Aurora mayoral candidates share their views on city issues at forum
Aurora mayoral candidates, all except incumbent Richard Irvin, shared their viewpoints on a variety of questions ranging in topic from ethical behavior to working with small businesses at Thursday's League of Women Voters Aurora Area candidate forum.
The mayoral primary election is set for Feb. 25.
The forum, held at the Aurora Police Department on East Indian Trail, was attended by Aurora mayoral candidates Jazmine Garcia, Karina Garcia, John Laesch, Judd Lofchie and Ted Mesiacos. Irvin previously said he had a scheduling conflict that prevented him from attending, and that he had unsuccessfully tried to get the forum's date changed to work with his schedule.
In the forum format, a moderator asks a question, then all candidates in attendance get a chance to give their answer before the moderator asks the next question. Candidates cannot directly respond to each other's answers like they would in a debate, and the audience is not allowed to applaud, cheer or boo for certain candidates.
While a variety of topics were discussed during the nearly two-hour event — of which a recording can be found on the League of Women Voters Aurora Area Facebook page: www.facebook.com/LWVAuroraArea — each candidates' answers along with opening and closing statements helped to build an overall picture of their campaigns and messaging.
Jazmine Garcia was the first to speak at the event, following last-name alphabetical order.
She said during her opening statement that, despite having a bachelor's and master's degree in urban planning, she personally has to rely on food stamps and Medicaid, is struggling to pay back her student loans and finds it 'impossible' to find affordable housing while 'do-nothing career politicians and developers fill their personal pockets.'
Throughout her answers, Jazmine Garcia advocated for rent control and more affordable housing, including saying that she will 'abolish homelessness' in the city if elected, and suggested that vacant city-owned land could be used to build tiny houses for people experiencing homelessness.
Another topic Jazmine Garcia brought up a number of times throughout her answers was ethical and civil behavior at the Aurora City Council. She suggested that all city officials should sign ethics and civility pledges, plus said she wanted to stop city politicians from taking campaign contributions from city vendors or others who do business with the city.
The daughter of Mexican immigrants, Jazmine Garcia said she loves how diverse Aurora is, but that those diverse communities do not feel welcome within the city currently. If elected, she would strive to make Aurora welcoming to all and would push to turn Aurora into a sanctuary city with clearer guidelines than those at the state level, she said.
Karina Garcia, who herself was undocumented for a time after she came to the U.S. from Mexico when she was 9, said undocumented people shouldn't feel scared to leave their homes, so she also supported the idea of Aurora becoming a sanctuary city. The city has a large Latino population, but people of other ethnicities are also undocumented here, she said.
'If they're here to work, and they're paying taxes, and they're providing for the community, and they're giving back, they should feel safe to be here in this city,' Karina Garcia said.
Supporting Aurora residents over those who live outside the city was a common theme throughout Karina Garcia's answers, whether she was talking about turning downtown into an entertainment center, focused mainly on attracting Aurora residents, to creating housing that people in Aurora can afford rather than trying to attract buyers from outside the city. She is the part-owner of a house-flipping business that keeps its finished homes affordable for residents, she said.
Karina Garcia is also the president and CEO of the Aurora Regional Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, so many of her answers also tied back to supporting local businesses. She pledged to make funding more streamlined for all businesses and to provide better resources to those looking to start a business within the city.
John Laesch, who is currently one of the two at-large aldermen on the Aurora City Council, said he is running for mayor because it seems to him that there are 'two Auroras,' one that works 'incredibly well' for developers, campaign donors and the politically connected but another for 'the rest of us,' who have to 'play by the rules' by waiting for things like building permits and pay higher taxes to 'subsidize' the city's other side.
He pledged that, if elected mayor, he would 'be a voice for all of us' by listening to residents and fighting for things like living-wage jobs, working-class housing, the environment and ethics reform.
These themes were present in nearly all of Laesch's answers, from saying that financial incentives for large developments are driving up rent prices and that the city should instead invest in local businesses or those that could bring in living-wage jobs, to proposing a city-wide listening tour so all residents can hear his goals and share their concerns along with a newsletter to better communicate with residents.
Laesch also said he wants to move the city more toward home ownership and away from apartments or other rentals. The city could tap into existing state and federal funding to help build more environmentally-friendly homes, he said.
Judd Lofchie, an attorney and commercial developer who formerly sat on the Aurora City Council and currently sits on the East Aurora School Board, brought up in his comments how difficult it is to start a business in Aurora.
He said he has helped around 50 businesses open, and permits sometimes take six to 12 months for approval when they should take two to three months, according to Lofchie. He said the city needs to be more business-friendly, give business more support and make things easier.
Aurora also needs to do a better job at planning where it is going, such as with a master plan, Lofchie said. For instance, he said Aurora needs to figure out what types of businesses that stakeholders throughout the community actually want to see downtown, and the city needs to start looking at potentially finding sources of drinking water other than the Fox River as other cities along it consider removing their dams.
