logo
Is Oman's proximity to equator the secret to its growing space launch potential?

Is Oman's proximity to equator the secret to its growing space launch potential?

Time of India3 days ago
Oman's Etlaq spaceport is shaping the Sultanate's rise as a regional space launch hub, backed by its equatorial location and expanding infrastructure/Representative Image
With its strategic location near the equator and open coastal geography, Oman is emerging as a prime platform for space vehicle launches. The Sultanate's expanding infrastructure and favourable geographical conditions have attracted interest from international aerospace companies and are now paving the way for Oman to position itself as a regional and global space launch hub.
Equatorial Advantage
and Coastal Launch Sites
Oman's proximity to the equator offers a significant scientific and economic edge rockets launched closer to the equator require less fuel due to the Earth's rotation aiding velocity. In addition, Oman's coastal access to the Indian Ocean and low population density near potential launch sites enhance safety and logistical feasibility.
'Oman's unique position makes it ideal for multi-orbit launches, including equatorial, sun-synchronous, polar, medium Earth, and geostationary orbits,' said HH Sayyid Azzan Qais Al Said, Founder and CEO of the National Aerospace Services Company (NASCOM) and Etlaq Spaceport in a public statement.
Etlaq Spaceport and Duqm-1: Laying the Groundwork
The Etlaq Spaceport marked Oman's formal entry into the regional space race with its first space launch 'Duqm-1', the first of its kind in the Middle East. Located at 18 degrees latitude, the site enables diverse orbital access and will play a key role in future missions.
Etlaq's vision includes:
A second launch pad for experimental missions
A spacecraft assembly facility
An Omani Formation Program that supports experimental launches within 14 weeks of planning
A long-term plan to be fully operational by 2027
The program also emphasises local talent development in space sciences and advanced engineering fields.
Government Backing and Vision 2040 Alignment
Dr. Saud Hamid Al Shukaili, Director General of Policies & Governance and Head of the National Space Program at the Ministry of Transport, Communications, and Information Technology, affirmed the government's commitment to making Oman a competitive destination for global space investments.
'The space launch project supports Oman Vision 2040 by attracting international space companies and strengthening national capabilities in spacecraft design, launch operations, and aerospace technology.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

ITR filing FY 2024-25: Top 8 mistakes first-time tax filers make; how to avoid them in AY 2025–26
ITR filing FY 2024-25: Top 8 mistakes first-time tax filers make; how to avoid them in AY 2025–26

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

ITR filing FY 2024-25: Top 8 mistakes first-time tax filers make; how to avoid them in AY 2025–26

