Govt presses for taller buildings around some Auckland train stations
Previously, the Government said Auckland Council must enable a minimum of no less than six storeys in a walkable distance around the Maungawhau (Mount Eden), Kingsland, and Morningside stations.
The change was intended to reflect "higher demand for housing and business' in these areas.
Now, it said the changes, outlined in the Resource Management (Consenting and Other Matters) Amendment Bill, "didn't go far enough" – and would require upzoning allowing buildings of at least 15 storeys high around those stations.
It also added the Mt Albert and Baldwin Avenue stations to the list, requiring upzoning allowing buildings in these areas of at least 10 storeys high.
ADVERTISEMENT
Housing Minister Chris Bishop and Auckland Minister Simeon Brown said the Mt Albert and Baldwin stations were "ripe for development", sited close to the Unitec campus and Mt Albert's popular shops and cafes.
'The Government is determined to fix our housing crisis and a key step toward that is unlocking housing capacity in Auckland. The best place to start is by building housing around high quality public transport.'
Brown said the CRL was a 'game-changing investment in the future of Auckland'.
'It will unlock significant economic opportunity, but only if we have a planning system to allow businesses and residents to take advantage of it.'
Bishop said the City Rail Link was a more than $5 billion investment in Auckland's continued growth.
'Enabling greater housing intensification along this corridor will help us maximise the benefits of this investment and provide more homes in a city geared up for growth.'
'The Resource Management (Consenting and Other Matters) Amendment Bill allows Auckland Council to withdraw its intensification plan change, PC78, with a requirement to notify a new plan change by 10 October this year. The upzoning we're announcing today will be incorporated into that new plan change.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
17 minutes ago
- Scoop
Property Council Welcomes Landmark Building Consent Reforms
Property Council New Zealand has welcomed today's announcement from the Government, describing the reforms as a pragmatic step toward a more consistent and accountable building system. Chief Executive Leonie Freeman said the move to replace joint and several liability with a proportionate liability model, alongside enabling voluntary consolidation of Building Consent Authorities (BCAs), addresses long-standing issues that have created cost and delay in the sector. 'Joint and several liability has often left councils as the last man standing. Proportionate liability changes this – a shift that the development community supports,' Freeman said. 'Spreading accountability more fairly across the construction pipeline should ease pressure on councils and provide greater certainty for the market. We expect this will also help reduce the risk-averse behaviour that slows down consenting and drives up costs.' Freeman noted that Property Council members are prepared to play their part. 'Our members are open to sharing liability if it gives councils greater confidence and improves consistency. The detail around mechanisms such as professional indemnity insurance and home warranties will be important for ensuring clarity.' On BCA consolidation, Freeman said the change could help remove unnecessary complexity. 'Sixty-six different interpretations of the Building Code create inconsistency and duplication. A regionalised model could help streamline processes, but its success will depend on councils' willingness to work together.' Freeman said the reforms build on earlier moves to improve access to new building products. 'Addressing both consenting and liability settings is a step in the right direction. These changes have the potential to remove blockages, reduce costs, and provide a more predictable system for everyone involved in the building process.' About Property Council New Zealand Property Council is the leading advocate for Aotearoa New Zealand's largest industry – property. Property Council New Zealand is the one organisation that collectively champions property. We bring together members from all corners of the property ecosystem to advocate for reduced red tape that enables development, encourages investment, and supports our communities to thrive. Property is New Zealand's largest industry, making up 15% of economic activity. As a sector, we employ 10% of New Zealand's workforce and contribute over $50.2 billion to GDP. A not-for-profit organisation, the Property Council connects over 10,000 property professionals, championing the interests of over 550 member companies. Our membership is broad and includes some of the largest commercial and residential property owners and developers in New Zealand. The property industry comes together at our local, national and online events, which offer professional development, exceptional networking and access to industry-leading research. Our members shape the cities and spaces where New Zealanders live, work, play and shop.
