Duke University's healthcare faces $108 million federal funding freeze amid discrimination probe under Trump administration
The Trump administration has frozen $108 million in federal funding allocated to Duke Health, citing allegations of systemic racial discrimination across Duke University's healthcare and academic systems.
The move intensifies the administration's ongoing crackdown on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs in higher education and healthcare institutions.
The funding block, first reported by Fox News and confirmed by a senior administration official, impacts Duke University School of Medicine as well as its broader healthcare research and delivery operations.
Title VI compliance
under scrutiny
This decision comes just a day after Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F.
Kennedy, Jr. and Education Secretary Linda McMahon sent a formal letter to Duke officials—President Vincent Price, Board Chairman Adam Silver, and Dean of the School of Medicine Mary Klotman—raising serious concerns over alleged 'racial preferences in hiring, student admissions, governance, patient care, and other operations.
'
According to the letter, the federal government is investigating whether Duke is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which bars racial or national origin discrimination in federally funded programs.
The letter urges Duke to audit its policies and form a 'Merit and Civil Rights Committee' to liaise with federal authorities.
'If Duke does not comply and is found to be in violation, the $108 million in federal support could be permanently rescinded,' the administration official stated.
Duke Health has yet to publicly comment on the funding freeze.
DEI crackdown in Trump's second term
President Trump has repeatedly vowed to dismantle DEI initiatives, which his administration claims 'exacerbate conflict and entrench bias.'
In his second term, sweeping executive orders have banned DEI programs across federal agencies and threatened universities with funding cuts for maintaining diversity-related policies.
In February 2025, the Department of Education warned academic institutions of potential sanctions over DEI-related activity, leading many universities to scale back or eliminate such programs entirely. Some even lost federal scholarships or research grants.
Critics argue that DEI efforts foster inclusive learning environments and promote civic engagement. Numerous studies indicate that exposure to diverse peers on campus enhances cultural understanding and political participation among students.
Impact on Duke's operations
The funding cut comes at a time when Duke and other top-tier research universities are facing broader challenges, including declining grant allocations from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). According to the
Duke Chronicle
, the university has already launched a voluntary separation incentive and is preparing for layoffs in August.
With the future of its federal support uncertain, Duke Health may face not just reputational risk but also major operational disruptions.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
12 minutes ago
- First Post
'We'll see what happens': Trump dodges question on extending August 12 China tariff deadline
US President Donald Trump on Monday dodged a question about whether he would extend the August 12 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods, saying 'we'll see what happens' read more US President Donald Trump on Monday dodged a question about whether he would extend the August 12 deadline for imposing higher tariffs on Chinese goods, saying 'we'll see what happens,' while praising China for its cooperation in ongoing trade talks with the US. 'We've been dealing very nicely with China. As you have probably heard, they have tremendous tariffs that they're paying to the United States of America,' Reuters quoted Trump as saying at a news conference at the White House. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'They've been dealing quite nicely,' he said, adding that he had a good relationship with Chinese President Xi Jinping. A tariff truce between the US and China is set to expire on August 12, though the Trump administration has signaled the deadline could be extended. More from World PM Modi to visit China: Why the trip matters amid Trump's steep tariffs on India Without an extension, US tariffs on Chinese goods are expected to surge to 145%, while Chinese tariffs on American products could reach 125%. The two countries agreed to a 90-day pause in their trade dispute during talks in Geneva this May, allowing time for further negotiations. A follow-up meeting in Stockholm in late July ended without any announcement on extending the truce. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Washington is making progress and expressed optimism about reaching a deal with Beijing. With the clock ticking, Trump on Sunday night called on China to quadruple its purchases of American soybeans and noted that doing so would help reduce America's trade deficit with China. 'China is worried about its shortage of soybeans,' Trump wrote on Truth Social in a message directed to Xi Jinping, China's leader. 'Our great farmers produce the most robust soybeans,' he added. With inputs from agencies
News18
12 minutes ago
- News18
US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage
Curated By : Last Updated: August 12, 2025, 00:39 IST It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will take up the case (Pexels/Representative Image) The US Supreme Court legalised same-sex marriage in 2015 following its landmark ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges. Now, nearly a decade after that historic decision, the nation's highest court is being urged to revisit the ruling. Kim Davis, a former county clerk from Kentucky, has submitted a petition asking the Court to consider granting her protection from personal liability under the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment, reported ABC . Davis made national headlines in 2015 when she was jailed for six days after refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, citing her religious beliefs. At the time, she was the only official authorised under Kentucky law to issue marriage licenses in Rowan County. When she denied a marriage certificate to David Ermold and David Moore, a lower court ordered her to pay $100,000 in damages for infringing on their constitutional rights. Recommended Stories In her recent appeal to the Supreme Court, Davis is contesting the $100,000 jury verdict and is also seeking $260,000 in emotional damages and attorneys' fees. Her claims had previously been dismissed by lower courts. A federal appeals court panel earlier this year ruled against her, stating that the former clerk 'cannot raise the First Amendment as a defence because she is being held liable for state action, which the First Amendment does not protect." It remains uncertain whether the Supreme Court will take up the case. The justices are expected to consider if they will take the matter during a private conference at the end of September. Should the Court agree to hear the case, oral arguments would likely take place in the spring of 2026, with a final decision anticipated by the end of June. 'I'm hoping that we'll obviously get justice in this case for Kim Davis but that the religious accommodation that she obtained for all clerks," said Matt Staver, Davis' legal representative, in a statement to Scripps News . View All "Dragging Out War" Zelensky Eyes "Stronger Global Pressure" on Russia Ahead of Trump-Putin Meet Donald Trump Will Try To Get Back Territory For Ukraine In "Feel-out Meeting" With Putin In Alaska North Korea Slams US-South Korea Drills; Lukashenko Admits Kim's Troops Took Part in Ukraine War |4K Air India Crash Victims' Families Demand Immediate Release Of Flight Recorders, Hire Us based Lawyer "Road To Misery" IRGC Slams Trump-Backed Zangezur corridor, Iran to Hold Meet with Armenia | 4K View all Meanwhile, William Powell, attorney for David Ermold and David Moore, expressed confidence in the current legal outcome. In a statement to ABC , he noted, 'Not a single judge on the US Court of Appeals showed any interest in Davis' rehearing petition, and we are confident the Supreme Court will likewise agree that her arguments do not merit further attention." In her petition, Davis further argues that the Court should treat the issue of same-sex marriage similarly to how it addressed abortion in its 2022 ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade. This is the first time that someone has challenged the same-sex marriage ruling after it was announced in 2015. News world US Supreme Court Urged To Revisit 2015 Ruling Legalising Same-Sex Marriage Read More
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Trump signs order extending China tariff deadline for 90 days, official says
US President Donald Trump has signed an executive order extending a pause in sharply higher US tariffs on Chinese imports for another 90 days, a White House official said. A tariff truce between Beijing and Washington had been set to expire on August 12 at 00:01 (04:01 GMT), but the Trump administration had hinted the deadline could be extended.
