Mets beat Nationals in Spring Breakout game behind home runs from top prospects Ryan Clifford, Boston Baro
Nick Morabito added a two-run single for the Mets.
The Spring Breakout is a chance for teams to show off some of their top prospects and an opportunity for the players to showcase their skills against other highly-touted players. It went very well for the Mets.
Tong, one of the Mets' top pitching prospects, started the game and was mostly sharp, allowing no runs and one hit in two innings. He struck out three and walked two. Tong, who has the best fastball in the organization, according to Baseball America, pitched at three levels last season, reaching Double-A.
The Mets also got scoreless work from Jonathan Pintaro (two innings). Dylan Ross, who showcased nifty breaking stuff, and Jonathan Santucci threw one scoreless frame each. Ryan Lambert, who can hit triple digits, allowed a run in the seventh inning.
In the third inning, Baro, a 20-year-old infielder drafted in the eighth round in 2023, smacked a solo home run on a 3-0 pitch. It was an opposite-field shot for Baro, a left-handed hitter. Baro also singled and scored in the fourth. The homer came off Washington's sixth-ranked prospect, Alex Clemmey, a lefty who struck out six over three innings in the game. Last year, Baro slugged four homers at St. Lucie before being promoted to High-A Brooklyn and had a .748 OPS over the two stops.
The Mets added two more runs in the fourth inning after loading the bases with two out. Morabito got ahead in the count, 3-0, and then believed the next pitch was ball four. He was so sure that he even tossed his bat away. But the umpire called it a strike. Morabito fouled off a pitch and then hit a single into short right-center field that plated two runs. Morabito, a second-round pick in the 2022 draft, batted .312 last season with 59 steals over two Class A stops and was named the organization's minor-league player of the year.
One of the more impressive facets of Jett Williams' skill set was on display in the first inning after he reached base on a fielder's choice when his popup dropped untouched. Williams, the Mets' top position-player prospect, took off for second with Clifford at the plate and was easily safe. Get used to seeing stolen bases from Williams, who has 56 steals in 66 tries (84.8%) in his minor-league career.
Kevin Parada, the 11th overall pick in the 2022 draft, was 2-for-3 with a double and a run scored. Parada batted .214 with 13 home runs in 115 games at Binghamton last year.
Clifford, mostly because his fifth-inning home run was the most impressive moment of the game. Clifford, whose prospect calling card is power, smashed a 2-2 pitch over the center-field wall, which is 406 feet from home plate. The ball landed at least halfway up a grass berm well beyond the wall. Clifford, a 21-year-old first baseman/outfielder, hit 19 homers last season over two stops, including 18 at Double-A Binghamton
"You put Jett on first, Jett's taking second" - @PSLtoFlushingJett Williams steals second base! pic.twitter.com/hex91fVCz4
— SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) March 16, 2025
Jonah Tong ends the first inning with a strikeout 💪 pic.twitter.com/8hjlf31Z2Y
— SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) March 16, 2025
Two more strikeouts for Jonah Tong 🔥 pic.twitter.com/9iRq1kRO8k
— SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) March 16, 2025
Boston Baro with an opposite-field home run! 💪 pic.twitter.com/9rqOjR3ZiP
— SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) March 16, 2025
Carson Benge goes the other way for a double! pic.twitter.com/sb8E18fh7a
— SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) March 16, 2025
Nick Morabito brings home two with a single! pic.twitter.com/ITqIjgXgUW
— SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) March 16, 2025
Nick Morabito steals second 🏃 pic.twitter.com/Vx9UW3f5lb
— SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) March 16, 2025
Ryan Clifford LAUNCHES a home run to dead center 💣 pic.twitter.com/rNt2MdBngs
— SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) March 16, 2025
A long double off the wall for Kevin Parada! pic.twitter.com/jx1DS8ZdMM
— SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) March 16, 2025
Boston Baro starts the 5-4-3 double play 💪 pic.twitter.com/8qXr8ZpUJV
— SNY Mets (@SNY_Mets) March 16, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
20 minutes ago
- Forbes
Green Bay Packers: 5 Positional Battles To Watch As Training Camp Winds Down
