Men misusing polygamy under Muslim law for selfish purposes: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday expressed concern over the misuse of polygamy under the guise of Muslim personal law, stating that the Quran's conditional allowance for multiple marriages is now being used by men for 'selfish purposes', contrary to its original intent.According to a report in Live Law, while addressing a matter involving multiple marriages, Justice Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal pointed out that polygamy was historically allowed in early Islamic times to support widows and orphans in the aftermath of wars, however, the modern-day interpretations often ignore the conditional and humanitarian nature of the provision.advertisement'There is a historical reason why the Quran allows polygamy. There was a time in history when a large number of women were widowed, and children were orphaned in primitive tribal tussles in Arabs. The Muslims suffered heavy casualties in defending the nascent Islamic community in Medina. It was under such circumstances that the Quran allowed conditional polygamy to protect orphans and their mothers from exploitation,' the court said.
The Court further aligned its view with the Supreme Court's recommendations in the Sarla Mudgal and Lily Thomas cases, reiterating the need for a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) as envisaged under Article 44 of the Constitution.As per the report, the court defined the legal position over multiple marriages by a Muslim male and their implications under Section 494 of the IPC. The court also laid down situations under which such marriages may or may not attract the offence of bigamy. The court stated that –advertisement1. If a Muslim male contracts his first marriage under Mohammedan law, his second, third, or fourth marriages will not be void, and thus Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) (which deals with bigamy) will not apply. However, if the second marriage is declared void (Batil) by a Family Court under Section 7 of the Family Courts Act, or by any competent court, then Section 494 IPC can be invoked.2. Conversely, if a man marries under the Special Marriage Act, Hindu Marriage Act, Christian, Parsi, or Foreign Marriage Acts, and then converts to Islam to marry again, such a second marriage would be void, and Section 494 IPC would apply.3. The court reaffirmed that Family Courts have the jurisdiction to determine the validity of a Muslim marriage performed in accordance with the Muslim Personal Law.The High Court also emphasised that a Muslim man does not have an absolute right to enter into a second marriage unless he is capable of treating all his wives equally, as mandated by the Quran.Must Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Iranian barrage hits Israeli residential area; fears grow of wider conflict in West Asia
The death toll grew Sunday as Israel and Iran exchanged missile attacks for a third consecutive day, with Israel warning that worse is to come. read more A picture shows Iranian rocket trails in the sky above Ramallah city in the occupied West Bank on June 15, 2025. Image- AFP Israel's military said several sites were hit by the latest Iranian missile barrage on Sunday, with a residential building on the country's Mediterranean coast reportedly struck, according to firefighters. In response, Israel said it began targeting dozens of surface-to-surface missile sites in western Iran, as the two arch-enemies exchanged direct fire for a third consecutive day, a dramatic escalation following years of covert and proxy warfare. The intensifying conflict marks the first time in decades that Iran and Israel have traded blows so openly, stoking fears of a prolonged confrontation that could engulf the wider West Asia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Residential areas in both countries have suffered deadly strikes since hostilities began two days ago. On Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Iran of deliberately targeting civilians. 'Iran will pay a very heavy price for the premeditated murder of civilians, women and children,' he said during a visit to the site of a missile strike on a residential building in the coastal city of Bat Yam, near Tel Aviv. The remarks came hours after Iranian missile fire targeting Israel killed at least 10 people overnight, according to authorities, pushing the death toll up to 13 since Iran began its retaliatory strikes Friday, with 380 reported injured. Iran activates air defences in Tehran Iran activated its air defences in Tehran and western parts of the country on Sunday, media reports in the Islamic republic said, as Israel intensified its attacks. 