
Oregon's landmark bottle redemption law may change due to concerns over drugs and homelessness
'It's just all completely changed,' she said. 'But the people are all still here, you know, all the residents are here still, and still raising their families.'
After more than five decades, Oregon's first-in-the-nation 'bottle bill' — now replicated in nine other states — faces a potential overhaul, with lawmakers considering new time restrictions on bottle redemption sites that some say have become magnets for drugs and homelessness.
The trailblazing law to reduce littering by incentivizing recycling helped cement the state's reputation as a leader in the emerging
environmental movement
. It has also become a financial security net for many, including those experiencing homelessness.
The legislation echoes calls to modernize the bottle bill, with some saying changes are needed to address unintended consequences.
'He did not envision this,' Truax said of former Oregon Gov. Tom McCall, who signed the bottle bill into law. 'It's just a mess.'
How does the bottle bill work?
Consumers originally paid a 5-cent deposit on each eligible bottle or can, then collected the deposit when they redeemed the empty container at a retailer, such as a supermarket or convenience store.
Over the years, the program has expanded accepted containers and increased the deposit
to 10 cents
. Twenty-seven centers exclusively for returns have been opened across the state.
California
,
Connecticut
, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts,
Michigan,
New York,
Vermont
and the U.S. territory of Guam followed Oregon in adopting the concept, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
In Oregon, people can sign up for accounts in which their refunds are deposited or choose cash redemptions. Some stores count containers by hand. Other sites have counting machines or areas where account holders can drop off bags of containers.
The deposit has not kept pace with inflation — 5 cents in 1971 would be equal to 40 cents today, according to the Consumer Price Index's inflation calculator — but many low-income residents rely on it.
Why are critics upset?
Stores must accept container returns when they are open, and owners of all-night convenience stores, particularly in Portland, say they're concerned about employee safety.
In an op-ed for
The Oregonian/OregonLive
last year, Jonathan Polonsky, president and CEO of the Plaid Pantry chain of convenience stores, wrote that fentanyl was selling for less than $1 a pill and 'a small number of cans add up to enough to buy drugs.'
People redeeming containers at night 'may be belligerent and intimidating, presenting a major safety risk to our store associates who have no choice under Oregon's Bottle Bill to handle returns at that hour,' he wrote.
Truax, who lives with her husband in northeast Portland, said homeless encampments and people relieving themselves in public were among the many things she had witnessed on her block.
'I've seen it all,' she said, describing the scourge of fentanyl as 'the cherry on the sundae.'
'It's just sad,' she added.
Environmentally friendly income source
At the bottle redemption center near Truax's home, Chris Grass waited with his father and girlfriend in the long line outside the door. They each redeemed the maximum amount of 350 containers per person per day for $105 in cash to help pay for gas and provide some extra money for things like cigarettes and coffee while he's unemployed, he said.
'A lot of people don't like people that go out and can,' he said. 'But it's actually good for the environment.'
In 2023, roughly 87% of eligible containers were returned for redemption, according to the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission. That was the highest rate in the nation that year, according to the Oregon Beverage Recycling Cooperative, which operates the bottle bill program on behalf of its distributor members.
What would the legislation do?
The bill being considered by lawmakers would allow stores across the state to refuse container returns after 8 p.m.
In Portland, it would allow for 'alternative' redemption sites, including possible mobile sites such as trucks that travel to different neighborhoods. Nonprofits would run the alternative sites for people who redeem containers every day, relieving the pressure on retailers, particularly downtown.
Stores in an area with an alternative drop site could limit or refuse hand-counted returns, with convenience stores specifically allowed to stop them at 6 p.m.
The proposal is supported by retailers as well as groups like the Ground Score Association, whose members include 'canners' and waste pickers who collect containers for income. The association operates a Portland redemption center under a bridge called The People's Depot that processes some 38,000 containers daily, according to its website.
It has pushed back against claims that the bottle bill fuels the fentanyl crisis and says most people redeeming bottles need the money to make ends meet.
'Since becoming manager of The People's Depot, I'm learning how polarizing The Oregon Bottle Bill is,' the depot's operational manager Kristofer Brown said in written testimony supporting the bill.
Do the proposed changes go far enough?
Unlike in some other states, Oregon's bottle bill program is run by the private beverage industry rather than state government. The Oregon Beverage Recycling Cooperative retains unredeemed deposits, which topped $30 million in 2019, according to a 2020 state audit of the bottle bill.
