Comoros president says a 'child' will replace him, opponents see succession plan
MORONI (Reuters) - (The Jan. 24 story said the president's comments confirmed accusations he had been grooming his son to take over. The story has been corrected to show the president's remarks have been subject to differing interpretations, and the government denies he was talking about his son. The translation of the comments has also been corrected to show he referred to 'a child' who would succeed him. The original story quoted him as referring to "my son". The Comorian word he used can mean 'child,' 'son' or 'daughter.')
Comoros President Azali Assoumani said in a speech to supporters that he would "take a child to put in my place" when he leaves office, comments his critics interpreted as confirming their suspicions that he is grooming his son to take over.
The president's office denied in a statement on Jan. 24, the day after the speech, that his comments referred to his son, government secretary general Nour El Fath. It said instead that he was referring to all Comorians as his children.
The Comorian word that Assoumani used in his remarks can mean either "child", "son" or "daughter".
Assoumani, whose re-election a year ago faced opposition allegations of voter fraud, put El Fath in charge of coordinating government affairs last year and granted him far-reaching powers over the cabinet.
Referring to when the time comes for him to leave power, Assoumani said in a speech to supporters on Moheli, one of the archipelago's three main islands: 'I have three homes: my house, the party and the presidency. If you do not chase me out, I will leave by myself. I hope to do it alive, on my own two feet and, at the moment of leaving, to take a child to put in my place."
In its statement, the president's office said Assoumani's remarks, delivered in Comorian, were not referring to El Fath.
"The government wishes to emphasise that at no time did President Azali speak of a possible succession of his son, Nour El Fath, as the head of the state," it said.
"He instead spoke of 'a child' who would succeed him, knowing that it is customary in the Comoros to describe every citizen as 'a child', without necessarily speaking of one's own offspring."
The statement said the president had rejected the idea of family succession in an interview on Jan. 15 with the France 24 television station. In that interview, he pointed out that El Fath would be ineligible to run for president in 2029 under the constitution, which says the presidency must rotate among the Comoros' three islands every 10 years.
Assoumani said El Fath would be free to run for president if he chose to when it was again his island's turn.
Opponents of Assoumani, however, said the speech was evidence of a dynastic plan.
"With this statement, he has only made official what we already knew," said Abdallah Mohamed Daoudou, a spokesperson for an opposition coalition.
"But Azali is deluding himself. The Comorian people and politicians will not accept the installation of a dynastic power or a monarchy in the Comoros," Daoudou told Reuters.
Mahamoud Salim Hafi, the deputy secretary-general of the government, told Reuters that the opposition "wanted to hear something that was not said" in the president's remarks.
"The president has never wanted to and will never hand over power to his son," he said. "Comoros will never become a dynasty. We are in a republican state."
Assoumani's ruling party decisively won parliamentary elections this month, although opposition parties either boycotted the vote or rejected the results, claiming fraud.
Comoros has a population of about 800,000. It has witnessed around 20 coups or attempted coups since winning independence from France in 1975.
Assoumani first came to power in 1999 through a coup and has won four elections since 2002.
Constitutional reforms in 2018 extended a requirement that the presidency rotate among the three main islands from every five years to 10.
(Writing by Hereward Holland; Editing by Michael Perry)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
FEMA offers states millions for ICE detention facilities, using money meant to help migrants
The Federal Emergency Management Agency is preparing to provide states with $608 million in grants to expand immigration detention facilities across the country. FEMA has begun a 'detention support grant program' to assist states with funding the construction of detention facilities that can be utilized by the federal government to detain immigrants arrested under President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown. States have up through Aug. 8 to apply for the program. The story was first reported by Reuters, which stated that the new FEMA grant will use funding from the Shelter and Services program, which was launched in December 2022 amidst the mass arrival of immigrants at the southern border. The FEMA program had $800 million in available funding. The program reimbursed local governments, counties and non-profits for the costs of meeting the needs of immigrants arriving at the border and not place the burden on taxpayers. U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso, was one of the key advocates for the program. More: US Rep. Veronica Escobar targets ICE agent's use of masks, says it is eroding public trust The SSP funding has already been diverted to help supplement the operation costs of the the Florida Everglades immigration detention facility, dubbed Alligator Alcatraz by the Trump administration. Department of Homeland Security Kristi Noem has stated that the everglade detention center is a model for others constructed by state governments, a press officer for FEMA said. The shifting of funding shelters to funding detention is part of the Trump administration's efforts to rollback all the programs that were meant to assist migrants arriving at the border. "Using SSP funding for immigration detention is illegal and something the administration clearly understands given how it repeatedly refers to holding immigrants in detention as 'sheltering aliens' throughout its public listing for this new program," Jorge Loweree, the Director of Policy at the American Immigration Council, said. "Reallocating SSP funding isn't so much about expanding detention as it is about the administration's obsession with continuing to do everything possible to either end or undermine all