
Revealed: Saudi Arabia's secretive rehabilitation ‘prisons' for disobedient women
A young woman wearing a black abaya is pictured in a city in north-west Saudi Arabia standing precariously on a second-floor window ledge. A second photograph shows a group of men escorting her down with the help of a crane.
The woman's identity is unknown, but she was allegedly being held at one of Saudi Arabia's notoriously secretive 'jails' for women banished by their families or husbands for disobedience, extramarital sexual relations or being absent from home.
It was a rare glimpse of the plight of hundreds or more girls and young women believed to be held in such facilities, where they are 'rehabilitated' so they can return to their families.
Speaking out in public or sharing footage of these 'care homes', or Dar al-Reaya, has become impossible in a country where voices on women's rights appear to have been silenced. But over the past six months, the Guardian has gathered testimony about what it is like inside these institutions, described as 'hellish', with weekly floggings, forced religious teachings and no visits or contact with the outside world.
Conditions are reported to be so bad that there have been several cases of suicide or attempted suicide. The women can spend years locked up, unable to leave without the permission of their family or a male guardian.
'Every girl growing up in Saudi knows about Dar al-Reaya and how awful it is. It's like hell. I tried to end my life when I found out I was going to be taken to one. I knew what happened to women there and thought 'I can't survive it',' says one young Saudi woman who later managed to flee into exile.
Maryam Aldossari, a Saudi activist based in London, says: 'A young girl or woman will stay in there for as long as it takes for her to accept the rules.'
While Saudi Arabia celebrates being awarded the Fifa men's World Cup and meticulously promotes itself on the global stage as reformed, women who have dared to publicly call for more rights and freedoms have faced house arrest, jail and exile. Activists say the the country's care homes are one of the regime's lesser-known tools for controlling and punishing women, and want them to be abolished.
Saudi officials have described the care homes, which were set up across the country in the 1960s, as providing 'shelter for girls accused or convicted of various crimes' and say they are used to 'rehabilitate the female inmates' with the help of psychiatrists 'in order to return them to their family'.
But Sarah Al-Yahia, who started a campaign to abolish the care homes, has spoken to a number of girls who describe an abusive regime, with inmates subjected to strip-searches and virginity tests on arrival and given sedatives to put them to sleep.
'It is a prison, not a care home, as they like to call it. They call each other by numbers. 'Number 35, come here.' When one of the girls shared her family name, she got lashes. If she doesn't pray, she gets lashes. If she is found alone with another woman she gets lashes and is accused of being a lesbian. The guards gather and watch when the girls are being lashed.'
Yahia, who is now 38 and lives in exile, says her parents had threatened to send her to Dar al-Reaya since she was 13. 'My father used it as a threat if I didn't obey his sexual abuse,' she says, adding that girls and women may face the horrifying dilemma of deciding between Dar al-Reaya and staying in an abusive home.
'They make it impossible for others to help women fleeing abuse. I know a woman who was sentenced to six months in jail because she helped a victim of violence. Giving shelter in the case of a woman charged for 'absenteeism' is a crime in Saudi Arabia.
'If you are sexually abused or get pregnant by your brother or father you are the one sent to Dar al-Reaya to protect the family's reputation,' she says.
Amina*, 25, says she sought refuge in a 'care home' in Buraydah, a city in central Saudi Arabia, after being beaten by her father. She says the building was 'old, crumbling and unsettling' and the staff 'cold and unhelpful'. They belittled her experience, says Amina, telling her other girls had it 'far worse' and were 'chained at home' and told her to 'thank God my situation wasn't that bad'.
The next day, staff summoned her father, says Amina, but did little to protect her. 'They asked both of us to write down our 'conditions'. I requested not to be beaten or forced into marriage, and to be allowed to work. My father demanded that I respect everyone, never leave the house without permission, and always be accompanied by a male escort. I signed out of fear – I didn't feel I had a choice.'
