Uranus Is Warmer Then We Thought, NASA Says
Most planets generate their own heat, so they emit more energy than they receive from the sun. That's the case with Jupiter, Saturn and Neptune. It's thought that the heat is leftover from the planet's formation. However, data from Uranus — which is restricted to the one time NASA visited the planet 39 years ago — suggested that Uranus had no internal heat. That confused planetary scientists because it suggested Uranus was much older than the other planets.
'Since Voyager 2's flyby, everybody has said Uranus has no internal heat,' said Amy Simon, a planetary scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. 'But it's been really hard to explain why that is, especially when compared with the other giant planets.'
Uranus: New Observations
New observations of reflected light from Uranus by Lowell Observatory and the Hubble Space Telescope, published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society journal by scientists at NASA and Oxford University, suggest otherwise.
Creating a computer model of the planet's atmosphere from decades of observations from ground- and space-based telescopes — from hazes and clouds to seasonal changes — the scientists figured out that Uranus actually reflects back 15% more energy than it receives from the sun. That's much less than most planets, but warmer than long believed and indicating that it does have an internal heat source.
Mission To Uranus
Humanity's only glimpse of Uranus was in 1986 when NASA's Voyager 2 spacecraft photographed it during its Grand Tour of the planets. A lot of its moons were imaged, too, but only some of their surface were in its view.
The Uranus Orbiter and Probe (UOP) is a concept for a mission to tour the Uranus system — including the ice giant itself and its moons — though the chances of it launching in time now seem slim. The need for a slingshot from Jupiter means that launch opportunities exist in the early 2030s for a journey to take 12-13 years. That window opens every 12 years or so when Jupiter returns to roughly the same position in the solar system.
What Color Is Uranus?
The news about the temperature of Uranus comes in the wake of another basic characteristic of the planet being reassessed. A study last year concluded that the belief that Uranus is pale cyan and Neptune is a deep azure blue is wrong. The study stated that the planets are actually a similar shade of greenish blue, and that the error was down to inaccurate color in NASA's Voyager 2's camera, which captured Uranus and Neptune in 1986 and 1989, respectively.
Moons Of Uranus
There are 27 moons around Uranus, four of which — Umbriel, Titania, Oberon and Ariel — are geologically active, and possibly ocean worlds. It's one reason NASA needs to send a mission. Observations last year by the James Webb Space Telescope indicate that Ariel may have an underground liquid ocean. Its surface was found to contain carbon dioxide ice, mostly on the side of the moon that faces away from the direction it orbits, which may be coming from a liquid ocean beneath the surface.
Wishing you clear skies and wide eyes.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A cosmic murder mystery: Scientists spot supernova of star violently stripped to the bone
Israeli and American scientists have uncovered a never-before-seen type of supernova, shedding light on how stars produce and expel heavy elements like silicon and sulfur during their violent deaths. Israeli and American scientists discovered a never-before-seen type of supernova, one that blasts out heavy elements like silicon and sulfur from the body of a dying star, a new study reveals. The findings of this study were published in the peer-reviewed academic journal Nature, and provide evidence for a long theorized part of stellar anatomy. All of this was made possible by witnessing an extremely violent and unusual death of a star, the result of which allowed scientists to look deeper than ever before. Of violence and onions: The death of a star and supernovae To understand what exactly happened, it's important to understand what a supernova is and, before that, to understand what a star is. Stars are, at their core, massive and extremely hot balls of gas, specifically hydrogen and helium. These two elements are very common - in fact, they are so common that they make up almost all matter in the universe. So where does everything else come from? To oversimplify complex astrophysics and chemistry, when these hydrogen and helium come together, they can heat up and new elements can be formed - if the circumstances are right. Stars are where this happens. These giant balls of gas possess cores that are a lot more solid, specifically made of iron. The cores are active and are fueled by a process of energy production, which sees the lighter elements to form heavier ones. This is known by nuclear fusion, and it is this process that keeps the star hot, allowing gases to expand while simultaneously drawing its mass toward the core in a delicate gravitational