Transcript: Sen. Rand Paul on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," March 23, 2025
The following is the transcript of an interview with Sen. Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on March 23, 2025.
MARGARET BRENNAN: And we turn now to Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul. He is the chair of the Homeland Security Committee, and he joins us this morning from Bowling Green, Kentucky. Good morning to you, Senator.
SEN. RAND PAUL: Good morning. Thanks for having me.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Sure, because of your role in Homeland Security, I want to follow up where we left off with National Security Adviser Waltz. There are legal questions around using these authorities to send out detainees without giving them a day in court. But there's also just questions of how it's being handled in regard to these individuals who were rejected by El Salvador, one for gender, one because they weren't Venezuelan at all. Do these concern- does any of this concern you? Along with claims from their family members that many of these people weren't gang members?
SEN. PAUL: There are some big legal questions here. On the one hand, the Bill of Rights applies to everyone, to persons. The Bill of Rights doesn't specifically designate citizens. It's really anyone in the United States the Bill of Rights applies to. On the other hand, the Alien and Enemies Act simply says, you really don't get much process. The president can simply declare that you are somehow a problem for foreign policy and opposed to our foreign policy, and you can be deported. So really, ultimately, this goes to the court, and then the court is going to have to decide, are they going to declare unconstitutional a law that's been around for a couple hundred years, or are they going to defer to Congress? If you look at the TikTok decision recently, which I don't agree with, but in the TikTok decision, the court basically said we're going to defer to Congress. Congress says this is about national security, and who are we to question Congress--
MARGARET BRENNAN: --Right and then the president issued executive order that defied the- what Congress did--
SEN. PAUL: Right, right. But my- my point is- is I think the court should have ruled on the First Amendment with regard to TikTok and not said, oh, well, whatever Congress wants. But if you look at the TikTok decision, and you had to guess what the Supreme Court is going to do, my guess is they'll uphold the Alien and Enemies Act. It's not necessarily my position, but I think the court will uphold it. So it's at least debatable on both sides, who's right or who's wrong here. And I think it's not correct for Democrats to simply say, oh, it's constitutional chaos. There's no leg to stand on. There actually is legal authority. On the one hand, it's been around for over 200 years.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But, but just- we're not talking about partisan politics. We're talking about the courts right now. And what the judge said he had questions about and talks about this being done, you know, essentially in the cover of night, this seems to be an argument the administration wants to have go to the Supreme Court. Are you comfortable with bypassing what you described as, you know, what's guaranteed in the Bill of Rights, a day in court, or at least some verification that some of these people actually are guilty in some way of what they're accused of, which is membership in a gang?
SEN. PAUL: So we have a contradiction. We basically have the Constitution that says everyone, persons in the United States have due process rights, have the Bill of Rights on their side, but we also have law that has been in power for 200 years saying, oh, well, except for when the president wants to deport people. So these are in conflict. There will have to be some decision making. On the question of whether or not a district judge can make a ruling for the whole country, that's also a very big question, and I suspect, as this works its way up to the Supreme Court, when you get to the Supreme Court, I do believe the Supreme Court is going to limit district judges from having nationwide rulings. So I think that's also in the offing. But these are huge legal questions, and the only way they begin is by a challenge.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah
SEN. PAUL: If the president doesn't challenge these, they never have standing and never get to court. So on the one hand, the president is generating this, but it's the only way to generate a final conclusion from the court.
MARGARET BRENNAN: It just sound- I mean- these are debates for law professors, certainly, but in the meantime, there are individuals who may have been sent wrongly to these facilities that are outside the U.S. jurisdiction. Are you comfortable as the man with oversight, as chair of the committee, with what's being done?
SEN. PAUL: I think the courts will rule that there has to be some process. I don't think you are going to be able to deport people--
MARGARET BRENNAN: So, yes, you are comfortable with it?
SEN. PAUL: So no, I- well, I think you're answering for me. I think there is going to be some process afforded by the courts for representation before you're deported in most cases. I don't know about the ones under the Alien and Enemies Act, and I'm not sure anybody knows that. And while I love constitutional law, I'm not a constitutional lawyer.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Yeah.
SEN. PAUL: I do think it goes to the Supreme Court. And there are arguments to be made on both sides of this question.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Got it. I want to ask you about some congressional business. I've seen it reported that you have pitched to Elon Musk a plan to claw back $500 billion in federal funding that Congress has already approved. There was an effort back in 2018 to do something like this, and it failed. Do you think you can actually get this done in a rescission package, and how much money do you think you can get back?
