What we know about new phone theft laws and how they'll work
Police will be allowed to search homes for stolen mobile phones without a warrant under new legislation unveiled in parliament on Tuesday.
The measure is just one included in the government's new Crime and Policing Bill, aimed at "taking back control of town centres" from criminals.
The proposals, which the government want to come into force by the end of this year, would permit officers to act in the so-called "golden hour" of investigations to search places where stolen items have been tracked electronically.
The bill contains a range of measures from tackling knife crime to anti-social behaviour, with home secretary Yvette Cooper saying it is about "taking back our streets and town centres" and "restoring respect for law and order".
The bill would give police forces new powers that would include the authority to enter a premises to search for and seize any stolen goods that have been electronically tracked, from mobile phones to cars and agricultural machinery.
Police could take faster action to recover stolen goods by getting approval from an inspector or higher ranking officer, rather than going through the courts systems to obtain a warrant.
This could lead to the recovery of phones that have been tracked by a "find my phone" app, wifi access points, Bluetooth, mobile network technology or tracking devices attached to any other possession or vehicle.
The government says this will allow police to act swiftly in the "golden hour" of investigations, when time is of the essence after a theft.
Cooper said: "For the last few years, our towns and cities have seen street theft shoot up, as organised gangs have been targeting mobile phones.
"But it is extremely frustrating for victims when they can see exactly where their stolen phone has gone but nothing is done.
"That is why we are determined to give the police the powers they need to move fast to crack down on these crimes that are blighting our communities."
The theft of smartphones has become a huge issue in the UK, and has been fuelled by the rise in gangs using e-bikes to pounce on unsuspecting members of the public.
Earlier this month, following Freedom of Information requests to 29 police forces, The Independent reported that there were at least 83,900 phone theft offences in the 12 months up to July 2024, almost double the 45,800 five years previously.
It said that London is the centre of smartphone theft, making up more than three quarters of cases, doubling to 64,224 instances in the past five years.
The legislation proposes to introduce Respect Orders to tackle anti-social behaviour, similar to Anti-Social Behaviour Orders (Asbos), introduced the last time Labour were in power but which were scrapped by the Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition.
The bill also proposes to clamp down on knife crime, by creating the power to seize bladed articles found on private property.
A new offence of assaulting a retail worker also aims to give staff in shops more protection, while the legislation that made the theft of items below £200 a summary-only offence will be removed.
The bill would also make cuckooing, whereby gangs take over someone's home for criminal activity, a specific offence. A new criminal offence for drink spiking will also be introduced.
A full list of the proposals can be found on the government's website here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man who attacked officers outside police station had been referred to Prevent
A man armed with Molotov cocktails and a hatchet who attacked officers outside a South Wales police station had been referred to the Prevent anti-terrorism programme a year earlier by his sister, a court heard. Alexander Dighton, 28, knocked one officer unconscious and stabbed another in the leg when he launched an attack on Talbot Green Police Station in Rhondda Cynon Taf on January 31. In a police interview, Dighton, of Pontyclun, said he did not consider the scope of damage, 'merely that blood had to be spilt'. He previously pleaded guilty to 10 charges relating to the incident. At a sentencing hearing at the Old Bailey on Friday, Judge Mark Lucraft KC heard Dighton had been referred to the anti-terrorism programme Prevent a year before the incident. Prosecutor Nicholas Hearn said: 'On January 5 2024, the defendant was reported to Prevent by his sister, who stated her brother holds racist and anti-Muslim views and is likely to be involved with incel groups. 'She also stated that he is vulnerable as he has gone missing previously and has attempted suicide.' The incel movement is made up of people who find themselves unsuccessful in relationships, often harbouring extreme and misogynistic views. On the night of the attack, Dighton arrived at the police station shortly before 7pm, where he lit a petrol bomb and threw it at a police van. When that failed to ignite, he attempted to start a fire by pouring lighter fluid over the van before smashing the windows of two vehicles using a pole. When confronted by officers, Dighton said: 'I'm fed up, I'm done,' before launching his attack. Attempts to restrain him using a Taser were unsuccessful because of the body armour he was wearing. He swung a pole at one officer, punched one in the head and stabbed another in the thigh, narrowly missing his femoral artery. Two of the three injured officers were taken to hospital for treatment. The court also heard Dighton had recently been involved in an altercation with his neighbour, during which he used a homophobic slur. A week before the incident, he had received a letter from the police telling him to attend a police station to provide biometric samples in relation to the alleged public order offence. In a police interview after the attack on the police station, he said that he expected officers to go to his home to attempt to arrest him for not providing a sample. Mr Hearn said: 'He intended to attack the police officers who attended with a shovel, which he had sharpened for that purpose, and that his intention at that time was to kill any police officers who attended. 'No officers in fact attended the defendant's address.' During the interview, he also said his intention was to let it be known that 'his tolerance for the government had come to an end' by causing as much damage as possible. Mr Hearn said: '(Dighton) said that he had 'teetered' as to whether he wanted to kill someone and had not been 'fully decided'.' Dighton, representing himself in court, spoke about violence being 'justified' against the state. He referred to grooming gangs and 'Boris Johnson having parties while the country is locked down' during the Covid-19 pandemic. The defendant added: 'People have such a short memory, it is terrible. 'I will be dead before I leave prison anyway, so that doesn't bother me.' The hearing continues.


