logo
Alibaba DAMO Academy partners to drive AI in health, climate

Alibaba DAMO Academy partners to drive AI in health, climate

Techday NZ6 days ago
Alibaba DAMO Academy, the research division of Alibaba Group, has announced a collaboration with the International Telecommunication Union to use artificial intelligence in addressing challenges related to healthcare, climate, and science.
The partnership will involve joint activities under the initiatives AI for Health, AI for Climate, and AI for Science. These activities will comprise both online lectures and in-person events, and are designed to facilitate knowledge sharing and expert exchanges between the two organisations. Both parties will also explore potential cooperation in robotics and embodied intelligence, as well as deepen work in AI and video technologies with the goal of supporting global technological development, solution deployment, and standardisation.
In addition to these activities, Alibaba DAMO Academy has become a founding member of the United Nations-led AI Skills Coalition, a platform aiming to help build AI skills and capacity in both developed and developing countries. Through this coalition, DAMO Academy will support efforts to empower governments, businesses, and organisations in less developed regions to fully leverage AI for sustainable development and good governance.
Healthcare applications in Singapore and Saudi Arabia
As part of its AI for Health efforts, Alibaba DAMO Academy is collaborating with NHG Health in Singapore to promote innovation in medical AI research and clinical applications at Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Tan Tock Seng Hospital is one of Singapore's largest multidisciplinary hospitals, and the joint initiative targets early screening for pancreatic cancer, osteoporosis, sarcopenia, breast cancer, and kidney masses.
The collaboration is utilising the strengths of both DAMO Academy and NHG Health, focusing on research, development, and the external validation of AI-powered early detection tools. The aim is to broaden access to precision medicine and enable earlier diagnosis and treatment. DAMO Academy intends for this partnership to support more timely and effective healthcare interventions by integrating advanced AI technologies within clinical settings.
Furthermore, in Saudi Arabia, DAMO Academy is working with Abdul Latif Jameel Health to examine opportunities for AI-assisted diagnosis of a range of acute and chronic medical conditions. This includes cancers such as pancreatic, gastric, and oesophageal cancers, chronic diseases like cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and fatty liver disease, as well as urgent conditions such as acute aortic syndromes and pulmonary embolism. "This partnership leverages the combined expertise of both organizations in medical AI technology and scientific research. The focus is on enhancing early screening for conditions such as pancreatic cancer, osteoporosis, sarcopenia, breast cancer, and kidney masses. Through joint research, development, and external validation, the collaboration aims to expand access to AI-driven early detection tools, ultimately supporting the advancement of precision medicine and enabling more timely and effective treatments."
This joint work seeks to extend the benefits of medical AI systems to wider populations and regions, merging DAMO Academy's technology products with Abdul Latif Jameel Health's global resources. By doing so, it is expected that more people will gain access to advanced diagnostic tools designed to facilitate the early identification and management of various medical conditions.
Featured innovations and recognition
Several of DAMO Academy's AI systems have recently been recognised in the United Nations' AI for Good: Innovate for Impact Interim Report 2025. One of the featured projects is Baguan AI Weather Forecasting, which produces specialised weather indicators that can support power energy generation, agricultural meteorology, low-altitude forecasting, and renewable energy planning at the regional level.
In healthcare, DAMO Academy's PANDA system (Pancreatic Cancer Detection with Artificial Intelligence) was highlighted for its ability to use deep learning to detect and categorise pancreatic lesions accurately using non-contrast CT scans. DAMO GRAPE (Gastric Cancer Risk Assessment Procedure with Artificial Intelligence), a framework for analysing three-dimensional CT scans to detect and segment gastric cancers, was also noted for its high sensitivity and specificity.
According to DAMO Academy, these innovations are part of its ongoing commitment to support scientific advancement and societal benefit through artificial intelligence. By contributing technologies and expertise to joint international and regional initiatives, the organisation seeks to further the practical deployment of AI that can address health, environmental, and scientific challenges across diverse communities.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ANZMES Demands Urgent Action On Severe ME Day, Highlighting "Systemic Neglect" Of Thousands Bedridden In NZ
ANZMES Demands Urgent Action On Severe ME Day, Highlighting "Systemic Neglect" Of Thousands Bedridden In NZ

Scoop

timea day ago

  • Scoop

ANZMES Demands Urgent Action On Severe ME Day, Highlighting "Systemic Neglect" Of Thousands Bedridden In NZ

