logo
Weight-loss jabs are the ‘talk of the House of Commons tea rooms'

Weight-loss jabs are the ‘talk of the House of Commons tea rooms'

Rhyl Journal6 hours ago
Wes Streeting said the jabs should be available according to need, not the ability to pay, and he planned to get them into the hands of those who need them most.
At the moment, people with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 or more, or 30 but with a linked health condition, can be prescribed jabs on the NHS through specialist weight-management services.
Other people are paying hundreds of pounds a month to get the jabs privately.
Mr Streeting told LBC radio: 'Weight-loss jabs are the talk of the House of Commons, half my colleagues are on them and are judging the rest of us saying 'you lot should be on them'.
'And the thing is, if you can afford these weight loss jabs, which can be over 200 quid a month, well that's all right for you.
'But most people in this country haven't got spared two and a half grand a year and often the people who have the worst and most challenging obesity also have the lowest income.
'So I'm bringing to weight loss jabs the principle of fairness which has underpinned the NHS.
'It should be available based on need and not the ability to pay.
'And that's what we're going to do on weight loss jabs, as well as a number of other things, including people getting more fit, more active, supporting people on diet and nutrition….that's the bit of the weight loss jab debate that sometimes gets lost.
'It's not that you can have some weight loss jabs and stuff your face with Jaffa cakes…'
He said obesity cost the NHS billions a year, adding that taxes have been going 'up and up' to pay for the health service.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rachel Reeves insists she is ‘cracking on with the job' after Commons upset
Rachel Reeves insists she is ‘cracking on with the job' after Commons upset

Powys County Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

Rachel Reeves insists she is ‘cracking on with the job' after Commons upset

Rachel Reeves said she was 'clearly' upset during her appearance at Prime Minister's Questions but insisted she was 'cracking on with the job'. The Chancellor and Sir Keir Starmer shared a hug, and the Chancellor smiled throughout her first public appearance after she broke down in tears in the House of Commons. Ms Reeves would not, however, be drawn into answering questions about the 'personal matter' which had upset her ahead of Wednesday's Prime Minister's Questions. She told broadcasters: 'Clearly I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that. 'My job as Chancellor at 12 o'clock on a Wednesday is to be at PMQs next to the Prime Minister, supporting the Government and that's what I tried to do. 'I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that.' The Chancellor rejected suggestions that her tears were related to a conversation with Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle or another member of Government. 'People saw I was upset, but that was yesterday. Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job,' she added. Sir Keir gave a full-throated defence of his Chancellor, and said he had not appreciated how upset she was while he was focused on the cut and thrust of Parliament's most-viewed weekly event. On Thursday, the Chancellor appeared alongside the Prime Minister and Health Secretary Wes Streeting as the Government launched it's 10-year plan for the NHS in London. Ms Reeves made no mention of Wednesday's incident in the Commons as she made her first public appearance since crying in the chamber. Smiling as she spoke at a health centre in London, the Chancellor insisted the NHS plan was 'good for the health of our nation and good for the health of our nation's finances'. She also stopped to take selfies with nurses and other healthcare staff who were gathered for the launch. Sir Keir and Ms Reeves embraced as he made his way to the podium to give a speech after the Chancellor had finished. The Prime Minister poured praise upon her in an open show of unity, hailing the decisions made by the Chancellor as playing a part in the Government investing 'record amounts in the NHS'. Sir Keir said he did not 'appreciate' that Ms Reeves was crying behind him at PMQs as the event is 'pretty wired'. 'It goes from question to question and I am literally up, down, question, looking at who is asking me a question, thinking about my response and getting up and answering it,' he said. Sir Keir added: 'It wasn't just yesterday. No prime minister ever has had side conversations in PMQs. It does happen in other debates when there is a bit more time, but in PMQs it is bang, bang, bang, bang. 'That is what it was yesterday and therefore I was probably the last to appreciate anything else going on in the chamber.' As the Prime Minister took questions from the media, several journalists invited Ms Reeves to comment on her tears, but only Sir Keir answered. Earlier, the Prime Minister said all people could be caught 'off guard' by their emotions, but the Chancellor had to deal with it while on camera in Parliament. He said she was doing an 'excellent' job, would remain in place beyond the next general election, and that they were both absolutely committed to the Chancellor's 'fiscal rules' to maintain discipline over the public finances. UK Government bonds rallied and the pound steadied on Thursday, after reassurances from the Prime Minister about the Chancellor's future. The sight of her in tears on Wednesday, and the £5 billion black hole in her public spending plans as a result of the welfare U-turn had spooked the markets, triggering a sharp sell-off of bonds, with the yield seeing the sharpest increase since US President Donald Trump's tariff plans shook up financial markets in April. Back in the Commons chamber, Commons Leader Lucy Powell defended her 'friend' Ms Reeves, and said 'she's got more class than most of the rest of the members opposite on the frontbench'. Leadership is hard. There are good days, some very good, and bad days, some very bad. The resilience you need for top jobs is superhuman. But if a Chief Exec cried in public, if a military chief said they hadn't read the operational plan properly because they had a bad day,… — Claire Coutinho (@ClaireCoutinho) July 3, 2025 The Conservatives meanwhile suggested Ms Reeves' public show of emotion was not acceptable. In a post on X shared by Tory leader Kemi Badenoch, shadow energy secretary Claire Coutinho said: 'Leadership is hard. There are good days, some very good, and bad days, some very bad. The resilience you need for top jobs is superhuman. 'But if a chief exec cried in public, if a military chief said they hadn't read the operational plan properly because they had a bad day, they would not be forgiven for it.'

