Psychiatric report finds Thomas Hamp was ‘acutely and severely psychotic' during stabbing
The Crown called Thomas Hamp, the man facing second-degree murder in the death of his longtime girlfriend Emily Sanche in February 2022, back to the stand this week following a mental health report on whether Hamp would be considered not criminally responsible for killing Sanche.
On Monday, the court heard criminal psychiatrist Dr. Shabehram Lohrasbe's report that found Hamp not criminally responsible under S. 16 of the Criminal Code. On Tuesday, the Crown called Hamp to return to the stand for cross-examination.
In the report obtained by Global News, Dr. Lohrasbe found Hamp was 'acutely and severely psychotic during the early morning hours of 20 February 2022.'
His findings also included that Hamp 'has a history of OCD and of Cannabis Use Disorder, each of which, independently, has been associated with the subsequent diagnosis of a psychotic disorder.' And during 2021 through until 2022 'Hamp suffered from psychotic symptoms that are within the realm of the Schizophrenia spectrum of disorders.'
Story continues below advertisement
Lohrasbe believed Psychosis was the dominant factor in the violence and that 'his capacity to 'know' that his actions were wrong, in the real world, was severely impaired.'
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Lohrasbe said this was a unique case as the mental state of Hamp was deeply documented by Sanche and her cousin Cathrine Sanche leading up to the incident.
Lohrasbe interviewed Hamp three times and used court documents and those from an assessment at the Saskatchewan hospital forensic services in North Battleford for the report.
The Crown requested Hamp be brought back to the stand to speak on the report and Lohrasbe's testimony. However, the defence requested Hamp only get questioned on the report.
The court granted the request for Hamp to take the stand, noting the Crown was unable to previously complete cross-examination due to the report not being available until a later date.
But the court did agree the questioning should only be on the report and not the testimony.
Hamp was questioned on his cannabis use before the incident and when the thought of killing Sanche came into his head.
Hamp told the court he stopped using cannabis days before. He also said he couldn't remember when the thought of killing Sanche came into his head, but remembers the thought being there.
Story continues below advertisement
Closing arguments are scheduled for Wednesday.
Hamp is charged with fatally stabbing Sanche in the early morning of Feb. 20, 2022. The court heard through a statement of agreed facts that Hamp grabbed a kitchen knife and stabbed Sance in the upper left chest area.
Hamp then went to the bedroom and injured himself with a knife. When police arrived Hamp told them a stranger had broken into their apartment, stabbing them both.
He later recanted his statement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
3 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Alberta judge rejects robber's Indigenous identity claims, proposes test for deciding who should and shouldn't get Gladue reports
An Alberta judge is proposing new guidelines for how courts handle people who say they are Indigenous during sentencing hearings, but don't have proof to back up their claims. Article content Last month, Justice Jordan Stuffco of the Alberta Court of Justice sentenced Jonathan Anthony Ninan to 33 months in prison for robbing a Leduc sports bar, after Ninan admitted to pointing a replica firearm at the bar's lone female employee and making off with $12,000 cash. Article content Article content Article content After pleading guilty to a pair of charges, Ninan requested a Gladue report, a pre-sentence document which examines the impacts of government policy towards Indigenous people on an Indigenous person's criminal conduct. Article content Article content While some offenders' claims of Indigenous identity are uncontroversial, Ninan had only the vague sense that his mother — with whom he has had almost no contact since age 10 — had 'some ancestral connection to an unspecified Indigenous community,' Stuffco wrote. Article content 'Although Mr. Ninan endured substantial childhood trauma and intergenerational harm due to abusive and neglectful biological parents, I do not find these factors are connected to Indigeneity,' wrote Stuffco, a member of the Métis Nation of Alberta. Article content 'I find Mr. Ninan is not an Indigenous offender because there was no meaningful evidence, other than self-identification, establishing Mr. Ninan as an Indigenous person.' Article content Article content The decision comes amid ongoing debate over Indigenous identity fraud, including deeper examination of Indigenous identity claims from public figures in government, pop culture and academia. Article content Article content Stuffco did not accuse Ninan of trying to mislead the court, noting the 24-year-old simply knew little about his mother 'due to his chaotic and abusive family history.' Article content Gladue reports Article content Since the Supreme Court of Canada's 1999 decision in R. v. Gladue — the first case to interpret Criminal Code amendments aimed at addressing the over-representation of First Nations, Métis and Inuit people in Canadian prisons — Indigenous offenders have been able to request pre-sentence reports examining their family histories and how government Indigenous policy may have contributed to their criminal behaviour. Article content Gladue and subsequent cases recognized Indigenous people 'endured many generations of unparalleled systemic abuse and discrimination at the hands of all levels of government,' Stuffco wrote, including residential schools, displacement from traditional lands and adoption into non-Indigenous families.