Green Bay Packers left tackle Rasheed Walker is trying to hold off Jordan Morgan and keep his starting job. Getty Images Tick, tick, tick … Time is running out on training camp. And one week from today, Green Bay Packers' general manager Brian Gutekunst will set his 53-man roster. The Packers have two practices this week — one a joint practice with Seattle on Thursday — and face the Seahawks in their final exhibition game Saturday. There are still a few positional battles and roster spots on the line. Here are the most intriguing ones as training camp hits the homestretch. It feels like the Packers have tried giving Morgan — their 2024 first round draft pick — this job since last season ended. And to his credit, Morgan has played well most of the summer. Still, Walker has made 35 starts (including playoffs) over the last two seasons and more than held his own protecting Jordan Love's blindside. 'Oh, it's 100% a competition,' Packers coach Matt LaFleur said on Sunday. 'I think Jordan's put a lot of good stuff on tape.' Walker missed time midway through camp with a groin injury and hasn't played in either preseason game. He might need a solid game against Seattle to keep his job. 'I mean shoot, no one's really said it to me, but I just come to work every day and go to work,' Walker said. 'That's all you can do. I'm a team first guy. I'm with the Green Bay Packers, so shoot, I'm going come to work every day, do my job.' The Packers will almost certainly keep just two quarterbacks on their 53-man roster. But Clifford and Elgersma are battling to be No. 3, which would mean they'd stick around on the practice squad. Clifford was Green Bay's No. 2 quarterback in 2023 and was on the practice squad last year. Clifford was in for just one series in last Saturday's preseason game against Indianapolis, but made it count. Clifford led a 13-play, 68-yard drive and capped it with an 11-yard touchdown run that gave the Packers their first lead of the game at 23-19. 'Year 3 is one where you should see a major spike and I feel like in the games I've gotten into so far, I've felt extremely comfortable,' Clifford said Monday. 'Feel like I'm seeing the field really well and I thought that was on display (against Indianapolis).' Elgersma, a Canadian quarterback from the University of Wilfrid Laurier, came to Green Bay's rookie mini-camp in May as a tryout player and impressed. Elgersma, who played 12-man football in Canada, certainly faced long odds to stick around then — and now. But Elgersma had a solid performance against the Colts last week, completing 7-of-11 passes for 109 yards, posting a 96.4 passer rating and leading three of Green Bay's four scoring drives. Now, Elgersma has a real shot to make the practice squad. 'For me, the most important thing is I focus day by day on getting better, but I do think that I have a high ceiling,' Elgersma said. 'If I can keep developing and keep spending time here, I can turn into a guy that can play on Sundays and give our team a chance to win every single time I'm out there.' The Packers were hoping second-year man MarShawn Lloyd would be a key cog here. But Lloyd — who played in just one game last year due to injury — is hurt again and certainly can't be counted on. The best bet is Emanuel Wilson, last year's primary backup to Josh Jacobs, keeps that job. And Chris Brooks, who played in 15 games last season, is No. 3. Israel Abanikanda, a fifth round draft pick by the Jets in 2023, has had a solid camp, though, both as a runner and a kick returner and could factor in with a big finish to camp. 'The way I grew up, I've got Nigerian parents, and they're very strong with me to never let things break me,' Abanikanda said. 'So that's always been my mindset, just to never let anything break me, just use everything to motivate you. God's always got a plan, so you have to follow that and keep working.' Edgerrin Cooper, Quay Walker, Isaiah McDuffie and Ty'Ron Hopper are locks to make the team. The fifth and final spot comes down to talented, but inconsistent Isaiah Simmons vs. reliable, but less gifted Kristian Welch. Simmons is remarkably athletic, but has struggled in Green Bay's two preseason games. 'Personally, I don't think it's been up to my standard,' Simmons said. 'I just feel like I've been thinking too much instead of just being myself. Trying to play too perfect, as opposed to just playing. You know what I'm saying?' Welch looked like a good bet to make the team last year, but was released on cutdown day. The Iola, Wis., native has been solid all summer, and is also a special teams standout. 'He's done a lot of good things,' LaFleur said of Welch. 