2025 NBA playoff odds: 'Time for the 'dogs to have their day'
Generally speaking, the past few months have been fantastic for the public betting masses. They cleaned up regularly on favorites in NFL odds, then made a pile of cash on favorites in March Madness odds.
It took much longer than oddsmakers anticipated, but the pendulum finally swung — at least for a couple of days — on NBA playoff odds. Underdogs are 5-0 straight up (SU) and against the spread (ATS) through the first five games of the second round.
"I'm not that surprised, and the reason I say that is because, over the past five months, we've had a lot of chalk winning, with football and the NCAA Tournament," said Johnny Avello, director of operations for DraftKings Sportsbook. "There will always be a time when there's a switching of the guard. This was that time for the 'dogs to have their day."
The run of upsets is creating interesting betting opportunities for the NBA playoffs. Avello helps dive more into those prospects.
Second-Round Switcheroo
It all started Sunday with Game 1 of the Indiana Pacers-Cleveland Cavaliers series. The Pacers were 8.5-point road underdogs and won outright 121-112. Then it continued on Monday and Tuesday: The New York Knicks, also 8.5-point road underdogs in Game 1, shocked the Boston Celtics 108-105 in overtime.
The Denver Nuggets, 10.5-point Game 1 road underdogs, sank the Oklahoma City Thunder 121-119, on Aaron Gordon's final-seconds 3-pointer.
Golden State dumped Minnesota 99-88 in Game 1, with the Warriors 6-point road underdogs.
So, in all four second-round Game 1s, underdogs won outright, the first time that's ever happened in the NBA. And, for good measure, in Pacers-Cavs Game 2 on Tuesday, Indiana rallied from 20 down to win 120-119 on a Tyrese Haliburton 3-pointer, with the Pacers 5.5-point 'dogs.
Where bettors can most likely take advantage is with series odds on the Celtics and Thunder. Prior to Game 1, Boston was a hefty -800 favorite to win the series vs. New York, while OKC was -700 to win the series vs. Denver.
Now, it's Celtics -340 and Thunder -290.
"Now, bettors have the opportunity to bet two favorites at a much shorter price. And they're doing it. We're seeing some Celtics money and some OKC money," Avello said.
And the opportunity isn't just with straight bets.
Parlaying the Favorites
Oklahoma City put up the NBA's best regular-season record, at 68-14 SU, then swept Memphis 4-0 in the first round. Boston was 61-21 SU in the regular season and dispatched Orlando 4-1 in the first round.
Parlaying both those teams to win their second-round series, now that the odds are a little easier to stomach, could be worth your while. And if you really want to get frisky — there's a better chance you'll lose your bet, but the payout is better if you win — you could even add in Cleveland, which opened as a -400 series favorite vs. Indiana and is now a +175 underdog.
But Avello advices proceeding with caution.
"It's there for bettors, and it's being done by some," he said. "You probably feel confident in the Celtics. It's hard to believe the Knicks could beat the Celtics. But the problem with being confident in that parlay bet is that you don't feel as good about the other two teams.
"OKC is just starting to come into its own, and it's the same with the Cavs. Plus, the Nuggets have been in this position recently. They have the pedigree."
Indeed, Denver won the NBA championship in 2023.
"I think we'll see more money on the Celtics, parlayed lightly with the others, or just straight bets on the Celtics," Avello said. "Parlaying two or three of them doesn't seem as sure, in the bettors' eyes. I don't know if they're feeling that, outside of the Celtics series."
Two-Way Wagering
Thanks to the second-round underdog run, there is another option: backing both sides in series odds.
"We saw customers bet the Knicks and Nuggets pretty good at +550 and +500, respectively, before Game 1," Avello said. "If you took +550 with the Knicks, and now you can lay -340 with the Celtics, you can get off your spot. You put yourself in a guaranteed spot where you can't lose."
The operative words there: "Can't lose." Meaning, the worst-case scenario is to break even, and the other scenario is making a couple hundred bucks.