The audit recommended several changes, including having some or all unredeemed deposits go to the state to help fund environmental programs.
Consolidated Oregon Indivisible Network, a progressive advocacy group, said in written testimony supporting the bill that 'money is piling up in the bottle deposit fund' and called for another government audit.
The OBRC says unredeemed refunds go toward operating expenses for the beverage container redemption system.
The Legislature has until late June to approve the bill, which received overwhelming approval in the Senate and is now in the House.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Massive revisions shook the jobs report. Tuesday's inflation data could get cloudy, too
The next batch of inflation data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics was already shaping up to be a high-profile affair due to the expected impact of President Donald Trump's hefty tariffs. But after Trump fired the agency's top statistician, Tuesday's report now comes with some other, unexpected baggage. July's Consumer Price Index is set to be released at 8:30 a.m. ET on Tuesday, just 11 days after Trump's unprecedented firing of the head of the BLS, following a lackluster jobs report that contained substantial revisions to prior months of employment data. The president baselessly claimed that BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer 'rigged' the data (an allegation that Trump's former BLS head and a cadre of statisticians and economists resoundingly disputed). Moreover, the data that feeds into the CPI could make the closely watched inflation gauge subject to greater revisions, in part due to Trump administration's budget and staffing cuts. 'There's going to be a larger margin of error with an expectation of rolling revisions to the CPI data in a way that is somewhat similar to what we see in the jobs data and the durable goods data,' Joe Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM US, told CNN. The BLS, one of many federal agencies subject to the Department of Government Efficiency's blunt axe, has increasingly cut back on the data collection that feeds into the critical pricing gauge. Since April, the BLS stopped collecting data in three not-so-small metro areas (Buffalo, New York; Lincoln, Nebraska; and Provo, Utah) and further leaned on an imputation process used to estimate prices by means other than direct, local observations (such as making price comparisons on a regional or national basis instead). The BLS said in early June that the tri-city collection reductions (which amounted to roughly 3.6% of the CPI's overall sample) were expected to have 'minimal' impact on the overall index but increase the volatility of geographic- or item-specific price indexes. Two weeks ago, the agency shared a statistical analysis of those cutbacks using a 77-month study period. It showed that the annual inflation reading was one-tenth of a percentage point higher in 18% of those months and one-tenth of a percentage point lower in 14% of those months. In that same notice, however, BLS also disclosed that it made a 15% wholesale reduction in collections across the other 72 coverage areas. 'Collection suspension affects both the Commodity and Services Pricing survey and the Housing survey,' the BLS wrote. 'As a result, the number of collected prices and the number of collected rents used to calculate the CPI has temporarily been reduced.' The BLS did not share any statistical analysis of those wider cuts nor provide enough information for others to estimate that, Alan Detmeister, a UBS senior economist who previously helmed the Federal Reserve's Wages and Prices section, told CNN. 'The 15% of the remaining sample is four times larger than the number of observations dropped than those three cities,' he said. 'And if those three cities already made it round differently a third of the time. You're probably talking a tenth or so on overall inflation. Not huge, but it's something.' 'It's definitely degrading the quality of the inflation statistics,' he said. While the reductions in price observations and increase in imputations could make the CPI data — especially on a monthly basis — less sharp, it's not expected to cause similar large variations as seen in the survey-driven jobs report, which is reliant on an increasingly shrinking sample of respondents, RSM's Brusuelas said. 'It's going to bore us to sleep watching the back revisions in the CPI and [Personal Consumption Expenditures] data,' he said. The issues of greater importance involving the CPI data is what Tuesday's numbers say about the trajectory of inflation and any coinciding pushback from the Trump administration on any report that shows tariffs are driving prices higher, Brusuelas said. For any presidential administration, that's 'tantamount to engaging in self-harm, attempting to tell the public that prices aren't rising, when they can clearly feel it in their own bottom lines and reduced purchasing power of their paychecks,' he said. 'You saw what happened when the Biden administration tried to play down price increases as inflation growth was slowing. It did not resonate.' In June, CPI rose to 2.7%, its highest level in four months, as price increases — including those from tariffs — packed a bigger punch. July's CPI is expected to tell a similar tale: Tariffs are causing higher prices on a wider swath of goods while falling gas prices and tepid consumer demand is keeping a lid on some services prices. All in all, the index is expected to rise 0.2% for the month and tick up to 2.8% on an annual basis, according to FactSet consensus estimates. The July CPI will show 'further evidence of tariff-induced inflation eroding the purchasing power of consumer paychecks,' Brusuelas said. 'The thing to understand is this is not going to happen with a bang but more of a slow deterioration in purchasing power.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Massive revisions shook the jobs report. Tuesday's inflation data could get cloudy, too
