logo
Vote-by-mail reform, mental health, and 911 funding top counties' priorities for 2025

Vote-by-mail reform, mental health, and 911 funding top counties' priorities for 2025

Yahoo31-01-2025

Sherene Hess, president of the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania, speaks about the organization's legislative priorities for 2025 in the state Capitol on Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2025. (Peter Hall/Pennsylvania Capital-Star)
Pennsylvania county commissioners have called on state lawmakers to address flaws in the commonwealth's vote-by-mail law and increase funding for mental health care and 911 services.
Local election officials continue to scramble to meet mail ballot deadlines and face legal challenges more than five years after voting by mail became an option for every Pennsylvania voter, members of the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania (CCAP) said.
'Achieving these priorities will not only improve county government, but more importantly, they will improve our communities and the lives of those we serve across the entire state,' Sherene Hess, president of CCAP's board of directors, said.
Hess and other members of CCAP's board gathered in Harrisburg on Wednesday to lobby members of the Pennsylvania General Assembly as the 2025-2026 legislative session gets underway and days before Gov. Josh Shapiro is set to roll out his proposed budget.
Pennsylvania's 67 counties are largely responsible for delivering services to residents that the state and federal governments pay for.
The counties also administer elections, which have become more complicated since former Gov. Tom Wolf signed Act 77 to allow absentee voting without an excuse in 2019. Voting by mail has been popular, but has also been the subject of unfounded claims of fraud and legal challenges.
'Act 77 remains unclear, or in some cases silent, on how counties should address certain situations,' CCAP board member Joseph Kantz, a Snyder County commissioner, said.
County election officials want the law to be clear about whether to count mail-in ballots that are returned without secrecy envelopes or with missing or incorrect dates, Kantz said. Although state and federal courts have ruled several times on that question, the state Supreme Court recently agreed to take up the question again.
Election officials have also been summoned to court over decisions about notifying mail ballot voters that they have made disqualifying mistakes and whether they should be allowed to correct them or vote by provisional ballot.
The widespread adoption of voting by mail has placed additional pressure on election officials to ensure ballots are mailed out in a timely manner and to count them fast enough to avoid delays in reporting election results.
Allowing counties to prepare ahead of election day mail-in ballots to be counted would reduce that stress, 'particularly in a busy presidential year like we've just faced,' Kantz said.
Wolf vetoed an omnibus bill passed in 2021 that would have given election officials the additional time they want to process ballots because it also contained measures Democrats said would disenfranchise voters. Subsequent efforts to amend Act 77 in similar omnibus bills have failed.
Kantz said Wednesday that CCAP is looking for a fresh approach by addressing each of the issues in a separate piece of legislation.
Northampton County Commissioner Lori Vargo Heffner said that as the stigma surrounding mental illness and mental health treatment has continued to crumble, the need for significant increases in funding for such care has become more urgent.
Counties deliver mental health care including community residential programs, family based support, outpatient care and crisis intervention on behalf of the state.
'Counties have been able to continue to serve their residents, but are stretching the limited state funding to its breaking point,' Heffner said. 'It's not hyperbole to say that the lack of adequate state funding paired with increased demand has pushed the collapse of the community mental health system.'
In 2024, CCAP called for a $250 million increase in mental health funding. That would have been a fraction of the $1.6 billion in additional funding that a survey of counties found is necessary to fully fund community-based mental health services. Shapiro's first two budgets increased county mental health funding by a total of $40 million.
This year, CCAP is asking for $100 million more, Heffner said. That would allow the counties to maintain their systems and increase capacity, she said, noting that people seeking community-based mental health care report wait times of at least six months and often much longer.
'The unmet community need has created a growing population of individuals that have become involved with emergency departments, law enforcement and the criminal justice system when no appropriate diversion exists,' Heffner said. 'The remaining solutions are hospitals or incarceration, both of which are not appropriate for settings for mental health treatment and are very costly.'
In Shapiro's first budget passed in 2023, the legislature approved an increase in the 911 surcharge that cellphone subscribers pay each month to support emergency dispatch services. Hess, the CCAP president, said Wednesday that despite the increase, counties must fund a significant cost of transitioning to Next Generation 911 systems through local taxes.
The General Assembly must reauthorize the surcharge before it sunsets at the start of 2026 and CCAP is calling for an increase to between $2.14 and $2.20 a month.
'This is something that must be addressed,' Hess said. '911 call volume is increasing, and revenue from the 911 surcharge is failing to maintain pace with the system costs over the last several years.'
A spokesperson for the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency said the Shapiro administration is aware the surcharge does not cover the counties' full costs, but it is awaiting an efficiency study from the legislature that is required as part of the 2023 legislation. Because the larger surcharge only took effect last year, it's unclear how much revenue it generated.
'In 2023, the prior surcharge of $1.65 covered about 74% of all reported expenditures incurred to provide 911 service,' spokesperson Ruth Miller said. 'The remaining costs are paid by the counties through their general funds or other revenue sources.'
Next Generation 911 is a digital system that uses the internet to connect the public with public safety answering points, also known as 911 centers, through voice, text messaging and video. It also increases the ability of centers to handle higher volumes of calls for help during natural disasters and to automatically transfer callers to the appropriate centers using geolocation information.
'A strong, connected, 911 system is critical to ensuring services can still be provided efficiently in situations of mass emergency, and to keep up with the pace of ever changing technological advances,' Hess said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Peters offers optimistic outlook for Michigan Dems in 2026 Senate Race
Peters offers optimistic outlook for Michigan Dems in 2026 Senate Race