'I was in the room as Rachel Reeves smiled after tears - one thing troubled me'
'I was in the room as Rachel Reeves smiled after tears - one thing troubled me'

Daily Mirror

time16 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

'I was in the room as Rachel Reeves smiled after tears - one thing troubled me'

It was clear at the start of the week that today's NHS 10-year plan launch was likely to be overshadowed by the devastating Labour rebellion over welfare reforms. What hadn't been yet clear was that a whole new distraction - the image of Chancellor Rachel Reeves crying in the Commons over a personal matter - was going to be on everyone's mind this morning. As I arrived to the health centre venue in east London, rumours were swirling that Ms Reeves would attend the long-awaited announcement of the NHS plan. No10 soon confirmed to me that she would indeed be there. Next came the news that she'd be speaking. As the journalists waited together outside the event, we all asked one another: What would she say, will her and the PM hug, will she address her tears during PMQs yesterday? It was clear the self-proclaimed "Iron Chancellor" wanted to come out fighting. And if we believe the descriptions from her Cabinet colleagues that she is an "extraordinarily resilient" person, it is no surprise she would have wanted to put on a display of strength this morning, in the face of the raw human emotion seen yesterday. As we entered the stage area, the swelteringly hot room felt like an apt atmosphere for a Government who is struggling to bring down the political and emotional temperature. Huge towering lights, a series of TV cameras and journalists and photographers, all hawked over the small, claustrophobic room, reminding us of the sort of daunting spaces politicians must come under all the time. I spotted Treasury and No10 aides first, looking serious and focused, at the back of the room. Then came Ms Reeves, flanked by PM Keir Starmer and Health Secretary Wes Streeting. An applause erupted for the three of them, but it felt as though it was for the Chancellor - which was proven later when the claps for her continued longer than usual when she went up to the podium. The Chancellor did not address her tears as she gave a short speech to the nation, speaking only about the NHS event and how she had pumped money into the health service. While in many a sense, it was a poor decision not to address yesterday's emotions, as it opened the door to a barrage of questions from journalists after, it showed the Chancellor as we know her. Ms Reeves, who was wearing a similar, if not the same, suit she wore to introduce the Autumn Budget, the first one ever set out by a female Chancellor, was there to praise the economy under the Labour government. "We fixed the foundations and we've put our economy back on a strong footing," she said. It was the reassurance the markets needed, after getting spooked last night following her tears. The Q&A was the toughest part for Ms Reeves to endure. Clearly a decision had been made that she was not going to speak - with a short TV interview planned for after the event. But it meant the PM was left to field questions about her, while she sat on the side lines, nodding and smiling. Mr Starmer was asked why he didn't react to her tears during PMQs, whether she would say something about her tears, whether the Chancellor was under too much pressure. They went on and on, with all eyes on Ms Reeves for her reaction. Follow our Mirror Politics account on Bluesky here. And follow our Mirror Politics team here - Lizzy Buchan, Mikey Smith, Kevin Maguire, Sophie Huskisson, Dave Burke and Ashley Cowburn. Be first to get the biggest bombshells and breaking news by joining our Politics WhatsApp group here. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you want to leave our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. Or sign up here to the Mirror's Politics newsletter for all the best exclusives and opinions straight to your inbox. And listen to our exciting new political podcast The Division Bell, hosted by the Mirror and the Express every Thursday. What was troubling me as I watched Ms Reeves, smiling, nodding and keeping her composure, as a room full of people spoke about her, was that we now know this is a mask. For the markets, the mask might do, to steady the pound and rally Government bonds. But it leaves us with the sad reality that we now all know Ms Reeves, behind the scenes, is facing something deeply upsetting. "Clearly I was upset yesterday and everyone could see that. It was a personal issue and I'm not going to go into the details of that.... I guess the thing that maybe is a bit different between my job and many of your viewers' is that when I'm having a tough day it's on the telly and most people don't have to deal with that," she later admitted. At the end of the event, the health workers there swarmed around Ms Reeves and Mr Starmer to take selfies. Our Iron Chancellor grinned, laughed and socialised for the camera-phones in her face. Whether a mask or not, does it matter? As Ms Reeves herself later said: "Today's a new day and I'm just cracking on with the job."

