logo
Tribunal bundle reveals new details in Sandie Peggie case

Tribunal bundle reveals new details in Sandie Peggie case

Ms Peggie was ultimately cleared, with the health board saying earlier this week that the panel "found that there was insufficient evidence" to back up the four allegations made by Dr Beth Upton.
Following the announcement, Scottish Labour's deputy leader, Dame Jackie Baillie, called on NHS Fife to settle the tribunal and bring "this sorry saga to an end.'
READ MORE
The minutes of the investigation form part of the evidence bundle — the compilation of all documents relevant to the employment tribunal, including the original complaint, witness statements, internal correspondence, screengrabs of WhatsApp messages, Facebook posts, disciplinary records, and responses from legal representatives.
The Herald on Sunday is the only newspaper to have accessed the bundle.
Ms Peggie, an experienced A&E nurse, was suspended after a confrontation with Dr Upton, a transgender medic, on Christmas Eve 2023 at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy.
Dr Upton ultimately made four complaints about Ms Peggie.
The first was that Ms Peggie was carrying out observations on a patient in the resuscitation area when Dr Upton entered the cubicle. Rather than continue, Ms Peggie allegedly "stopped, exited the cubicle and told Beth Upton to complete the observations herself."
The second concerned an incident on December 18, when a child left the department without being seen. Dr Upton said they asked Ms Peggie for her "advice and assessment from a triage perspective," but the nurse refused to answer and "chose to speak through a colleague."
The third allegation was of misconduct: that Ms Peggie told Dr Upton they "did not have the correct chromosomes to be within a female changing room," and referred to "a recent news story that involved a transgender woman in a female Scottish prison."
The fourth was that she misgendered her colleague by referring to Dr Upton as "he/him, including in discussions with colleagues."
However, the minutes of the investigation suggest that the potentially career-ending patient safety allegations were quickly dismissed.
Dr Beth Upton (Image: Getty) Dr Upton told investigators their "concerns were more in relation to potential issues that could happen in the future" and that they "did not feel patient safety was compromised for this patient at this time."
Ms Peggie's managers also said they had no concerns about her practice.
Esther Davidson, Ms Peggie's supervisor, told the panel she had "never received any concerns about anyone's safety in relation" to the nurse's practice.
She did refer to "one occasion around eight years ago when a newly qualified nurse felt intimidated by Miss Peggie and eventually snapped." An early resolution meeting was held, followed by a short monitoring period. "There were no further issues after this."
Also included in the evidence bundle is a letter sent by Dr Kate Searle, Dr Upton's supervisor, to all emergency department consultants.
The email, circulated shortly after the Christmas Eve incident, appeared to condemn Ms Peggie outright — before any formal investigation had taken place or Ms Peggie had been asked for her account of events.
Dr Searle wrote: "Beth was approached in a very confrontational and aggressive manner by SN Sandie Peggie in the changing room. She stated that she had no right to be in the female changing room, and that Sandie was not the only member of staff who felt this way, and that she found Beth's presence in there intimidating.
"She then proceeded to use other offensive terms, including alluding to her presence in the female changing room being akin to the situation of a convicted rapist being housed in a woman's prison earlier this year.
"Beth is understandably shaken and distressed by the episode, and indeed felt unsafe and threatened at the time. I have had a long chat with Beth today and ensured she knows we all support her and that we condemn the actions of Sandie."
Dr Searle added that she had ensured Dr Upton would not share shifts with Ms Peggie over the next month, had filed a formal Datix report, contacted NHS Fife's equality lead, referred Dr Upton to occupational health services, and arranged for managers to meet Ms Peggie.
Dr Searle is due to give evidence and be cross-examined at the tribunal on Tuesday.
"I felt upset and afraid"
Dr Upton told investigators that early on, they found Ms Peggie to be "someone that didn't want to engage with her."
They said they "felt things were challenging enough with the changing room situation" and "wanted to ensure that she was not contributing to making things difficult within the department" and that their "concerns did not warrant going to speak to someone at that point."
Asked about the impact of the Christmas Eve incident, Dr Upton said they "felt upset and afraid, and has remained so since."
READ MORE
They took two months off work in March 2024 after learning Ms Peggie was returning to the department. They told the panel they had suffered "daily panic attacks," and that "her wife was concerned about safety at work."
"I feel people — especially in this country — can be prejudiced towards trans people," they said.
"I was conscious of the potential for this situation to become so much bigger, which it has subsequently done."
They said there had "been leaked pre-transition photos of her and harassment of her and her family, all of which has been very distressing."
They said journalists had turned up at their door and harassed them and others around them.
Personal logs and earlier difficulties
Dr Upton kept notes of their interactions with Ms Peggie on their phone. In one entry dated August 2023, they wrote that Ms Peggie had walked into the changing room while they were there and "abruptly walked out" and waited outside.
