and our role 'in building a society, rooted in principles of diversity, cooperation, and compassion', as Robinson puts it. Researchers and activists have repeatedly drawn attention to the poor quality of education in government schools in both rural and urban India. A high dropout rate on account of poverty and poor basic facilities is endemic, and children who do manage to remain in school plough through an irrelevant and joyless educational experience. Teaching and learning, by and large, except in a few elite educational institutions, are a frustrating experience for teachers and students, where classrooms reproduce the hierarchy between the two, and students learn early that the authority of the teacher cannot be questioned. The declining social status of teachers, their lack of professional autonomy and lack of motivation to upgrade their skills contribute to the state of affairs. From Robinson's vast experience, which he shares with readers and audiences, I would like to mention two. One was an experiment that challenged children to find different ways to use a paper clip: they discovered 200 uses. In another instance, a young girl diagnosed with ADHD was advised to be sent to a special school. The distressed parents consulted the principal, who left the girl in his office and met the parents outside while observing the student all the time. She danced with great joy and skill in his large office. The principal (I imagine, smiled) and told the parents to admit her to a dance school, which they did. She excelled in dancing, earned a high reputation and even started a dance academy for girls. Every child and adult is not equally talented, but educational institutions can certainly help every child and adult discover and develop their interest and confidence. Parents must also learn not to be obsessed with grades and marks, and admissions, which are viewed as the sole purpose of education, in our competitive, market-driven society.
Hindustan Times
8 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
DU begins ECA trials today
Delhi University is set to begin from Friday the trials for extracurricular activities (ECA) for undergraduate admissions 2025-26, officials said. The university has received 13,000 ECA applications — a 14% increase from last year . (FILE) The university has received 13,000 ECA applications — a 14% increase from last year — with the top category being debating (English), said DU officials. 'A total of 13,000 ECA applications have been received by the university. Debate (English) has received 1,700 applications, which is the highest among the ECA categories. National Cadet Corps (NCC), which has received over 3,000 applications, does not have the trial component,' said Deepti Taneja, convener, ECA Admissions Committee. This year, a total of 1,347 ECA seats have been offered across 14 categories, including creative writing (Hindi and English) debate (Hindi and English), digital media (photography, filmmaking, animation), divinity, fine arts (sketching, painting, sculpture), music vocal (Indian and Western), music instrumental (Indian and Western), dance (Indian classical, folk, Western and choreography) has 275, theatre has 122, quiz has 25, and yoga has 42. NCC and National Service Scheme (NSS), which have 98 and 100 seats, respectively, have no physical trials. The admission process for ECA is centralised and based on a composite score, where 75% weightage is on ECA performance (certificates and trials) and 25% on CUET scores. The trials will be conducted in various DU colleges, as allocated by the central committee. The university on Thursday shared the final schedule for the same. The trial scores will later be uploaded on the university's admission portal around July 25, following which a grievance window will be opened.