For example: If, pre-series, you put $100 on the Knicks +550, then you could now come back on the Celtics -340 for $340. If New York wins, then you'd win $550, minus the $340 losing Celtics bet, for a total profit of $210. If Boston wins, then you'd win $100, but lose $100 on the Knicks wager, so you'd break even.
And if you wanted to lock in a little profit, then you've got a narrow window there, too, if you do the math.
But let's be honest here: Those strategies are only if you're completely risk-averse. And if you bet a hundred bucks on the Knicks +550, then you're not risk-averse; you did so because you want to turn a little into a lot.
So you're probably better off skipping all that math. Let it ride and hope for a Knicks or Nuggets upset.
Patrick Everson is a sports betting analyst for FOX Sports and senior reporter for VegasInsider.com . He previously worked for Covers. Follow him on Twitter @ PatrickE_Vegas .
Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account, and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily!
recommended
Get more from National Basketball Association Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
22 minutes ago
- New York Times
Pacers keep betting on themselves this season — and keep winning
OKLAHOMA CITY — The phones in Indiana remained quiet through the first week of February. The Pacers knew what they had, even if the rest of the basketball world hadn't caught on yet. The future of the team could have been up in the air. After a 10-15 start to the season, the Pacers were on fire, but a January hot streak sparked versus a mostly cushy schedule. For months, they had heard about how their Eastern Conference finals run the previous spring was fluke-ish, a product of injuries to the rest of the NBA. The organization stared at a daunting financial situation, by its standards, for the 2025-26 season. Advertisement The Pacers could have tried to save money. They could have deemed themselves good but not good enough to topple the three teams that stood far ahead of them in the East at the time of the trade deadline. They could have angled more toward the future. But they knew what they had, even if others doubted how high they could climb. No matter how Indiana's season ends, whether a 1-0 NBA Finals lead turns into the first non-ABA title in franchise history or trends in the opposite direction, this will be the legacy of the 2025 Pacers. At every level of the organization — in the locker room, on the coaching staff, in the front office — they have believed they are good enough. They lose 15 of 25 to begin the season, and they bounce back. They fall down big seemingly without enough time remaining to make a comeback, and they win a first-round playoff game. Then they do the same in Round 2. And again in Round 3. And one more time to kick off the finals. Tyrese Haliburton's new Pumas, which he jokingly credited for his dagger to clinch Game 1 on Thursday, need an adventurous win probability chart stamped onto them, the type with a steep upward slope at the very end, the symbol of this Pacers season. The Pacers, no matter the situation, continue to bet on themselves. And they continue to prove themselves correct. Teams swooned over center Myles Turner leading into the trade deadline. Turner is the rare rim-protecting 3-point marksman, an intuitive fit on any roster, someone who could help on both sides of the ball without disrupting a group's ecosystem. The 29-year-old will be a free agent this summer. If the Pacers pay him even the low end of his market value without making any other edits to the roster, they will go into the luxury tax for the first time since 2005. This would be new. But the Pacers refused to engage with other front offices on Turner. They believed they were good enough to make a run impressive enough to justify whatever expenses could be next. Advertisement Other front offices checked in on Andrew Nembhard, the man who glitzed Shai Gilgeous-Alexander out of his sneakers on a stepback 3-pointer late in Game 1. The Pacers were better with Nembhard on the court all season, and their turnaround coincided with his return from injury in early December. Because of his contract structure, which includes a low salary this year that jumps to $18 million in 2025-26, dealing him could have presented one way to get off long-term money. But Indiana swatted away any mention of his name. Nembhard was too important. And the Pacers, they believed, were not frauds. Far from it. They were not trading Nembhard. They weren't trading Turner. They weren't depleting their depth, one of the main catalysts of