"Can't help but feel slightly off, upset, put off by this. Disappointed it appears that she chose not to enter because of me and didn't think I belonged there. Sad times."
A second note, from October 2023, said Ms Peggie again left the changing room when Dr Upton arrived.
After the Christmas Eve incident, Dr Upton wrote that they were "distraught."
"I feel attacked and cornered. I explained, this is the first time I've experienced anything like this in person."
Asked why they kept a log on your phone, Dr Upton said "if you're having difficult interactions with people, that you should keep a track of it."
They added that their wife and mother "also advised her to keep a track of difficult interactions and any repeat behaviours."
Dr Upton told the panel they were "feeling uncomfortable in the situation and felt it was good to keep track."
They also confirmed they "had previous difficulties with a colleague during her FY1 placement, and had kept a log of that."
Ms Peggie's legal team sought an order for Dr Upton's phone to be inspected by forensic expert Jim Borwick. However, this was rejected by the tribunal.
They wanted to discover the date and time the notes were created and when they were edited.
Mr Borwick is due to give evidence on Tuesday.
The nurse's response
The panel also sent supplementary questions to Ms Peggie. None were about patient safety. The first four were about her general use of pronouns.
In a formal reply, Ms Peggie's solicitor, Margaret Gribbon, said a disciplinary hearing should 'proceed on the basis of concrete allegations of clearly specified allegations of misconduct, normally on a specified date. An invitation to an employee to make a general confession is neither usual nor fair."
Asked how she refers to Dr Upton, Ms Peggie said: "Beth."
She added: "Pronouns are not used to address people, so I do not use pronouns, either preferred pronouns, or correct sex pronouns, to address anybody, patients or colleagues."
Asked why she told colleagues before Christmas Eve that she would speak to Dr Upton directly, Ms Peggie said: "No one appeared willing to speak to Beth on behalf of myself or my colleagues.
"I hope that by speaking to him personally, he might be able to realise he was making us feel uncomfortable by changing in a female changing area, and the reason why, in the hope he would understand and change elsewhere."
She said she entered the changing room to change her trousers, which were soiled due to menstruation, and that the situation made her feel "embarrassed."
Asked whether her feelings contributed to the interaction, she said: "Yes."
Asked if she had discussed the incident with a supervisor, she replied: "I wasn't upset I was menstruating.
"I was upset because my dignity as a woman was being violated because I was being forced to deal with the situation with a male being present in the female changing room at a time when I felt vulnerable and in dire need of privacy and a single-sex space.
"I didn't feel comfortable speaking to the staff I was working with, especially as it was a personal and embarrassing matter. I was keen to go home, especially as it's Christmas Day, and discuss my upset with my husband and my family."
She said the incident lasted just two minutes and that she hoped the conversation might help Dr Upton understand.
Asked why she didn't report the matter, Ms Peggie said: "I was hopeful that Beth would accept my concerns and the reasons why I felt uncomfortable.
"I tried to give him an example so he could appreciate the severity of the situation. I told them I had a difficult history with men."
"I didn't think it was necessary to speak to anyone, because I was hoping, on reflection, Beth would understand."
She said she was "upset that the interaction did not seem to have had any influence on the way Beth felt, and I realised from his reaction that he did not seem to care about the stress he was causing me."
"I was left shaken following his response. It was on my mind throughout the shift, but I did not want it to impact my work."
Sandie Peggie (r) with solicitor Margaret Gribbon (Image: Jeff J Mitchell/Getty) Ms Peggie denied ever referring to chromosomes.
"I am a nurse and don't need to ask a person what their chromosomes are, because I already know. I deny referring to chromosomes during my interaction with Dr Upton."
Asked about the reference to the Scottish prison story, she said: "It was in the media at the time. I was trying to give [Dr Upton] an example of how I and other women feel."
Asked whether she treated Dr Upton with dignity and respect, Ms Peggie replied: "Yes, because Dr Upton's presence there and the board's decision to permit him to use a female-only changing room was unlawful.
"I felt upset, humiliated and harassed to find him there, particularly when I had a menstrual flood to deal with. I remained as calm as I could, but I felt strongly that he should not be there.
"His insistence that he was entitled to be there meant I felt I had no option but to try different explanations of why his presence made me and many of my colleagues uncomfortable.
"I should not have been put in this position, and I handled it as well and as calmly as I could, given the difficult circumstances in which management had put me."
NHS Fife's findings
In a statement released on Wednesday, NHS Fife said: "The panel found that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of misconduct."
Ms Peggie's solicitor, Ms Gribbon, said her client was "relieved and delighted that this 18-month long internal process has concluded and cleared her of all allegations."
The tribunal continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hospices secure £5m to support NHS-level pay for staff
Hospices secure £5m to support NHS-level pay for staff

