
Global Retailers' Tariff Strategy Risks Spreading Pain Beyond US Consumer
Global retailers including sandal maker Birkenstock and jeweller Pandora are looking at spreading the cost of US tariffs by raising prices across markets to avoid big hikes in the United States that could hurt sales.
A global presence gives large retailers an advantage to minimise higher tariff costs in the US, but it is putting central banks on watch as the strategy could fuel inflation in other markets like the European Union and Britain, where consumer prices have finally started to stabilise.
Birkenstock's chief financial officer said last week that a 'low-single-digit' price increase globally would be enough to offset the US tariff impact.
Pandora CEO Alexander Lacik said the Danish company is debating whether to raise prices globally or more in the US, its biggest market.
'Companies are really thinking about distributing the tariff,' said Markus Goller, partner at consultancy Simon Kucher in Bonn, Germany. 'A manufacturer from outside of the US might say, OK, I cannot increase my prices to the US market that much, so I will do a little increase in the US, and a little increase in Europe, and in other markets.'
US President Donald Trump has imposed a blanket tariff of 10 percent on all global imports and is threatening higher so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs on its trading partners.
When US behemoth Walmart said it would have to raise prices in response to tariffs, Trump ordered the world's biggest retailer via social media to 'eat the tariffs'.
Announcing price increases in non-US markets could be a way for retailers to avoid a similar backlash from Trump.
'Obviously if your products coming into the US are now subject to tariffs, then math says that you have to raise your prices in the US,' said Jean-Pierre Dubé, professor of marketing at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.
'But you don't want to be accused by the White House of raising prices purely because of US tariffs, so if you can demonstrate that your prices are going up everywhere then... it's kind of a shield.'
Retailers could raise prices on certain products or in certain markets where consumers are less price-sensitive, and use that to subsidise other products or countries where price hikes would hurt sales more, said Jason Miller, professor of supply chain management at Michigan State University.
'Maybe a US-only firm has to raise (US) prices by 12 percent. But you, as a global firm, raise prices by 8 percent because you can play with pricing in other markets,' he said.
If many multinational retailers do spread the tariff pain, higher inflation could spread even to countries which, like Britain, have already struck trade agreements with the US in a bid to minimise the economic fallout of tariffs.
Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey earlier this month raised the issue of 'global companies that don't make that distinction [on tariff rates] and just say, we're going to impose a pricing solution which goes right across the world irrespective of those differences.'
'I think we do have to watch that carefully,' he said. Inflation Uncertainty
In the euro zone, inflation was finally gliding towards the European Central Bank's 2 percent target. European companies surveyed by the European Central Bank (ECB) in late March said price growth in the retail sector was subdued.
But that was before Trump unveiled his tariff policy on April 2, and later hiked tariffs on Chinese goods to 145 percent.
However, the US tariffs on China - lowered last week to 30 percent - have allowed some European retailers to source goods more cheaply than before.
Martino Pessina, CEO of Takko Fashion, which sells clothes in 17 European countries, said suppliers in China had offered lower prices as US retailers cancelled orders from factories there, and shipping costs also fell.
'What we don't know is if there's going to be inflation in the US and if that inflation comes to Europe or not,' Pessina said.
Some big retailers have in any case ruled out raising prices outside the US.
'There is no reason to raise prices outside the US because of the tariffs,' Adidas CEO Bjorn Gulden told investors after reporting results late last month. 'The discussion we're having on tariffs is only for the US.'
ECB executive board member Isabel Schnabel has said the euro zone's inflation rate may initially dip below the central bank's 2 percent target, but that tariffs might prove inflationary further down the road.
'In order to compensate for the hit to input costs, firms also tend to raise the prices of goods not directly affected by tariffs,' Schnabel said in a speech earlier this month.
While every company has its own pricing strategy, economists warn some could take advantage of tariffs to raise prices by more than rising costs, boosting their profits similarly to the inflation surge of 2021-2022 during the pandemic.
'It will be very difficult for a firm's customers to know what portion of the product's total costs are subject to the tariff, or even the tariff rate that applies. This information asymmetry creates a ripe environment for exploitation. Just as it did during COVID,' said Hal Singer, professor of economics at the University of Utah.
US consumers' 12-month inflation expectations jumped in April to 6.7 percent, the highest reading since 1981. And in the euro zone, too, consumers are expecting inflation to rise.
'If people are expecting inflation, well then it gives firms a little bit more room to raise prices,' said Miller.