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Peters offers optimistic outlook for Michigan Dems in 2026 Senate Race

U.S. Sen. Gary Peters (D-Bloomfield Twp.) at the Mackinac Policy Conference, May 30, 2024 | Anna Liz Nichols Following the conclusion of his term in 2027, U.S. Sen. Gary Peters (D-Bloomfield Township) said he plans to remain active in public policy. Earlier this year, Peters, who has served in the U.S. Senate since 2015, announced he would not seek reelection in 2026, to the shock of many. While sitting down with the Michigan Advance at last month's Mackinac Policy Conference, Peters said his post-Washington plans are still up in the air, but stressed that he's not retiring. 'I'll have a lot more control over my life when I'm not in the Senate, because it gives me a lot more flexibility to do a variety of things. But I'm going to stay active,' Peters said. With a year and a half left in the Senate, Peters said he remains focused on the Great Lakes, specifically on securing funding for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and additional appropriations for the U.S. National Guard's Great Lakes Oil Spill Center of Expertise in Sault Ste. Marie, which he helped establish. Alongside serving in the U.S. Senate, Peters also chaired the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee from 2021 through 2025, with U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) taking over the role for the 2026 campaign cycle. While Peter's decision not to run for reelection created uncertainty for Democrats' pathway back to a majority in the Senate, Peters said he's confident his party will retain the seat. 'Actually, that was part of my decision, because I want to make sure that the seat continues to be Democratic,' he said, pointing to two key factors that he said give the Democrats good odds. First, 2026 will be a good year to be a Democrat, Peters said, with the party out of power typically performing better during midterm elections. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'You have that historical precedent. Plus just the increased chaos we're seeing out of the Trump administration will mean that people are going to be voting Democratic, and next year, I think you're going to see that similar to what we saw in the last Trump administration,' Peters said, referencing the 2018 mid-term election where Democrats were able to take control of the U.S. House of Representatives. In another benefit, Democrats also have a deep bench of candidates, Peters said, noting that while others may declare for candidacy, the four Democratic candidates that have already jumped into the race 'are all very talented people.' The Democratic slate is currently made up of U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens (D-Birmingham), state Sen. Mallory McMorrow (D-Royal Oak), former Michigan House Speaker Joe Tate (D-Detroit) and former Wayne County Health Director Abdul El-Sayed. Former U.S. Rep. Mike Rogers (R-White Lake) is currently the only Republican candidate, however reports say U.S. Rep. Bill Huizenga (R-Zeeland) is also weighing a run, though he has yet to make a formal announcement. That said, Democrats can't take anything for granted as Michigan is set to be a top battleground state, Peters said. 'The challenge for a race – Senate race in particular – when you have a primary is that you don't get your nominee till fairly late into August. And this race, it'll go from zero to 100 miles an hour within hours of the election,' Peters said. However, the 2024 election illustrated a clear divide in the Democratic Party between its moderate members and the more progressive wing, best illustrated by the party's split over Israel and Gaza. When looking for a pathway forward, Peters said Democrats need to remain focused on economic issues like affordable health care, job opportunities and voters' ability to save for and live a dignified retirement. 'All those issues are the most powerful. And you should always be focused on those. And that's not going to change,' Peters said. When you think about the previous presidential election – where former Vice President Kamala Harris lost to Trump by just over 80,000 votes – a presidential loss would typically bring a Senate election loss with it, Peters said. However, that didn't happen in Michigan. 