
Paramount Has a $1.5 Billion 'South Park' Problem
In an interview with Vanity Fair in September, South Park creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone all but swore off satirizing Donald Trump, noting 'I don't know what more we could possibly say.'
We found out what more they could say yesterday, in brutal fashion. The same day Paramount announced a five-year streaming deal with South Park , including 50 new episodes, the show's 27th season premiere mercilessly mocked both president Trump and the network for capitulating to his demands, settling with him over the 60 Minutes lawsuit, and canceling The Late Show With Stephen Colbert . The episode, called 'Sermon on the Mount,' did not hold back on crass jokes aimed at Trump, showing him with a 'teeny tiny' penis both in animation and as a deepfake, and portraying him as Satan's lover in a style reminiscent of the gay Saddam Hussein character from the 1999 movie South Park: Bigger, Longer & Uncut.
The episode aired as Paramount is set to merge with media company Skydance. Politicians and media personalities alike are speculating that its eagerness to keep Trump happy is motivated by gaining the US Federal Communications Commission's approval of the deal, which was made official Thursday evening. Before being fired, Colbert, a late-night ratings leader, described Paramount's $16-million settlement with Trump as a 'big fat bribe' and on Monday's show he said 'the gloves are off' while telling the president 'go fuck yourself.' Between Colbert's remaining season, network colleague Jon Stewart's scathing indictment of both Paramount and CBS, the new South Park deal, and a transformative merger, the company appears to be looking at a period where some of its biggest stars are openly hostile to both it and the president.
'I welcome Skydance's commitment to make significant changes at the once storied CBS broadcast network,' FCC Chairman Brendan Carr—who wrote Project 2025's chapter on the telecommunications agency—reportedly said in a statement Thursday supporting the merger. 'Today's decision also marks another step forward in the FCC's efforts to eliminate invidious forms of DEI.'
Paramount did not respond to WIRED's requests for comment. In a statement emailed to WIRED, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers derided South Park as irrelevant and derided 'left' fans who liked the season opener.
'The Left's hypocrisy truly has no end—for years they have come after South Park for what they labeled as 'offense' [sic] content, but suddenly they are praising the show. Just like the creators of South Park , the Left has no authentic or original content, which is why their popularity continues to hit record lows,' she says.
'This show hasn't been relevant for over 20 years and is hanging on by a thread with uninspired ideas in a desperate attempt for attention. President Trump has delivered on more promises in just six months than any other president in our country's history—and no fourth-rate show can derail President Trump's hot streak.'
Paramount's press release announcing the South Park deal—reported to be worth $1.5 billion—describes the show as 'one of the most valuable TV franchises in the world.' It also praises Parker and Stone as 'fearless' and 'boundary-pushing.'
But the roasting of Trump in 'Sermon on the Mount' was also something else: mean. Deeply, devastatingly mean.
After being accused by the Canadian Prime Minister of being akin to a 'dictator from the Middle East,' Trump lashes out at a White House artist for painting him with a small penis. The small dick theme is repeated throughout the episode, with numerous portraits of him humping things and animals and Satan telling him, 'I can't even see anything, it's so small.' Trump petulantly threatens to sue him, and the artist, and Jesus, and the entire town—basically anyone who pisses him off. It's also implied that he's on the Epstein list.
'Do you really want to end up like Colbert?' Jesus asks the townspeople, who are pushing back against forced Christianity in their kids' school. He calls out Paramount by name, saying, 'we're going to get canceled, you idiots.'
The town strikes a deal with the president, forcing them to do pro-Trump messaging—a nod to Trump's claim on Truth Social that Paramount's 'new owners' have agreed to give him $20 million in advertising and public service announcements in addition to the settlement. (Paramount told Deadline the settlement doesn't include PSAs and said it 'has no knowledge of any promises or commitments made to President Trump other than those set forth in the settlement proposed by the mediator and accepted by the parties.') The show is then interrupted by a PSA, where a deepfake Trump stumbles around naked through the desert; this time, his genitals have a pair of googly eyes attached. 'Trump: his penis is teeny, tiny. But his love for us is large,' a narrator says. The ad ends with 'He Gets Us. All Of Us'—'He Gets Us' is also the slogan used for a Christian ad campaign.
You can argue that portraying Trump as a narcissistic manchild and focusing so heavily on his appearance is low-brow. But Nick Marx, an associate professor of film and media studies at Colorado State University, says it's also a refreshing change from the defiant messaging of Colbert and others.
'It's fucking funny as hell that they seek to sexually humiliate Trump,' he claims, saying it's an effective troll of what he believes to be the president's 'vanity and insecurity.'