'A few minutes ago, the Kermanshah air defence system was activated,' the Mehr news agency said. The official IRNA news agency said air defences were also activated in the Iranian capital. Israel 'got' Iran intelligence chief, Netanyahu tells Fox News Prime Minister Netanyahu strongly suggested that Israel has killed Iran's intelligence chief Mohammad Kazemi in an aerial attack, as the arch-foes ramp up their conflict. 'Moments ago, we also got the chief intelligence officer and his deputy in Tehran,' Netanyahu told Fox News in an interview from an undisclosed location in Israel, adding 'our brave pilots are over the skies of Tehran, and we're targeting military sites, nuclear sites.' Israel claims it hit a refuelling aircraft in the deepest strike yet inside Iran Israel's military claimed to have attacked an Iranian refueling aircraft in Mashhad in the country's northeast, saying it was the deepest strike yet inside Iran and the farthest carried out from Israel. Videos circulated Sunday afternoon of black smoke rising in the city, which is home to the Imam Reza shrine, a site of pilgrimage for Shiites. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Israeli military said the aircraft flew a distance of 2,300 kilometers (1,430 miles) from Israel. Iran did not immediately acknowledge the attack. With inputs from agencies
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Residents welcome reduction in use of loudspeakers at mosques
Mumbai: Many residents living in densely populated areas and in the vicinity of mosques have welcomed the silence or reduced decibel levels of loudspeakers in mosques. Several residents TOI spoke to on Sunday said they felt a positive change as the mosques in their neighbourhoods either muted loudspeakers or cut down decibels to the permissible limit (55 decibels during daytime and 45 decibels at night). Tired of too many ads? go ad free now This allows elderly persons, students, and bedridden patients much-needed relief. "I stay hardly 200 metres away from a couple of mosques at Kurla Pipe Road. I don't see any decrease in the number of devotees in mosques after azaan stopped being amplified through loudspeakers. This is a relief and should be welcomed," said Mohammed Tarique. Tarique added that he is a practising Muslim who regularly prays five times a day but does not miss the sound of azaan via loudspeakers. Tarique recalled a trend of many mosques which amplified through loudspeakers not just the azaan but even Friday sermons of the imams. "What was the need to make the whole mohalla listen to sermons delivered inside mosques? ... I am glad it has stopped now that loudspeakers are muted or decibels reduced," said Tarique. Kalina resident Abraham Mathai welcomed the move. "I used to put earplugs during azaan on loudspeakers. Now it is a relief for everyone, including students and elderly people. I congratulate even those elders in the community who back this positive move," said Mathai. Khursheed Siddiqui, general secretary, Masjid and Madrassa Mohammadiya at Vikhroli, said that soon after Bombay high court observed in Jan 2025 that "use of loudspeakers is not an essential part of religions", he called for a meeting of elders and explained why loudspeakers' decibel levels needed to be brought down to permissible limit. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "There were some who argued why only mosques needed to comply with the court's decision, but now we all see the benefits of not amplifying the azaan through loudspeakers," said Siddiqui. Mira Road resident Syed Zafar Ahmed lives in a cosmopolitan locality. "If I felt irritated at high decibels of azaan, how would non-Muslims have felt? I am glad many mosques have themselves removed the loudspeakers or are following the court's guidelines on the use of loudspeakers," said Ahmed.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
1979–1983: When Israel was ready to help India denuclearise Pakistan but the plan was called off
In the early 1980s, Israel offered India a plan to bomb Pakistan's fast-developing nuclear site at Kahuta. Motivated by concerns about an 'Islamic bomb' and its implications for West Asia, the proposed operation would have mirrored Israel's 1981 strike on Iraq's Osirak reactor. India came close. Plans were drawn, bases selected, aircraft prepared. But in the end, New Delhi pulled back. That decision, once largely forgotten, is now under fresh political scrutiny. Himanta Biswa Sarma: 'A historic window was squandered' On 15 June 2025, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma reignited a long-dormant strategic debate. Writing on X, he said, 'A historic window to safeguard India's long-term security was squandered, for short-term diplomatic comfort.' He claimed that India had the intelligence and operational readiness in the 1980s to strike the Kahuta nuclear facility . R&AW had confirmed uranium enrichment activity there. Israel had offered support, including operational planning. Military agencies were on