On Severe ME Day, the Associated New Zealand Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Society (ANZMES) is issuing an urgent call for government action to address the systemic neglect of New Zealanders living with Severe and Very Severe Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME). ANZMES highlights that an estimated 25% of the 65,000 Kiwis with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) - over 16,000 people - are housebound or completely bedridden, many requiring 24/7 care simply to survive. Severe ME is a devastating, multi-systemic neurological illness that can leave individuals unable to tolerate light, sound, or touch. It can rob them of the ability to speak, eat, or perform any basic self-care. Despite the severity and scale of the crisis, these individuals remain largely invisible, trapped within their homes and failed by a healthcare system ill-equipped to meet their needs. Fiona Charlton, ANZMES president states "Their suffering is compounded by a healthcare system that lacks the necessary expertise and facilities. On Severe ME Day, we are not just asking for awareness, we are demanding tangible commitments from MPs to provide safe, compassionate, and evidence-based care. Inaction is no longer an option." ANZMES is calling on policymakers to address this crisis by actioning specific, urgent changes: Fund Dedicated Care: Establish funding for dedicated ME/CFS respite and long-term residential care facilities staffed by healthcare professionals trained by ANZMES in the specific needs of severe ME patients. Mandate Education: Implement mandated ME/CFS education for all healthcare professionals to ensure safe, evidence-based practice and prevent the harm caused by inappropriate advice like Graded Exercise Therapy (GET). Update Disability Policy: Formally include ME/CFS in all national disability support policies and frameworks, as recommended by the United Nations, to ensure access to essential support. United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD. In its 2022 review, the Committee made a recommendation that the New Zealand government should: 'Expressly include ME/CFS (Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) in disability policy and practice, to ensure access for persons with ME/CFS to health care and disability services'. As part of the campaign, ANZMES is running an InMEmory Tribute to honour the individuals who have been lost to ME/CFS and to acknowledge those currently living in profound isolation. "Every name and country in our tribute represents a life devastated by this illness and a family left to navigate a broken system," said ANZMES President. "Their lived stories are the reason we fight for a future where no one is left to suffer in silence." ANZMES urges the public, healthcare professionals, and policymakers to visit its website Severe ME Day 2025 to access critical resources and learn how they can support the urgent call for action.

Dystopian Killing Fields and Starvation in Gaza
Dystopian Killing Fields and Starvation in Gaza

Scoop

time3 days ago

  • Scoop

Dystopian Killing Fields and Starvation in Gaza

Starvation as a way of life. Starvation as a way of death. Starvation as policy, justification and vengeance. As the state of Israel hums along frittering, scratching and violating international human rights conventions, the chroniclers are kept busy on the morgue's relentlessly growing inventory and peace's loss. Of late, a vast number of humanitarian organisations have decided to express their collective outrage in a statement at what is happening in Gaza. The statement as run by Doctors Without Borders on July 23 is stark: 'As the Israel government's siege starves the people of Gaza, aid workers are now joining the same food lines, risking being shot just to feed their families. With supplies now totally depleted, humanitarian organisations are witnessing their own colleagues and partners waste before their eyes.' Two months after the implementation of the controlled aid scheme by Israel, utilising the grotesquely named Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, over 100 organisations were 'sounding the alarm and urging governments to act: open all land crossings; restore the full flow of food, clean water, medical supplies, shelter items, and fuel through a principled, UN-led mechanism; end the siege; and agree to a ceasefire now.' Outside Gaza, and even within the Strip, abundant supplies of food, clean water, medical supplies, shelter items and fuel sat untouched. Humanitarian organisations had been prevented from accessing them. 'The Government of Israel's restrictions, delays, and fragmentation under its total siege have created chaos, starvation, and death.' A paltry figure of 28 trucks a day were being allowed into the Strip. The relevant gore is recounted: massacres at food sites in the Gaza Strip are impossible to ignore; the figures from the UN suggest that 875 Palestinians had been slaughtered while seeking sustenance as of July 13. The frequency of these 'flour massacres' is also receiving comment from those in the employ of the operation being run by GHF, policed by private contractors and the IDF. Retired US special forces officer Anthony Aguilar, who resigned from working with the GHF, told the BBC that he had 'witnessed the Israeli Defense Forces shooting at crowds of Palestinians.' During his entire career, he had never seen such 'brutality and use of indiscriminate and unnecessary force against a civilian population, an unarmed, starving population.' The NGO statement goes on to note the rise of cases of acute malnutrition, most prevalent among children and the elderly. (The World Food Programme has warned that one in three Gazans do not eat for days at a time, with 90,000 women and children requiring treatment.) 'Illnesses like acute watery diarrhea are spreading, markets are empty, waste is piling up, and adults are collapsing on the streets from hunger and dehydration.' In the face of this, international law's decrees appear like the neglected statues of a distant land. The three sets of Provisional Measures Orders from the International Court of Justice, handed down since 2024, have warned Israel to observe its obligations under the UN Genocide Convention and address the humanitarian crisis in the Strip. In its modifying order of provisional measures handed down on March 28, 2024, the ICJ instructed Israel to 'take immediate and effective measures to enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance to address famine and starvation and the adverse conditions of life faced by Palestinians in Gaza'. These include the provision of 'food, water, electricity, fuel, shelter, clothing, hygiene and sanitation requirements, as well as medical supplies and medical care' and 'increasing the capacity of land crossing points and maintaining them open for as long as necessary'. The latest concession from Israel to deal with this engineered humanitarian catastrophe is a promise to open humanitarian corridors to permit UN convoys into the Strip. In addition to that, COGAT, the Israeli military agency overseeing humanitarian affairs in Gaza, has announced that Jordan and the United Arab Emirates will be permitted to parachute humanitarian aid to those in Gaza. UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has made a small team of British military planners and logisticians available to assist Jordan in this endeavour. On July 27, the IDF also released a statement claiming it had made the first airdrop including 'seven packages of aid containing flour, sugar, and canned food'. These efforts, in their practical futility, are a reiteration of the humanitarian airdrops conducted by the US military and Jordan's air force in March last year. These drops will do little to alter the cruel, strangulating model of aid delivery in place, emboldening the fittest recipients capable of outpacing their adversaries. Those recipients will also be fortunate not to be injured or killed by the dropped packages, instances of which were recorded in March last year. 'Why use airdrops,' asks Juliette Touma, chief spokeswoman for the United Nations agency for Palestinian refugees, 'when you can drive hundreds of trucks through the borders?' Using trucks was 'much easier, more effective, faster, cheaper.' Precisely why using them is so unappealing to the IDF. Instead of focusing on isolating Israel, its allies prefer piecemeal approaches that prolong the suffering of the Palestinians. Measures such as those announced by Starmer to 'evacuate children from Gaza who need medical assistance, bringing them to the UK for specialist and medical treatment' only serve to encourage the Israeli war machine. The aid drops serve to do much the same. The objective is one of inflicting a sufficient degree of harm that will encourage the eventual depopulation of the enclave. Israel's allies, with intentional or unintentional complicity, will clean up.