SEN. PAUL: Well, this goes to another huge legal question. Can the president impound money, or does he have to send it back and we approve the cuts through rescission, and this is going all the way to the Supreme Court also, because I think the Trump administration believes they can just not spend it. There's another question within the question, can the president and his people, can Secretary Rubio pause the spending. On that issue I think they will win. You will be able to pause spending as long as you don't go through the end of an appropriations year. If you get through that, I believe it's impoundment, and I think the court so far has said it has to come back, and less as the Trump administration argues that the empowerment Act is unconstitutional. So this was headed to the Supreme Court also. It is my personal belief we should adhere to the law as it is now, and that is, send it back and have Congress confirm it. It's a simple majority vote. It's called rescission. I did mention this to Elon Musk. He seemed enthusiastic. It can be done. No Democrats- you have to realize, no Democrats will cut one penny from any spending anywhere. But can we get all the Republicans, is the real question.
MARGARET BRENNAN: You can get 51 Republicans, you think, to get on board with this?
SEN. PAUL: Well, I think the president's gonna- the president is going to have to use effectively his bully pulpit and his popularity to convince all Republicans to do it. It's not a given that Republicans will stand, will will vote for this. We tried it once in the first administration it was only--
MARGARET BRENNAN: --Right, I remember--
SEN. PAUL: --15 billion, and we we lost. We lost two Republicans. But my suggestion to the Trump-, my suggestion to the Trump administration is come to the Republicans who you suspect might have misgivings and convince them, in advance, don't put it in their lap. Bring them 500 billion. If they say this, 10 billion, I can't deal with, I can deal with the 490, you're gonna have to pre negotiate the rescissions package. But I think you could get there.
MARGARET BRENNAN: I want to ask you about the Department of Education. States, as everyone I think knows, provide the majority of the funding and oversight for your local schools. But Kentucky, when we looked at the numbers, gets the fourth most federal education funding per student of any state in this country. You have over 900 schools that have these Title One programs, which are low income schools who need that federal subsidy to continue to operate. How are schools going to get that money if the president closes the Education Department?
SEN. PAUL: I think the bigger question, if we're sending all this money to Kentucky and all the other states, why are our scores abysmal? Why do two thirds of the kids not read at proficiency? Why do two thirds of the kids or more not have math proficiency? So it's an utter failure–
MARGARET BRENNAN: Isn't that up to the state?
SEN. PAUL: What I'd like to- let me finish, I'd leave it back to the States. It has always been a position, a very mainstream Republican position, to have control of the schools by the states, send the money back to the states, or better yet never take it from the States. About half of our budget in Kentucky goes to education, and that's the same in a lot of states. I think we can handle it much better. When I talk to teachers, they chafe at the national mandates on testing they think are not appropriate for their kids. They think they waste too much time teaching-
MARGARET BRENNAN: --Right--
SEN. PAUL: --teaching to national testing. The teachers would like more autonomy, and I think the teachers deserve more autonomy.
MARGARET BRENNAN: But when we look at the budget in Kentucky, the state receives 2 billion in federal education funding. Do you have a guarantee that the federal government, federal taxpayers will still provide 2 billion in education funding? That seems important to your state.
SEN. PAUL: I'd rather well, no, what I'd rather is a guarantee that my kids can read and write and do math. The amount of dollars, look, the number of dollars has gone up exponentially, and our scores have gone the other way. So dollars are not proportional to educational success. What I want is success, and I've talked a lot about this, I think there are innovations we can do where there's more learning via some of the best teachers, and we pay them more. I would like to have an NBA or NFL of teachers, the most extraordinary teachers teach the entire country if not the entire world--
MARGARET BRENNAN: --Who would run that? The education department?--
SEN. PAUL: --And some of them- no what you'd find is they'd be selected out state by state across the nation. Look, people say, oh, without the department education, we'd have no testing. I was- I was in school before then, we did achievement tests in the sixth grade, the fifth grade, the eighth grade, and we compared ourselves across state lines. There were international testing.
MARGARET BRENNAN: --Yeah--
SEN. PAUL: --You don't need the Department of Education for any of that. But what I can tell you is--
MARGARET BRENNAN: --Okay--
SEN. PAUL: --the best teacher in the world is not teaching the kids. What we need to do is have the best teachers and pay them more, but they wouldn't teach 30 kids. They might teach 10 million kids at a time, because it would be presented to the internet with local teachers reinforcing the lessons.
MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, I'm sure we'll be talking more about this. Senator Paul, thank you for your time today. We'll be right back.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
25 minutes ago
- Politico
Sherrill gets Scutari to back off Cabinet power play
Good Wednesday morning! Democratic gubernatorial nominee Mikie Sherrill phoned Senate President Nick Scutari late last week after she learned of his proposal to limit the amount of time Cabinet members can serve without confirmation. Sherrill, perhaps not shockingly, didn't like the idea of giving the Senate more leverage over the executive branch. But Scutari didn't put up a fight. He agreed to put then never-formally introduced proposal aside — at least for now. Still, we don't know who the next governor is going to be. And if it's Republican Jack Ciattarelli, I can't help but wonder whether Scutari will take this idea back off the shelf. In other moves related to the balance of power, a bipartisan group of senators wants to make the State Police its own department for the first time since 1948, moving it out of the Attorney General's purview. More on that below. FEEDBACK? Reach me at mfriedman@ WHERE'S MURPHY — No public schedule QUOTE OF THE DAY: 'Don't try to get me killed out here. I mean, that's what killed those people in Minnesota.' — Senate President Nicholas Scutari on a stalled package of abortion rights bills HAPPY BIRTHDAY — Leonard Lance, Henry Klingeman WHAT TRENTON MADE BAD BOYS BAD BOYS, WHATCHA GONNA DO WHEN THEY MAKE A DEPARTMENT FOR YOU — Lawmakers seek to make State Police its own department, by POLITICO's Matt Friedman: Amid tensions between New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin and the state Legislature, a bipartisan group of senators is seeking to move the State Police out of the attorney general's authority. The new legislation would make the New Jersey State Police its own department for the first time in 76 years, removing it from within the Department of Law and Public Safety, which is led by the attorney general. 'I don't think a politically-appointed lawyer who does not know anything about policing should be the person responsible for the State Police to report to,' said state Sen. James Beach, a Democrat from Camden County who's the bill's prime sponsor. A spokesperson for the Attorney General's Office declined to comment. While the bill comes during a period of tension between Platkin and the Legislature — as well as between Platkin and the State Police — it likely won't take effect until the end of his tenure at the earliest if it passes, since New Jerseyans will elect a new governor in November. Beach and state Sen. Mike Testa, a Republican, are the two prime sponsors of the bill, NJ S4613 (24R). Democratic Sen. Linda Greenstein — chair of the Law and Public Safety Committee — and Republican Sen. Bob Singer are co-sponsors. VICE AND CONSENT — 'State will lessen tax hikes on internet and sports betting to 19.75% instead of 25% Murphy wanted,' by The Press of Atlantic City's Wayne Parry: 'New Jersey will raise taxes on internet gambling and online sports betting, but not by as much as Gov. Phil Murphy had proposed. In a deal reached Monday night, lawmakers agreed to raise the tax rate on both forms of gambling to 19.75%, down from the 25% Murphy sought in his budget proposal in February. Online sports betting is currently taxed at 13%, and internet gambling is taxed at 15%. The deal was confirmed by five lawmakers and industry officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they say they were not authorized to discuss budget negotiations publicly. … Pennsylvania taxes online sports betting at 36% and online slot machines at 54%. New York taxes online sports betting at 51%. Last year, online sports betting in New Jersey brought in $138.3 million in tax revenue, and internet gambling generated $358.3 million in taxes.' —'New Jersey lawmakers eye hiking nicotine taxes to boost revenue' ROEING AGAINST THE CURRENT — 'Sherrill Goes after Ciattarelli on the Anniversary of the Overturning of Roe v. Wade,' by InsiderNJ's Fred Snowflack: 'Elections are not the same. Candidates are different, as are the offices sought. Still, some wondered if abortion rights as a motivator to drive Democratic turnout had waned. That's a very relevant issue in light of the New Jersey governor's race. That became clear Tuesday when Mikie Sherrill held a zoom call with the press to announce her endorsement by the Planned Parenthood Action Fund of New Jersey. It was noted that when it comes to abortion, women growing up today have fewer rights than the grandmothers. She was asked if the abortion issue still resonates widely. 