
US attack on Iranian nuclear sites roils oil market, India braces for possible price surge
New Delhi: Global crude oil prices may face sharp upward pressure when markets open for trade Monday, after the US launched air strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities — Natanz, Fordo and Isfahan — escalating tensions in the Middle East.
The strikes have raised concerns of supply disruptions that could hit major importers like India, which depends on overseas oil for more than 85% of its energy needs.
In a televised address on Sunday (India time), US President Donald Trump confirmed the direct American assault on Iran's nuclear programme, ending days of speculation about Washington's entry into the Israel-Iran conflict. He warned that further strikes could follow.
Read this | Mint Primer: What if the US joins Israel's war with Iran?
'Remember, there are many targets left. Tonight was the most difficult of them all by far, and perhaps the most lethal. But if peace doesn't come quickly we will go to those other targets with precision, speed and skill," Trump said.
Hormuz threat puts India's energy security at risk
The strikes have amplified fears of a possible Iranian response, particularly threats to block the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow chokepoint through which nearly 20% of global crude oil and liquefied natural gas flows. Energy markets have long feared that any disruption here could trigger a severe supply crunch.
'Concerns remain over whether supplies through the Strait of Hormuz would be blocked. Refiners are keeping a close watch and looking for alternate sources in case supplies through the strait are halted," said an official with a state-run oil marketing company.
Read this | Mint Explainer | Strait of Hormuz: Will Iran shut the vital oil artery of the world?
Iran currently produces about 3.3 million barrels per day (mbd) of crude oil, exporting 1.8-2.0 mbd. While Iranian oil facilities have reportedly been hit, the extent of damage remains unclear. But the larger risk lies in a broader regional conflict that could pull in other major oil producers in the Gulf, said ratings agency Icra Ltd in a recent report.
India could face significant cost pressures even though it no longer buys oil directly from Iran due to US sanctions. Crude supplies from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates, all routed via the Strait of Hormuz, account for nearly half of India's total imports. About 60% of its natural gas imports also pass through this critical passage.
Since 13 June 2025, when the Israel-Iran conflict began, crude prices have risen from $64-65 per barrel to $74-75 per barrel.
Oil is likely to average around $70-80 a barrel in FY26, and a sustained rise from current levels risks a reduction in India's growth forecasts, Icra Ratings Ltd had said on Friday.
Read this | India concerned about crude oil supply disruptions in Strait of Hormuz as prices surge after Israel's attacks on Iran
'A sustained flare-up in the conflict poses upside risks for estimates of crude oil prices, and India's net oil imports and the current account deficit. A $10/bbl increase in the average price of crude oil for the fiscal will typically push up net oil imports by ~$13-14 billion during the year, enlarging the CAD (current account deficit) by 0.3% of GDP," Icra noted.
India's import bill in FY25 stood at $137 billion, according to the Petroleum Planning & Analysis Cell.
"Impact on the import bill will depend on how long the elevated prices sustain. However, a 10% increase in crude prices may lead to a 3% increase in the import bill given that crude oil comprises about 30% of India's total imports. With this, the trade deficit may increase to 0.1-0.2% of GDP. There would be some pressure on the currency but an impact on GDP is not seen as of now," said Madan Sabnavis, chief economist at Bank of Baroda.
Icra had also said that changes in crude oil prices are likely to translate faster into higher wholesale and consumer inflation. For every 10% increase in crude oil prices, wholesale inflation could rise by 80-100 basis points, while consumer inflation may increase by 20-30 basis points, depending on the extent of pass-through into retail fuel prices.
'Only about 8% of the energy supplies moving through the strait can be rerouted via alternative corridors," said Prashant Vashisht, vice president at Icra. "If the strait is blocked, India would have to source more from regions like Russia and Nigeria."
On Friday, Brent crude futures on the Intercontinental Exchange closed at $77 a barrel, down 2.33% amid earlier uncertainty over US military involvement.
Oil market volatility is expected to spike when trading resumes, said Rahul Kalantri, vice president for commodities at Mehta Equities. 'We expect a knee-jerk rally potentially pushing Brent to the $80–$85 range or beyond if further conflict escalates," he said, adding that a full blockade of the Strait could drive prices 10–20% higher.
Also read | Oil is warming up, but India's inflation may escape the heat
Earlier this month, JP Morgan had warned that a major escalation could push crude oil prices as high as $120 a barrel. However, the bank noted that so far, despite multiple historical threats, the Strait of Hormuz has never been fully closed. 'Crucially, for all of recorded history, crude oil continued to flow," JP Morgan wrote.