Political cosyism behind 3rd medical school decision-making
Political cosyism behind 3rd medical school decision-making

Scoop

time3 days ago

  • Scoop

Political cosyism behind 3rd medical school decision-making

On 21 May I was introduced to two new words (always a moment of light excitement for me) by Dr Bryce Edwards, Director of the newly established Integrity Institute which publishes regular Integrity Briefings. On this occasion the new word was 'chumocracy' and 'cosyism': Chumocracy and cosyism. He was referring to the work of Auckland University Professor of Economics Robert MacCulloch who was calling out 'soft corruption' by political and business elites in Aotearoa New Zealand. His focus included government, banks, big business and the rightwing 'thinktank' New Zealand Initiative. Such was the strength and persistence of the hostile response from these elites that he felt sufficiently pressured to close his website. The core of MacCulloch's argument is that New Zealand is run by a 'chumocracy' of elites who are connected by what he calls 'cosyism'. Third medical school announcement These were the words that I began to think about after absorbing the announcement by Health Minister Simeon Brown and Universities Minister Shane Reti early in the afternoon of 21 July that it was proceeding with the proposed third medical school at Waikato University: Official announcement. Later that the same day I was interviewed about the decision on Radio New Zealand's The Panel where my main focus was on the poor process which was likely to lead to an eventual poor outcome: Medical school decision based on poor process. Nearly two years earlier I had outlined my concerns about the Waikato University proposal in an article published by BusinessDesk (26 August 2023): Third medical school caution. What is the third medical school The new medical school is to provide a four-year medical degree for students who already are graduates with a non-medical degree to work as general practitioners (or as other rural doctors) in regional and rural areas. The medical degree at the existing two medical schools, Auckland and Otago, is five years. The advocated expectation is that the proposed Waikato Medical School will be graduating 120 doctors a year once it is up and running. With its opening scheduled for 2028 the first graduates should start working as general practitioners or other rural doctors at the earliest in 2037. This gap comprises both the time at the medical school and the time as resident (junior) doctors in training. Last year the Ministry of Health commissioned a report which advised that that Waikato's teaching model would be similar to the model in Wollongong University, south of Sydney. Reportedly 45% of the latter's graduates become GPs of which around 30% proceeded to work in rural areas. In 2017 the Auckland and Otago medical schools had proposed that they be allowed to jointly establish a new joint 'school of rural medicine'. However, while the previous Labour-led government and Ministry of Health was favourably disposed to this initiative, progress was understandably impeded by the Covid-19 pandemic. In a memo to then Health Minister Shane Reti in September last year, Treasury recommended that Auckland and Otago Medical Schools be asked to present a counter-factual argument to the Waikato proposal. However, it appears that no such invitation was made. Analysis by the Integrity Institute The best commentary I have seen on this decision has come from Bryce Edwards in another Integrity Briefing published the same day as the Government's announcement and after my The Panel interview (21 July): Costly case study in policy capture. Edwards also drew upon the excellent investigative work of Radio New Zealand's Guyan Espinar. Consistent with his above-mentioned piece on 'chumocracy' and 'cosyism' he describes the decision as: … not, at its core, a decision about health policy. It is a decision about political power, influence, and the erosion of good process. This project serves as a textbook case study of policy capture, where the interests of a well-connected institution, amplified by high-powered lobbyists, have overridden expert advice, fiscal prudence, and superior alternatives. Later in his piece he adds: This lack of transparency and due process is antithetical to good governance. The entire Waikato med school saga has unfolded via secret contracts, private lobbying meetings, and politically wired relationships – all largely hidden from the public until journalists and watchdogs pried it into the light. Backing this up Edwards draws upon many questionable process features including: Waikato Vice-Chancellor Professor Neil Quigley working 'hand-in-glove' in 'partisan coordination' with Shane Reti before the last election and promising the proposed school would be 'a 'present' to a future National