'Certainly his value is just his ability to go out and do a lot of things in terms of special teams. He's a four phase guy, and then he's got enough experience at linebacker that if you need to fill a hole, he can fill any of those three spots.' Matthew Golden, Jayden Reed, Romeo Doubs, Dontayvion Wicks and Savion Williams are the top five. If the Packers keep six — or more — they'll have tough choices. Mecole Hardman has two Super Bowl rings from his time in Kansas City and has ability in the return game. Malik Heath is a nice blocker, but lacks explosiveness. Undrafted Julian Hicks and Cornelius Johnson have had their moments this summer, but remain longshots. 'The good thing about it is they're all competing and they're all showing us what they're about,' Packers offensive coordinator Adam Stenavich said. 'And any time you're out there in a game scenario and you make plays, that stands out for sure. So it's been good to see.'
Fox Sports
7 hours ago
- Fox Sports
What MLB Could Look Like After Expansion: Eight Divisions, New Rivalries?!
Major League Baseball What MLB Could Look Like After Expansion: Eight Divisions, New Rivalries?! Published Aug. 19, 2025 12:45 a.m. ET share facebook x reddit link The Mets swapping the Braves for the Yankees as divisional foes? Goodbye to the Dodgers vs. Giants rivalry as we know it? Geographic realignment in MLB is more likely than you think. Or, more likely than previously thought, after commissioner Rob Manfred surprisingly discussed the subject on Sunday. With expansion expected before the end of this decade, there could be a major shuffling to help address concerns over travel schedules. As Manfred explained, teams like the Red Sox flying to the West Coast to face the Angels in an early postseason series doesn't make fans of either team happy with the scheduled game times. First up, though, where would the expansion teams go? There are plenty of candidates: Nashville, Salt Lake City, or an MLB return to Canada by way of Montreal. There's also Mexico City (elevation at 7,349 feet!) to rival the Rockies' Coors Field as the park that pitchers would most hate to see on the schedule. But with Manfred's emphasis on geography and the complications of making that work, two cities – Charlotte and Portland – made the most sense for this exercise. And with new franchises in the Rose City and the Queen City, we can ask: What would a realigned MLB look like? We've got an idea. ADVERTISEMENT Eight divisions with four teams each, which is a huge shift from today's six divisions with five teams. The American League gets condensed (confined to the heavily populated East Coast out to the Great Lakes region), while the National League stretches out for far more square mileage. Okay with that? Well, let's talk about the why of each division. American League New York Yankees New York Mets Boston Red Sox Philadelphia Phillies A division that places together four of the largest, loudest cities in the region — don't worry, that's a compliment. This division also has maybe the strongest "we're so back/it's so over" energy of them all, too, given how these fan bases tend to engage with their teams' highs and lows. Keeping the Red Sox and Yankees together was paramount, but this setup also has the bonus of letting the Mets and Yankees rivalry grow that much larger, since it won't just be for New York supremacy, but also for the divisional kind. Breaking up the Mets and Braves is disappointing, but the Phillies-Mets rivalry is no slouch. Also, it's not as if the Braves and Mets will never play in important games. They'd both be American League teams now, and will play often enough to ruin each other's regular seasons, while also leaving open the possibility of matching up in the postseason. Baltimore Orioles Washington Nationals Pittsburgh Pirates Cleveland Guardians The Orioles and Nationals don't share a city, but they are close enough to share the same regional sports network — a fact that's been a point of contention between the two in the past. The two are already paired up as designated rivals by MLB, so keeping them together here makes sense. The Pirates and Guardians are both charting newer territory, but it's because they both make more sense here than in other divisions. Pirates fans, if you feel odd not being in the Central anymore, consider that you're no longer haunted by the Cubs or Cardinals or this season's Brewers this way. Minnesota Twins Milwaukee Brewers Detroit Tigers Toronto Blue Jays The Blue Jays and Tigers used to be rivals in the '80s and '90s due to their