Teacher who started online petition to remove headteacher for ‘racism' banned
He also made 'repeated safeguarding failures' over several months, including on social media where he re-tweeted pupils' comments in support of his own position.
The Change.org petition, which received more than 6,000 signatures before it was ended, said the headteacher had permanently excluded three black students from the school after one month in the role and had introduced 'a zero tolerance behaviour policy that disproportionately affects BAME and SEN students'.
His name was removed from the petition after the Metropolitan Police received reports of four death threats from the school, the Guardian reported.
Giving oral evidence to the panel, the headteacher said Mr Adusei came to his office on April 19 2021 and informed him that he and others did not think he was doing a good job, and that he had come to request his resignation.
He said there was no attempt by Mr Adusei to specify his grievances or the basis upon which he was asking him to resign at the meeting, but that he said 'If you don't resign I am going to start a petition to get you out', which left him feeling threatened.
Another witnesses told the panel that the following day, they saw Mr Adusei and another member of staff in the playground with around 10-20 students stood around them, which was 'unusual' as he should not have been on duty for their lunch.
A Year 10 pupil who was stopped by the witness after walking past with their phone out – which was against school policy – said: 'Not gonna lie sir, a member of staff has told me to get it out to sign a petition'.
Mr Adusei was suspended the same day.
Addressing the claims in the petition, the headteacher told the panel he had only been directly involved in excluding two students and that the decision was taken in consultation with various other management staff.
He said there was 'no basis' for asserting that his actions disproportionately affected BAME or SEN students.
A separate Crowdfunder page which claimed Mr Adusei had suffered 'a brutal exclusion and an attempted silencing and tarnishing of his reputation' due to the incident also raised £320.
The panel found Mr Adusei had made 'deliberate and pre-determined decisions to publish untrue and/or misleading comments about Colleague A (the headteacher) and then to manipulate the actions of children for his own private purposes', which it considered to be 'an abuse of his position and an abuse of trust.'
It had received evidence that the headteacher suffered 'threatening online abuse' as a direct of the petition, which had also led to plain clothes police officers being placed at the school gates.
The panel also heard that Scotland Yard had contacted the individual to implement enhanced protection measures as a result of the petition.
Further allegations that Mr Adusei had failed to complete welfare calls to 26 pupils in his tutor group and failed to teach online lessons on two occasions in January 2021 were also found to have been proven.
The panel was satisfied that Mr Adusei's behaviour 'amounted to misconduct of a serious nature which fell significantly short of the standards expected of the profession.'
Mr Adusei, who had been employed at the school since 2019, provided no mitigation to the panel or evidence of material insight or remorse for his actions.
In a written conclusion on Wednesday, decision maker Sarah Buxcey, acting on behalf of the Education Secretary, banned Mr Adusei from teaching indefinitely subject to a five-year review period.
She said: 'In this case, factors mean that allowing a lesser review period is not sufficient to achieve the aim of maintaining public confidence in the profession.
'These elements are the seriousness of the findings involving safeguarding failures and the lack of evidence of either insight or remorse.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
a day ago
- BBC News
Bristol RE teacher banned after having sex with teenage girl
A teacher who had sex with one of his pupils the day after she finished school has been banned from the profession Murphy, who was a religious education (RE) teacher at a Bristol school, invited the girl to his house and had sex with her, a Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA) panel teenager, known as Pupil A, also claimed they had previously had "sexual activity" in the school and he sent her "explicit pictures of himself in the staff bathrooms".The TRA found the 35-year-old guilty of unacceptable professional conduct and banned him from teaching. "The fact the sexual relationship began less than 24 hours after Pupil A was a pupil at the school was a significant factor in the panel forming this opinion," the TRA report said. In a witness statement the girl said Mr Murphy once arrived at her place of work and "begged her to leave with him in his car to perform sexual acts upon him". She added once that was over, he then "dropped her back to work like nothing happened". The TRA report said Mr Murphy admitted he and Pupil A knew each other and their relationship was "entirely founded on their time as teacher and pupil at the school"."The panel concluded for all intents and purposes, and certainly in Pupil A's eyes, the relationship between Mr Murphy and Pupil A was one of teacher and pupil and, therefore, one with a power imbalance," the report said. 'Sorry' It added while Mr Murphy showed "some remorse and regret" that the relationship took place, the panel believed this was based on the impact on himself and not on the pupil."Not a day passes by where I don't wish I could go back and change things," Mr Murphy said in a statement submitted to the panel."I am sorry to all my former students and my ex-colleagues. I let both myself and all of them down through my actions." In a statement Avon and Somerset Police confirmed an allegation of sexual activity with a child in breach of trust was reported to them in November 2020."A man attended a voluntary interview and the reporting party was updated on the progress of the investigation," a spokesperson said."We submitted a file to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for a charging decision. The CPS made the decision not to charge after concluding that prosecution was not proportionate given the matters of the case."The reporting party indicated they would appeal the decision and request a review."
