Current And Former Commissioners Call For The Release Of Equal Pay Amendments' Human Rights Analysis
Our parliamentary processes are in place to protect democratic participation rights and should not be circumvented, especially on an issue like this which has significant consequences for so many people.
The Equal Employment Opportunities (EEO) Commissioner and three former EEO Commissioners are calling for the release of the human rights analysis of the controversial equal pay amendments.
Saunoamaali'i Dr Karanina Sumeo, Dr Jackie Blue and Dame Judy McGregor say they support the current EEO Commissioner Professor Gail Pacheco's concerns that the legislative overhaul will make claims more difficult. Professor Pacheco is concerned about the halt in progress on 33 current claims and the lack of consultation. Earlier in the week, she made a statement that said:
' The significant savings to the Government will come from the pockets of women working in jobs that are undervalued.
'It's also concerning that the government is putting a stop to progress made to current claims that thousands of individuals have contributed to in good faith. Their hard work deserves to be respected, not undone.
'Our parliamentary processes are in place to protect democratic participation rights and should not be circumvented, especially on an issue like this which has significant consequences for so many people.'
The Cabinet paper accompanying the legislation had blanked out the human rights implications in a redacted section.
The former EEO Commissioners say that the public deserves to know the human rights consequences of the fast-tracked bill which was passed under urgency this week. 'The use of urgency locked out both women and members of the public to have input on critical legislation that impacts on their jobs, their livelihoods, their families and breaches their rights.'
'Pay equity obligations are specified in various legally binding United Nation conventions to which New Zealand is a signatory, such as the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), and in conventions on the rights of disabled people and racial discrimination. New Zealand has also signed up to International Labour Organization conventions on pay equity.
'As a country we regularly boast about being a human rights leader so we need to see how this could affect our reputation as well as how it affects women who deserve pay equity in good faith.
'The New Zealand Government has repeatedly promised the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) that it was making steady progress on implementing equal pay and pay equity.'
' In its last report to CEDAW the Government boasted about the effectiveness of the legislation it has now overturned. Women are worried about the human rights implications of making it harder to get pay equity,' the former Commissioners say.
The Ministry for Women told the CEDAW committee last year that the previous equal pay law had 'introduced a practical and accessible process to raise and consider claims of systemic sex-based pay undervaluation in female-dominated occupations.'
The Ministry told CEDAW the changes had set out 'a clear pay equity process to test whether work that is predominantly done by women is free from sex-based undervaluation.'
'Now that this practical, accessible and clear pay equity process has been abandoned, we need to know how women's human rights will be protected. We need to see the advice that the Cabinet was given in the true spirit of transparency,' the former Commissioners say.
' Aotearoa New Zealand consistently tells the United Nations that it is proud of its leadership on gender equality in the international community. We now have to be honest that we are no longer first in class. We are alarmed that human rights implications were not disclosed or examined and regarded as insignificant.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
11 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Israel orders army to execute government decisions on Gaza
Israel's military will have to execute any Government decisions on Gaza, the Defence Minister said on Wednesday after reported disagreements over the prospect of a full occupation of the Palestinian territory.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Opinion: NCEA isn't perfect but New Zealand shouldn't forget why it was introduced in the first place
The reforms are meant to address long-standing concerns over how students accumulate credits to complete their qualifications. With the NCEA, students can opt out of assessments, including final exams, once they have accumulated enough credits. But as the Government seeks to address the 'gaming' of the system, it shouldn't lose sight of why the NCEA was introduced in the first place – and who it was designed to help. While the system has its flaws, a return to an exam-based model may not make the grade either. Addressing uneven achievement The NCEA was introduced between 2002 and 2004 to replace the School Certificate, Sixth Form Certificate and Bursary qualifications. Its aim was to broaden educational success, recognising diverse forms of learning as legitimate. The previous qualifications primarily valued traditional academic subjects because those were, in large part, the only ones available for assessment. The NCEA represented a shift away from viewing vocational learning – for example, in trades or creative subjects – as less valuable and not a viable path to formal qualifications. It also marked a departure from 'norms'-based assessment, which scaled student results to fit predetermined pass and fail rates. In contrast, NCEA was 'standards'-based: if a student could demonstrate the required skills or knowledge, they received the credits. But since the early days of the NCEA, there have been concerns students could achieve the qualifications without really having gained an adequate education. The flexibility of the NCEA – allowing