'We won here in Michigan. And if you look at Elissa Slotkin's campaign, it was focused on those bread and butter economic issues. We won Tammy Baldwin in Wisconsin, and Nevada and Arizona and all of those Senate candidates, that's what they focused on. They outperformed the top of the ticket and they won,' Peters said. Democrats still have to work to excite their base and cannot ignore them, but those economic issues are just as important to Democratic voters as they are to independents, Peters said. As President Donald Trump works to radically reshape the federal government, congressional Democrats are tasked with both resisting the president and the Republican majority, and delivering results for their constituents. While bringing home results for constituents is difficult, the Democratic minority has to use its position to call out Republicans' actions and paint a contrast in the minds of voters, Peters said, emphasizing elections are all about contrast. Trump has violated pretty much every major norm of democracy, alongside several laws, Peters said, and while the judicial system has repeatedly been a check on the president, Democrats need to be aggressive in calling that out. 'I think we definitely have to be extremely aggressive in calling out just the blatant corruption we're seeing from the Trump administration,' Peters said, pointing to his decision to accept a $400 million jet as a gift from Qatar as well as his meeting with investors in his cryptocurrency business. 'We can't normalize that in any way, not just for the short term of getting rid of President Trump, but we can't normalize it for future administrations as well. The United States needs to be the place where corruption is never tolerated,' Peters said. However, Democrats still need to walk and chew gum by retaining their focus on the economic issues, Peters said. 'I think those issues too are going to play out as we look at tariffs, which will increase costs. When people start paying more for the everyday goods that they have, they're going to realize that Donald Trump's promise that he was going to lower inflation on day one is not the case,' Peters said. He also pointed to Republican's tax and spending bill, warning the plan would increase the nation's deficit by trillions of dollars, prompting higher interest rates. 'So you pay more for your car, you're going to pay more for your mortgage, your credit card, all those costs as a result of what I believe is completely irresponsible fiscal policy from the Republicans right now,' Peters said. As some Democrats have called on their officials to do more to resist the president, arguing they could do more to be a thorn in Trump's side, Peters said Democratic lawmakers are using the tools they have. While they've been able to use procedures to delay votes on legislation, those efforts are only delays, Peters said. 'We currently live, and I hope we always live, in a democracy and that means the majority rules in a democracy, yep. And if, if the majority have the votes, you can't stop it,' Peters said, noting that Republicans were in a similar position during the first half of former President Joe Biden's term. This is where elections have consequences, Peters said, prompting Democrats to put their energy into next year's election. Given the current political circumstances, Peters predicts Democrats will take back control of the U.S. House in 2026. The chamber is currently split 220-212, with three open seats. 'When you take back the House, then the dynamic changes dramatically in Washington. And Donald Trump, we'll be able to stop him, because he won't be able to pass things through the House,' Peters said. While retaking the Senate would prove more challenging, it's not something Democrats can write off, Peters said. The chamber is currently split 53-45 with two independents Senators, Bernie Sanders (D-Vt.) and Angus King (D-Maine), caucusing with Democrats. While he understands the frustration among activists, Peters reiterated Democrats' limited options. 'You can slow down the majority, but eventually majority wins,' he said.