Once she returned home, Amina says the beatings continued and in the end she was forced to flee into exile. 'I remember being utterly alone and terrified. I felt like a prisoner in my own home, with no one to protect me, no one to defend me. It felt like my life didn't matter, like even if something terrible happened to me, no one would care,' she says.
Sign up to Global Dispatch
Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team
after newsletter promotion
For young girls, learning to fear Dar al-Reaya starts from a young age. Shams* says she was 16 when a woman who had been in one of the care homes was brought to her school. She told the class that she had started a relationship with a boy and was caught by the religious police and made to confess to her father. After she became pregnant her family disowned her and the father refused to allow her to marry, so she was sent to Dar al-Reaya. 'She told us, if a woman has sex or a relationship she becomes a 'cheap woman'. If you are a man you will always be a man, but if a woman makes herself cheap, she will be cheap for life.'
Layla*, who still lives in the country, says she was taken to Dar al-Reaya after complaining to the police about her father and brothers. She says they abused her and then accused her of bringing shame on her family after she posted on social media about women's rights. She remained in the care home until her father agreed for her to be released, even though he was her alleged abuser.
'These women have no one. They could be abandoned for years, even without committing a crime,' says a Saudi women's rights activist who wishes to remain anonymous. 'The only way out is through a male guardian, marriage or jumping off the building. Old men or former convicts who did not find a bride would look for a bride in these institutions. Some women would accept this as the only way out.'
Some Saudi men will say a woman deserves to be there or that they should be thankful that the government provides facilities to protect them, says Fawzia al-Otaibi, an activist forced to flee the country in 2022.
'No one dares tweet or speak about these places. No one will ask about you when you go there. They make the victims feel ashamed,' Otaibi says.
Activists say that if the Saudi regime were serious about women's rights they would reform the care home system and provide proper safe shelters for victims of abuse. 'There are women who have good families who do not abuse or hide them,' says a Saudi activist now living in exile. 'But many live under strict restrictions and suffer abuse silently. The state supports this abuse with these institutions. They only exist to discriminate against women. Why are the Saudi authorities allowing them to stay open?'
The human rights group ALQST says Dar al-Reaya facilities are notorious within Saudi Arabia as state tools for enforcing gender norms and 'stand in stark contrast to the Saudi authorities' narrative of women's empowerment'. Campaigns officer, Nadyeen Abdulaziz, says: 'If they are serious about advancing women's rights, they must abolish these discriminatory practices and allow the establishment of genuine shelters that protect, rather than punish, those who have experienced abuse.'
A Saudi government spokesperson said there was a network of specialised care facilities that supported vulnerable groups, including women and children affected by domestic violence. It categorically rejected claims of enforced confinement, mistreatment, or coercion.
'These are not detention centres, and any allegation of abuse is taken seriously and subject to thorough investigation … Women are free to leave at any time, whether to attend school, work, or other personal activities, and may exit permanently whenever they choose with no need of approval from a guardian or family member.'
It also said that reports of domestic violence were received through a dedicated and confidential hotline, and that all cases were addressed swiftly to ensure the safety of those affected.* Names have been changed
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
40 minutes ago
- BBC News
Newshour UN calls for investigation into Gaza aid stations deaths
The UN Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres, has called for an independent investigation into the reported killing on Sunday of at least thirty-one Palestinians near a US-backed aid distribution centre in Gaza. Israel denied that their forces fired at people near the site. UN human rights chief, Volker Turk, tells us the incident shows Israel's disregard for Palestinian civilians. Also in the programme: Russia stands by its hard line demands at ceasefire talks in Istanbul, and the French parliament votes to posthumously promote Alfred Dreyfus, in an attempt to right one of histories most infamous anti-Semitic scandals (Picture: Palestinians who were killed in the Israeli army attacks near the American aid center in Rafah and the Muin area and Salahaddin Street in the east of Khan Yunis are being sent to their last journeys by their relatives at Nasser Medical Center in Khan Yunis city, Gaza on June 2, 2025. Photo by Abed Rahim Khatib/Anadolu via Getty Images)


BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
The Documentary Podcast Assignment: What future for Assad's army?
The former rebels who now rule Syria dismantled the old regime's security forces as soon as they came to power last December. Overnight, half a million soldiers, police and intelligence officers, and some civil defence workers lost their jobs and income. Many of those sacked were guilty of atrocities. But the majority probably were not. Tim Whewell reports on the reconciliation process which deprived servicemen of their jobs – but delayed justice. He talks to a variety of former junior members of the security forces – a civil defence worker, a policeman and an officer of the elite Republican Guard – to ask how and why they originally became servants of the regime – and find out how they are living now. War crimes investigator Kilman Abu Hawa says only 10-15% of former servicemen are guilty of crimes: the guilty should be prosecuted, and the innocent reinstated. Nanar Hawach of the International Crisis Group draws a parallel with Iraq, where the security forces were dismantled after the fall of Saddam Hussein. Many discontented former officers in Iraq eventually joined the jihadi group, ISIS. Do the mass dismissals in Syria risk provoking a similar insurgency?


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Trump slaps Biden over Iran and denies U.S. nuclear deal would allow country to enrich uranium
President Donald Trump blamed former President Joe Biden for the U.S.'s current Iran woes - and denied that the new Iran nuclear deal would allow for uranium enrichment. On Monday, Axios reported that the 'secret' nuclear deal proposed Saturday by the United States would allow Iran to enrich low levels of uranium for a period of time that was yet to be determined. The White House didn't immediately contest those details, which run counter to public statements from White House envoy Steve Witkoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 'The AUTOPEN should have stopped Iran a long time ago from "enriching,"' Trump chimed in Monday evening. 'Under our potential Agreement - WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' The president has nicknamed 82-year-old Biden 'autopen,' using it as a way to disparage the Democrat for allegedly being asleep at the wheel - and allowing aides to sign documents for him. Not much progress was made with Iran during Biden's four years in office, after Trump pulled out of the Obama-era nuclear deal in 2018. The Biden administration initially tried to revive the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the Obama deal, but it was later declared 'dead.' In the meantime there were warnings about Iranian assassination plots against Trump and other key Trump 1.0 administration figures over the U.S.'s 2020 targeted strike in Iraq that killed Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani. Now the U.S. is once engaged in Iran nuclear talks, this time with Witkoff at the helm. Axios reported that the proposal Witkoff submitted on Saturday included 'preliminary ideas' that would be discussed in the next round of talks. Under the proposal, Iran would be barred from building new enrichment facilities and would have to 'dismantle critical infrastructure for conversion and processing of uranium.' It also stated that Iran would have to halt new research and development of centrifuges. At the same time, it would allow for some domestic enrichment, though not beyond those necessary for civilian purposes. Upon signing the agreement, Iran would have to temporarily reduce its enrichment concentration to 3 percent, sources told Axios. Iran's underground nuclear facilities would have to become 'non-operational' for a period of time that was agreed to by the parties. The country's above-ground facilities would be limited to to the level needed to make nuclear reactor fuel using International Atomic Energy Agency guidelines. Sanctions relief would follow if Iran 'demonstrates real commitment' to the satifaction of the U.S. and the IAEA. And overall the nuclear deal would focus on creating a regional enrichment consortium. Those terms would make it easier for the U.S. to strike a deal. But they would likely irritate Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has called on the U.S. to only strike a deal with Iran under the strictest terms. 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Axios in a statement. 'Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it,' she said. 'Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media.' When asked for comment on the Axios story, a White House official told the Daily Mail that the deal was 'tough' and it would prevent Iran from getting the bomb. 'President Trump is speaking the cold, hard truth,' the official said via email. 'The terms we gave Iran were very tough and would make it impossible for them to ever obtain a nuclear bomb.'