balance. So that's how some of the heavier elements are made, but others still need more heat - hotter than what a star's core can usually handle. What's more, all those heavier elements are still stuck in the stars. How do they get out and expand into the universe, forming planets and asteroids and more? The answer is that the star has to die. When the star can no longer produce energy, it collapses in on itself. When this happens, it results in a massive explosion, one of the most powerful forces of energy in the universe - a supernova. This fuses some of those heavy elements together to make even heavier ones, and all of them get blasted out into the cosmos. This process is essential to the function of the universe, allowing everything to keep expanding and ultimately sending forth the building blocks of the universe's continued expansion. In other words, everything in the universe is made of stardust, and supernovas are what send that stardust out there to accumulate and make new things. The remnants of that progenitor star are still there, condensing together to form a neutron star or a black hole, or maybe even a diffuse nebula of sorts. So that's what scientists have already known. But there is more to this story. See, stars are a lot like onions and - they have layers. The heavier elements occupy the inner layers, getting heavier and heavier as they get closer to the iron core. The massive outer layers are where those lighter elements, like hydrogen and helium, are. But this was only a theory. Studying a supernova can be hard, as while the stars that go supernova are always 10-100 times heavier than the Sun, the explosion happens in a fraction of a second. Even still, it's possible to observe the bright light from the supernova for some time - even weeks can go by without the light fading. But until now, scientists have only ever seen the traces of light elements like hydrogen and helium, rather than anything heavier. But all of that changed with this study The now deceased star in question is SN2021yfj, a massive star far heavier than our Sun. In September 2021, the flare from its supernova was spotted by Dr. Steve Schulze, a former member of Weizmann Institute of Science's astrophysics team and now a researcher at Northwestern University. Using the Zwicky Transient Facility telescope in California, Schulze and his team did a spectral analysis. What this means is that they looked at the different colors of the flare's light. Each color represents a different element, and by observing which colors are present in its spectrum, scientists can figure out what elements are present. In other words, this is how you can use light and colors to figure out what things are made of. This isn't exactly easy, though, as intrusive obstacles can get in the way of a spectral analysis. In Schulze's case, those obstacles came in the form of clouds, stopping researchers from getting a clear enough image. But someone at the University of California, Berkeley, managed to get it. And the results were shocking. Normally, when studying a supernova, one expects to see the usual suspects of light and abundant elements, like helium, carbon, oxygen, and so on. But that's not what they found. Instead, the light fired out by SN2021yfj with its dying breaths consisted largely of sulfur, silicon, and argon. That's not supposed to happen. So how could the supernova just not have the lighter elements, and instead have the far heavier ones? A cosmic murder mystery: How a star was stripped to its core before death by explosion The conclusion Schulze came to was that something went wrong. Massive stars like SN2021yfj are, as mentioned previously, like onions - they have layers. And some of those layers have been peeled off. This itself isn't unheard of. Stripped stars, as they are known, have been seen before. But those usually have layers made of helium, carbon, or oxygen - exposed when the outermost hydrogen layers were lost somehow. But SN2021yfj must have had even those layers stripped away. That's not like just peeling a few layers off an onion. Rather, it's more like stripping it to the bone - and that's the part that's unheard of. 'This star lost most of the material that it produced throughout its lifetime,' Schulze said in a statement. 'So we could only see the material formed during the months right before its explosion. Something very violent must have happened to cause that.' This is not a thing that should happen. As noted by Weizmann's Dr. Ofer Yaron, a leading expert on supernovae, this level of deep exposure is a major challenge to prevailing theories on how these layers fall away. Something happened that caused this star to die like this. But what? Several theories were put forward. A companion star could have theoretically exerted force that caused the layers to be stripped away. Another explosion or strong stellar winds could have been the culprit. But the main suspect is actually SN2021yfj itself. The star's core likely produced so much heat that the nuclear fusion caused an incredibly powerful burst of energy. This then may have caused the star's layers to be blown apart, sending the outer layers away. This, essentially, means that SN2021yfj ripped itself apart. But this may have happened before. In fact, the shed layers may have collided into one another, or into another layer that had been blown out a previous time, and that resulted in another explosion. But how much does this factor into the death of SN2021yfj? That, currently, is still a mystery. But what is sure is that no one has ever had the chance to look at stellar anatomy this closely, going deeper than anyone has gone before. 