Ministers want to overhaul rules to make it easier to open pubs and music venues
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has said she wants to 'protect pavement pints' as a new licensing framework will also fast-track permissions for al fresco dining in dedicated areas as the Government looks to modernise planning rules.
The Government wants to make it easier to convert disused shops into venues, and dedicated 'hospitality zones' will be brought forward that could see permissions for outside dining, street parties and extended opening hours pushed through quickly.
Developers will also be made responsible for soundproofing buildings they construct near pubs or clubs, to protect existing venues from noise complaints.
The Government has said the plans will be subject to a call for evidence.
The Business Secretary has said that 'red tape has stood in the way of people's business ideas for too long'.
Jonathan Reynolds said: 'This Government has a plan to replace shuttered up shops with vibrant places to socialise, turning them into thriving cafes or busy bars, which support local jobs and give people a place to get together and catch up over a beer or a coffee.
'Red tape has stood in the way of people's business ideas for too long. Today we're slashing those barriers to giving small business owners the freedom to flourish.'
Ms Reeves said that 'pubs and bars are at the heart of British life'.
'For too long, they've been stifled by clunky, outdated rules. We're binning them, to protect pavement pints, al fresco dining and street parties – not just for the summer, but all year round,' she added.
An industry body warned earlier in July that the equivalent of more than one pub per day will close across Great Britain this year, pointing to high bills and taxes.
The British Beer and Pub Association (BBPA) estimated that 378 pubs will close this year across England, Wales and Scotland, which it said would amount to more than 5,600 direct job losses.
The projected 2025 figures compare with 350 closures in 2024.
Bar chain Brewdog announced this week that it would close 10 of its venues, as chief executive James Taylor told staff it is partly in response to 'rising costs, increased regulation, and economic pressures'.
Representatives of the hospitality industry welcomed the changes but said they should go hand in hand with a cut to business rates as cost pressures threaten to 'tax out of existence' some businesses.
Kate Nicholls, chairwoman of UKHospitality, said: 'We strongly welcome these proposals to cut red tape and make it easier to open and operate hospitality venues, create jobs and grow the economy.
'But positive and encouraging as these measures certainly are, they can't on their own offset the immediate and mounting cost pressures facing hospitality businesses which threaten to tax out of existence the businesses and jobs that today's announcement seeks to support.'
Emma McClarkin, chief executive of the British Beer and Pub Association, said: 'After bringing together key voices in the pubs and the wider hospitality sector, it's great news that many of the industry's recommendations on how best to cut red-tape and support growth will be acted on.
'These changes must go hand in hand with meaningful business rates reform, mitigating staggering employment costs, and a cut in beer duty so that pubs can thrive at the heart of the community.'
Andrew Griffith MP, shadow business secretary, said: 'Though any cutting of red tape for hospitality businesses is welcome, this is pure hypocrisy and inconsistency from Labour.'
He said the Government was 'crippling the hospitality industry by doubling business rates, imposing a jobs tax and a full-on strangulation of employment red tape'.