'I think that is the card to play … And I am frustrated that more of the comedians that I love on the left haven't leaned into that really harsh attack of him.'
Critics of the episode on X issued complaints that 'the left took over south park,' and 'this show is for libtards' while others outright expressed fear that Trump will get the show canceled, saying'South Park was good while it lasted.'
But making small dick jokes isn't woke—it's exactly that type of humor, along with an affinity for saying the r-word and racial and homophobic slurs that helped cultivate South Park 's right-wing audience. Marx thinks that's a good thing for liberals.
'Right-wing humorists, the Joe Rogans and Andrew Schulzes of the world, they're the ones occupying this offensive free speech space. And so anything that the left can do to reclaim artists like Parker and Stone would be a benefit to them.'
In a meeting Thursday, the FCC's Carr said he's 'not a ' South Park ' watcher,' NBC News reports. He also said Trump is against 'a handful of national programmers' who 'control and dictate to the American what the narrative is, what they can say, what they can think.' But, while many of his attacks have focused on news organizations themselves—ABC, CBS, NPR, even the Wall Street Journal—censoring cherished entertainers could rile up members of the public who frankly may not care that much about the plight of journalists.
That's something that Paramount too, has to contend with now.
'They just inked this $1.5 billion deal that, to me, is a gesture of full and unequivocal support from Paramount,' Marx says. 'The syndication and streaming licenses that South Park draws are worth much, much more than they've been paying Parker and Stone over the years.' He says he wouldn't be surprised if Parker and Stone got away with nothing more than a slap on the wrist.
But, as the episode itself indicated, Trump has been relentless with his lawsuit targets and openly bragged about getting Colbert fired and keeping the media in line.
Michael Sozan, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, says he could absolutely see Paramount trying to tone down South Park 's content, considering that they settled on 'the flimsiest of lawsuits,' predicated on the claim that 60 Minutes edited an interview with Kamala Harris to make it more flattering to her. But he said doing so could 'wake up a sleeping giant': the public. The streamer has also promised Trump it will cancel its DEI initiatives.
'A lot of American people are starting to be more and more aware of how Trump is trying to censor reporters, but now also just entertainment shows that he disagrees with it. That is something that authoritarians do,' he says. People could respond with outrage or boycotts.
But he cautions that's not Paramount's only problem, as it clinches the $8 billion Skydance merger.
Already Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren have written a letter to Skydance CEO David Ellison, seeking answers about the 'secret side deal with President Trump,' that allegedly offered him future PSAs. Trump has called Ellison's father, Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison, a 'friend.' California officials are also looking into whether the company engaged in bribery related to the deal, as Semafor reported.
'If there's a Democratic administration and a Democratic Department of Justice starting three years from now, or Democratic House or Senate, Paramount also has opened itself up to the possibility of lots of investigations,' Sozan says.
It's fascinating that South Park and late-night comics are issuing some of the harshest rebukes of Trump, though Sozan says satire—and joy—are considered by scholars to be an effective tool against authoritarians who 'want to keep people depressed and in line.'
He thinks the backlash over Paramount's mounting controversies could be a genuine 'cultural flashpoint.'
So far, there's no indication that Paramount plans to censor South Park . Then again, the Skydance merger has only just been greenlit.
At the end of the premiere, Cartman and Butters, seemingly stand-ins for Parker and Stone, try to kill themselves because Cartman is depressed that 'woke is dead' and he has nothing to make fun of anymore.
'I think I might be going,' Butters says. 'Yep, sweet death is about to come. I love you man,' Cartman replies.