Lofchie suggested that his proposed master plan would also consider affordable housing, which he said should be worked into the deals Aurora makes with residential developers. In exchange for the economic incentives the city would give to the development, the developer should be required to set aside a percentage of units as affordable housing, he said.
Ted Mesiacos, who currently serves on the Aurora City Council as the 3rd Ward alderman, said Aurora's current stock of affordable housing is similar to nearby cities, so Aurora should 'be careful to avoid outpacing the towns around us in creating additional housing.' However, the city should look into partnering with builders to put new houses on empty residential lots the city currently owns by using existing federal funding, he said.
Similar partnerships were proposed throughout Mesiacos' answers, such as a possible agreement with Aurora Township to expand its existing Ride in Kane transportation program. He also said the city should look into bringing back an Amtrak train station and Greyhound bus station to downtown.
Aurora's downtown has seen 'short-term successes,' according to Mesiacos, and while he hopes it continues, the city needs to consider how it will move forward 'in an orderly fashion,' he said. Aurora's downtown, neighborhoods and parks need to have design standards, and the city needs to bring in a larger variety of developers to work on downtown projects rather than just the handful that currently do projects there, he said.
Public safety was another common thread throughout many of Mesiacos' answers. He said that people and businesses need to feel safe, so police need to be more visible both at community meetings and in public places.
Early voting began Jan. 16 for the primary election on Feb. 25, which includes the Aurora mayoral primary. The top two finishers in the mayoral primary will move on to the April 1 consolidated election.
rsmith@chicagotribune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
PA House passes bill requiring American-made steel in tax-payer funded projects
HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — The Pennsylvania House of Representatives passed a bill Monday requiring American-made steel for all tax-payer funded projects. State law already requires government projects to use American-made steel. However, H.B. 1018 would extend this requirement to private entities receiving public funds or tax incentives. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'This is one way to bring back good-paying, family-sustaining jobs – by leveling the playing field for hardworking people and industries that were economically steamrolled by unfair competition,' said Rep. Frank Burns (D-Cambria), who sponsored the bill. The bill, which is a part of Burns' larger 'American Made Jobs Plan,' passed the House 200-2. It will now move to the Senate for concurrence. Mexican aluminum, steel exporters say sales in US down 63% due to tariffs The bill comes as tariffs have driven down the demand for foreign-made steel. In February, President Donald Trump ordered a 25% tariff on Mexican and Canadian steel and aluminum imports. Exporters of Mexican steel and aluminum said that has led to a 63% drop in sales to the United States. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A message to Trump protesters in California: Put down the Mexican flags
As thousands of demonstrators take to the streets of Los Angeles protesting immigration enforcement operations, images of Mexican flags waving alongside burning cars and clashes with federal agents are once again dominating news coverage. While the passion and commitment of these protesters are undeniable, they are making a critical strategic error that could undermine their cause and harm the very communities they seek to protect. They are ignoring an important lesson from history on how prominently displaying this flag can backfire with the broader public. More than 30 years ago, Californians were facing intense economic insecurity as the state was crawling out of a recession amid a dramatic influx of immigrants, trends eerily similar to today. It led to a public backlash against immigration led by then-Gov. Pete Wilson. The political centerpiece of the movement in 1994 was Proposition 187. The measure called for denying public services to undocumented immigrants. Latino students and activists organized massive protests across the state. Like today's demonstrations, these protests featured prominent displays of Mexican flags. One demonstration at Los Angeles City Hall drew an estimated 70,000 protesters, one of the largest protests in city history. But it only served to inflame a distressed public. Proposition 187 passed decisively with 59% of the vote. Post-election analysis revealed that the Mexican flag imagery had become a powerful weapon in the hands of the measure's supporters. Harold Ezell, the former Immigration and Naturalization Service Director who helped author Prop. 187, later declared that the 'biggest mistake the opposition made was waving those green and white flags with the snake on it. They should have been waving the American flag.' Technically, opponents of the measure eventually would win. Courts ruled that Prop. 187 was unconstitutional. But the political damage for supporters of immigrants would extend far beyond that single election. Prop. 187's passage, aided by the visual narrative of foreign flags at protests, helped transform California politics for a generation—but not necessarily in the way protesters intended. While an entirely new generation of Latino political activism was stirred by the heated passion of that campaign, so too was an anti-immigrant fervor that consumed California politics for a generation. Rather than just building sympathy for immigrants and a show of ethnic solidarity when the community was under attack, the imagery reinforced opponents' framing of immigration as a question of national loyalty rather than human and constitutional rights. Today, protesters in Los Angeles risk repeating this strategic blunder. The Mexican flag being waved amid destruction, violent interaction with law enforcement, and burning vehicles allows opponents to shift the narrative away from legitimate concerns about immigration enforcement tactics and toward questions of