government'. Waikato University helping pay for the National party's campaign announcement of the medical school plan (about $5,000). Government officials seeing 'red flags' in the proposal including alarm bells ringing from Treasury, the Tertiary Education Commission and the Ministry of Education warning of bloated costs, duplication risks and logistical hurdles. The use of two of the most well-connected lobbyists: initially former Labour senior adviser Neale Jones and more substantially former National cabinet minister Steven Joyce. Joyce's firm was paid about $1 million over three years by Waikato for 'consultancy' (le, leveraging his political influence). Questionable procurement in the way Waikato University hired Joyce leading to a public 'scolding' by the Auditor-General John Ryan. Ignoring the arguably better alternative of expanding the existing Auckland and Otago medical schools which were already running rural immersion schemes and satellite programs geared toward rural health. Edwards does not hold back: At its core, the Waikato medical school saga is an illustration of how not to make public policy. The process has failed every basic test of transparency, public accountability, and evidence-based decision-making. A public university and eager politicians cooked up a major spending initiative as a political favour, greased by lobbyists and implemented via dubious means. The normal checks and balances – open procurement, independent policy analysis, genuine stakeholder consultation – were subverted or ignored. It's the kind of deal that breeds public cynicism in politics, the sense that big decisions are made on behalf of the powerful or the connected, not the public. Further: By greenlighting this project in July 2025, ministers have signalled that political paybacks matter more than prudent spending. They have effectively rewarded a campaign of lobbying and pressure that sidestepped the usual contest of ideas. That sets a horrible precedent. It tells every other vested interest: hire the right insiders, make the right donations or deals, and you too can get the government to write a big cheque, officials' advice be damned. And: The Waikato medical school greenlight might be a political win for a few, but it's a loss for New Zealand's standards of governance. It undermines confidence that our health investments are made wisely and fairly. And it should prompt some soul-searching in Wellington: if this is how we make big decisions now, what does that say about who really runs the country? Unconvincing contrary views There have been contrary analyses supporting the Government's decision which I find unconvincing. Luke Malpass, Stuff Political, Business & Economics Editor and formerly holding a leadership role in the New Zealand Initiative expressed a negative view of current medical schools describing them emotively, but without substantiation, as a 'duopoly'. Writing in The Post (22 July; paywalled) in a flaky critique he dismisses those critical of the process, presumably including Bryce Edwards, as 'weird': Flaky rather than investigative. Two days later Waikato University ethics professor and philosopher Nick Algar wrote a paywalled opinion piece in The Post abstractly arguing that those critical of the Government's were guilty of 'sloppy thinking'. This reminded me of the expression 'pot calling the kettle black': Sloppy thinking in the debate over Waikato medical school | The Post Sloppy analysis of 'sloppy thinking'. He also reminded me of Oscar Wilde on philosophy although without the latter's famous and infamous wit: 'My philosophy? I'm always right and you are wrong.' The last word Let's leave the last word to the action of the Government in releasing its redacted 'cabinet business case' material at 6.45pm last Friday as reported by the Otago Daily Times the following day: Politically expedient timing of third medical school case. This timing has been a common practice of successive governments recognising that this is the most difficult time for media scrutiny before it is taken over by other news. If the difficult to substantiate claim of $50 million savings per year stood up to rigorous scrutiny it would have been released at a time convenient for media scrutiny. But 'chumocracy' and 'cosyism' necessitated otherwise. Ian Powell Otaihanga Second Opinion is a regular health systems blog in New Zealand. Ian Powell is the editor of the health systems blog 'Otaihanga Second Opinion.' He is also a columnist for New Zealand Doctor, occasional columnist for the Sunday Star Times, and contributor to the Victoria University hosted Democracy Project. For over 30 years , until December 2019, he was the Executive Director of Association of Salaried Medical Specialists, the union representing senior doctors and dentists in New Zealand.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store