ITR filing FY 2024-25: Filing an income tax return for the first time is an important financial milestone. While digital tools have made compliance more convenient, many first-time filers still fall into avoidable traps that can delay refunds, trigger unnecessary scrutiny, or create long-term tax complications. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now As we approach the AY 2025-26 tax return filing season, here are some common mistakes that new taxpayers tend to make and tips to avoid them. Choosing the correct ITR Form It is common for new filers to assume that ITR-1 applies to everyone with salary income. However, those with additional income sources like capital gains, house property, or freelance income may be required to use ITR-2 or ITR-3. Filing the incorrect form can result in the return being marked defective thereby requiring the need for filing a rectification. First-time filers should thoroughly evaluate their complete income profile and utilize the income tax portal, relevant utilities, or seek professional advice to ensure they are using the correct form. Reviewing Annual Information Statement (AIS)/ Tax Information Summary (TIS) and Form 26AS Many new filers, particularly salaried individuals, rely solely on their Form 16 issued by their employer, neglecting the comprehensive details available in AIS/TIS and Form 26AS. These statements reflect income reported by employers, banks, mutual funds, and others along with TDS/TCS deductions. Discrepancies between income and taxes reported in the tax return and those reflected in the statements can lead to mismatches, refund delays, or even notices from tax authorities. Downloading and comparing these forms from the income-tax portal prior to tax filing can prevent such issues and ensure complete and accurate reporting. Also Read | Not reporting all Incomes and losses Taxpayers often mistakenly believe that only taxable income must be declared. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now However, exempt income like PPF interest, and even capital losses must be disclosed. Failure to report such exempt income or losses can create gaps in your financial records and prevent carrying forward losses to offset future gains. Therefore, it is crucial to maintain a comprehensive list of all the earnings, including the smallest amounts, and report them under the correct schedule. Not Maintaining Proof for Deductions Although additional controls are introduced in the tax return form like entering the document identification number for any claim of deduction, there is no requirement to upload any supporting documents along with income tax returns. Even then, it is advisable to maintain all supporting documents, either digitally or physically for any future audit queries. Wrong Classification of Income Head Misclassifying income is another subtle but impactful error. For example, reporting freelancing income under the head 'Salary' or short-term capital gains reported under 'long term capital gains.' Such misreporting can lead to incorrect tax computation. Understanding the correct heads of income and ensuring appropriate classification is essential for filing an accurate tax return. Reporting Foreign Shares Indian employees working in MNCs often receive foreign shares as part of a Global ESOP Plan. Employees qualifying as residents must report foreign dividend income and capital gains upon selling of the foreign shares. Additionally, there is a requirement to report foreign shares in the Foreign Asset Schedule once the shares are vested. Also, if foreign tax is deducted on dividend income or on capital gains, employees can claim relief under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. Failing to report the income or not properly disclosing foreign assets can lead to penal consequences. Also Read | Not Disclosing All Bank Accounts First-time filers may declare only their salary bank account, missing out other savings or NRO accounts. While only one bank account needs to be pre-validated for refund, failure to disclose others may raise red flags. All your bank accounts (other than dormant accounts as prescribed by the Tax Department) such as savings, current, NRO account etc needs to be reported in the tax return. Completing the filing process: The importance of e-verification This is the simplest yet most overlooked step. Filing is only complete once the return is e-verified within 30 days. If not verified, the return is treated as invalid, as if the return was not filed at all. E-verification can be completed through Aadhaar OTP, net banking, or by sending the signed ITR-V by post. Finally, filing your tax return before the due date is very crucial to avoid late fees. Also, it is important to update the contact details such as email, mobile number and address which will help to receive updates and communications from the tax department in a timely manner. Also Read | Filing your tax return is more than just a legal obligation, it's your gateway into the financial system. Getting the basics right builds confidence and ensures a smooth, hassle-free tax experience. A little caution today ensures peace of mind—so file smart, file right, and stay stress-free. (The author Shanmuga Prasad, is Director-Tax, EY India. Dilish Davis, Senior Tax Professional, EY India also contributed to the article)

62 percent of GIM manufacturing investment commitments converted to project applications: MB Patil
62 percent of GIM manufacturing investment commitments converted to project applications: MB Patil

India Gazette

time12 hours ago

  • India Gazette

62 percent of GIM manufacturing investment commitments converted to project applications: MB Patil

Bengaluru (Karnataka) [India], July 6 (ANI): Karnataka Minister for Large and Medium Industries, MB Patil, stated on Saturday that Rs 3.4 lakh crore worth of formal project applications have been filed out of the 5.56 lakh crore investment commitments made for the manufacturing sector during the Global Investors Meet (GIM) - Invest Karnataka 2025. This amounts to a 62% conversion rate. Speaking at an exclusive session organised by the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) in the presence of Union Minister for Commerce and Industry Piyush Goyal, MB Patil attributed this impressive conversion as a result of sustained post-MoU engagement with investors, ensuring that intent translates into tangible action. 'Companies such as Krones, Safran, TASL, and many others have already filed formal applications with the state, with several having already commenced groundwork. Additionally, with both IndiGo and Air India now operating MRO (Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul) facilities in Karnataka, alongside TASL's upcoming MRO unit and HAL's existing operations, Karnataka has truly earned its place as the 'MRO Capital of Asia',' Patil noted. Patil further stated that out of the total Rs 10.27 lakh crore worth of investment commitments received during the GIM, proposals valued at Rs 4.34 lakh crore or about 42 per cent, have already materialised into project applications. He positioned Karnataka as a reliable partner in the evolving global economic landscape. He said, 'As the world adopts the China+1 strategy and responds to uncertainties caused by global conflicts, Karnataka has emerged as a dependable and natural partner. We are building not just industrial parks, but self-contained ecosystems that are future-ready and innovation-driven.' The new State Industrial Policy, launched during the GIM, has been widely appreciated for its progressive and inclusive framework. The policy places a strong emphasis on sustainability by integrating decarbonisation goals, green regulatory frameworks, and dedicated promotion of green industrial practices. It also offers targeted additional incentives for Zone 1 and Zone 2 districts, supporting balanced regional development. (ANI)