By Helen Reid, Francesco Canepa, Balazs Koranyi; Editors: Lisa Jucca and Susan Fenton
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Johnson blasts House ‘big, beautiful' bill, backs Musk
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) on Tuesday blasted the megabill featuring President Trump's tax cut and spending priorities and backed tech billionaire Elon Musk's recent comments on it. In an interview on NewsNation's 'The Hill,' host Blake Burman brought up an earlier post from Musk on the social platform X in which he called the legislation a 'disgusting abomination.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' Musk said in his post. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' 'He's telling the truth, you know I'm — that's all I'm doing too,' Johnson said of Musk's comments. The 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' legislation, which made it through the House last month, prolongs Trump's 2017 tax cuts and bolsters funding for defense and border priorities. It also makes cuts to spending on social safety net programs like Medicaid and food aid. 'The trajectory of deficits is up, and no matter what the 'big, beautiful bill' does, it does not address that long term prospect, it does not bend the deficit curve down,' Johnson said Tuesday. 'It supports it going up.' Musk had said previously in an interview on 'CBS Sunday Morning' that he was 'disappointed' to see the 'big, beautiful' legislation make it through the House. 'I was, like, disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly, which increases the budget deficit … and it undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing,' Musk said in the interview. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' faces resistance from Republican senators over debt fears
President Donald Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill" is facing criticism, even from within his own party, as some lawmakers remain skeptical about the massive spending package and its potential impact on the nation's debt, despite it being under consideration by a Republican-controlled Congress. The spending bill, which the House passed late last month and is now in the Senate's hands, aims to address a number of issues, including tax policy, border security and immigration, defense, energy production, the debt limit, and adjustments to SNAP and Medicaid. However, without a serious overhaul, lawmakers like Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., is still a "no" on the legislation because it will increase the nation's debt limit. He is among a group of at least four Republican senators who have expressed concerns over Trump's bill, because of the package's projected increase in the national debt. Rand Paul Says He Would Support 'Big, Beautiful Bill' If Debt Ceiling Hike Removed This week, Paul relayed his concerns to media members that the bill will raise the debt ceiling by $5 trillion. "We have never raised the debt ceiling without actually meeting that target," he said. "So you can say it doesn't directly add to the debt, but if you increase the ceiling $5 trillion, you'll meet that. And what it does is it puts it off the back-burner. And then we won't discuss it for a year or two." Read On The Fox News App As of Tuesday, the national debt, which measures what the U.S. owes its creditors, was $36.2 trillion, according to the Treasury Department. Trump pushed back on Paul's remarks about his bill. Trump Warns Rand Paul He's Playing Into 'Hands Of The Democrats' With 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Opposition "Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!" Trump wrote on TRUTH Social. Meanwhile, the national deficit, which occurs when the federal government's spending exceeds its revenues, was $1 trillion as of Tuesday, according to Treasury Department data. On Tuesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the "blatantly wrong claim that the 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill' increases the deficit is based on the Congressional Budget Office and other scorekeepers who use shoddy assumptions and have historically been terrible at forecasting across Democrat and Republican administrations alike." Sen. Ron Johnson Proposes 'Line-by-line' Cuts To Pass Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' The outlook for the federal debt level is bleak, as FOX Business previously reported, with economists increasingly sounding the alarm over the torrid pace of spending by Congress and the White House. Under the terms of the bill, the bill would add over $2 trillion to budget deficits over a decade, according to a recent analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). All together, the tax cuts and reforms in the package add nearly $3.8 trillion to the deficit over a decade – though spending reductions in other parts of the bill offset some of that to arrive at the $2.3 trillion figure. Elon Musk, who ended his tenure last week as Trump's lead in the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), doubled down on his position Tuesday that the House's reconciliation package was an "abomination." White House Stands By Tax Bill After Musk Calls It A 'Disgusting Abomination' "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk posted on X Tuesday. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." The Trump administration and some congressional Republicans have pushed back on the estimates of the bill, also known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, and its impact on the deficit, arguing that economic growth from the tax cuts will stimulate economic activity and lead to more tax revenue than what is projected. Speaker Johnson Clashes With Rand Paul Over 'Wimpy' Spending Cuts In Trump's Bill "Hope it does a lot to get some further cuts," Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., told Fox News about the bill. "We don't want to bankrupt the country. And what Elon also should recognize is we don't need more solar and EV credits. That actually makes it worse. He probably knows that, though." To push back on the criticism, the White House launched a website where Americans can tabulate how much the bill will personally save them. The House passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act on May 22 with a narrow 215-214-1 vote that went largely along party lines. If that version of the bill is revised by the Senate, the legislation will have to go back to the House for another vote before it can go to Trump's desk and become article source: Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' faces resistance from Republican senators over debt fears
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Bulgaria hoping for EU Commission's green light to use euro
Bulgaria's hopes of joining the euro may receive a critical boost on Wednesday when the European Commission gives its view on whether the country has met the conditions for joining the common currency. The government in Sofia announced at the beginning of the year that it was carrying out a new push to join the eurozone by January 2026. Bulgaria has been a member of the European Union since 2007 and had previously planned to replace its national currency, the lev, with the euro in 2024, but the adoption was postponed due to a comparatively high inflation rate of 9.5% at the time. The commission recently said it expects an inflation rate of 3.6% for Bulgaria in the current year and 1.8% in 2026, raising hopes that Sofia is ready to join the eurozone. The criteria for joining the euro include price stability, sound public finances and stable exchange rates, among other conditions. If the commission concludes that Bulgaria is ready to become the 21st EU country to use the common currency, the other EU countries and the European Parliament will still have to give their consent. Within Bulgaria itself, the possible introduction of the euro has been accompanied by fierce protests. The pro-Russian nationalist opposition party Vazrazhdane (Revival) called for a referendum on keeping the lev. Activists collected 604,000 signatures in favour of a referendum. The Bulgarian parliament however has twice rejected a referendum on the currency issue - in 2023 and recently in May 2025.