
Heathrow chief's phone was on silent as power cut fire unfolded, inquiry reveals
Heathrow's chief executive could not be reached to tell him about the airport's closure after a power outage because his phone was on silent, an inquiry has revealed.
Thomas Woldbye was asleep when chief operating officer Javier Echave decided to suspend operations at 1.15am on 21 March after a fire at a substation in west London affected the supply of electricity to the site, it has emerged.
The airport closed for around 16 hours, cancelling about 1,300 flights and causing travel chaos for nearly 300,000 passengers.
Heathrow commissioned an inquiry into what happened, led by former transport secretary Ruth Kelly, who is an independent member on the airport's board.
The inquiry's report, published on Wednesday, found that Mr Woldbye "was not involved" in the decision to suspend operations as he was unaware of several attempts to reach him due to his phone being on silent mode until 6.45am on 21 March.
"Although his phone was on his bedside table, Mr Woldbye reported that it did not alert him to the F24 alarms [to activate emergency procedures] or to Mr Echave's other calls because the phone had gone into a silent mode, without him being aware it had done so and he was asleep at the time," the report stated.
3:39
Mr Woldbye expressed "his deep regret at not being contactable during the night of the incident", according to the review.
The inquiry recommended that Heathrow should consider having a "second means of contact" to notify key individuals about critical incidents.
However, it also found that the decision to suspend operations was "correctly made" as it was "essential to protect the safety and security of people, as well as the integrity of the airport and the UK border".
Ms Kelly said: "The evidence confirms that Heathrow made the right decisions in exceptionally difficult circumstances.
"Whilst the disruption was significant, alternative choices on the day would not have materially changed the outcome.
"The airport had contingency plans in place, and the report highlights that further planned investment in energy resilience will be key to reducing the impact of any similar events in the future."
But Nigel Wicking, the chief executive of Heathrow Airline Operators' Committee (AOC), described the report as "back patting" because it did not "recognise the significant cost impact" borne by airlines.
0:49
He told MPs on the Transport Select Committee he had warned Heathrow bosses the power supply was vulnerable less than a week before the outage.
Heathrow AOC, which has more than 90 members including Virgin Atlantic and British Airways, criticised the handling of the closure, saying flights could have taken off earlier on Friday and that communication was "appalling".
The inquiry found there "may have been opportunities to open parts of the airport slightly sooner" on 21 March but this "likely would have been only by a maximum of a couple of hours or so". It started accepting limited flight arrivals from 4pm and departures from 8pm that day.
Mr Wicking told Sky News' business and economics reporter Sarah Taaffe-Maguire on Wednesday that the review did not help to better understand whether the airport had the resources it needed.
Instead, he said he was looking to the full National Energy System Operator report, expected to be released by the end of June.
A spokesperson for the Heathrow Reimagined campaign group, whose supporters include British Airways's owner International Airlines Group and Virgin Atlantic, said: "Lessons must be learnt from the closure of Heathrow during March's power outage, but the internal Kelly Review allows Heathrow to set and judge by its own standards.
"It fails to properly tackle the poor contingency planning and years of inefficient spending that left Heathrow vulnerable."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
15 minutes ago
- The Sun
M&S issues update for customers with gift vouchers after cyber attack
MARKS and Spencer has issued an update for customers with gift vouchers after its cyber attack. Customers have taken to social media to share their dissatisfaction with the retailer's latest update. 1 It comes as the ongoing chaos has left scores of M&S shoppers unable to use their gift vouchers. Yet the retail giant initially told customers they won't get extensions of the expiry dates on vouchers due to expire. One customer took to X, pleading: 'My vouchers expire at the end of this month but I can't use them. Can I have them extended?' But M&S responded: 'Unfortunately we're unable to extend vouchers.' They later appeared to soften, agreeing to "double check" on the customers behalf. Last month, shoppers also said they'd hit a brick wall. One couple revealed on the MoneySavingExpert forum that they've been saving up vouchers from their M&S credit card for months, only to be told they'd have to use them now or lose them entirely. The customer posted: 'We contacted M&S Customer Support which bluntly said that if we didn't use the vouchers by their expiry date then that was tough. 