prior efforts to make our system fair, functional, or just." More: Texas based immigration advocacy group sues Trump administration over courthouse arrests Rolling back Shelter and Services Program El Paso County, the city and local charities benefited from the FEMA program, guaranteeing that migrants were not left on the streets after being released by Border Patrol. The funds allowed the city to buy the Morehead elementary school and allowed the county to open and operate the Migrant Support Services Center. The county's service center closed on Dec. 31, 2024 amidst uncertainty over the future of the SSP funding. More: What is Dignity Act 2025? How will it change US immigration system? FEMA began blocking the reimbursement of funds to charities and local governments in March, including in El Paso, stating that the use of the funds to support migrants likely broke the law. The funds were frozen until recipients shared the names and addresses of the people who were served with the funding. The Trump administration officially canceled the contacts in early April. The number of migrants currently arriving at the southern border are at the lowest levels in decades. Jeff Abbott covers the border for the El Paso Times and can be reached at:jdabbott@ on Twitter or @ on Bluesky. This article originally appeared on El Paso Times: FEMA offering states millions to build immigration detention facilities Solve the daily Crossword

USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Zelenskyy says Russia is preparing for new offensive operations
KYIV, Aug 12 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on Tuesday that Russia was preparing for new offensive operations just days before U.S. President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin were due to meet. "We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations," he wrote on X, without elaborating on the location. "In such circumstances, it is important that the unity of the world is not threatened." (Reporting by Pavel Polityuk; Writing by Dan Peleschuk; Editing by Alison Williams)
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Explainer-Can Trump take control of Washington to fight the city's crime?
By Jan Wolfe (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to put Washington, D.C., under full federal control to reduce crime, even as city officials stressed crime is already falling. While Trump does have some authority over the capital city's police force and National Guard soldiers, a full federal takeover would likely be blocked in court. Here is why. WHAT DOES THE CONSTITUTION SAY ABOUT CONTROL OF DC? The U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1787, provided for the creation of a federal capital district to serve as the permanent seat of the government. The Constitution made clear that Congress has complete legislative authority over the district. But Congress has historically delegated at least some of the day-to-day work of municipal government to other entities. HOW IS DC GOVERNED? A federal law passed by Congress in 1973, known as the Home Rule Act, allowed city residents to elect a mayor and council, who have some autonomy to pass their own laws. Congress still has budgetary oversight over D.C., however, and can overturn local legislation. Congress did that most recently in 2023, voting to overturn changes to Washington's laws that lowered penalties for some crimes. WHO CONTROLS DC LAW ENFORCEMENT? The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has authority over the city's Metropolitan Police Department. But the Home Rule Act allows the president to take control of the MPD for federal purposes during emergencies if 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist.' A presidential takeover is limited to 30 days, unless Congress votes to extend it through a joint resolution. Trump invoked this part of the Home Rule Act on Monday, saying in an executive order that there is a "crime emergency" in the city that necessitates federal management of the police department. Bowser has pushed back on Trump's claims of unchecked violence, saying the city is "not experiencing a crime spike" and highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year. Violent crime, including murders, spiked in 2023, turning Washington into one of the nation's deadliest cities, according to city police data. However, violent crime dropped 35% in 2024, according to federal data, and it has fallen an additional 26% in the first seven months of 2025. Trump also has broad control over the D.C. National Guard's 2,700 soldiers and airmen. They report directly to the president, unlike counterparts in other states and territories. Trump said on Monday he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington. SO CAN TRUMP 'FEDERALIZE' DC? It is highly unlikely. To exert full federal control of D.C., Trump would need Congress to repeal the Home Rule Act. Such a repeal would require 60 votes in the U.S. Senate, where Trump's Republican Party has a 53-47 advantage. Democrats have been supportive of home rule for DC and are not expected to cross party lines to endorse Trump's vision. But there are ways Trump can exert more influence over the district without fully taking it over. Trump in recent months has directed federal law enforcement agencies such as the FBI to increase the police presence in Washington. Trump has broad authority to reallocate FBI personnel, and in recent months, FBI agents around the country have been given temporary assignments to help with immigration enforcement. Trump also signed an executive order in March to make D.C. "safe and beautiful," establishing a task force to increase police presence in public areas, maximize immigration enforcement, and expedite concealed carry licenses. CAN TRUMP EVICT DC'S HOMELESS POPULATION? Trump has said homeless people must move out of Washington, without offering specifics of a plan to accomplish this. "I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before," Trump said on Truth Social. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital." The federal government owns much of Washington's parkland, so the Trump administration has legal authority to clear homeless encampments in those areas, like President Joe Biden did while in office. But the federal government cannot force people to move out of the city because they lack shelter, legal experts said.