their magical spring. They opted to hold on to Obi Toppin, another player on an eight-figure salary they could have sent elsewhere for financial reasons. All Toppin has done to justify the move — or lack thereof — is race for transition buckets and drain 3-pointers. He nailed five during the first game of the finals. The narrative of both teams in the finals, the Pacers and the Oklahoma City Thunder, has surrounded trades. The Pacers traded for Haliburton in what will go down as an all-time heist. They were clever enough to use 2023 cap space to sign Bruce Brown to an intentionally bloated contract, then use that large salary to flip Brown for Pascal Siakam, another dandy of an exchange. They identified Aaron Nesmith in the deal that sent Malcolm Brogdon to Boston and used space to absorb Toppin without giving up any players or consequential draft picks. The Thunder are built on trades, too. They acquired Gilgeous-Alexander in the Paul George deal. They selected Jalen Williams with a draft pick they got in the same trade. They flipped Josh Giddey for defensive menace Alex Caruso. They have stockpiled draft picks like no franchise ever. Advertisement But sometimes, the best moves are ones of omission. Sometimes, the smartest trades are the ones organizations choose not to make. The Thunder, for example, could have messed with their core midseason to add a veteran, such as Brooklyn Nets sharpshooter Cam Johnson. They opted not to, banking on continuity and a close-knit locker room, which they could ride to the end of the season. The Pacers have the same band together, too, a similar squad to the one that went to the conference finals last season, but one with even more familiarity. The names might be the same, but this is a better team than it was a year ago. It's more physical defensively. Nembhard and Nesmith engulf perimeter threats. And the more time guys have spent together, the more telepathy has reigned supreme, whether on their blink-of-an-eye fast breaks, their constant cutting or their hot-potato ball movement. The front office believed in the players. And the players had their backs. 'You come into the year with all the talk around how (going to the Eastern Conference finals) was a fluke,' Haliburton said. 'You have an unsuccessful first couple months, and now it's easy for everyone to clown you and talk about you in a negative way. And I think as a group we take everything personal as a group. It's not just me. It's everybody.' This is a spite run. The Pacers go down 14 with 2:51 to go, only for Nesmith to sink jumper after jumper and for them to win. They trail by 15 in the fourth quarter of a finals game and push the Thunder into paralysis. Nembhard shimmies into a 3. Haliburton lifts for victory. They start 10-15 and recognize life will be different once Nembhard returns — and once Haliburton, after a slow start to the season, forms into a one-man offense. They trek through the trade deadline insistent this year's team is cohesive enough to play deep into the spring, even as the conversation everywhere other than Indiana is about a supposedly guaranteed conference finals between the Boston Celtics and Cleveland Cavaliers, whom the Pacers, of course, handled in only five games. The Pacers have trailed all year. It's deterred neither their players nor decision-makers. Now, they're receiving the payoff. (Photo of Myles Turner: William Purnell / Getty Images)
USA Today
22 minutes ago
- USA Today
Report: Mavericks schedule visit with Cooper Flagg ahead of 2025 NBA draft
Report: Mavericks schedule visit with Cooper Flagg ahead of 2025 NBA draft The Mavericks have Cooper Flagg scheduled for a pre-draft visit to Dallas, @TheSteinLine has learned. Flagg, Knicks, Suns and more from the NBA grapevine ... all here in my latest around-the-league notes: — Marc Stein (@TheSteinLine) June 7, 2025 Projected No. 1 pick Cooper Flagg is reportedly scheduled to meet with the Dallas Mavericks ahead of the 2025 NBA draft, according to Marc Stein of The Stein Line on Substack. Flagg led Duke to the Final Four, averaging 19.2 points, 7.5 rebounds, 4.2 assists, 1.4 steals and 1.4 blocks on 38.5% shooting from 3-point range. He became the 22nd player in program history to be named a consensus first-team All-American. The Player of the Year is set to visit the Mavericks later this month to get to know team personnel before the organization selects him with the first pick on June 25. Jason Kidd said last month that he believes the Mavericks are a great situation for Flagg, with their mixture of established veterans and up-and-coming players. He believes Flagg will be able to step in and make an immediate contribution. The 6-foot-8 forward has drawn comparisons to former Duke legend and Hall of Famer Grant Hill because of his size, athleticism and ability to affect games in various ways. Former coach Mike Krzyzewski even called him the best freshman to ever play with the Blue Devils. The Mavericks have the first pick in the draft for only the second time in franchise history. After previously trading franchise cornerstone Luka Dončić, the Mavericks will soon meet with their next once-in-a-generation player in Flagg.