'It's always surprising – and deeply satisfying – to discover a completely new kind of physical phenomenon,' said Prof. Avishay Gal-Yam, whose research group in Weizmann's Particle Physics and Astrophysics Department focuses on understanding how the elements are formed in the universe. 'As soon as I saw the data Dr. Schulze sent me, it was obvious we were witnessing something no one had ever seen before. 'Once we identified the spectral signatures of silicon, sulfur, and argon, it was clear this was a major step forward: Peering into the depths of a giant star helps us understand where the heavy elements come from. Every atom in our bodies and in the world around us was created somewhere in the universe and went through countless transformations over billions of years before arriving at its current place, so tracing its origin and the process that created it is incredibly difficult. Now it appears that the inner layers of giant stars are production sites for some of these important, relatively heavy elements.'
Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
How We Mapped Nightmare Commutes on NJ Transit
Today we're bringing you a special edition of MapLab from Aaron Gordon, our colleague on the data team. Last summer I wrote about a stalled New Jersey Transit commuter train that trapped passengers inside a tunnel for three hours during a heat wave with no air conditioning. The overwhelming reader reaction in my inbox was that I had failed to capture the full extent to which service disruptions on the aging system infuriate riders.
UPI
27 minutes ago
- UPI
NASA employs AI to better predict solar activity
Aug. 20 (UPI) -- NASA announced Wednesday that it is deciphering the sun's behavior with help from artificial intelligence. In a press release, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration said that, in conjunction with IBM among other partners, it has developed an AI model dubbed the Surya Heliophysics Foundational Model, which has been trained on nine years' worth of data from NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory. Surya is Sanskrit for "sun." "We are advancing data-driven science by embedding NASA's deep scientific expertise into cutting-edge AI models," said NASA Chief Science Data Officer Kevin Murphy in the release. "By developing a foundation model trained on NASA's heliophysics data, we're making it easier to analyze the complexities of the sun's behavior with unprecedented speed and precision." "This model empowers broader understanding of how solar activity impacts critical systems and technologies that we all rely on here on Earth," he added. Using solar data, Surya can analyze solar flares and make predictions regarding how space weather might impact technology such as communication systems and satellites, as well as power grids. Surya can also forecast how UV from the sun affects the Earth's upper atmosphere and determine solar wind speed. "Our society is built on technologies that are highly susceptible to space weather," said NASA's Heliophysics Division Director Joseph Westlake in the release. "Just as we use meteorology to forecast Earth's weather, space weather forecasts predict the conditions and events in the space environment that can affect Earth and our technologies." "We want to give Earth the longest lead time possible," said solar physicist Andrés Muñoz-Jaramillo Wednesday in a press release from IBM. "Our hope is that the model has learned all the critical processes behind our star's evolution through time so that we can extract actionable insights." NASA also reports that while Surya is designed for Sun study, it can be adapted to engage several types of scientific explorations, including observing the Earth and conducting planetary science. Additionally, both the model and training datasets from Surya are available to try out online at Hugging Face, GitHub and in IBM's TerraTorch library for fine-tuning geospatial AI models. A benchmark dataset called "SuryaBench" has also been open sourced to the public. "We've been on this journey of pushing the limits of technology with NASA since 2023, delivering pioneering foundational AI models to gain an unprecedented understanding of our planet Earth," said Juan Bernabé-Moreno, the IBM director in charge of the scientific collaboration with NASA. "With Surya we have created the first foundation model to look the sun in the eye and forecast its moods."