Newsweek
44 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Texas' Largest Newspaper Trashes Greg Abbott Protest Move: 'Expect Better'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Houston Chronicle, Texas's top selling newspaper, has published an editorial fiercely critical of Governor Greg Abbott over his rhetoric and decision to deploy Texas National Guard troops in response to protests against immigration enforcement, saying "we expect better of him." Newsweek contacted Governor Abbott for comment on Friday via email outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters On Tuesday, Abbott announced the deployment of Texas National Guard soldiers. The following day on X he said "5,000+" National Guard personnel would help manage protests in the state adding: "Don't mess with Texas." The move came after days of unrest in Los Angeles which began on June 6 when demonstrators clashed with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents attempting to conduct raids in the city. The following days saw more violent disorder with Waymo self-driving vehicles set on fire and rocks thrown at police who responded with tear gas and other "less lethal" weapons. Abbott's move places him at odds with California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who opposed President Donald Trump's decision to deploy California National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles. What to Know In its editorial, the Houston Chronicle said Abbott's decision to deploy National Guard troops following protests "seems like an overreaction," adding: "But there was no serious indication Tuesday that Texas was on the verge of exploding. No burning cars. No looting. No mayors imposing curfews." Instead the editorial claimed the "most significant provocation to violence seemed to come from Abbott himself, citing the governor's warning that "Peaceful protesting is legal. But once you cross the line, you will be arrested. FAFO." FAFO is an acronym for 'F*** around find out.' The editorial described this as "the kind of thing that middle schoolers say before a fistfight" adding: "This isn't the grown-up leadership that Texas needs." Governor Greg Abbott speaking during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025 in Austin, Texas. Governor Greg Abbott speaking during a bill signing in the State Capitol on April 23, 2025 in Austin, Texas. Brandon Bell/GETTY According to All Sides, a website which monitors media bias, the Houston Chronicle is a centrist publication. In recent years it has endorsed Democratic presidential candidates including Kamala Harris in 2024 and Joe Biden in 2020. There was some disorder in Austin and Dallas on Monday night during anti-ICE protests, police making a number of arrests in both cities. According to Fox 7 Austin, four officers were injured after some demonstrators began throwing rocks and other missiles, while police responded with pepper balls and tear gas. Further protests are expected across Texas on Saturday as part of the national "No Kings" movement, which said it has organized 1,800 demonstrations nationwide. The protests coincide with Trump's 79th birthday and a controversial parade planned for Washington, D.C. nominally celebrating the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army. On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the Trump administration to return control of the California National Guard troops he deployed to Newsom, though this was later temporarily blocked by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal. What People Are Saying In its editorial the Houston Chronicle said: "We join Gov. Abbott in urging that anyone planning to protest do so peacefully. But we also hope that he and other leaders will set a respectful tone and allow police to do their jobs. Local law officers have more peacekeeping training and community knowledge than National Guard soldiers. And the National Guard, in turn, is far better at domestic peacekeeping than the U.S. military. Domestic policing is not the military's job, not what the vast majority of soldiers are trained to do." On Thursday, via X, Abbott said: "Texas will not tolerate the lawlessness we've seen in LA. I deployed 5,000+ Texas National Guard soldiers & 2,000+ DPS troopers across Texas to maintain order at these protests. "Anyone who damages property or harms a person will be arrested. Don't mess with Texas." Speaking to Newsweek about Saturday's planned protests Mark Shanahan, who teaches American politics at the UK's Surrey University, said: "How many people turn out for the 1,800 planned protests will be fascinating and an indication of the strength of opposition to Trump's hard-line policies on immigration and law and order. For 249 years the USA really hasn't tolerated kings or tyranny, yet this president continues to push ever-harder at those Constitutional barriers. His military parade is more reminiscent of the exercises in hubris and vanity often seen in Moscow and Pyongyang." What Happens Next It remains to be seen what role, if any, the Texas National Guard will fulfill during Saturday's 'No Kings' protests. Any conflict between soldiers and demonstrators on American streets would likely spark civil liberties concerns.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bangladesh interim government head signals possible early election
DHAKA (Reuters) -Bangladesh's interim leader signalled on Friday the possibility of holding a national election in February next year, two months earlier than previously announced. Muhammad Yunus, the Nobel peace laureate who has led an interim government since August, was responding to a suggestion from Tarique Rahman, acting chairman of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, who urged the vote be held before Ramadan, which begins in mid-February 2026. Yunus responded positively, saying an election could be held in the week before Ramadan if sufficient progress was made on political and judicial reforms. The comments came in a joint statement released after the two men met in London. Yunus, currently on a visit to Britain, last week said the election would be held by the first half of April 2026. However, pressure has been mounting from opposition groups for an earlier vote, with the BNP warning of public unrest if elections were delayed beyond December. Yunus' administration, which came to power after deadly student-led protests forced then Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to flee to India, has recently faced growing discontent. BNP chief Khaleda Zia was acquitted in January in a long-running corruption case, clearing her path to contest the upcoming election. Rahman is Zia's son. Meanwhile, Hasina's Awami League party has been effectively sidelined after its registration was suspended by the Election Commission and its activities banned under the Anti-Terrorism Act.