Madras High Court asks government to shut illegal homestay facilities in Ooty & Kodai, form panel
It also ordered setting up of a three-member committee headed by the district revenue officer (DRO) in the Nilgiris and Dindigul districts for holding field inspection to check the credentials of the homestays (bed-and-breakfasts).
A special bench comprising Justices N Sathish Kumar and D Bharatha Chakravarthy passed the order on Friday while hearing a batch of petitions pertaining to forest-related matters.
The committee will comprise municipal commissioner and district tourism officer.
'A thorough inspection shall be made by this committee to check whether the homestays have obtained proper licence from the tourism department or the local bodies. If they are found to have violated the norms, they must be closed down forthwith,' the bench ordered, adding that the inspection shall be held throughout the hills.
It instructed the authorities concerned to introduce a dedicated mobile number with social media access so as to enable the public to share details of unauthorised facilities or to lodge complaints.
Pointing out that numerous unauthorised homestays are operating in the hill stations, the bench said there is 'an urgent necessity' to crack down on them.
The bench also expressed concern about the homestays fleecing tourists during the peak season for offering their services, and wanted the committee to check if these facilities have obtained a proper building plan and whether they have converted a residential building into a commercial one without permission.
It directed the government to file a report on June 20 in this regard.
ePass upper limit
The special bench of the high court permitted district collectors of the Nilgiris and Dindigul to increase the upper cap for issuing ePass for vehicles entering these hill stations by 500 and 300, respectively during the summer festivals such as the Flower Show, Fruit Show and Rose Show
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
6 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Madras HC bins plea to allow one sect to operate stall in temple
CHENNAI: The Madras High Court on Tuesday dismissed a petition praying for orders to the Hindu Religious & Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) department to ensure that the contract for running the 'prasadham kadai', which sells edible sacred offerings, at the renowned Devarajaswamy temple in Chinna Kancheepuram is given only to men belonging to the Vaishnavite Brahmin community. Justice N Anand Venkatesh observed that Vaishnavites are a sect worshipping Lord Perumal and they do not constitute a specific caste. The petition, filed by L Ravi of West Mambalam in Chennai, prayed for the court to quash the auction notice dated July 31, 2025 issued by the HR&CE department, and conduct the auction for awarding tender for the 'prasadham kadai' as per the conditions contained in the original auction notices dated June 3 and July 4. The auction notice dated July 31, 2025 had revised the tender condition and fixed the eligibility criteria as experience of five years in preparing 'prasadham' in a Vaishnavite temple and running the 'prasadham kadai'. Justice N Anand Venkatesh, who heard the submission of special government pleader NRR Arun Natarajan, found no violation in the clauses of the tender notice dated July 31. Natarajan added that the tender cannot be awarded solely based on a particular community, and noted that the Madurai Bench of the high court had held that a particular sect cannot be given the rights for preparing the 'prasadham'. July 31 notice altered tender condition: Petitioner The petitioner had said that the July 31 notice that altered the tender condition was nothing but 'a colourable exercise of power' and it was against the 'principles of natural justice and fair play'. The clause is also against the custom and practice followed in the temple for past 22 years of allowing only Vaishnavite Brahmins to take part in the tender process, the petitioner had contended.
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Girl injured after jumping from High Court building
The Madras High Court campus witnessed tense moments on Tuesday when a 15-year-old girl jumped from the first floor of the buildingafter the hearing of a case related to her custody. She was injured and immediately rushed to the Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital (RGGH) in the High Court ambulance. The Neelankarai police in Chennai had secured the minor girl from Andaman islands and produced her before a Division Bench of Justices M.S. Ramesh and V. Lakshminarayanan initially on August 8, 2025 following a habeas corpus petition (HCP) filed by her biological father who had divorced her mother. When the case was taken up again on Tuesday, the girl told the court that she wanted to go with her mother who also resides in the Andamans. However, after perusing a confidential report submitted by the mediation centre, the judges felt that it would not be conducive and safe for her to go back to the Andamans. The judges directed the police to admit her to the Government Children's Home for Girls at Kellys in Chennai and then take her to the Institute of Mental Health at Kilpauk for psychiatric evaluation. They also called for the evaluation report in a sealed cover by August 26, 2025. After the hearing was over and the orders were passed, the police brought the girl outside the court hall and as they were walking on the corridors, she tried to escape and in the process, jumped from the first floor by holding on to the serial lights that had been put up for the Independence Day celebrations. However, she lost balance and fell down. 'Immediately, she was rushed to the government hospital in the High Court ambulance. It appears to be an accident that occurred during the bid to escape from the police and not a suicide attempt, although only a proper inquiry would reveal the real reason,' said a lawyer. (Assistance for overcoming suicidal thoughts is available on the State's health helpline 104, Tele-MANAS 14416, Sneha's suicide prevention helpline 044-24640050 and Speak2Us helpline at 9375493754)
NDTV
7 hours ago
- NDTV
After Top Court's Stray Dog Order For Delhi, Madras High Court's Big Hint
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on Tuesday said it would consider directing the Tamil Nadu government to implement in the state the Supreme Court's order on managing street dogs in Delhi. A Bench was hearing and disposing of a batch of petitions relating to stray animals — one on stray cattle, another on street dogs in general, and a third on the menace of dogs inside a temple that had allegedly bitten devotees, causing injuries and raising fears of rabies. During the hearing, petitioners submitted alarming data, claiming that Tamil Nadu had already recorded 3.67 lakh dog bites and 20 deaths due to dog-bite-related rabies this year alone. The judges said they would issue combined formal orders after studying the Supreme Court's detailed guidelines. The possible directive has sparked mixed reactions. Animal welfare activists expressed concern over the state's lack of infrastructure, manpower, and veterinary expertise to handle such a large street dog population. "Dogs have equal rights to live in this world," one activist said, adding that a poorly implemented crackdown could leave thousands of dogs neglected or starving. They urged the court instead to ensure that the state rigorously enforces the Animal Birth Control (ABC) programme, which focuses on sterilisation and vaccination as humane solutions. On the other hand, many residents and civic activists welcomed the move, stressing that human life must come first. They argued that the rising number of fatal and non-fatal dog attacks called for immediate, decisive intervention. "Lives should not be lost to dog bites in this day and age," one petitioner said, pointing to the absence of coordinated rabies control measures in several districts. The court's reference to the Supreme Court's Delhi order suggests that Tamil Nadu could soon see new, court-mandated protocols for street dog management — potentially affecting everything from municipal responsibility and sterilisation drives to shelter management and public awareness campaigns. The Bench is expected to issue its final directions after reviewing the top court's ruling, setting the stage for a state-wide policy on balancing public safety and animal rights.