STV News

time23 minutes ago

  • STV News

Hospices secure £5m to support NHS-level pay for staff

Hospice workers in Scotland are to receive pay equal to their NHS counterparts following a £5 million funding commitment from the Scottish Government. The investment, set out in the 2025-26 Budget, will ensure that frontline staff providing essential palliative and end-of-life care in independent hospices are fairly paid in line with NHS pay scales. The funding aims to help hospices recruit and retain skilled healthcare professionals during a time of rising workforce pressures and increasing demand for palliative care services. The move comes after Scottish Labour called for the cash to be released by ministers. Health secretary Neil Gray said: 'Independent hospices provide vital care and support to people and families across Scotland at the most difficult times in their lives. I am pleased we are able to support these organisations in supporting pay parity for their clinical staff. 'This funding recognises the skilled, compassionate care that hospice staff deliver every day, and helps ensure their pay reflects the immense value of their work.' But a leading hospice provider has expressed concerns that a £5m funding boost 'will not touch the sides'. Marie Cure Scotland, which has two hospices in the country, has questioned how much of an impact the cash would have, citing the UK Government's increase to employer national insurance contributions – which have been steadfastly opposed by ministers in Scotland. 'As Scotland's largest palliative and end of life care provider caring for people at our two Scottish hospices and in people's homes, Marie Curie Scotland welcomes the Scottish Government's announcement about how the £5m for Scotland's hospice sector, announced in the budget in December, will be provided,' said Marie Curie's associate director of policy and public affairs Amy Dalrymple. 'But one-off funding like this will not address the long-term funding challenges or tackle the inequalities that exist in end of life care. 'Alongside increased support for community services, we're calling on the Scottish Government to deliver a sustainable, long-term funding plan, that includes ways to future-proof the workforce, so that wherever you live, whatever your illness, you'll be able to rely on good care right to the end.' She added: 'Investment in hospice staff is essential. There is only one chance to get end of life care right. 'However, we are concerned that this £5m will not touch the sides given the recent changes to employer National Insurance contributions which are expected to cost Marie Curie Scotland close to half a million pounds in 2025-26 alone. 'Death is one of two certainties in life. 'The Scottish Government must prioritise palliative care to ease the strain on the already overburdened and underfunded NHS and create a system that works for everyone now and in the future.' In November 2024, hospice bosses warned they face an 'insurmountable funding gap' and said concerns are mounting that they may have to turn people away. They said hospices are a 'key part' of the health and care system, but they are not part of the NHS, with charities instead having to fund their running costs. Chair of the Scottish Hospice Leadership Group, Jacki Smart, said: 'This is a welcome first step in recognising the needs of the hospice sector, which plays a key role in delivering specialist palliative care for Scotland. 'It is right for patients and staff that hospices can pay skilled professionals fairly and in line with NHS colleagues, and we need to keep pace on this.' The announcement comes after UK ministers announced £75m would be shared among 170 facilities in England – believed to be the biggest boost ever for the sector. The UK Government announced its funding increase in the Sunday Mirror, with minister Stephen Kinnock praising the impact of the facilities. 'Hospices play a vital role in our society by providing invaluable care and support when people need it most. 'At this most difficult time, people deserve to receive the best care in the best possible environment with dignity.' Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

