
Republican Nevada governor vetoes voter ID measure
Nevada's GOP Gov. Joe Lombardo vetoed a voter ID measure on Thursday foregoing a proposed requirement to have voters show identification before casting ballots at the polls.
The bill known as AB499 was passed in a bipartisan effort by the state legislature to improve voter verification and increase the number of drop boxes for mail ballots across the state.
Lombardo said he ultimately chose to veto the bill over a lack of clear provisions and guidelines on regulations.
'I wholeheartedly support Voter ID and am appreciative of the effort to codify it into statute. However, this bill is not entirely consistent with the constitutional amendment that Nevada voters will consider again in 2026,' the governor wrote in a Thursday message.
'AB 499 fails to resolve-and may even introduce- inconsistencies in how voter identification is reviewed, does little to improve signature verification and leaves too much ambiguity for future interpretation or regulation,' he added.
The legislation would've required in-person voters to show their ID while allowing mail-in ballots to be accepted with a valid signature.
'This inconsistency undermines the principle of uniform voter verification. Voter ID is essential for ensuring election integrity, and it should be applied consistently across all voting methods,' Lombardo said.
However, Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager (D-Nev.) said the veto symbolized a 'breach of trust' after the governor previously shared support for the bill, according to the Associated Press.
Lombardo's veto comes as Republicans usher in a sweeping push to codify stricter identification requirements for voters.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poll: Americans disapprove of spending public funds to put on military parade in Washington
Nearly 2 in 3 U.S. adults — 64% — oppose the use of government funds for this weekend's military parade in Washington, D.C., celebrating the Army's 250th birthday, according to new data from the NBC News Decision Desk Poll, powered by SurveyMonkey. Majorities of Democrats (88%) and independents (72%) oppose the use of government funds to put on the parade, while 65% of Republicans support it. Spending public funds on the parade is more popular among supporters of the MAGA movement (75% support), compared to Republicans who identify more as supporters of the party itself (56% support). The poll was conducted May 30-June 10 and surveyed 19,410 adults nationally, with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.1 percentage points. The Saturday parade to celebrate the Army, which also falls on both Flag Day and President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, will include about 6,600 soldiers, 50 aircraft and 150 vehicles, according to defense officials. There will be different sections for different portions of the Army's history, and the event is expected to feature an air show with flyovers and a demonstration by the Army's Golden Knights parachute team. But it's not clear how possible storms forecast for Saturday in the Washington area could affect those plans. The event could cost as much as $45 million, a price tag that includes up to $16 million for costs associated with potential damage to city streets caused by tanks driving on them. Respondents in the Decision Desk Poll were asked: "As you may know, President Trump has ordered a military parade in Washington D.C. on June 14th to commemorate the U.S. Army's 250th Birthday. Defense officials estimate the cost for this parade could be as much as 45 million dollars. Do you support or oppose the use of government funds for the parade?" Overall, 14% of adults said they strongly supported the use of government funds for the parade, and another 22% said they somewhat supported it. Meanwhile, 44% were strongly opposed and another 20% were somewhat opposed. In early May, Trump defended the cost of the parade by arguing on NBC News' "Meet the Press" that the total was 'peanuts compared to the value of doing it.' 'We have the greatest missiles in the world. We have the greatest submarines in the world. We have the greatest Army tanks in the world. We have the greatest weapons in the world. And we're going to celebrate it,' he said. Democratic politicians have criticized Trump over the parade spending, saying the money could go to other causes. "You're not doing it to celebrate the Army's birthday, you're doing it to stroke Donald Trump's ego," Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., said last week during a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing to Army leaders discussing its budget. "There are lots of ways to celebrate the Army's birthday without blowing it all on a parade," she added. Others, including groups aligned with Democrats, are planning protests around the event in Washington and across the country, along with ongoing protests about Trump's immigration policy happening around the U.S. The NBC News Decision Desk Poll, powered by SurveyMonkey, was conducted from May 30-June 10 among a national sample of 19,410 adults aged 18 and over. The margin of error is plus or minus 2.1 percentage points. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Two in three Americans oppose using tax money for military parade: poll