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Draymond Green shared insights about his mother's trash-talking skills: 'She talks bad about all the players on my team but annihilates me'
Draymond Green shared insights about his mother's trash-talking skills: 'She talks bad about all the players on my team but annihilates me' originally appeared on Basketball Network. Known for his elite playmaking, defense and leadership, Draymond Green is undoubtedly one the brightest minds in the NBA. Drafted in the second round as the 35th pick, the Michigan State product has certainly surpassed most expectations. Advertisement Born to Mary Babers-Green and Wallace Davis, Draymond was 12 years old when his parents divorced. However, the former DPOY formed a strong bond with his stepfather, Raymond Green, to the extent that he even adopted his last name. Draymond's mother, Mary, had a very influential role in the Warriors star's life. Despite all the financial hurdles, Mama Green ensured her son faced no hurdles in his pursuit of a pro basketball career. That said, she was also his toughest critic. Recently, appearing on 'Jimmy Kimmel Live,' Dray discussed how his mom often schooled him during games, adding that none of his teammates were spared either. 'My mom since I was a child has been the mom who from the stands, she yells, 'You suck.' But the thing about my mom is she talks bad about all the players on my team. She kills them, but she absolutely annihilates me. I've always heard the stories from it where, in the beginning, a parent will almost want to get snappy at her, and as they continue to watch her, they realize how bad she talks about me, they just like, 'Oh, that's no problem, what she's saying about my kid,'' said Draymond, adding how when he often told his mom to stop, she would be mad at him as if he did something wrong. A strict disciplinarian Babers-Green is certainly beaming with joy, considering how far Dray has come in his life. The 6'6' forward defied all odds, whether it was not having the ideal athleticism and agility, or being undersized for his position. The veteran forward carved his niche, making him one of the cornerstones of the Warriors franchise. Advertisement In a 2015 interview with GQ, when asked what about Draymond made her most proud, she had the following to say. 'I'm not big on proud. I'm a spiritual person. So I look at it, if I'm saying I'm proud, I'm taking something away from the Creator. All I did was give birth to him. So I look at as one thing that makes me happy about that he has stayed true to himself. He's rich now. He's a well-off type of guy now. He still uses his money like it was when he had the little money. He still has his same Range Rover that he had when he first got there,' mentioned Mama Green. When asked if she was better than her son when it came to trash-talking, Babers-Green admitted she had become rusty with age but would get him at times. Mary believed a lot of her talking smack had to do with the city of Saginaw, where life was tough, and there was no room for those who complained. Related: "God, if you let me get through this, I won't play no more" - Larry Bird describes the moment that made him retire for good 'The bad boy' image One of the most controversial players in recent times, Draymond has often made headlines for the wrong reasons. Involved in multiple altercations, ejections, fines and suspensions, the 2017 steals leader is also occasionally an official's worst nightmare. Advertisement In recent years, things seem to have gone a little too far, whether it was the punching incident with Jordan Poole or getting into a brawl with Rudy Gobert and Jusuf Nurkic. Nonetheless, the Dubs enforcer was at his best behavior for most of the 2024-25 season, with his defensive prowess shining yet again. Related: Shaquille O'Neal reveals which two dunks in his NBA career are his favorite: "He was all over me, and I was like, 'Get the fu** off me'" This story was originally reported by Basketball Network on Jun 7, 2025, where it first appeared.