hotly-contested fights for the AL East crown, a fact celebrated by their being designated rivals in the eyes of MLB in the present. Sure, some rivalries are being lost because of this geographic shift, but others can be reignited — great timing, too, because both of these clubs are the most competitive they've been in ages right now, and have the young rosters to keep that going. As for the Brewers, it's a return to the American League — they switched to the NL in 1998, when the then-Devil Rays and Diamondbacks joined MLB as expansion teams. This also would arguably be the first time the Twins were in a division that aligned with their location: they are central, sure, but a little out of place with the rest of the division, and were previously in the AL West before the '98 switch to six divisions. Atlanta Braves Miami Marlins Tampa Bay Rays Charlotte (Expansion) The first space where an expansion team is necessary for filling out a division. We'd lose the current Mets vs. Braves divisional rivalry, but it does create an opportunity for Atlanta and the new squad, Charlotte, to come to blows given their relative proximity. Putting the two Florida teams together might help foster a rivalry there, too, but part of this is pure geography as per Manfred's edict. Did you know that driving from Charlotte to Atlanta actually takes the same amount of time as a trip from St. Petersburg to Miami? Florida is a long state, folks. National League Chicago Cubs Chicago White Sox St. Louis Cardinals Cincinnati Reds Like New York's duo, Chicago can see their two teams face off far more regularly about who is the pride of their city. The Cubs get to keep their designated-by-MLB rival in the White Sox, and without losing their historic rival, the Cardinals. The Reds get to keep a couple of familiar faces they're used to sparring with around, and while they do lose the Pirates and Brewers, in the grand scheme of things, those three were not in the same division for that long: the Reds used to be in the NL West before the wild card era, and the Brewers were in the AL until the 1998 season. Colorado Rockies Kansas City Royals Texas Rangers Houston Astros There are two ways to look at this division. The first is that some cracks in the geographic realignment plan are showing a bit, owing to how these teams are distributed around the country — there are teams from three different existing divisions here. The second is the way that you should be thinking about it: this fixes some longstanding issues! Why were the Rockies in the NL West? There wasn't anywhere else to go, despite being in a different time zone than the California clubs and closer to the NL Central clubs. Why were the Astros in the AL West? Because there were just four AL West teams when they made the switch from the NL in 2013 – despite Houston being significantly closer to Boston than it is to Seattle. The Rangers also get to move out of their oddball AL West designation while preserving their Texas-based rivalry, and the Rockies join a division with the team actually closest to them, the Royals. Los Angeles Dodgers San Diego Padres Los Angeles Angels Arizona Diamondbacks Three of the four remaining California teams — this exercise assumes the Athletics will be in Las Vegas in 2028 — get into this one division, since they're all close together in what's a massive state. Manfred said the Red Sox and Angels facing off in the postseason isn't ideal for MLB or its fans. But the Angels and Dodgers fighting for a postseason spot or spoiling each other's season or facing off in October would be! The Padres and Dodgers get to keep their bloodfeud going in this arrangement, too. The Diamondbacks still aren't in the right time zone, but that's the nature of the geographic beast: they're at least aligned distance-wise with the rest of this crew. Seattle Mariners Las Vegas Athletics San Francisco Giants Portland (Expansion) The A's and Giants can renew their former Bay Area rivalry, even if it is which team from the Northwest division is the best. Yes, the Giants lose the Dodgers rivalry, but like the Braves/Mets and the emphasis towards more geographically-oriented scheduling, those two will still be seeing a ton of each other, and will be able to face off in the postseason, as well. An expansion team in Portland narrows the lonely gap between the Mariners and the next team south, and since there are some historic sports rivalries between the two cities — Seattle Sounders/Reign/SuperSonics and Portland Timbers/Thorns/Trail Blazers fans, hello — the seed is already planted for transferring