Scoop
17 minutes ago
- Scoop
Biggest Building Consent System Reform In Decades
Minister for Building and Construction The Government is announcing the biggest change to the building consent system since the Building Act came into force in 2004, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. 'The building sector has the potential to be an economic powerhouse, yet productivity has stalled since 1985 despite major advances in building methods and technology,' Mr Penk says. 'New Zealand's sluggish consenting system is delaying projects and driving up costs, making the average standalone house here 50 percent more expensive to build than in Australia. 'We must eliminate system blockages to speed up the delivery of new homes and infrastructure. "Today, we are announcing plans to ease the cost burden on ratepayers for defective building work. "Right now, councils are hesitant to sign off on building consents and inspections because they could be held liable for all defects, leaving ratepayers to foot the bill. 'This often happens when one of the parties responsible cannot pay for repairs, for example, if a business goes bust. 'Currently, building owners can claim full compensation from any responsible party – and it's often councils, with the deepest pockets and no option to walk away, that end up paying out. 'The risk-aversion this creates leads to frustrating delays and extra cost for builders and homeowners. 'A case in Queenstown shows the scale of this issue. In 2015, the Oaks Shores body corporate filed a $160 million claim for weathertight defects. The developer had been placed into voluntary liquidation and was not sued, leaving ratepayers exposed to the entire claim. 'If the case hadn't been settled privately, ratepayers could have faced rates increases of $300 a year for 30 years. 'It's time to put the responsibility where it belongs. "The Government will scrap the current framework, known as joint and several liability, and replace it with proportionate liability. 'Under this new model, each party will only be responsible for the share of work they carried out. 'Building owners will be protected if things go wrong and we're exploring options such as requiring professional indemnity insurance and home warranties, similar to arrangements in Australia. 'The second major change I am announcing will allow councils to voluntarily consolidate their Building Consent Authorities (BCAs) functions with each other. 'It is ridiculous builders, designers and homeowners must navigate 66 different interpretations of the Building Code, because of the number of council BCAs across the country. 'Builders can be rejected on paperwork that would be accepted by a neighbouring authority simply because each BCA applies the rules differently. 'Many councils have asked for this and I expect they will seize the opportunity to consolidate, share resources like building inspectors and IT systems, and pass the savings on to ratepayers. 'Clearing blockages in the building consent system to make it easier and more affordable to build is an important part of this Government's economic growth plan. 'We know the sector is behind us. New Zealand Certified Builders have said that this is the most significant change for the building industry in a generation, that it has been a long time coming and the change is welcomed by the industry. 'We are determined to get the building and construction sector firing on all cylinders, and that requires bold change. 'This Government is making that change.' Q&A sheet and list of Government building initiatives. Changes to liability settings and measures to enable voluntary BCA consolidation will be made by amending the Building Act 2004. The Government expects to introduce a Bill to Parliament in early 2026. The Government is investigating supporting mechanisms for proportionate liability. These may include: Regulatory changes to support BCA consolidation will include removing the requirement for a Territorial Authority (TA) to be a BCA providing they transfer their building control functions to another accredited BCA, removing restrictions on TAs transferring their building consent functions to a non-TA organisation, and updating and standardising regulations to eliminate duplication and incentivize collaboration.