Immigrants abandon Dems to support GOP immigration policies in large polling shift
Immigrants abandon Dems to support GOP immigration policies in large polling shift

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Immigrants abandon Dems to support GOP immigration policies in large polling shift

It appears that the group of American voters who have shifted in large numbers from Democrats to Republicans in recent years on the combustible issue of immigration are actually the nation's immigrants themselves. A look at pre- and post-election surveys from the 2020 and 2024 cycles indicates a 49-point swing by voters born outside the United States – the vast majority of whom are considered immigrants – on which major political party would do a better job handling the issue of immigration. American National Election Studies (ANES) data from the 2020 presidential election indicates voters born in another country said they favored Democrats rather than Republicans on the issue of immigration by a 58%-24% margin. Trump Deployment Of Troops To Quell La Rioters Latest Page In President's Political Playbook Four years later, the data indicated 45% of voters born in another county who cast a ballot in the 2024 presidential election said the GOP would do a better job handling immigration, with 30% pointing to the Democratic Party. There was a smaller but still prominent shift from the Democrats to the Republicans by all voters, according to the data from ANES, which is the oldest election study in the world (dating back to 1952) and is often referred to as the gold standard for election surveys. Read On The Fox News App Click Here For The Latest Fox News Polling Daron Shaw, who serves as a member of the Fox News Decision Team and is the Republican partner on the Fox News poll, said the large shift toward the GOP on the immigration issue by those born outside the U.S. is "reflective of the fact that immigrant voters started so pro-Democrat. There's more room for them to shift." Shaw also noted that before President Donald Trump first ran for the White House in 2016, immigration and border security were generally seen as separate issues. "Since Trump has come on the scene, those issues have really melded to the Republican advantage," Shaw said. Shaw, a politics professor and chair at the University of Texas, also said "you're seeing a movement towards the Republican Party on immigration because it's been largely focused on border security. That's true with non-immigrant populations as well as immigrant populations." Head Here For The Latest Fox News Reporting, Analysis, And Opinion On The Issue Of Immigration Immigration and border security were key issues that Trump spotlighted as he campaigned to win back the White House in last year's presidential election. Republicans won back control of the presidency and the Senate and defended their small House majority in the 2024 elections. And Republicans made gains among Black, Hispanic and younger voters, all traditional members of the Democratic Party's base. Border security and immigration have remained in the nation's political spotlight in the nearly five months since Trump returned to the White House, thanks to the president's sweeping and controversial moves on the two issues. Aiming to extinguish escalating protests in Los Angeles sparked by immigration raids carried out by ICE at his administration's direction, Trump sent in National Guard troops and even mobilized Marines. The unrest and the moves by Trump have dominated national headlines for nearly a week. Fox News' Dana Blanton and Victoria Balara contributed to this article source: Immigrants abandon Dems to support GOP immigration policies in large polling shift

Democrats Chase Trump's Laser Pointer on Immigration
Democrats Chase Trump's Laser Pointer on Immigration

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats Chase Trump's Laser Pointer on Immigration