Telegraph
3 days ago
- Telegraph
How HR became the most hated people in Britain (by the people who work in it)
Instead, she says, HR has embraced a form of ideological activism, with groups acting as 'little extremist cells' and training modules that 'actually create a disaster area' rather than minimise risk. The internal contradictions are piling up. One advertising employee – a white middle-class woman in her 20s – says she had once been chosen to represent her agency in a company-wide diversity scheme because they were too worried about asking a black, Asian or minority ethnic (BAME) member of staff in case they felt it was tokenism. 'I did feel a bit out of my depth without any lived experience – other than being a woman and northern,' she quipped. The training being delivered by some HR departments has itself become problematic. Take the case of Carl Borg-Neal. After an unblemished 30-year career at Lloyd's Bank, the manager found himself out of a job after inadvertently blurting out the N-word during anti-racism training in July 2021. Around 100 staff were in the virtual session when he had asked how best to handle a situation when an ethnic minority used an offensive slur, using the N-word as an example but saying it in full rather than the abbreviation. Though several colleagues stuck up for him, the trainer claimed to be left 'badly distressed' and had to take a week off work. A complaint later made its way to HR, disciplinary proceedings were activated and, four months later, he was sacked. 'I realised later on that once it had got back to HR, which was dealing with the bank's race action plan that I was doomed,' he told The Telegraph last year. Furious at being branded a racist, Borg-Neal – a white middle-aged man in his late 50s – took Lloyd's to a tribunal claiming unfair dismissal and, after a two-year battle that risked him facing financial ruin, he won. In total, it cost Lloyd's nearly £1m in compensation, tax and legal fees. 'Increasingly, HR doesn't seem able to handle grievance procedures impartially,' says de Grunwald. 'They take the side of whichever group they feel most sympathy with, according to their own politics. It's a total no-no.' Some suggest part of the problem lies with the CIPD, the UK's leading HR training body. With 400 staff and a stranglehold on credentials, its dominance is under increasing scrutiny. 'It's a massive revenue generator,' claims one HR leader. 'But I've interviewed CIPD Level 7 candidates who don't know the nine protected characteristics under the Equality Act. This is the bread and butter of HR.' Critics say the body has become ideologically driven under its £300,000-a-year chief executive Peter Cheese, providing 'terrible advice' on trans inclusion and pushing fashionable but flawed thinking. 'They are obsessed with hybrid working and white-collar office life,' one source says. 'Completely irrelevant to the millions in healthcare, retail and hospitality.' 'Organisations have suffered from a lack of robust leadership,' says de Grunwald. 'A lot of people got quite spooked by all the young graduates coming in with these big ideas, and it made a lot of older middle-aged people feel like dinosaurs. 'They just got told they were bigots and to shut up. If only those people were less worried about looking old-fashioned and instead felt able to say, 'No, this isn't right, this doesn't fit with the Equality Act, this can only be bad for the workers'. They lost their confidence at the exact moment that they needed it.' 'You've spent a lot of money and time hiring brilliant people, but you've told the best people to shut up, or basically given them the message they're not welcome there because they've got the wrong views.' 'I've thought for quite a long time there was a backlash coming against HR,' she added. 'But I didn't expect a Coldplay concert to be the thing that would trigger an identity crisis.'
Daily Mirror
5 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Primary school teacher had sick videos of kids and searched 'Japanese schoolgirls'
Steven Spong, 30, had been teaching at Monkwick Junior School in Colchester up until October 2022, when he was sacked following a police investigation into his conduct A primary school teacher who searched for "Japanese schoolgirls" and "jailbait" has been sacked after police discovered he shared indecent images and videos of kids as young as six. Steven Spong, 30, had been teaching at Monkwick Junior School in Colchester when he was arrested in July, 2022, after authorities found he uploaded child abuse images online. In October 2022, he was fired by the school following a police investigation into his conduct. Following an investigation, police decided to take no further action against Spong because they were not found on his devices. Instead, he was referred to Teaching Regulation Agency (TRA). The misconduct hearing, which was held this year, heard how police identified 16 videos and images that had been uploaded to the internet from Spong's home IP address. They included nine videos in category A, the most serious kind. Some of the children in the images were as young as six years old. The other uploads included two Category B videos, one Category B image, two Category C images and one Category C video. Spong also confessed to searching for "Japanese teenagers" and "Japanese schoolgirls" to find pornographic images of people that looked under 18-years-old, along with the term "jailbait." Spong denied any wrongdoing during disciplinary proceedings and the police investigation but admitted the facts in full ahead of the misconduct hearing. He also admitted that his conduct was sexually motivated. Decision maker Marc Cavey said: "The panel noted that, whilst the conduct took place outside the education setting, the nature of the alleged conduct relates directly to the conduct expected of those within the teaching profession and the standards which they are expected to uphold. "Given the significance of these findings, and the fact that the behaviour concerned related to children, the panel determined that Mr Spong's actions were clearly relevant to his teaching role and working in an education setting. "The panel noted it was of particular significance that Mr Spong's conduct occurred at the time he was a teacher within a primary school. It therefore determined that Mr Spong's actions could directly impact upon his teaching role." The panel added because Mr Spong did not attend the hearing and did not supply any documents to the panel, members could not be sure his conduct would not be repeated. Spong was banned from the teaching profession indefinitely and will not be able to appeal. He will never return to the classroom.