patriotism, lawlessness, and national identity. It transforms what should be a debate about American constitutional rights and due process into a conversation about foreign loyalty and cultural assimilation. It highlights division and, at least optically, prioritizes foreign loyalty over American loyalty. This messaging problem is particularly acute given how Latino political attitudes have evolved since 1994. Research shows that today's Latino voters, especially younger generations, are increasingly assimilated and respond differently to ethnic appeals than their predecessors. Millennial and Generation Z Latinos are more motivated by intersectional movements that promote equality for all Americans rather than country-of-origin symbolism. For these assimilated voters, substantive policy discussions prove more influential than ethnic appeals tied to ancestral homelands. Pew Research Center shows that more than half of all Hispanics view themselves as 'typical Americans.' That number grows to 80 percent in younger Latinos. The Mexican flag imagery also alienates more than just Latinos. It also turns off potential allies who should be natural coalition partners. The 1994 protests should have included not just Latinos but also far more whites, Asian Americans, and African Americans who opposed Prop. 187 on civil rights grounds. In the end, Prop. 187 lost only among Latinos but was supported by white, Black, and Asian voters due, at least in some part, to the ethnic polarization Latino activists were imparting to rally their communities. Similarly, today's immigration enforcement concerns affect diverse communities across Los Angeles. But when protests are visually dominated by Mexican flags, these broader coalitions understandably feel excluded from what should be an American civil rights movement. Perhaps most damaging, the flag imagery provides opponents with exactly the ammunition they need to dismiss legitimate grievances. This is how immigration activists lose the message to Donald Trump. Using the flag of a foreign nation undermines the moral high ground of this position. Moreover, it cedes the American flag to the rising extremism we're witnessing on the American right. Latinos are Americans concerned about American issues like economic opportunity, public safety, and constitutional rights. Treating them as a monolithic bloc defined by ancestral nationality not only misreads their political priorities but also reinforces stereotypes that opponents can exploit. Put away the Mexican flags. Embrace American symbols and American values. Frame the debate in terms of constitutional rights and due process rather than ethnic identity. The stakes are too high, and the lessons of history too clear, to repeat the strategic errors that helped doom the fight against Prop. 187. American protesters fighting for American rights should carry American flags. Mike Madrid is a political analyst and a special correspondent for McClatchy Media.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Saudi Arabia's Mohammed bin Salman invited to G7 summit in Alberta: sources
Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has been invited to attend the upcoming Group of Seven (G7) summit in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies, two government sources told CBC News. Bin Salman, known as MBS, is a powerful figure in the Middle East and his oil-rich country is seen as a key player in hopes of brokering peace as the deadly war in Gaza drags on. Sources with knowledge of the invite spoke to CBC News on the condition they not be named. The Saudi embassy has not confirmed whether bin Salman will make the trip to Alberta next week. Saudi Arabia is not a G7 member, but other world leaders are often invited for discussions at the annual summit. The Gulf kingdom has been a vocal supporter of the need for a Gaza ceasefire and the recognition of a Palestinian state. The U.S. has pushed for Saudi Arabia to normalize ties with Israel amid the ongoing war in the region, but the prospect of formal ties still appears far away. Bin Salman was also invited to last year's G7 summit in Italy, but did not attend. Still, the crown prince's invite will likely anger human rights activists. Bin Salman has denied involvement in journalist Jamal Khashoggi's 2018 murder and has pointed to recent measures expanding women's rights as evidence his country is becoming more progressive and tolerant. However, human rights watchers push back on that argument, highlighting the ongoing suppression of dissidents and the country's treatment of migrant workers. Canada sanctioned 17 Saudi nationals linked to the murder of Khashoggi in 2018. Mexico's Sheinbaum joining summit Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum confirmed Monday she will make the trip and says she hopes to have a pull-aside conversation with U.S. President Donald Trump. Her trip north comes as both Canada and Mexico grapple with Trump's persistent tariffs and economic threats, which have also stressed the Canada-Mexico relationship; Ontario Premier Doug Ford has suggested Canada go it alone with the U.S. on trade. "I have decided that I will attend the G7," Sheinbaum said in a statement Monday. "The foreign affairs minister is working on setting up bilateral meetings — it is likely that we will have one with Trump." Prime Minister Mark Carney's office has signalled he is hoping to reach a deal on tariffs and trade around the G7 meetings, taking place in Kananaskis, Alta., from June 15 to 17. The prime minister has also said he wants to make progress on bilateral issues with the U.S. before talks take place on the trilateral Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA). A review of that deal is officially slated to start in 2026, although Mexican officials have suggested they expect a review to start earlier than that. Aside from leaders of G7 countries — Canada, the U.S., the U.K., France, Italy, Germany and Japan plus the European Union — the guest list is growing. The full list hasn't been made available by Carney's office, but last week the prime minister confirmed he had also invited Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa (this year's G20 chair), South Korean President Lee Jae-myung and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte have said they will attend.