Toronto Sun
9 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
Ajax man caught dealing drugs in Sudbury to serve rest of sentence behind bars
Stephen Malabre-Patrick argued he should be released now because of poor conditions at Sudbury Jail Harold Carmichael Published Jun 07, 2025 • Last updated 5 hours ago • 3 minute read A southern Ontario drug dealer has failed to convince a Sudbury judge he should be released early because of poor conditions at Sudbury Jail. A southern Ontario drug dealer has failed to convince a Sudbury judge he should be released early because of poor conditions at Sudbury Jail. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Instead, Ontario Court Justice Martin Lambert ruled that Stephen Malabre-Patrick of Ajax will need to finish his sentence for drug trafficking in jail. Malabre-Patrick's lawyer argued his client should be given time-served credit because of poor conditions at Sudbury Jail, such as overcrowding and lockdowns, and be released now. Now 33, Malabre-Patrick pleaded guilty to cocaine possession for the purpose of trafficking and conspiracy to traffic controlled substances. He was one of six southern Ontario people police officers busted in 2023 for drug trafficking in Sudbury. The Crown and defence lawyer Thomas Evangelista agreed Malabre-Patrick should receive a sentence of two years less a day. The only thing to be determined was how much pre-trial custody he should get. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Crown argued Malabre-Patrick should receive the typical 1.5-1 so-called Summers pre-trial custody credit. Summers credit refers to the practice of a sentencing judge reducing a sentence for the time an individual spent in pre-trial custody. It's based on the principle that time served before a trial or plea may be considered in determining the final sentence, reflecting that the individual has already endured some of the potential consequences of their actions. As a result, a judge can subtract 1.5 days from the sentence for every day spent in pre-sentence custody. Evangelista, however, said his client should also receive a Duncan credit due to poor conditions at Sudbury Jail. If granted, Malabre-Patrick would be released immediately. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. A Duncan credit allows a judge to award additional credit for time spent in pre-trial custody beyond the standard 1.5:1 ratio when 'particularly harsh' conditions of detention are present. Justice Lambert, however, didn't buy that argument. He ruled Malabre-Patrick was entitled only to the 1.5-1 Summers pre-trial custody credit. Lambert noted that sentences for drug trafficking often involve penitentiary terms, meaning two years or more in a federal jail. He said the Duncan credit is issued for 'exceptionally punitive conditions' and granting the extra credit to Malabre-Patrick to turn his sentence into a time-served one 'would not reflect the seriousness and gravity of the offences.' In the end, Malabre-Patrick's pre-trial custody credit came to 516 days. That leaves him with 213 days or about seven months to serve. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Justice Lambert also issued a 10-year weapons ban and a DNA order. Lambert noted that Malabre-Patrick, 33, had worked in construction and painting and has a job offer in construction waiting for him upon his release. The judge took into account that Malabre-Patrick completed numerous programs while in custody. 'I accept that Mr. Malabre-Patrick's pleas of guilt are an indication of remorse on his part,' said Lambert. Members of the Provincial Joint Forces Guns and Gangs Enforcement Team, in partnership with the Greater Sudbury Police Service and with assistance from the Durham Regional Police, executed warrants in Greater Sudbury, Toronto and Ajax on March 29, 2023, as part of an ongoing investigation that began in August 2022 This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Malabre-Patrick was one of six people from southern Ontario arrested in a Greater Sudbury home on March 30, 2023, during the execution of a search warrant. Officers found 200 grams of cocaine with an estimated street value of $100,000 in a bedroom Malabre-Patrick was using. According to a police news release at the time, officers seized about 2.7 kilograms of cocaine, nearly 300 grams of fentanyl, a loaded nine-millimetre magazine, more than $97,000 in Canadian currency, and $1,000 in counterfeit currency. After 44 days in custody following his arrest, Malabre-Patrick got bail with strict conditions that included house arrest. He breached those conditions and was back in custody in Oshawa on Aug. 5, 2024, and has remained in custody since. As a result of the two guilty pleas, the Crown dropped other charges Malabre-Patrick was facing. hcarmichael@ X; @HaroldCarmichae Olympics Columnists Toronto & GTA Columnists Toronto & GTA
Global News
12 hours ago
- Global News
U.K. judge warns of risk to justice after lawyers cited fake AI-generated cases in court
Lawyers have cited fake cases generated by artificial intelligence in court proceedings in England, a judge has said — warning that attorneys could be prosecuted if they don't check the accuracy of their research. High Court justice Victoria Sharp said the misuse of AI has 'serious implications for the administration of justice and public confidence in the justice system.' In the latest example of how judicial systems around the world are grappling with how to handle the increasing presence of artificial intelligence in court, Sharp and fellow judge Jeremy Johnson chastised lawyers in two recent cases in a ruling on Friday. They were asked to rule after lower court judges raised concerns about 'suspected use by lawyers of generative artificial intelligence tools to produce written legal arguments or witness statements which are not then checked,' leading to false information being put before the court. Story continues below advertisement In a ruling written by Sharp, the judges said that in a USD$120-million lawsuit over an alleged breach of a financing agreement involving the Qatar National Bank, a lawyer cited 18 cases that did not exist. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The client in the case, Hamad Al-Haroun, apologized for unintentionally misleading the court with false information produced by publicly available AI tools, and said he was responsible, rather than his solicitor Abid Hussain. But Sharp said it was 'extraordinary that the lawyer was relying on the client for the accuracy of their legal research, rather than the other way around.' In the other incident, a lawyer cited five fake cases in a tenant's housing claim against the London Borough of Haringey. Barrister Sarah Forey denied using AI, but Sharp said she had 'not provided to the court a coherent explanation for what happened.' The judges referred the lawyers in both cases to their professional regulators, but did not take more serious action. Sharp said providing false material as if it were genuine could be considered contempt of court or, in the 'most egregious cases,' perverting the course of justice, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. She said in the judgment that AI is a 'powerful technology' and a 'useful tool' for the law. Story continues below advertisement 'Artificial intelligence is a tool that carries with it risks as well as opportunities,' the judge said. 'Its use must take place therefore with an appropriate degree of oversight, and within a regulatory framework that ensures compliance with well-established professional and ethical standards if public confidence in the administration of justice is to be maintained.'