Trump's Big, Brutal Bill Entrenches US Empire
Trump's Big, Brutal Bill Entrenches US Empire

The Wire

time13 hours ago

  • The Wire

Trump's Big, Brutal Bill Entrenches US Empire

Inderjeet Parmar 3 minutes ago Presented as a 'beautiful' fix for growth and security, HR 1 actually funnels wealth to America's richest, arms a $1 trillion war machine and thickens domestic repression, all with the aim of propping up a waning imperial hegemony. The 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' (H.R. 1), heralded as a transformative economic and security package for the United States, is less an economic stimulus than a manifesto for American supremacy. It weds two imperatives of the US ruling class: an upward transfer of wealth and a vast expansion of militarised power, thereby entrenching its domestic and global dominance. Cloaked in rhetoric about jobs, growth and border security, the Bill arrives at a moment when Washington's hegemony is fraying thanks to rising multipolarity, domestic inequality is at an all time high fast – the top 1% hold 32% of wealth – and popular discontent is increasing. Ruling elites secure dominance not merely through coercion but by manufacturing consent via ideological control over civil society—media, politics, and cultural institutions. The Big Brutal Bill, framed as a 'beautiful' solution to economic and security challenges, exemplifies this process. Its proponents, including Republican leaders and sections of the corporate media, have deployed neoliberal and nationalist narratives to mask the legislation's true aims: redistributing wealth upward, strengthening coercive state mechanisms and escalating militarism to sustain US global primacy. This demands the US power elites discipline both domestic and global populations. The bill's economic provisions constitute a brazen transfer of wealth from the working and middle classes to the ultra-rich. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the bill reduces household resources for the poorest 10% by 4% ($940 annually) while boosting incomes for the richest 0.1% by $389,000 for those earning over $4.3 million. Extending the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which directed two-thirds of benefits to the top 20%, the bill amplifies a historical trend: since 1975, the top 1% have sapped $79 trillion from the bottom 90%. Cuts to Medicaid ($930 billion) and SNAP (affecting 4.5 million people) further impoverish the working class, with 15–16 million potentially losing healthcare. This wealth transfer is not merely economic but ideological. Ruling elites, through Fox News and various well funded corporate think tanks, frame the bill as a universal economic boon, echoing neoliberal myths of 'trickle-down' prosperity. Yet, the bill's regressive tax structure and social cuts weaken the economic base of the working and middle classes, limiting their capacity for resistance. Such policies fragment the potential for a radical 'historic bloc' – a unified working-class alliance capable of challenging capitalist dominance. The bill's economic impact aligns with America's global imperial strategies. By prioritising corporate tax breaks, it mirrors US strategies in the Global South, where austerity and privatisation entrench elite power. This domestic imperialism treats the US working class as a colonised population, extracting wealth while offering ideological platitudes about 'growth.' Militarism and War: Coercive Pillars of Hegemony The bill's $1 trillion military budget, the largest in US history, is a cornerstone of its aggressive imperial agenda, escalating war risks while consolidating ruling-class power. Allocating $400 billion for nuclear warheads, hypersonic missiles, and 200 new bombers, the budget aims to counter multipolar rivals like China and Russia. Yet, this spending dwarfs the military budgets of the next ten states across the world. What this bill shows is the degree to which the US empire relies on military dominance and violence to maintain its increasingly precarious global hegemony. The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute notes that such military modernisation lowers conflict thresholds, with arms races historically preceding wars 70% of the time. This leads to escalating fears of military miscalculation in regions like the South China Sea. The budget has a dual role: coercion abroad and control at home. Abroad, it reinforces U.S. primacy by projecting power against adversaries, a response to the declining legitimacy of the US-led liberal imperial-international order. Domestically, $50 billion for militarised police and National Guard equipment, alongside $8 billion for 10,000 new ICE agents and private prisons, equips the state to suppress dissent. The bill's provision barring courts from holding officials in contempt further enables authoritarianism, echoing post-9/11 trends where domestic repression accompanied foreign wars (e.g., Iraq). Imperialism is not solely an external phenomenon; it disciplines domestic populations to ensure compliance with elite agendas. The military-industrial complex benefits immensely, with $250 billion in contracts to firms like Boeing and Raytheon. Since 2001, some arms firm stocks have outperformed the Standard & Poor 500 by 600%, and contractor CEOs earn $20–$30 million annually. This economic-militaristic nexus incentivises instability, geopolitical tensions, and war, as historical examples like Iraq ($39 billion to Halliburton) demonstrate. Ruling elites are leveraging coercion to secure economic power, with war profits reinforcing their hegemony. Ideological Consent: Nationalism and Distraction The bill's militaristic and economic aims are cloaked in nationalist ideology, a classic tactic to secure consent. Its $10 billion for 'countering foreign disinformation' doubles as domestic propaganda, while border wall and ICE funding ($8 billion) symbolise 'defending America.' These measures rally nationalist sentiment, particularly among the 55% of Republicans who support the budget for 'security'. Such symbols unify subordinate classes under ruling-class leadership, diverting attention from wealth transfers and social cuts. Put crudely, American elite nationalism is little more than an instrument to mask class conflict. By demonising immigrants and foreign adversaries, the bill aligns segments of the working class with elite interests, dampening class consciousness. SIPRI data suggests nationalist surges increase war risks by 15–20% within five years, as publics tolerate aggression. The bill's narrative of 'preventing a recession' and 'securing borders' obscures its role in impoverishing millions, a hegemonic sleight of hand. Crisis of Hegemony and Resistance It is not a coincidence that the bill has emerged in a moment of hegemonic crisis. Rising inequality, multipolarity and public opposition signal eroding consent. Yet, the ruling elite counters this through intensified coercion (military, police) and ideological manipulation (nationalism, neoliberalism). Crises of hegemony require constant renewal, explaining this aggressive consolidation. However, cracks exist: there are widespread denunciations of the bill as a 'wealth transfer' and 'war machine'. Without a unified and organised counter-hegemonic movement, however, this resistance remains fragmented. The Big Brutal Bill is a masterclass in imperial hegemony, blending wealth transfers, militarism, and nationalism to entrench the power of the American Establishment. Its $1 trillion military budget escalates war risks by fuelling arms races and domestic repression, while its economic provisions siphon wealth from the working and middle classes to the ultra-rich. The bill is an example of what Gramsci would call a 'war of position' – fortifying US capitalism amid crisis, reflecting the American state's dual nature: coercive abroad, exploitative at home. Resistance requires exposing these truths and building a historic bloc to challenge the ruling class's grip. Inderjeet Parmar is a professor of international politics and associate dean of research in the School of Policy and Global Affairs at City St George's, University of London, a fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, and a columnist at The Wire. He is an International Fellow at the ROADS Initiative think tank, Islamabad, and author of several books including Foundations of the American Century. He is currently writing a book on the history, politics, and powers of the US foreign policy establishment. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store