NHS weight-loss jabs could become available in high streets
NHS weight-loss jabs could become available in high streets

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

NHS weight-loss jabs could become available in high streets

NHS weight-loss jabs could soon be made available in shopping centres and on high streets across the country, under a new 10-year health plan aimed at expanding access to treatment. The radical proposal comes as Health Secretary Wes Streeting revealed the injections were the "talk of the House of Commons tea rooms". The comprehensive plan for the health service outlines a clear need to bring weight-loss services and treatments closer to where people live and work. It states the government will collaborate with industry to "test innovative models of delivering weight loss services and treatments to patients effectively and safely" in convenient locations, including "on the high street, or at any out-of-town shopping centre". Alongside physical locations, the strategy also suggests the implementation of "digital-only models," where the entire process, from consultation to management, is handled online. Crucially, the plan introduces a new payment structure for companies involved in delivering these services. They will not solely be compensated based on patients losing weight, "but if that also translates into outcomes that really matter for patients, such as fewer heart attacks, strokes or cancer diagnoses." Earlier, Mr Streeting emphasised that access to weight-loss jabs should be determined by medical need, not by a person's ability to pay. At the moment, people with a body mass index (BMI) of 35 or more, or 30 but with a linked health condition, can be prescribed jabs on the NHS through specialist weight-management services. Other people are paying hundreds of pounds a month to get the jabs privately. Mr Streeting told LBC radio: 'Weight-loss jabs are the talk of the House of Commons tea rooms, half my colleagues are on them and are judging the rest of us saying 'you lot should be on them'. 'And the thing is, if you can afford these weight loss jabs, which can be over 200 quid a month, well that's all right for you. 'But most people in this country haven't got a spare two and a half grand a year and often the people who have the worst and most challenging obesity also have the lowest income. 'So I'm bringing to weight loss jabs the principle of fairness which has underpinned the NHS. 'It should be available based on need and not the ability to pay. 'And that's what we're going to do on weight-loss jabs, as well as a number of other things, including people getting more fit, more active, supporting people on diet and nutrition….that's the bit of the weight-loss jab debate that sometimes gets lost. 'It's not that you can have some weight-loss jabs and stuff your face with Jaffa cakes…' He said obesity costs the NHS billions a year, adding that taxes have been going 'up and up' to pay for the health service.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store