'The only option we have is to spend them on something we don't really need.' They added that M&S stores aren't even able to place orders, meaning customers can't just pop in and buy bigger items either. Even staff are reportedly unable to order stock, with fears some branches could start running out of essentials altogether. Some stores have even been stripped of staples like bananas and Colin the Caterpillar cakes, and popular meal deals were pulled in smaller branches An MSE forum ambassador said: 'Given the number of people this may affect, perhaps thousands as you suggest, I would expect M&S to extend the end date for these.' While another shopper fumed: 'The least they could do is extend the date.' M&S credit card reward vouchers are valid for 17 months, while shoppers with gift cards have 24 months from the last transaction to spend them. When The Sun contacted M&S, it advised affected customers to get in touch - but didn't confirm whether it would offer extensions on a case-by-case basis after all. A M&S spokesperson said: "The majority of M&S credit card customers redeem their reward vouchers in stores, and they can continue to do so. "If for any reason customers aren't able to redeem in store, and their vouchers are due to expire soon, we would ask them to get in touch with us so we can support them.' Meanwhile, the attack is still causing carnage across the business. M&S was forced to pull online orders, birthday perks were suspended, and Sparks offers were frozen. The store has now confirmed that some freebies, like birthday cookies, will still be honoured eventually. But when it comes to Rewards Vouchers — a perk many customers save up to use for larger purchases — the answer so far is a hard no. The cyber attack, which kicked off over Easter weekend, has been one of the worst to hit the high street in years. It has forced M&S to halt online orders and triggered widespread disruption, including a £300million blow to profits. Online shopping is still out of action and is expected to remain patchy until at least July, with fashion, home and beauty sales taking a battering. Timeline of the attack Saturday, April 19: Initial reports emerge on social media of problems with contactless payments and click-and-collect services at M&S stores across the UK. Customers experience difficulties collecting online purchases and returning items due to system issues. Monday, April 21: Problems with contactless payments and click-and-collect persist. M&S officially acknowledges the "cyber incident" in a statement to the London Stock Exchange. CEO Stuart Machin apologises for the disruption and confirms "minor, temporary changes" to store operations. M&S notifies the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) and the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) and engages external cybersecurity experts. Tuesday, April 22: Disruptions continue. M&S takes further systems offline as part of "proactive management". Wednesday, April 23: Despite earlier claims of customer-facing systems returning to normal, M&S continues to adjust operations to maintain security. Contactless payments are initially restored, but other services, including click-and-collect, remain affected. Thursday, April 24: Contactless payments and click-and-collect services are still unavailable. Reports surface suggesting the attackers possibly gained access to data in February. Friday, April 25: M&S suspends all online and app orders in the UK and Ireland for clothing and food, although customers can still browse products. This decision leads to a 5% drop in M&S's share price. Monday, April 28: M&S is still unable to process online orders. Around 200 agency workers at the main distribution centre are told to stay home. Tuesday, April 29: Information suggests that the hacker group Scattered Spider is likely behind the attack. Shoppers spot empty shelves in selected stores. Tuesday, May 13: M&S revealed that some customer information has been stolen. Wednesday, May 21: The retailer said disruption from the attack is expected to continue through to July. Meanwhile, M&S isn't the only store facing cyber trouble. Co-op was forced to shut down part of its IT system after facing a hacking attempt last month. It confirmed that it had "taken proactive steps to keep our systems safe". It was later revealed that the personal data of a "significant number" of its 6.2million customers and former members had been stolen. The details included names, contact information, and dates of birth. However, the retailer assured customers that passwords, credit card details, and transaction information were not compromised. Full services resumed on May 14, following the .


BBC News
35 minutes ago
- BBC News
The Law Show Should killers be forced to attend sentencing hearings?
The Victims and Courts Bill is progressing through Parliament, and will force convicted criminals to attend their sentencing hearings. If criminals convicted of the most serious offences in England or Wales refuse to attend, or are disruptive in court, they will face an extra two years in prison. There are other sanctions too, including missing out on family visits. 'Reasonable force' can also be used to get criminals to attend. The families of three women killed in London - Sabina Nessa, Jan Mustafa and Zara Aleena - have been campaigning for a new law. In each case, the men who murdered their loved ones refused to come to their sentencing hearings. Their families are not alone; the mother of 9 year old Olivia Pratt-Korbel, who was fatally shot in August 2022, has also been calling for a change in the law. The man who murdered her daughter also refused to come to court to be sentenced. But will the changes improve the court system for the families of victims? Also on the programme: The first purely-AI legal service has been given the go ahead in England and Wales - what does it mean for the UK legal sector? And who gets the dog? Why all couples might want to consider a "pet-nup" in case they split up. Presenter: Joelle Grogan Producers: Ravi Naik and Charlotte Rowles Editor Tara McDermott Contributors Charlie Sherrard KC, criminal justice barrister and judge Claire Waxman, Victim's Commissioner for London Dr Giulia Gentile, Department of Law, University of Essex and expert on AI and digital regulation Samantha Woodham, barrister and co-founder of The Divorce Surgery.


Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is meeting Donald Trump for the first time, so will it be another Starmer love-in, or a Zelenskyy-style brush off?
The German chancellor will hold his first face-to-face meeting with President Trump later. On the agenda are discussions around the war in Ukraine, the ongoing conflict in the Middle East and tariffs. It's understood Donald Trump and Friedrich Merz will have a working lunch and early afternoon meeting before potentially holding a news conference. The question is, will Mr Merz emerge smiling like Sir Keir Starmer, or be berated like [Ukrainian President] Volodymyr Zelenskyy? There's no doubt the leader of Europe's largest economy has a lot to discuss with Mr Trump, the head of Germany's most important trading partner. Berlin was trying to recover from two years of recession, only to be hit by the Trump administration's 25% tariffs on vehicles and the new 50% tariff on steel and aluminium. The president's threat of a 50% tariff on all European goods is also still looming for July unless a deal with Brussels is struck. In the past, the US leader hasn't minced his words, calling the Germans "very bad" as he bemoaned "the millions of cars they sell to the US". 10:47 While the EU is leading negotiations on tariffs, Mr Merz knows he must be careful not to anger Mr Trump. The president has been clear that he believes Europe has been ripping America off and a misstep could reinforce this view, potentially making it harder to agree a deal. Germany's reliance on the US for defence has also triggered Donald Trump in the past. During his first term, he tweeted that Germany "owes vast sums of money to NATO and the United States must be paid more for the powerful, and very expensive, defence it provides to Germany". However, Mr Merz will be hoping to avoid a fight over this after Germany said it would boost defence spending and the chancellor vowed to create the strongest army in Europe. This, plus his efforts to crackdown on illegal migration, may help to counter views that German leadership is weak. While the Germans are focused on a productive meeting, Mr Merz's past criticism of the US could come back to haunt him. 👉 Listen to The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim on your podcast app 👈 Following a 10-day period of intense criticism of Europe and Ukraine by the Trump administration in February, the chancellor warned that Europe could no longer rely on Washington. Merz mimicked the US president Referring to the president's assertion that European security was no longer America's primary focus - a stunning reversal of decades of US foreign policy - he said it was clear that "the Americans, at least this part of the Americans, this administration, are largely indifferent to the fate of Europe". More recently, when asked about his first phone call with Mr Trump, he mimicked the president, highlighting how often he uses the word "great". Ahead of Thursday's meeting, a spokesperson for the German government played down concerns of a clash, saying the pair had spoken several times on the phone and that the chancellor was well prepared. It's understood he had a call with the French president in the lead-up. Perhaps Emmanuel Macron was able to offer some advice after he and Mr Trump rekindled their first-term bromance during their White House encounter in February. We have been told the chancellor will also be bringing a gift for the president. King's invitation went down well There's no doubt that when Mr Starmer produced an invitation to the UK from King Charles, it boosted the mood in the Oval Office during his first visit. From the moment the embossed letter was handed over, the atmosphere became more relaxed. The spokesperson wouldn't reveal what Mr Merz is bringing, clearly determined to maintain the suspense. It could potentially be something from Rhineland-Palatinate, the region in southwest Germany's wine country where Donald Trump's paternal grandparents were born. The chancellor knows the area well, having completed his military service there in the 1970s, and has already invited the president to visit his ancestral home. 3:12 Germans appear confident Whatever it is, the Germans seem confident the meeting between the two leaders will be a success, underlining the German leader's firm belief in the transatlantic relationship and his experience holding top-level meetings with politicians. In reality, however much he prepares, his team knows he must expect the unexpected. It could be that vice president JD Vance decides to revisit his blistering attack on Europe, which left the audience at the Munich Security Conference speechless, earlier this year. Or, perhaps the Trump administration will lash out again about the far-right Alternative for Germany party being classified as right-wing extremists by Germany's domestic intelligence service; the potential pitfalls are many. What will happen is anyone's guess and the uncertainty ensures this meeting of political heavyweights will be a fascinating watch.