A new survey from the NBC Decision Desk Poll, powered by Survey Monkey, showed that 64 percent of Americans disapprove of the use of state funds for this weekend's military parade. On Saturday starting at 6:30 p.m., 150 vehicles, 50 aircraft and 6,600 soldiers will parade the street of Washington, D.C., to mark the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary, which also coincides with President Trump's 79th birthday. Depending on the weather, there could also be an air show. The celebration is estimated to cost between $25 million and $45 million taxpayer dollars, according to the Army. The price also includes potential damage to public spaces caused by tanks driving on the streets. Overall, 88 percent of Democrats and 72 percent of Independents disapprove of the use of government funds, while 68 percent of Republicans support it. Within the Republican party, the MAGA faction approves up to 75 percent while more moderate Republicans approve at 56 percent. The question the poll asked respondents was: 'As you may know, President Trump has ordered a military parade in Washington D.C. on June 14th to commemorate the U.S. Army's 250th Birthday. Defense officials estimate the cost for this parade could be as much as 45 million dollars. Do you support or oppose the use of government funds for the parade?' Respondents were asked whether they supported or opposed, moderately or strongly. Fourteen percent of adults say they strongly support federal funding for the parade. In contrast, 44 percent say they strongly oppose it. Twenty-two percent say they somewhat support it compared to 20 percent who say they are somewhat opposed. The poll was conducted from May 30 to June 10 among 19,4100 adults nationwide. The margin of error stands at plus or minus 2.1 percent. An Associated Press-NORC Center of Public Affairs Research survey also confirmed that 60 percent of Americans said the parade was 'not a good use of government funds.' Democrats have had strong reactions to the parade. 'If it was really about celebrating military families, we could put $30 million toward helping them offset the cost of their child care, food assistance and tuition,' said Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) on X on June 5. 'We all like to enjoy a nice birthday party. But most of us don't celebrate with a $45 million taxpayer-funded military parade,' Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said on X. This demonstration of force also contrasts with Trump's deployment of 4,000 members of the National Guard and 700 Marines to Los Angeles to squall protests over immigration raids. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Social chaos': GOP, Dem lawmakers sound off on Los Angeles unrest
Lawmakers are split over who bears responsibility for the chaos in Los Angeles after President Donald Trump federalized the National Guard for the first time in 60 years. Protests rejecting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations erupted in downtown LA last weekend, and the Trump administration ordered National Guardsmen and Marines to the city following days of escalating anti-ICE protests and riots. "The riots that we are seeing in LA are a direct reflection" of sanctuary city policies, Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., told Fox News Digital. Republicans have largely condemned the violence in Los Angeles as Democrats accused the Trump administration of escalating tensions. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, considered a potential 2028 presidential candidate, has led the Democrats' rejection of the Trump administration's action in LA. Trump Sends Clear Message Federalizing National Guard For La Riots: This Is Not 2020 "We really need to have accountability for the administration that has decided to intentionally uncork this chaos," Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., also rumored to harbor 2028 presidential ambitions, told Fox News Digital. Read On The Fox News App Newsom Files Emergency Motion To 'Immediately Block' Trump's Use Of Military To Stop La Riots "The Trump administration owns this," Ocasio-Cortez added. "The Trump administration, Donald Trump and [White House advisor] Stephen Miller know that when you violently raid elementary schools, Home Depots and start ripping kids out of people's arms, it's going to create and stoke social chaos." "This administration is intentionally creating chaos," she said. Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., added fuel to Democrats' fire on Thursday when he was forcibly removed and handcuffed by authorities after trying to confront Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem at a press conference in LA. Republicans once again condemned Padilla, while Democrats raged against the Trump administration. Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., told Fox News Digital that Democrats' anti-ICE rhetoric is "dangerous." "It's going to get somebody killed," Mace said. The last time a sitting U.S. president used his federal authority to deploy the National Guard without the governor's request was during the civil rights march in Alabama from Selma to Montgomery in 1965. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., the only Palestinian American in Congress who was censured last year for her criticism of U.S. policy on the war in Gaza, said the protests are not "anti-ICE." "It's not anti-ICE, it's pro-constitutional rights, pro-due process, pro-making sure that people are following the law," Tlaib told Fox News Digital, adding, "The immigrant communities have been saying since 2003 that ICE has been rogue, and it has not followed people's constitutional rights." A federal judge on Thursday ruled that Trump must return control of the California National Guard to Newsom, but an appeals court quickly reversed that decision. The White House said the order "puts our brave federal officials in danger." "The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief. The President exercised his lawful authority to mobilize the National Guard to protect federal buildings and personnel in Gavin Newsom's lawless Los Angeles," said White House spokesperson Anna Kelly. Fox News Digital's Jasmine Baehr contributed to this report. Original article source: 'Social chaos': GOP, Dem lawmakers sound off on Los Angeles unrest