'As the result, shorter opening hours, shedding jobs and expensive pints are becoming the norm.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool forward CONVINCED Richard Hughes to sell Luis Diaz
Liverpool will soon wrap up a €75m deal which sees Luis Diaz join Bayern Munich. The Colombia winger, 28, joined the Reds back in 2022 for an initial fee of £37.5m (€45m) and his signing has largely been a success. Diaz has won all the major honours in the domestic game - contributing 13 goals en route to the Premier League title last season. LFC x New Era Shop Now LFC Signed Merch Shop Now LFC x Titleist Shop Now Arne Slot opted to use the forward in two different positions during the title-winning campaign - wide on the left as well as in a false 9 role. But with two years left on his contract - and no prospect of a renewal - the time has come for a parting of the ways. Sporting director Richard Hughes has done great business - effectively doubling Liverpool's money on Diaz. Liverpool well-covered on left wing It had been speculated that the Reds could go into the market for a direct replacement - with Rodrygo among the options mentioned. However, according to a new report from James Pearce in the Athletic it appears Liverpool will instead spend the Diaz fee on ANOTHER target - most probably Alexander Isak. That's because the club believe that the current options they possess on the left are sufficient with Cody Gakpo, Hugo Ekitike and Florian Wirtz all capable of filling in. And the emergence of , meanwhile, may be the key factor in the Anfield club declining the opportunity to sign a left winger. Ngumoha a factor in Diaz decision 'Liverpool believe they have sufficient left-sided cover already in place," the report reads. 'Cody Gakpo, who scored 18 goals in all competitions last season, is expected to kick on and play an even bigger part. 'New signing Hugo Ekitike can operate off that flank as well as through the middle, while the emergence of Rio Ngumoha is another factor. 'It would be wrong to expect too much from Nguhoma given he doesn't even turn 17 for another month, but he's a massive talent. 'He has lit up pre-season and you don't want to block his pathway.' © IMAGO - Rio Ngumoha Liverpool
Yahoo
3 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tide turns as TPG leads talks to lead digital bank fundraising
TPG, the American private equity giant, is in advanced talks to take a stake in Tide, the British-based digital banking services platform. Sky News has learnt that TPG, which manages more than $250bn in assets, is discussing acquiring a significant shareholding in the company. Sources said that Tide's existing investors were expected to sell shares to TPG, while a separate deal would involve another existing shareholder in the company acquiring newly issued shares. The two transactions may be conducted at different valuations although both are likely to see the company valued at at least $1bn, the sources added. The size of TPG's prospective stake in Tide was unclear on Monday. Earlier this year, Sky News reported that Tide had been negotiating the terms of an investment from Apis Partners, a prolific investor in the fintech sector, although it was unclear whether this would now proceed. Tide has roughly 650,000 SME customers in both Britain and India, with the latter market expanding at a faster rate. Morgan Stanley, the Wall Street bank, has been advising Tide on its fundraising. Tide was founded in 2015 by George Bevis and Errol Damelin, before launching two years later. It describes itself as the leading business financial platform in the UK, offering business accounts and related banking services. The company also provides its SME 'members' in the UK a set of connected administrative solutions from invoicing to accounting. It now boasts a roughly 11% SME banking market share in Britain. Read more:Wise set for resounding winTalkTalk's £100m windfallUS could lose, even if Trumps wins Tide, which employs about 2,000 people, also launched in Germany last May. The company's investors include Apax Partners, Augmentum Fintech and LocalGlobe. Chaired by the City grandee Sir Donald Brydon, Tide declined to comment on Monday. TPG also declined to comment.


Forbes
6 minutes ago
- Forbes
Trump Claims Epstein ‘Stole' Workers From Him
President Donald Trump said he cut ties with Jeffrey Epstein because Epstein repeatedly poached his employees—the first time he's cited that as a reason for their falling out as he seeks to distance himself from the convicted sex offender amid a persistent saga that's led to a break with Trump's base. President Donald Trump gestures as he meets British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for bilateral talks ... More at Trump Turnberry golf club on July 28, 2025 in Turnberry, Scotland. (Photo by) Getty Images Trump said 'for years, I wouldn't talk to Jeffrey Epstein' because 'he stole people that work for me,' the president told reporters Monday during his visit to Scotland. Previous reports have suggested Trump banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago after Epstein made advances towards another member's teenage daughter and that Epstein and Trump had a falling out when Trump outbid Epstein for a Palm Beach mansion in 2004. Trump gave the new reason he said Epstein became 'persona non grata' to him as the blowback surrounding the Justice Department's decision not to release additional documents related to its Epstein investigation has continued for a month, bringing renewed attention to Trump's own personal relationship with Epstein. Trump on Monday also repeated a claim he made last week that he never went to Epstein's island in the Caribbean, Little Saint James, telling reporters he was invited but 'turned it down' and claiming, without evidence, former President Bill Clinton went there dozens of times, despite Clinton denying previously he ever visited the island.