board. The launch point: Jamnagar air base in Gujarat. According to Sarma, Indira Gandhi had initially approved the strike. But then she backed out. Her son, Rajiv Gandhi , later shelved it permanently under pressure from global powers. Live Events What Israel offered and why According to Deception: Pakistan, the US, and the Global Weapons Conspiracy by Adrian Levy and Catherine Scott-Clark, Israel saw Pakistan's nuclear progress as an existential threat — not just to India, but to the entire Middle East. In 1979, Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin even wrote to UK PM Margaret Thatcher to warn of Pakistan's ties with Libya's Colonel Gaddafi. He feared Pakistan could pass nuclear weapons to Libya. Israel, still fresh off its own successful bombing of Iraq's Osirak reactor in 1981, suggested a similar strike on Kahuta. The plan involved Israeli F-16s and F-15s flying into Indian airspace. They would refuel at Jamnagar and Udhampur, while Indian Jaguar deep-strike aircraft would assist the mission. Why the plan was shelved Though Indira Gandhi reportedly gave initial approval, the strike never materialised. A combination of domestic unrest, geopolitical risks, and American pressure weighed in. India in the 1980s was boiling. Punjab was in ferment with the Bhindranwale insurgency. Kashmir was simmering after the execution of JKLF co-founder Maqbool Bhat. The aftermath of the Emergency still hung over Delhi. And in the background, India and Pakistan were edging toward confrontation in Siachen. A strike on Kahuta could have triggered an all-out war. India, unlike Israel, would be in direct range of Pakistani retaliation. And the fallout — nuclear or diplomatic — would land on Indian soil. There were international risks too. The CIA reportedly tipped off Pakistan, prompting Islamabad to issue veiled threats of retaliation using newly acquired F-16s from the US. Washington, keen to use Pakistan to arm Afghan mujahideen against Soviet forces, was in no mood to entertain an Indian-Israeli strike. Then came the assassination of Indira Gandhi in 1984. Her son, Rajiv, took over and prioritised diplomacy. The Kahuta plan was buried for good. The fallout and what came next By the late 1980s, Pakistan had made significant strides in developing nuclear weapons. The mastermind behind the programme was A.Q. Khan, who had stolen uranium enrichment designs from a Dutch facility. With help from countries like China and North Korea, Pakistan's bomb was becoming a reality. In 1988, Rajiv Gandhi and Pakistani PM Benazir Bhutto signed an agreement prohibiting attacks on each other's nuclear facilities. Since then, the two countries exchange lists of nuclear installations every year on 1 January. But the nuclear story didn't end there. In 1998, just weeks after India's Pokhran-II tests, Pakistan responded with five nuclear tests of its own. The world changed overnight. Nuclear deterrence and its costs Since Chagai-I in 1998, Pakistan's nuclear weapons have cast a long shadow over India's strategic calculus. During the 1999 Kargil War, it limited India's response. In later years, Pakistan's arsenal emboldened its use of proxy terror — from the 2001 Parliament attack to the 2008 Mumbai carnage. India, in response, has adopted a doctrine of surgical strikes and air raids — such as the 2016 Uri operation and 2019 Balakot strike. But each move remains calculated, always weighed against the risk of nuclear escalation. It's this cautious dance that Sarma pointed to when he referred to Pakistan's 'nuclear blackmail.' In his words, India's 'tragic inaction during the 1980s remains a cautionary tale of what could have been — and what wasn't.' Israel's fears didn't start in 1998 Pakistan's nuclear ambitions had long worried Israel. In May 1979, Menachem Begin wrote to Margaret Thatcher, raising the alarm about Zia-ul-Haq's nuclear drive and Pakistan's deep ties with Libya. Begin warned: 'What could happen in the Middle East, and particularly to the men, women and children in Israel should the lethal weapons of mass killing and destruction fall at any time into the hands of an absolute ruler like Colonel Qaddafi.' By 1998, Israeli officials even issued private reassurances to Pakistani diplomats after Islamabad raised fears of a pre-emptive Israeli strike. Israel, under Benjamin Netanyahu, denied any such plan existed. India had a narrow window in the early 1980s to act decisively. It chose restraint. Whether that was prudence or a missed opportunity continues to divide opinion. What remains, however, is a precedent. In 1988, India and Pakistan found a way to at least protect each other's nuclear sites, a rare diplomatic success. But nuclear weapons, once introduced, have changed the logic of war in South Asia. And decades later, that ghost of Kahuta — the raid that never was — still haunts India's strategic thinking.