schools, teachers and students to tailor learning pathways – is both its greatest strength and its greatest weakness. It has been criticised for being confusing, inconsistent and lacking credibility. Last year, Mike Grimshaw, an associate professor of sociology at Canterbury University, raised concerns that students were entering university 'functionally illiterate'. He said New Zealand was 'under-educating but over-qualifying'. Concerns such as this over the NCEA have fuelled repeated calls for reform. Whiplash for schools While few dispute changes are needed, the scale and pace of the Government's proposals are another matter. Schools have already contended with numerous policy shifts under this Government, including rapid curriculum changes and new assessments in primary and secondary schools. Now they are being told the entire NCEA framework will be replaced. The sheer volume and speed of these changes puts significant pressure on teachers. This is not the only concern. Under the NCEA, a Year 12 student who worries they might fail the calculus 'standard' can still do maths, knowing they have the option not to sit the calculus exam. Under the new system, this sort of flexibility disappears. Students will either take Year 12 mathematics – or they will not. This inflexibility raises the stakes. It may deter students from taking certain subjects altogether for fear of failure. The renewed emphasis on exams is also problematic. Research has shown exam outcomes can be influenced by gender, anxiety and even personal circumstances on exam day. In other words, exams are not necessarily the 'credible' measure of learning they are made out to be. There are also important questions that the Government's policy consultation proposal does not answer. What are the options for a student who fails the certificate on their first attempt? Will schools still be able to tailor internal assessments to suit their students? Room for some optimism There are, however, reasons for cautious optimism. The Government has promised to retain the NCEA standards-based approach. Preserving the integrity of whole subjects means students are more likely to learn topics, such as algebra, that keep academic options open but are often left out in the NCEA. But this will come at a cost. The stakes will feel higher and students will face greater pressure to succeed. The NCEA delivered on the promise that we shouldn't automatically assume half of our population will fail. Over the past two decades, more young people have left school with qualifications. But did they learn more? That remains an open question. The new system will likely bring consistency and arguably credibility to high school qualifications. But some students will pay the price of this higher-stakes approach to education. David Pomeroy is senior lecturer in Mathematics Education, at the University of Canterbury.
NZ Herald
13 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Pro-Trump nationalist Karol Nawrocki becomes Poland's President amid tensions
Presidents in Poland can initiate as well as veto legislation, and have some influence over the country's foreign and defence policies. The outgoing President, Andrzej Duda, had already been at loggerheads with Tusk over many issues, including opposing easing an almost total ban on abortion. 'Annoy us' But relations are likely to be even worse under Nawrocki as the political climate heats up before parliamentary elections planned for 2027, analysts say. Karol Nawrocki's victory highlights Poland's political polarisation and his presidency may strain relations with the Government. Photo / Getty Images 'I have no doubt that Mr Nawrocki will do everything to annoy us,' said Tusk, who warned that he would not let Nawrocki 'demolish' his Government. Nawrocki has repeatedly branded Tusk's Government as 'the worst in the history' of democratic Poland. He has promised to be 'an active president' from the start and has said he wants to 'stimulate' the Government with various bills. In a video posted on social media on Tuesday, he said his inauguration would open 'a new chapter in the history of our beloved Poland. 'Let us unite,' he said. The Government holds a parliamentary majority but the Government and the President may be forced to make some compromises. 'Both parties should realise that engaging in intense confrontation is obviously not the way forward,' said Piotr Trudnowski, a member of Klub Jagielloński, a Christian-Democrat think tank. 'Poland First, Poles First' Ewa Marciniak, a political scientist at the University of Warsaw, said Nawrocki would have to work with the Government on foreign policy – in which he has 'no experience'. During the election campaign, he highlighted the importance of ties with the United States and his close ties with Trump. 'It is precisely from this that he will build his foreign policy, at least initially,' Marciniak said. One major difference could be relations with Ukraine. Trudnowski said Nawrocki would 'not be as enthusiastic' as his predecessor on Ukraine. During his campaign, Nawrocki opposed the idea of Nato membership for Ukraine and criticised Kyiv for not having 'shown gratitude for what the Poles have done'. Under his slogan 'Poland First, Poles First', he was critical of some of the benefits received by the more than one million Ukrainians who have fled to the country. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has congratulated Nawrocki and emphasised the importance of close ties with Poland – a vital transit country for military and humanitarian supplies to his country as it fights off Russia's invasion. After speaking to Nawrocki by phone last week, Zelenskyy said the two had agreed to visit each other and seek forms of co-operation 'that will bring real results for both our countries and our people'. Zelenskyy said he was 'thankful for the readiness to work together and for the assurance of continued support for Ukraine'. – Agence France-Presse