For fans of the show—and free speech in general—let's hope that's not true. But just in case, you should probably watch that episode now.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
20 minutes ago
- CNBC
Oil steady after big gains on Trump's Russia ultimatum
Oil prices ticked up in early trading on Wednesday after rising more than 3% in the previous session as potential supply shortages came into focus after U.S. President Donald Trump gave Moscow an abbreviated deadline toward ending the war in Ukraine. Brent crude futures rose 14 cents, or 0.19%, to $72.65 a barrel by 0048 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude climbed 2 cents, or 0.03%, to $69.23 a barrel. Both contracts had settled at their highest since June 20 on Tuesday. On Tuesday, Trump said he would start imposing measures on Russia, including 100% secondary tariffs on its trading partners, if it did not make progress on ending the war within 10-12 days, moving up an earlier 50-day deadline. "Effective secondary 100% tariffs would lead to a dramatic shift in the oil market. A number of key buyers of Russian oil would likely be reluctant to continue purchases, particularly large U.S. trading partners," ING analysts said in a note. "While this gives OPEC+ room to start unwinding additional tranches of supply cuts, it would still leave the market in deficit under a worst-case scenario." The U.S. had warned China, the largest buyer of Russian oil, that it could face huge tariffs if it continues buying, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told a news conference in Stockholm where the U.S. was holding trade talks with the EU. JP Morgan analysts said in a note that while China was not likely to comply with U.S. sanctions, India has signaled it would do so, potentially putting 2.3 million barrels per day of Russian oil exports at risk. The U.S. and EU averted a trade war with a deal that included 15% U.S. tariffs on European imports, easing concerns about the impact of trade tensions on economic growth and offering further support to oil prices. In Venezuela, foreign partners of state oil company PDVSA are still waiting for authorizations from the U.S. to operate in the sanctioned country after talks on the subject last week, which could return some supply to the market, potentially easing pressure for prices to rise.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
B&B Must Watch Moments July 30: Eric Insists Ridge Choose Brooke or Taylor
The Bold and the Beautiful must-watch moments for Wednesday, July 30, include Eric drawing a line in the sand, insisting that Ridge choose between Brooke and Taylor. Plus, fashion implodes in Italy. This episode is full of explosive moments and gripping drama in Italy as the choices made in Los Angeles continue to play out overseas. Watch as your favorite characters face the fallout. Catch all the drama on CBS or Paramount+. Previously on B&B Ridge (Thorsten Kaye) kissed Taylor (Rebecca Budig) goodbye before heading to Italy with Forrester Creations. Brooke (Katherine Kelly Lang) also went to Italy for the splashy fashion show on the terrace of the La Canzone Del Mare. Taylor and Ridge are getting married, and Ridge insisted to everyone that he had moved on with Taylor. Of course, Nick's (Jack Wagner) return got under Ridge's skin, but that wasn't necessarily due to Nick's attention to Brooke, was it? WATCH NOW: Soap Hub Says breaks down all the soap buzz. Of course, being in Italy together has brought Brooke and Ridge closer. They can't help it. While they're there, the focus is on the fashion show, though. It simply must be a success with such big names involved. MORE: Find out what else happens this week on B&B. Next On B&B Wednesday, July 30, 2025. #9578Eric holds the line, telling Ridge he needs to decide between Brooke and implodes in Italy. Solve the daily Crossword


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
UN investigator says US sanctions over her criticism of Israel will seriously impact her life
ROME (AP) — An independent U.N. investigator and outspoken critic of Israel's policies in Gaza says that the sanctions recently imposed on her by the Trump administration will have serious impacts on her life and work. Francesca Albanese, the U.N. special rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza, is a member of a group of experts chosen by the 47-member U.N. Human Rights Council in Geneva. She is tasked with probing human rights abuses in the Palestinian territories and has been vocal about what she has described as the 'genocide' by Israel against Palestinians in Gaza . Both Israel and the United States, which provides military support to its close ally, have strongly denied that accusation. Washington has decried what it called a 'campaign of political and economic warfare' against the U.S. and Israel, and earlier this month imposed sanctions on Albanese, following an unsuccessful U.S. pressure campaign to force the international body to remove her from her post. 'It's very serious to be on the list of the people sanctioned by the U.S.,' Albanese told The Associated Press in Rome on Tuesday, adding that individuals sanctioned by the U.S. cannot have financial interactions or credit cards with any American bank. When used in 'a political way,' she said the sanctions 'are harmful, dangerous.' 'My daughter is American. I've been living in the U.S. and I have some assets there. So of course, it's going to harm me,' Albanese said. 'What can I do? I did everything I did in good faith, and knowing that, my commitment to justice is more important than personal interests.' The sanctions have not dissuaded Albanese from her work — or her viewpoints — and in July, she published a new report, focused on what she defines as 'Israel's genocidal economy' in Palestinian territories. 'There's an entire ecosystem that has allowed Israel's occupation to thrive. And then it has also morphed into an economy of genocide,' she said. In the conclusion of the report, Albanese calls for sanctions against Israel and prosecution of 'architects, executors and profiteers of this genocide.' Albanese noted a recent shift in perceptions in Europe and around the world following an outcry over images of emaciated children in Gaza and reports of dozens of hunger-related deaths after nearly 22 months of war . 'It's shocking,' she said. 'I don't think that there are words left to describe what's happening to the Palestinian people.' The war began on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel and killed some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 people captive. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed over 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which does not differentiate between combatants and civilians but says more than half the dead are women and children. Nearly 21 months into the conflict that displaced the vast majority of Gaza's 2.3 million people, the United Nations says hunger is rampant after a lengthy Israeli blockade on food entering the territory and medical care is extremely limited. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .