logo
European Commission aims to guide research cash to political priorities in next long-term budget

European Commission aims to guide research cash to political priorities in next long-term budget

Euractiv08-07-2025
Jacob Wulff Wold Euractiv Jul 8, 2025 18:42 2 min. read News
Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Want to keep reading?
Get a subscription on Euractiv Pro and elevate your political insight! Discover Euractiv Pro
For corporations Already have an account?
Log in
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

OpenAI wants US-wide AI rules with an eye on Europe's rulebook
OpenAI wants US-wide AI rules with an eye on Europe's rulebook

Euractiv

time3 hours ago

  • Euractiv

OpenAI wants US-wide AI rules with an eye on Europe's rulebook

The company says it wants federal AI rules to avoid 'a patchwork of state rules' Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maximilian Henning Euractiv Aug 13, 2025 15:00 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. OpenAI is urging California, a trendsetter in US regulation, to align its AI rules with existing national or international frameworks, including the EU's, to avoid conflicting regulations across the country. The EU passed its AI Act last year and introduced a voluntary Code of Practice for providers of large AI models, a non-binding framework signed by almost all major US and European companies, including OpenAI. In a letter to California Governor Gavin Newsom, OpenAI said the state should treat AI companies as compliant with its own rules if they have signed up to the EU's code, or if they work with the US's federal AI Centre. In the letter, OpenAI's chief lobbyist Christopher Lehane recommended policies 'that avoid duplication and inconsistencies' with those of similar democratic regimes. In a blog post accompanying the letter, the company warned the US must choose between setting clear national standards for AI and 'a patchwork of state rules', adding: 'Imagine how hard it would have been to win the Space Race if California's aerospace and tech industries had been tangled in state-by-state regulations'. At a US Senate hearing in May, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said having 50 different regulatory regimes would be 'quite bad' and warned that adopting the EU's approach to AI regulation would be 'disastrous', instead calling for a 'light touch' federal approach. California, the most populous and wealthiest US state, often seeks to set an example for others through its regulation. But tensions over AI rules between Washington and state capitals have been brewing for some time. At the start of July, the US Senate scrapped a decade-long ban on state-level AI laws from President Donald Trump's broad budget bill. Weeks later, the Trump administration published an AI Action Plan seeking to block federal funding for AI in states with 'burdensome AI regulations'. (de)

Commission targets reform of its food chain rules in 2026
Commission targets reform of its food chain rules in 2026

Euractiv

time8 hours ago

  • Euractiv

Commission targets reform of its food chain rules in 2026

Some farmer organisations have called on Brussels to tighten up the rules and ban sales below production cost Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Maria Simon Arboleas Euractiv Aug 13, 2025 13:52 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. The European Commission is preparing an overhaul of legislation on unfair trading practices (UTPs) to prevent farmers from selling below production cost. The EU executive announced this week that it will launch a consultation on the revision this autumn with the aim of presenting a proposal a year later. In his blueprint for the agri-food sector, EU farm chief Christophe Hansen promised that the Commission would overhaul the UTPs directive to address one of farmers' key concerns: not covering production costs. Not everyone welcomed the announcement, with EU supermarket lobby Eurocommerce saying that the Commission should not have pre-empted the outcome of the ongoing evaluation of the rules, due to be completed in November. The directive currently distinguishes between 'black' and 'grey' unfair market practices – the former being unconditionally prohibited, such as payment delays of one month, and the latter permitted if agreed between parties, such as the return of unsold products. Some farmer organisations have long called on Brussels to tighten up the rules by including the purchase of agricultural products below production cost in one of the two categories. Countries including Belgium, Croatia, France and Spain have similar measures in place. But in a debate at the Special Committee on Agriculture (SCA) in June, member states could not agree on what to do with the colour scheme. In parallel, EU lawmakers are currently working on a 'quick fix' to the UTPs directive that the Commission proposed last December. The goal is to ensure cross-border enforcement and tackle international purchasing alliances. The Council reached an agreement on the proposal in April and the Parliament's AGRI committee adopted its position last month. MEPs wants to kick-start institutional talks as soon as the plenary gives its green light in September. (jp) CORRECTION: This story's headline has been changed to reflect the fact that the legislation is due to land in late 2026.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store