'I think this still is a really key issue,' she said. New Jersey has moved to protect abortion right legislatively, but has not yet done so through a constitutional amendment, which Sherrill supports.' —'Concerns about student health as transgender policy clashes continue' — 'Beloved N.J. environmental school will shut down if 'tragic' budget cut is approved' TRUMP ERA MCCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE — McIver heads to court as watchdog group files complaint against Alina Habba: by POLITICO's Ry Rivard: Rep. LaMonica McIver (D-N.J.) is expected to appear in federal court for the first time Wednesday morning on a trio of charges following a May scuffle outside a federal immigration facility. At her arraignment in Newark, McIver will plead not guilty, spokesperson Hanna Rumsey said. McIver is accused in a three-count indictment of slamming a federal agent with her forearm and 'forcibly' grabbing him and using her forearms to strike another agent. Allegations of physical violence by a sitting member of Congress are rare, with a handful of incidents including the pre-Civil War caning of a senator by a member of the House. … Her allies are also trying to turn the tables on the federal prosecutor bringing the case, the interim U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, Alina Habba. The Campaign for Accountability, a liberal watchdog group, filed a complaint this week against Habba with the New Jersey Office of Attorney Ethics. The complaint alleges Habba has acted improperly since becoming a prosecutor and cites her actions in the McIver case, along with comments about turning 'New Jersey red' and announcing investigations into its Democratic governor and attorney general over immigration. BOVE, B___H, GET OUT THE WAY — U.S. Sen. Andy Kim wants to testify against the nomination of controversial Trump administration lawyer Emil Bove to a New Jersey Third Circuit judgeship before the Judiciary Committee today, but he doesn't expect he'll be allowed to. In a letter this morning, the freshman Democrat said Bove 'has demonstrated that he lacks the independence to objectively decide the cases before him, the temperament to serve on the bench, and the moral compass to comply with professional ethics obligations. 'During his short time with the Justice Department, Mr. Bove earned the reputation of being the President's enforcer by pressuring the office in the Southern District of New York to drop its prosecution of New York City Mayor Eric Adams, hunting investigators and prosecutors assigned to investigate the January 6 insurrection, and working to gut Department of Justice's numerous divisions, including the historic Civil Rights Division and the Public Integrity Section,' Kim wrote. 'I believe that Mr. Bove sees his role more as the President's defense lawyer rather than an independent counsel at the Department of Justice working on toward just outcomes for the American people. In fact, just this week, a Department whistleblower stated that Mr. Bove ordered subordinates to ignore court orders as the Administration pursued its heartless removal policy of immigrants across the country. I hope this Committee and my colleagues outside its jurisdiction carefully follow developments related to this astonishing accusation because it alone should be enough to disqualify any nominee seeking a seat on any court, let alone a circuit court.' FREEDOM OF SPEECH — 'Norwegian tourist, 21, is barred from entering the US after ICE guards find meme showing JD Vance with a bald head on his phone,' by The Daily Mail's Olivia Allhusen: 'A Norwegian tourist claims he was harassed and refused entry to the US after immigration officers found a meme of JD Vance on his phone. Mads Mikkelsen, 21, arrived at New Jersey's Newark Airport on June 11, excited about his holiday. But, his plans were thrown into disarray when he was reportedly pulled aside by border control and put in a cell. The tourist was then subjected to what he described to Norwegian outlet Nordlys as an 'abuse, of power and harassment.' 'They asked questions about drug trafficking, terrorist plots and right-wing extremism totally without reason,' he told the outlet. Mr. Mikkelsen, claimed the officers then threatened him with a $5,000 fine or five years in prison if he refused to give the password to his mobile phone. The guards reportedly found a meme on the device's camera roll showing US vice president JD Vance with a bald, egg-shaped head. Mikkelsen said after discovering the image the authorities sent him home to Norway the same day.' —'NJ's emergency medical services task force in funding crisis' —'Dem attorneys general vow to continue challenging Trump's 'outrageous overreach'' LOCAL EAST NEW JERSEY — Zohran Mamdani topples Andrew Cuomo in NYC mayoral race, by POLITICO's Jeff Coltin: — Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old democratic socialist lawmaker, is on pace to win the Democratic primary for New York City mayor — a seismic shift in what normally would have been a sleepy reelection for the incumbent, Eric Adams, and one that involved toppling Andrew Cuomo's political comeback. Cuomo conceded defeat late Tuesday night and said he called to congratulate Mamdani. 'Tonight was not our night' Cuomo said at the headquarters of the New York City carpenters union. 