those feelings onto a new MLB team. Postseason: What Would It Look Like? Rather than three division champions and three wild card teams, the setup here would feature four division winners and a pair of wild cards. There would still be an NL side and an AL side to the postseason bracket, which means that the league could avoid the scenario Manfred brought up when extolling the virtues of geographic realignment — the Red Sox (or Phillies, or Mets, or Braves or Blue Jays or whichever team) wouldn't have to fly out to the West Coast for Division Series or Wild Card round games in a packed postseason broadcasting schedule that inevitably cuts fans out from watching their favorite teams. MLB could choose to change things even further, both in the postseason or in a divisional format — what if they scaled back divisions, or used straight seeding, or something akin to the NBA's setup and so on — but the alignment is already disruptive: this feels like the best possible balance between what already is and what should be, with the emphasis on geography espoused by MLB. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account , and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! FOLLOW Follow your favorites to personalize your FOX Sports experience Major League Baseball What did you think of this story? share
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
How MLB's regional realignment could end historic rivalries
The American League and National League have been institutions in baseball for more than 120 years. If MLB has expansion in the coming years, it's expected those leagues could be totally reimagined to break up baseball's league and division infrastructure as we know it going forward. The New York Yankees and Mets could be in the same division. Same goes for the Chicago Cubs and White Sox. With the universal DH now well-established, radical realignment is likely coming to MLB over the next decade. Baseball insiders have whispered about the possibility of regional-based realignment for a few years. MLB commissioner Rob Mandred was asked directly about it on Sunday night during an ESPN broadcast, and didn't shy away from his next bold rules change. Manfred said expansion and realignment are intertwined, and offered the biggest insight yet into what baseball could look like in the future. 'I think if we expand, it provides us with an opportunity to geographically realign. I think we could save a lot of wear and tear on our players in terms of travel. And I think our postseason format would be even more appealing for entities like ESPN because you'd be playing out of the east and out of the west. And now that 10 o'clock time slot, where we sometimes get Boston-Anaheim, it would be two West Coast teams in that 10 o'clock slot.' 'I think the owners realize that there is demand for Major League Baseball in a lot of great cities, and we have an opportunity to do something good around that expansion process.' Nashville and North Carolina have been the hottest candidates for expansion, but it's not rumored to happen until 2028 or 2029. Expansion still seems pretty far away at this point with nothing concrete about potential new markets, but if MLB has it their way, it will trigger widespread divisional realignment. Imagine MLB's divisions look something like this: East: Yankees, Mets, Red Sox, Phillies North: Blue Jays, Tigers, Guardians, Pirates Mid-Atlantic: Orioles, Nationals, Braves, North Carolina team South: Rangers, Astros, Rays, Marlins Great Lakes: Cubs, White Sox, Brewers, Twins Midwest: Royals, Cardinals, Reds, Nashville Southwest: Dodgers, Angels, Padres, Diamondbacks West: Rockies, A's, Giants Mariners This isn't exactly perfect and is more of a rough draft. Manfred has already instituted a couple radical ideas in his time as commissioner. The pitch clock has been an unmitigated success, and feels like one of the best sports rule changes in a while. Opinions may very on baseball's decision to put a runner at second base in extra innings, make the bases bigger (and easier to steal), and expand the playoffs. At first blush, I don't like the look of realignment at all. It would be wrong to break up the Cubs and Cardinals from the same division, for example. Maybe the AL and NL don't really mean anything anymore now that everyone plays with the DH, but this change still feels too radical for my taste. Still, the pitch clock was such a good idea that it proves big changes can work in baseball. Change is likely coming to baseball again, like it or not. This really feels like Manfred's boldest plan yet.