The Indian government is closely monitoring the evolving situation. The petroleum ministry has held consultations with oil marketing companies to assess the state of domestic supplies and build contingency plans.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
6 minutes ago
- NDTV
How US Airstrikes Created Win-Win Chance For Iran, Diplomatic Fix For Trump
New Delhi: With the US carrying out precision airstrikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran, all eyes are now on Tehran's response. Iran now faces a tough choice: a strong retaliation may lead to further escalation, but a meek response may result in the national leadership losing popular support. There is another possibility: Iran may not strike back at the US now. Trump Throws A Bait The Donald Trump administration struck three nuclear installations in Iran -- Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan. This is the first time the US has attacked facilities in Iran since the 1979 Iranian Revolution. However, the precision nature of the strike suggests that Trump has, in effect, thrown the ball into Iran's court. "Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier," the US President said after the airstrikes. The US has thrown a bait. If Iran chooses to respond by targeting US facilities, Washington DC would then step up its offensive and push the "we didn't start the war" narrative. What Iran Said After the Attacks Iran's Foreign Affairs Ministry has condemned the US' "brutal military aggression" and termed it a "grave and unprecedented violation" of the fundamental principles of the UN Charter and international law. "The US military aggression against the territorial integrity and national sovereignty of a UN member state - carried out in collusion with the genocidal Israeli regime - once again laid bare the depth of depravity that governs American foreign policy and revealed the extent of hostility harbored by the US ruling establishment against the peace-seeking and independence-loving people of Iran." "The Islamic Republic of Iran is resolved to defend Iran's territory, sovereignty, security and people by all force and means against the United States' criminal aggression," Iran has said, urging the UN Security Council to step in. Why Iran May Not Target the US It would be reckless of Iran to launch a direct attack on the US at this point. The unequal military capabilities aside, such an attack would give Trump exactly what he wants -- a reason to launch a massive offensive. What Iran may do instead is let Trump have this symbolic victory and continue its attacks against Israel. Doing this keeps Washington out of the war and puts more pressure on Tel Aviv. If the US still targets Iran, it would seem like the aggressor going to war on Israel's behalf. Diplomatic Dilemma For Trump In joining the war against Iran, US President Trump has played a major gamble. For long, Trump has spoken against "forever wars" fought by former US Presidents abroad, but his escalation today flies in the face of that rhetoric. While the Democrats in the US have stepped up their political attacks following the airstrikes, Trump also runs the risk of alienating a section of his Republican supporters. If the US manages to get Iran to capitulate, Trump can still claim a major win. But if that doesn't happen, he will be blamed for drawing Washington into another protracted conflict. This is also bad optics for brand Trump, especially at a time when Pakistan has backed him for the Nobel Peace Prize, stressing that his intervention in the India-Pakistan conflict last month "stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker". India has repeatedly emphasised that the ceasefire was the result of direct diplomacy between New Delhi and Islamabad, with the latter reaching out after India targeted key military installations in Pakistan. A Win-Win Option For Iran Today's airstrikes in Iran provide a big opportunity for Iran to shift its nuclear strategy. Iran had signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty in 1968 and ratified it in 1970 as a non-nuclear-weapon state. Amid the spiralling conflict with Israel, Tehran had earlier said its lawmakers are preparing a bill for withdrawal from the NPT. The US airstrikes provide it with a better option. It can now simply say it does not know what has happened to its enriched uranium supplies due to wartime conditions. This would create a strategic ambiguity, and this alone could deter future attacks and keep Western powers guessing. This approach offers Iran three advantages: (1) it can delay a direct confrontation with the US (2) provide a justification to step away from nuclear transparency (3) provide leverage in any post-war negotiation.