'I'm very proud of the campaign that we ran.' Mamdani won 43.5 percent of first-place votes to Cuomo's 36.3 percent, according to the New York City Board of Elections. But that outcome is not final. The board is expected to announce full results on July 1 in an election that utilized ranked-choice voting, which allows New Yorkers to pick up to five candidates in order of preference. JERSEY CITY — 'Child's death prompts rally for better traffic safety measures in N.J. city,' by NJ Advance Media's Larry Higgs: 'Jersey City safety and parent groups plan to rally at city hall at 5 p.m. Wednesday to demand more safety improvements and traffic enforcement after a tragic accident claimed the life of a 6-year-old boy on June 13. The groups are pressing city officials for more enforcement and an increase in safety infrastructure to protect pedestrians. 'Jersey City has made a lot of progress on Vision Zero, but it is not enough, and we need faster action to prevent more tragedies now,' said Jimmy Lee, a founder of Safe Streets Jersey City. 'We need to double-down and accelerate on what's been working.'' YOUR EMINENCE DOMAIN — 'Church vs. State battle erupts over 'deeply troubling' parish property fight,' by NJ Advance Media's Ricahrd Cowen: 'A legal battle is brewing between Queen of Peace Church parish and the North Arlington Board of Education, which is threatening to use eminent domain to acquire the church's La Salle Center for prekindergarten classrooms. Negotiations between the parish, the board of education and the Roman Catholic Diocese of Newark over a long-term lease of the La Salle Center recently broke down in May. Now both sides are gearing up for a potential legal battle between church and state. North Arlington school superintendent Stephen M. Yurchak said the board of education 'has begun the preliminary legal steps required under New Jersey law to explore eminent domain proceedings' to acquire the property, located next door to Queen of Peace Roman Catholic Church on Ridge Road.' DUCK THE POLICE COMIN' STRAIGHT FROM THE POND — 'Lacey Township police rescue 9 ducklings trapped in storm drain,' by The Press of Atlantic City's John O'Connor: 'Police rescued nine ducklings that fell into a storm drain Monday morning. Officers responded to an area near Lacey Mall for a report of several ducklings in distress and they discovered they were trapped, police said in a Facebook post. The ducklings were rescued and returned to their mother, who was waiting nearby, police said.' GROSS MEN — 'Attorneys debate separate Bergen trials for ex-councilman, son charged with child porn,' by The Record's Kaitlyn Kanzler: 'A former Tenafly councilman and his son appeared in court on June 16 to discuss potentially separating their cases on charges of possessing child pornography. The defense attorneys appeared before Superior Court Judge Nina Remson to file a severance motion, which would separate the trials of Jeffrey Grossman, the father, and Steven Grossman. The pair were arrested in October 2023 on child pornography possession charges. Jeffrey Grossman resigned from the Tenafly Borough Council and withdrew from the November election that year.' —'[Manville] sued over rezoning of former shopping center, Superfund site' —'Ex-treasurer stole $32,000 from [Absecon] school's PTO, cops say' —'It's nearly 100 degrees. Some N.J. schools are holding outdoor graduations anyway' —'6 men sue Atlantic County alleging sexual abuse at Harborfields juvenile facility' —'Newark Public Schools adopts AI literacy screener as part of state plan to boost reading skills' —'After three-vote loss, Roselle candidate seeks recount' —'Toms River considers plan for first Orthodox Jewish high school' R.I.P. — 'Former Middle Township Mayor Dan Lockwood dies at 57' EVERYTHING ELSE LITERALLY UNFAIR — 'Meadowlands State Fair won't return until 2027. Here's why,' by The Record's Lucas Frau: 'The Meadowlands State Fair will not come to MetLife Stadium this year or next summer, with the venue hosting the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup and the 2026 FIFA World Cup. The fair announced on its website that the two-year hiatus comes at the request of MetLife Stadium to accommodate the numerous soccer games that will be played there over the next two summers. The rides and other activities will return to MetLife Stadium in 2027, the Meadowlands State Fair announcement said.' AN EVESHAME — 'Essential Pinelands waters under renewed development threat,' by Jeff Pillets for NJ Spotlight News: 'The headwaters of the Black Run Creek in Evesham Township are among the most pristine reaches of New Jersey's 938,000-acre Pinelands National Reserve. … For more than 1 million people in Burlington County and areas downstream, ecologists say, the Black Run is an essential component of clean drinking water. … Developers are now looking to bulldoze some 800 acres of privately owned land in the Black Run headwaters and build up to 270 new homes. Opponents of the plan, who've collected more than 5,000 signatures against it, say the threat to the Black Run headwaters is proof that long-awaited reforms to better protect Pinelands water can't come fast enough. … 'The good news is that new rules to limit this kind of intrusion are at hand,' [Pinelands Preservation Alliance Executive Director Jaclyn] Rhoads said, in an interview with NJ Spotlight News last week. 