Lib Dems accuse Neil Gray of stealing credit for Hospice funding
Lib Dems accuse Neil Gray of stealing credit for Hospice funding

The Herald Scotland

time3 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Lib Dems accuse Neil Gray of stealing credit for Hospice funding

The funding is intended to help facilities caring for people at the end of their lives increase wages to be in line with staff in the NHS. Responding to the announcement, the Scottish Liberal Democrat leader has said the government may wish to claim the credit for this move, however, he commented that it was his party who pushed the First Minister to commit to the £5 million funding during budget talks. Alex Cole-Hamilton MSP said: "More money to support hospices was a key Scottish Liberal Democrat demand in budget negotiations so I am glad than an additional £5m for the hospice sector is being delivered. "Neil Gray may be keen to claim the credit but this is an area that we forced on to the agenda because from visiting hospices and speaking with staff and residents, we recognised the huge demands being placed on the sector." Scottish Lib Dem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton (Image: Ken Jack) Mr Cole-Hamilton added: "The work they do week-in week-out to help those with life shortening conditions and their families is incredibly challenging but so important. "I hope that these additional funds can immediately be put to work to support service users by recruiting skilled staff. That's the difference that Liberal Democrat MSPs can make.' The SNP has been contacted for comment. READ MORE: Hospice CEOs warn that sector is 'struggling enormously' Scotland's first children's hospice set for £17m revamp The budget was passed earlier this year, and, since then, Scottish Labour have called for the cash to be released by ministers. Speaking ahead of a visit to a hospice on Friday, Health Secretary Neil Gray said: 'Independent hospices provide vital care and support to people and families across Scotland at the most difficult times in their lives. 'I am pleased we are able to support these organisations in supporting pay parity for their clinical staff. 'This funding recognises the skilled, compassionate care that hospice staff deliver every day, and helps ensure their pay reflects the immense value of their work.' Jacki Smart, chairwoman of the Scottish Hospice Leadership Group, said: 'This is a welcome first step in recognising the needs of the hospice sector, which plays a key role in delivering specialist palliative care for Scotland. 'It is right for patients and staff that hospices can pay skilled professionals fairly and in line with NHS colleagues, and we need to keep pace on this.' Marie Curie has welcomed the funding but said that "one-off" investments like this will not address long-term funding challenges. The charity is pushing the Scottish Government to deliver a sustainable funding plan for hospices for the future. Amy Dalrymple, Associate Director of Policy and Public Affairs at Marie Curie Scotland said: 'As Scotland's largest palliative and end of life care provider caring for people at our two Scottish hospices and in people's homes, Marie Curie Scotland welcomes the Scottish Government's announcement about how the £5 million for Scotland's hospice sector, announced in the Budget in December, will be provided. 'But one-off funding like this will not address the long-term funding challenges or tackle the inequalities that exist in end of life care. Alongside increased support for community services, we're calling on the Scottish Government to deliver a sustainable, long-term funding plan, that includes ways to future-proof the workforce, so that wherever you live, whatever your illness, you'll be able to rely on good care right to the end. 'It is shocking that the public purse spends four times more on hospital inpatients in their last year of life than on primary, community health, and hospice care combined for this group. This doesn't need to be the case, and means that we need to radically transform care of dying people. 'Investment in hospice staff is essential. There is only one chance to get end of life care right. However, we are concerned that this £5 million will not touch the sides given the recent changes to employer National Insurance contributions which are expected to cost Marie Curie Scotland close to half a million pounds in 2025/26 alone. 'Death is one of two certainties in life. The Scottish Government must prioritise palliative care to ease the strain on the already overburdened and underfunded NHS and create a system that works for everyone now and in the future.' Scottish Labour health spokesperson Jackie Baillie said: 'After months of dither and delay, it is welcome that the SNP is finally allocating the funding it promised in its budget – but this is funding promised for last year's pay rise. There is nothing on the table for this year. 'Hospices are still being short-changed by the SNP, and staff and services will continue to pay the price. 'A Scottish Labour government will properly support hospices and the crucial work they do, and fully fund a fair deal for staff.'