In his first term, Trump chased Democrats laser pointer; now, theyre chasing his. No issue illustrates this like immigration; its become the Democrats red dot. Whenever, wherever, and however Trump moves it, Democrats cant help pouncing. In his first term, Trump reacted to everything Democrats and the establishment media did. He couldnt help himself, as though always compensating for having lost the 2016 popular vote. Forever taking their bait, his tweets poured forth. His frequently abrupt policy and political changes cost him on Obamacare - and popular support, too: Throughout his first term, Trump never had a favorable job approval rating in the RealClearPolitics Average of national polls. In his second term, circumstances have markedly reversed. Democrats have been reacting to Trump since before he took office - if not since before he won it. Even before his inauguration, Democratic leaders ran to microphones to announce their defiance. As they did, they picked politically questionable issues. Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker proclaimed he was opening his state to more transgender surgeries; California Gov. Newsom proclaimed support for electric vehicle credits. When Trump talked about a third term, even with the Constitution clearly blocking it, Democrats and the establishment media were apoplectic. Once in office, they were opposed to DOGE with equal vehemence. In short, if Trump proposed it, Democrats opposed it. They couldnt help taking the bait. However, of all the things Trump has pursued, nothing has exorcised Democrats like his crackdown on illegal immigration. New Jerseys governor, boldly proclaiming he was harboring an illegal immigrant, dared ICE to come…until ICE said they intended to. Democratic officials stormed a New Jersey ICE holding center. When a Milwaukee judge was arrestedfor helping an illegal immigrant avoid ICE capture, Democrats rallied around her, despite a judges job being one of impartiality on cases before the bench. When Kilmar Abrego Garcia was deported from Maryland, the accused MS-13 gang member became a Democratic cause célèbre. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) went to El Salvador to have cocktails with Garcia; other Democratic members of Congress followed. Nationwide, Democrats have prominently counseled illegal immigrants on evading ICE. Still, the Los Angeles uprising over the last several days took Democratic efforts (or lack thereof when it comes to enforcement) to another level. Mayor Karen Bass (who already had bungled wildfires that caused enormous damage) and Gov. Gavin Newsom stood by as the city descended into anarchic chaos from protests over ICE doing its job. Trump called in the National Guard. Next, the Marines. Newsom called press conferences. And sued. He sought to cast himself as a political paladin, a knight-errant in defense of not enforcing immigration law. The better term for Newsom and the rest of the Democrats rallying to the cause of blocking the deportation of immigrants in the country illegally would be "knights-in-error." More accurate in terms of immigration and law enforcement policy, it would be more accurate still in terms of politics. Having already given Trump a winning issue, they are now gift-wrapping it in images: attacking law enforcement, rioters, outside agitators, destruction, looting, burned-out vehicles, a city aflame. Each picture a winner for Trump, each one a loser for Democrats. To understand how big a loser these visuals are for Democrats, just look at the polling numbers. RCPs final average for President Bidens job approval on crime was 38% approval and 59% disapproval - a negative 21 percentage-point margin. On immigration, Bidens final job approval average was 33.5% approval and 64.8% disapproval - a negative 31.3 percentage-point margin. With negatives like these, why do Democrats insist on fighting on this terrain? Why Trump does is clear: His job approval on immigration is 51.5% approval versus 47% disapproval - a positive 4.5 percentage points. The figures on reduced illegal immigration and overall crime since he took office only burnish the law-and-order credentials Democrats are thrusting on him. Even in California, increased law enforcement is a winner. Californias ballot measure that increased penalties for shoplifting and drug possession - and undid an earlier ballot measure relaxing these - passed overwhelmingly last November. Non-deluded Democrats have also voiced their concerns with picking this losing fight. Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) and Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) have both had the temerity to swim against Democrats lemming tide. Immigration has become a laser pointer for Trump to use on Democrats. With every flash of the red dot, Democrats instinctively respond, each time believing one more pat of the paw, one more snap of the jaw, and they will have seized what is forever a pounce away. It is not true that Democrats do not have an agenda; they do: Trumps. Or rather, Trumps agenda has them. And on immigration, it has Democrats right where Trump wants them. J.T. Young is the author of the recent book 'Unprecedented Assault: How Big Government Unleashed America's Socialist Left' from RealClear Publishing and has over three decades' experience working in Congress, the Department of Treasury, the Office of Management and Budget, and representing a Fortune 20 company.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store