The next batch of inflation data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics was already shaping up to be a high-profile affair due to the expected impact of President Donald Trump's hefty tariffs. But after Trump fired the agency's top statistician, Tuesday's report now comes with some other, unexpected baggage. July's Consumer Price Index is set to be released at 8:30 a.m. ET on Tuesday, just 11 days after Trump's unprecedented firing of the head of the BLS, following a lackluster jobs report that contained substantial revisions to prior months of employment data. The president baselessly claimed that BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer 'rigged' the data (an allegation that Trump's former BLS head and a cadre of statisticians and economists resoundingly disputed). Moreover, the data that feeds into the CPI could make the closely watched inflation gauge subject to greater revisions, in part due to Trump administration's budget and staffing cuts. 'There's going to be a larger margin of error with an expectation of rolling revisions to the CPI data in a way that is somewhat similar to what we see in the jobs data and the durable goods data,' Joe Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM US, told CNN. The BLS, one of many federal agencies subject to the Department of Government Efficiency's blunt axe, has increasingly cut back on the data collection that feeds into the critical pricing gauge. Since April, the BLS stopped collecting data in three not-so-small metro areas (Buffalo, New York; Lincoln, Nebraska; and Provo, Utah) and further leaned on an imputation process used to estimate prices by means other than direct, local observations (such as making price comparisons on a regional or national basis instead). The BLS said in early June that the tri-city collection reductions (which amounted to roughly 3.6% of the CPI's overall sample) were expected to have 'minimal' impact on the overall index but increase the volatility of geographic- or item-specific price indexes. Two weeks ago, the agency shared a statistical analysis of those cutbacks using a 77-month study period. It showed that the annual inflation reading was one-tenth of a percentage point higher in 18% of those months and one-tenth of a percentage point lower in 14% of those months. In that same notice, however, BLS also disclosed that it made a 15% wholesale reduction in collections across the other 72 coverage areas. 'Collection suspension affects both the Commodity and Services Pricing survey and the Housing survey,' the BLS wrote. 'As a result, the number of collected prices and the number of collected rents used to calculate the CPI has temporarily been reduced.' The BLS did not share any statistical analysis of those wider cuts nor provide enough information for others to estimate that, Alan Detmeister, a UBS senior economist who previously helmed the Federal Reserve's Wages and Prices section, told CNN. 'The 15% of the remaining sample is four times larger than the number of observations dropped than those three cities,' he said. 'And if those three cities already made it round differently a third of the time. You're probably talking a tenth or so on overall inflation. Not huge, but it's something.' 'It's definitely degrading the quality of the inflation statistics,' he said. While the reductions in price observations and increase in imputations could make the CPI data — especially on a monthly basis — less sharp, it's not expected to cause similar large variations as seen in the survey-driven jobs report, which is reliant on an increasingly shrinking sample of respondents, RSM's Brusuelas said. 'It's going to bore us to sleep watching the back revisions in the CPI and [Personal Consumption Expenditures] data,' he said. The issues of greater importance involving the CPI data is what Tuesday's numbers say about the trajectory of inflation and any coinciding pushback from the Trump administration on any report that shows tariffs are driving prices higher, Brusuelas said. For any presidential administration, that's 'tantamount to engaging in self-harm, attempting to tell the public that prices aren't rising, when they can clearly feel it in their own bottom lines and reduced purchasing power of their paychecks,' he said. 'You saw what happened when the Biden administration tried to play down price increases as inflation growth was slowing. It did not resonate.' In June, CPI rose to 2.7%, its highest level in four months, as price increases — including those from tariffs — packed a bigger punch. July's CPI is expected to tell a similar tale: Tariffs are causing higher prices on a wider swath of goods while falling gas prices and tepid consumer demand is keeping a lid on some services prices. All in all, the index is expected to rise 0.2% for the month and tick up to 2.8% on an annual basis, according to FactSet consensus estimates. The July CPI will show 'further evidence of tariff-induced inflation eroding the purchasing power of consumer paychecks,' Brusuelas said. 'The thing to understand is this is not going to happen with a bang but more of a slow deterioration in purchasing power.'


CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Massive revisions shook the jobs report. Tuesday's inflation data could get cloudy, too
The next batch of inflation data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics was already shaping up to be a high-profile affair due to the expected impact of President Donald Trump's hefty tariffs. But after Trump fired the agency's top statistician, Tuesday's report now comes with some other, unexpected baggage. July's Consumer Price Index is set to be released at 8:30 a.m. ET on Tuesday, just 11 days after Trump's unprecedented firing of the head of the BLS, following a lackluster jobs report that contained substantial revisions to prior months of employment data. The president baselessly claimed that BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer 'rigged' the data (an allegation that Trump's former BLS head and a cadre of statisticians and economists resoundingly disputed). Moreover, the data that feeds into the CPI could make the closely watched inflation gauge subject to greater revisions, in part due to Trump administration's budget and staffing cuts. 'There's going to be a larger margin of error with an expectation of rolling revisions to the CPI data in a way that is somewhat similar to what we see in the jobs data and the durable goods data,' Joe Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM US, told CNN. The BLS, one of many federal agencies subject to the Department of Government Efficiency's blunt axe, has increasingly cut back on the data collection that feeds into the critical pricing gauge. Since April, the BLS stopped collecting data in three not-so-small metro areas (Buffalo, New York; Lincoln, Nebraska; and Provo, Utah) and further leaned on an imputation process used to estimate prices by means other than direct, local observations (such as making price comparisons on a regional or national basis instead). The BLS said in early June that the tri-city collection reductions (which amounted to roughly 3.6% of the CPI's overall sample) were expected to have 'minimal' impact on the overall index but increase the volatility of geographic- or item-specific price indexes. Two weeks ago, the agency shared a statistical analysis of those cutbacks using a 77-month study period. It showed that the annual inflation reading was one-tenth of a percentage point higher in 18% of those months and one-tenth of a percentage point lower in 14% of those months. In that same notice, however, BLS also disclosed that it made a 15% wholesale reduction in collections across the other 72 coverage areas. 'Collection suspension affects both the Commodity and Services Pricing survey and the Housing survey,' the BLS wrote. 'As a result, the number of collected prices and the number of collected rents used to calculate the CPI has temporarily been reduced.' The BLS did not share any statistical analysis of those wider cuts nor provide enough information for others to estimate that, Alan Detmeister, a UBS senior economist who previously helmed the Federal Reserve's Wages and Prices section, told CNN. 'The 15% of the remaining sample is four times larger than the number of observations dropped than those three cities,' he said. 'And if those three cities already made it round differently a third of the time. You're probably talking a tenth or so on overall inflation. Not huge, but it's something.' 'It's definitely degrading the quality of the inflation statistics,' he said. While the reductions in price observations and increase in imputations could make the CPI data — especially on a monthly basis — less sharp, it's not expected to cause similar large variations as seen in the survey-driven jobs report, which is reliant on an increasingly shrinking sample of respondents, RSM's Brusuelas said. 'It's going to bore us to sleep watching the back revisions in the CPI and [Personal Consumption Expenditures] data,' he said. The issues of greater importance involving the CPI data is what Tuesday's numbers say about the trajectory of inflation and any coinciding pushback from the Trump administration on any report that shows tariffs are driving prices higher, Brusuelas said. For any presidential administration, that's 'tantamount to engaging in self-harm, attempting to tell the public that prices aren't rising, when they can clearly feel it in their own bottom lines and reduced purchasing power of their paychecks,' he said. 'You saw what happened when the Biden administration tried to play down price increases as inflation growth was slowing. It did not resonate.' In June, CPI rose to 2.7%, its highest level in four months, as price increases — including those from tariffs — packed a bigger punch. July's CPI is expected to tell a similar tale: Tariffs are causing higher prices on a wider swath of goods while falling gas prices and tepid consumer demand is keeping a lid on some services prices. All in all, the index is expected to rise 0.2% for the month and tick up to 2.8% on an annual basis, according to FactSet consensus estimates. The July CPI will show 'further evidence of tariff-induced inflation eroding the purchasing power of consumer paychecks,' Brusuelas said. 'The thing to understand is this is not going to happen with a bang but more of a slow deterioration in purchasing power.'