NHS Fife wanted to 'punish' veteran nurse Sandie Peggie over trans medic row, tribunal is told
NHS Fife wanted to 'punish' veteran nurse Sandie Peggie over trans medic row, tribunal is told

Daily Mail​

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

NHS Fife wanted to 'punish' veteran nurse Sandie Peggie over trans medic row, tribunal is told

The pursuit of a nurse who challenged a trans doctor for being in the woman's changing room was 'controlled from the very top' to punish her for objecting, a tribunal has heard. Sandie Peggie has sued NHS Fife and male-born medic Dr Beth Upton after being suspended from work for challenging the doctor's use of the room. The embattled health board was accused of punishing the 51-year-old nurse for the 'heresy' of the 'refusal to accept or pretend that Dr Upton is a woman'. During another extraordinary day of evidence it emerged the investigator looking into Ms Peggie had a private meeting with Dr Upton, 30, to adjust notes from an interview. And the lawyers involved became embroiled in a row about pronouns, with the NHS Fife KC Jane Russell demanding the nurse's lawyer stop referring to Dr Upton as a man. It led to barrister Naomi Cunningham firing back, telling the tribunal Ms Russell had been 'indulged in repeated futile objections to my use of correct sex pronouns for Dr Upton'. Ms Peggie has taken NHS Fife and Dr Upton to an employment tribunal and has claimed her treatment has broken the Equality Act. It follows an incident on Christmas Eve 2023 when she challenged Dr Upton in the women-only changing room at Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, for which she was subsequently suspended and investigated for. Ms Peggie, a nurse of 30 year's experience, last week was cleared of gross misconduct with NHS Fife finding 'insufficient evidence'. Angela Glancy, a clinical nurse manager, led an investigation into allegations against the nurse and became involved in the case in late February 2024. Ms Cunningham heighted a note from early January 2024 which was forwarded to Norma Beveridge, the director of nursing, which the senior boss said it was a 'very serious allegation with the potential for significant reputational damage'. In her cross-examination, Ms Cunningham said: 'The truth is this process was controlled from the very top, isn't it. 'Sandie always had to be put through this process and punished for her offence of standing up to a man who wanted to use the women's changing room?' The witness, who has worked for NHS Fife for 27 years, rejected the claim, and told the lawyer: 'I don't agree with that.' The hearing, in Dundee, was told that Dr Upton was offered a meeting after querying the notes made during an investigation interview. Ms Cunningham asked if it was 'normal practice' to 'meet up privately with the witness in order to agree adjustments to the notes', and was told by Ms Glancy that it had been 'the first time it has been asked of me'. Ms Glancy said most of the changes were grammar changes, and there was not 'anything in the body of the notes that were changed that I disagreed with'. During in the hearing Ms Glancy referred to Dr Upton as 'he', before changing it to 'she', prompting the intervention of the NHS Fife KC who said she had a concern at Ms Cunningham's 'persistent misgendering' which was 'discombobulating' the witness. Ms Russell, who said NHS Fife were 'not used to Dr Upton being referred to with the pronouns he/him' asked the judge to note her concerns and asked Ms Cunningham to 'reflect on her language'. Ms Cunningham promptly declined the invitation, and continued to refer to Dr Upton with the 'he/him' pronouns. The witness disagreed with Ms Cunningham when she asked: 'The reason Sandie had to be punished, through this whole process, was she was guilty of the exact same heresy in the eyes of the board to which Ms Russell, no doubt on the instructions of the board, has taken repeated exception in the course of this hearing, namely the refusal to accept or pretend that Dr Upton is a woman.' Also during the hearing the two sides butted heads, with Ms Cunningham telling the tribunal judge that at no point had she 'impugned Ms Russell's character or professionalism, but unfortunately the converse is not true'. Ms Russell said the concerns she had raised were about the fairness of proceedings, and added: 'My concerns have been raised appropriately and professionally in public and in private at all times.' The tribunal continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store