Scoop
32 minutes ago
- Scoop
Five Unions To Take Government To Court Over Pay Equity
Five major unions are launching a High Court challenge against the Government over its removal of pay equity rights, arguing the amended pay equity legislation violates fundamental rights and discriminates against women workers. The NZNO, PSA, PPTA, TEU and NZEI Te Riu Roa are filing proceedings in the High Court seeking a declaration that the amended Equal Pay Act 1972 is inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. The legal challenge argues the Coalition Government's legislation breaches three fundamental rights: freedom from gender-based pay discrimination, the right to natural justice, and the right to fair legal process. The case gives workers who have been denied their right to challenge gender-based pay discrimination a chance to challenge the Government in court. If successful, a Parliamentary Select Committee must consider the declaration of inconsistency and a Parliamentary debate must occur. The Government is then required to formally respond. The claim will be formally lodged on August 29 at the High Court in Wellington following a rally by women whose pay equity claims have been cancelled. NZNO delegate and Plunket nurse Hannah Cook said: "Nurses and care workers like me are devastated by the scrapping of our pay equity claims. Plunket nurses were so close to finally having our hard work recognised. Nurses and care workers are the backbone of a caring society and the Coalition Government needs to value us. These changes don't just impact us. They impact our families, our livelihoods and our quality of life. "The Coalition Government has shown it doesn't value us nurses and those of us in women dominated workforces. It is 2025 for goodness sake. We shouldn't still be paid less than those in male dominated occupations." PSA National Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said: "We are asking the High Court to declare that the Government's actions are inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 because of the discrimination New Zealand women will face as a result of the Government's action. The legal action comes after the Government cancelled pay equity claims and gutted the Equal Pay Act 1972 with no prior signalling and without a select committee process. The Government silenced women but we know the High Court will listen to our claims. This is just the start of our campaign for pay equity for New Zealand women and we will be leaving no stone unturned to achieve pay equity. "The decision to cancel claims that were about to be heard by the Employment Relations Authority is inconsistent with the constitutional foundations of New Zealand which do not provide for the Government to interfere with the judicial system in this way." Sandra Grey, Te Pou Ahurei | National Secretary of the TEU said: "If Brooke van Velden and Christopher Luxon thought avoiding a select committee process would allow them to dodge accountability for stealing $12.8 billion from low paid women workers we've got news for them. We look forward to the women of Aotearoa having their day in court to ensure that the government is forced to defend its actions." Stephanie Mills, National Secretary of NZEI Te Riu Roa said: "The scrapping of the teachers claim without consultation and under urgency was a kick in the guts for our teacher members after years of blood, sweat and money getting the claim moving. "NZEI Te Riu Roa, along with four other unions, has agreed to take the Government to court because they have not followed a democratic process, and because the Government has sent a message to this mainly female profession that their time, expertise and work is not valued. "Teachers go into their profession knowing the stresses and extra hours involved because they are passionate about young people learning, but they have limits. We're seeing more teachers looking at other options or teaching in Australia, because they feel their work is not valued in Aotearoa. Teaching is a foundational job for our society, but this Government has shamefully chosen tax cut savings over giving teachers pay equity." Chris Abercrombie, PPTA President said: "This Government's decision to extinguish our pay equity claim is not only unjust-it is unlawful. "Our claim was built on years of rigorous, evidence-based work, carried out in good faith under a process agreed with previous governments. To have that work discarded by political decree is a betrayal-not just of teachers, but of every woman in Aotearoa New Zealand whose work has been historically undervalued. "This is about more than pay. It's about whether our country honours its commitments to fairness, equity, and the rule of law. We will not stand by while those principles are trampled. Our members deserve better. Our students deserve better. And our democracy deserves better." Background In May 2025, the Coalition Government passed the Equal Pay Amendment Act under parliamentary urgency without consulting unions or affected workers. The legislation effectively ends workers' ability to pursue pay equity claims by creating virtually insurmountable barriers and cancelling existing claims that were already underway. The new law retrospectively discontinued all existing pay equity claims and proceedings that had not yet been determined, forcing workers to start their cases from scratch under a much more restrictive regime. Workers who had already settled pay equity claims with review provisions have also been stripped of those rights and face a 10-year ban on raising new claims. The amended legislation dramatically increases the threshold for pay equity claims, requiring work to be performed by a workforce that is at least 70% female for 10 consecutive years, compared to the previous requirement of approximately 60% female either currently or historically. It also empowers employers to unilaterally discontinue claims at multiple stages of the process. These changes disproportionately harm women working in critical caring professions like teaching, nursing, and aged care - occupations that have historically been undervalued because they are predominantly performed by women. The legal action seeks declarations that the Act discriminates against pay equity claimants on the grounds of sex and violates natural justice principles.