NDTV
6 minutes ago
- NDTV
From Bahrain To Qatar, A Look At Key US Military Bases In Middle East
Tehran: Amid tensions spiralling in the Middle East, Iran has warned of "severe consequences" for the United States after the US military joined Israeli forces to strike three nuclear sites in Iran early on Sunday. Iranian state television said "every American citizen or military personnel" in West Asia was now on Tehran's "target" after US airstrikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities. Hossein Shariatmadar, a close aide of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and managing editor of the hard-line Kayhan newspaper, wrote an editorial on Sunday calling on Iranian forces to strike the US naval fleet in Bahrain and close the Strait of Hormuz for American, British, German, and French ships. "It is now our turn to act without delay. As a first step, we must launch a missile strike on the US naval fleet in Bahrain and simultaneously close the Strait of Hormuz to American, British, German, and French ships," he wrote. Shariatmadari's editorial followed a warning from Khamenei himself, who earlier cautioned the United States of "severe consequences" for its military intervention. While Iran plans its next move, NDTV looks at key US military bases in the Middle East that could be on Iranian target as the Pentagon braced for almost-certain retaliation against American forces in the region. Across the Middle East, the US has reportedly stationed over 40,000 troops on American bases and warships in the region-- which fall under the US military's Central Command (CENTCOM). The major concentrations of US forces in the region are in Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq, Syria, Kuwait, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Key US Bases In The Middle East Bahrain: The US Navy's Fifth Fleet and US Naval Forces Central Command are headquartered in Bahrain-- a tiny Gulf kingdom that remains the United States' critical asset in the Persian Gulf. Bahrain's deep-water port can dock some of the largest US military vessels, including aircraft carriers. It is home to America's four anti-mine vessels and two logistical support ships. The US Coast Guard also has vessels in the country, according to The Times OF Israel report. The base has been used by the US Navy since 1948, when the facility was operated by Britain's Royal Navy. Qatar: Al Udeid Air Base, the largest US military base in the Middle East, is in Qatar. The base reportedly includes the forward components of CENTCOM, as well as its air forces and special operation forces in the region. It also hosts America's rotating combat aircraft, as well as the 379th Air Expeditionary Wing. Iraq: The United States has various troop installations in Iraq, including the Al Asad Air Base in Al-Anbar Governorate and Al Harir Air Base in Erbil. Baghdad is not only Washington's close ally since after 2003 war, but also Tehran's arch enemy in the region. The Middle Eastern nation houses some 2,500 US troops as part of the international coalition against the Islamic State jihadist group. Iran targeted the Al Asad Air Base in 2020 after the killing of Quds Force leader Qasem Soleimani. The Al Harir Air Base has also been on the receiving end of Iranian proxy group drone attacks Syria: For years, the US has maintained a military presence at various installations in Syria as part of international efforts against the Islamic State group, which rose out of the country's civil war and overran large parts of Syria and neighbouring Iraq for years. America's Al Tanf Garrison is housed in southern Syria, near the borders of Iraq and Jordan. Kuwait: Kuwait has several US bases, including Ali al-Salem Air Base, located about 20 miles from the Iraqi border, that houses members of the Air Force's 386th Air Expeditionary Wing. The base is the "primary airlift hub and gateway for delivering combat power to joint and coalition forces" in the region. It also has Camp Arifjan, the location of the forward headquarters for the US Army component of CENTCOM. The US Army reportedly also stocks prepositioned materiel in the country. UAE: America's Al Dhafra Air Base is located in the United Arab Emirates. The installation is home to the Air Force's 380th Air Expeditionary Wing, which operates F-22 Raptor fighter jets and several kinds of surveillance planes and drones, including MQ-9 Reapers. Al Dhafra also hosts the Gulf Air Warfare Centre for air and missile defence training.


Hans India
11 minutes ago
- Hans India
US committed great crime: Iran slams strike on its nuclear sites, calls for UN action
Iran has strongly condemned the United States strikes on its nuclear facilities, calling it a 'brutal military aggression' and gross violation of international law and the UN Charter. In the aftermath of coordinated US airstrikes on three nuclear sites, Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, Iran has urged the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to take immediate action. In its official statement, Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs declared, "The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Islamic Republic of Iran condemns in the strongest terms the brutal US military aggression against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities, which was committed in flagrant and unprecedented violation of the most fundamental principles of the United Nations Charter and the rules of international law, and holds the warmongering and law-breaking US government responsible for the extremely dangerous effects and consequences of this great crime." Iran further claimed the attack was carried out with the 'criminal complicity and cooperation of the genocidal Zionist regime,' referring to Israel, which it accused of orchestrating the broader escalation. According to Tehran, the attack occurred on the tenth day of Israeli military aggression against Iran and reveals 'the criminal complicity and participation of the US with the Zionist regime.' The Iranian government said the strikes were not only a violation of Article 2, Paragraph 4 of the UN Charter, but also of Security Council Resolution 2231, the resolution that endorsed the 2015 nuclear deal. Iran emphasised that the targeted nuclear facilities were under IAEA safeguards and strictly peaceful in purpose. The statement continued, 'The Islamic Republic of Iran recognises its right to resist with all its might the US military aggression and the crimes committed by this rogue regime and to defend Iran's security and national interests.' Iran has now called for an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council and demanded the IAEA Board of Governors address the situation. The Ministry accused the IAEA Director General of showing 'clear bias' and blamed him for 'providing the basis and excuse for the recent disaster.' 'It has now become clear to everyone that a country that considers itself a permanent member of the Security Council does not adhere to any rules or ethics and will not refrain from any lawbreaking or crime to advance the interests of a genocidal and occupying regime,' the statement concluded.