'The bad news is that it's taken way too long. Pressure on the aquifer from drought, from brush fires, from overdevelopment is only getting worse.' TESLA CRASH — 'Tesla sued over Model S crash that killed three in New Jersey,' by Reuters' Jonathan Stempel: 'Tesla was sued on Monday by the estates of three people killed last September when their 2024 Model S equipped with Autopilot and Full Self-Driving features crashed on New Jersey's Garden State Parkway. The wrongful death lawsuit filed in the federal court in Camden, New Jersey, attributed the deaths of David Dryerman, 54; his wife Michele, 54; and their daughter Brooke, 17, to the car's 'defective and unreasonably dangerous design.' … The complaint said the car's defective design caused it to stray from its lane of travel and fail to apply emergency braking, resulting in the crash. It also said Tesla failed to warn David Dryerman, who was driving, that his Model S was unsafe, citing Musk's statement in 2016 that Autopilot was 'probably better' than human drivers.' — 'In NJ, suicide rates double for middle-aged men. Why a 'friendship recession' is spreading' —'JCP&L reports more than 14,600 customers without electricity at Shore' —'High school seniors talk prom and that NJ rite of passage: going to the Shore' —'Jonas Brothers, Dana Bash, David Burke headline 2025 New Jersey Hall of Fame class'
Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
North Carolina proposal to ban inland shrimp trawling met with fierce pushback
A potential ban on inland shrimp trawling has become one of the most controversial bills moving through North Carolina's state legislature. Why it matters: The proposal, which would ban trawling less than a half-mile off the coast, heats up a long battle between the state's recreational and commercial fishermen. It also pits those opposed to the measure over environmental concerns against others who say a ban would devastate the state's shrimping industry and wipe out jobs. Several hotly debated proposals — including on tax cuts, immigration and gun permitting — have advanced in this year's legislative session, which began in January, but none have caused quite as much of a stir as the state Senate's shrimp trawling measure. Driving the news: The proposal has been met with fierce pushback from commercial fishermen, who catch shrimp in the state's estuaries and sounds. "There's been a war and they're trying to get rid of the commercial sector," Ryan Speckman, co-founder of Locals Seafood, tells Axios, noting the commercial fishing industry in North Carolina is quite small. The big picture: North Carolina is the only state on the eastern seaboard that has yet to ban inshore shrimp trawling, supporters of the legislation note. Proponents argue it's a long overdue change needed to protect natural habitats from "what has long been recognized as one of the most destructive fishing practices in coastal waters," per the North Carolina Wildlife Federation. Shrimp trawling requires dragging heavy nets and chains on the ocean floor, and some methods result in the unintended capture of other species, the federation said. Between the lines: Lawmakers who have supported the legislation faced death threats just days after a Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband were killed, while another Minnesota state Sen. John Hoffman and his wife were injured after they were shot inside their homes. The State Bureau of Investigation arrested a Brunswick County man Friday for threatening Republican Senate Rules Chairman Bill Rabon, per WECT. "All senators in Raleigh need to understand what happened to Melissa Hortman and John Hoffman in Minnesota can happen here in North Carolina," the man said in a Facebook post, the outlet reported. The latest: Amid outcry from the commercial fishing industry and pushback from Republicans and Democrats alike, the Senate advanced a separate bill Monday that would pay commercial fishermen affected by the bill, spending some $10 million to do so over the next five years, WRAL reports. Still, opponents of the legislation gathered in Raleigh Tuesday afternoon to protest the legislation with the backing of House lawmakers from both sides of the aisle. Two lawmakers who are among the most ideologically opposite in the state legislature, Republican Rep. Keith Kidwell, a far-right freedom caucus member, and Democratic Rep. Pricey Harrison, both spoke against the inshore trawling ban, according to WRAL. "Are we going to shut down the people who go to work every day, making an honest living, because some branch of the government finally decides in some slimy backroom deal that they don't want to do this anymore?" Kidwell said. Harrison said that if the legislature was concerned about the environment, it would be talking about water quality, coastal development, wetlands and more, according to WRAL.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Wednesday briefing: Poll on Iran strikes; New York's Zohran Mamdani; Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; Bezos wedding; and more
U.S. strikes set Iran's nuclear program back by a few months, an initial report said. There was a major upset in the New York City mayoral primary. Congress is moving toward passing Trump's massive tax and immigration bill. Florida is building an 'Alligator Alcatraz' for migrant detainees. More extreme heat is expected across the country today.
