logo
What Trump's budget cuts could mean for the environment

What Trump's budget cuts could mean for the environment

Nahar Net06-05-2025

President Donald Trump's first 100 days included a wide range of attacks on environmental and climate initiatives. His proposed budget does the same.
The document released Friday looks to curtail or cut billions of dollars for everything from drinking water, clean energy and weather satellites to national parks, emergency management and environmental justice, to name a few.
That aligns with Trump's aggressive targeting of climate policy and crackdown on diversity initiatives as he pushes fossil fuel investment. Federal agencies are racing to bolster coal power and oil and gas while blocking renewable energy sources, rolling back landmark water and air regulations and attacking scientists in federal weather work tied to climate research.
The much-anticipated plan will define the Republican president's second term, but it's important to note that Congress will ultimately decide the spending plans.
This skinny budget is a proposal, often considered a statement of the administration's values. It includes topline numbers only, regarding discretionary spending. A more detailed budget is expected soon.
Here's a look at some of the environmental and climate funding at risk:
Clean water
The proposed budget looks to slash $2.46 billion in Clean and Drinking Water State Revolving Loan Funds.
The clean water funds, through federal-state partnerships, give low-cost financing to communities for water quality infrastructure including municipal wastewater facilities, decentralized wastewater treatment systems and more. The drinking water funds provide money to states and water systems to help them align with the Safe Drinking Water Act.
The plan says states should be responsible for funding their own water infrastructure projects, but would provide a decreased amount, $305 million total, to give states time to adjust.
National Parks
The administration is targeting $1.2 billion in spending cuts to the National Park Service's operations, construction, its Historic Preservation Fund, and National Recreation and Preservation grants. The budget said the reason for the cuts is because parks get "duplicative" state, local and private sector support.
The Service has been the subject of an aggressive downsizing effort, which could impact park hours, safety and upkeep. Millions of tourists are expected to visit national parks this summer.
Severe weather reporting and resources
The weather, oceans and fisheries agency — the parent agency to the National Weather Service — has been the subject of massive Department of Government Efficiency layoffs, impacting its crucial observations and forecasts.
The proposal outlines $1.5 billion in cuts to what it calls "climate-dominated" NOAA operations, research and grants, plus infrastructure and satellites. It says these are not aligned with the administration ending the Green New Deal, referring to the Democrats' moonshot plan to combat climate change and shift away from fossil fuels.
The budget says NOAA's educational grant programs have, for instance, "funded efforts to radicalize students against markets and spread environmental alarm."
Environmental justice
While environmental justice was touted under the previous administration, the Trump administration has moved to reverse those policies as part of its broader shift from DEI.
Friday's proposal said it would remove $100 million in "taxpayer funded programs that promote divisive racial discrimination and environmental justice grants that were destined to go to organizations that advance radical ideologies."
Trump cut White House advisors who worked to ensure the federal government helped communities in heavily-polluted areas, and eliminated Biden's "Justice40" initiative that required 40% of the benefits from certain environmental programs go to those communities. The Department of Transportation also rescinded Biden-era memos that called on state agencies to factor social and environmental justice into infrastructure decisions.
Communities near heavy industry, ports and highways are often made up largely of Black, Latino and low-income Americans.
Biden's infrastructure law
The budget proposal seeks to repeal more than $15 billion of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law, named the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, passed in 2021. The Biden administration's law looked to spur domestic manufacturing, improve roads, bridges and ports, fund cleaner drinking water and other programs.
Among other things, canceling the spending — which it calls the "Green New Scam" — would impact key electric vehicle tax credits that have helped boost electric vehicle uptake in the U.S.
Removing 'equity' from FEMA money
The budget proposes $646 million in cuts to Non-Disaster Federal Emergency Management Agency grant programs.
FEMA is intended to provide disaster response and recovery support for states and communities impacted by storms, wildfires, floods and more. Trump has been critical of the agency, which helps fund debris removal, rebuilding efforts and first responder expenses.
FEMA has already been politicized in the administration's first 100 days; for example, its Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program was ended, and the agency's acting director canceled $188 million in grants to New York City, finding the money inconsistent with Trump administration priorities.
The budget says "FEMA under the previous administration made 'equity' a top priority for emergency relief and declared that DEI was mandatory," referring to diversity, equity and inclusion. The budget looks to reduce these programs that it calls "wasteful and woke."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Buckle Up, America: Trump and Musk's Divorce Could Give Birth to the Third Party the Country Needs
Buckle Up, America: Trump and Musk's Divorce Could Give Birth to the Third Party the Country Needs

Ya Libnan

time4 hours ago

  • Ya Libnan

Buckle Up, America: Trump and Musk's Divorce Could Give Birth to the Third Party the Country Needs

By Vlad Green, Op-Ed If you think presidential politics couldn't get any weirder, buckle up. The Republican Party now faces a messy, high-profile breakup between Donald Trump and Elon Musk—and it's more than just an ego clash. It's the political equivalent of a reality TV episode that ends with someone's makeup smeared and a chair flying across the room. For a while, it looked like Musk and the GOP were best buddies. Musk's tech billionaire status and army of social media followers gave Republicans an instant upgrade in coolness. But after Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' fiasco (which might as well have been sponsored by a late-night infomercial) and Musk's subsequent meltdown—where he supported calls for Trump's impeachment—the bromance fizzled faster than a bottle of Diet Coke left in the sun. Now, Musk is talking about starting his own political party—presumably one where everyone drives electric cars, tweets at warp speed, and tries to colonize Mars before breakfast. On his platform X, he even polled his followers on whether America needs a new political party to represent the '80% in the middle.' And, surprise, 80% agreed—because online polls never lie, right? Let's be honest: both parties could use a wake-up call. The GOP is stuck in a never-ending rerun of the Trump Show—complete with impeachment threats, Twitter feuds, and enough drama to fill a daytime soap opera. Meanwhile, Democrats, while busy arguing over which way to lean on every issue under the sun, have managed to convince half the country they're either incompetent or too cautious to deliver real change. If things keep going this way, America might just be headed south—and I don't mean Florida. Voters are tired of choosing between two stale brands that offer either chaos or gridlock. A third party—ideally one that's less like a sideshow and more like a serious movement—might be the jolt of caffeine this democracy needs. Of course, building a viable third party is harder than landing a Tesla on Mars. But if anyone has the money, the ego, and the Twitter presence to try, it's Elon Musk. If he pulls it off, Republicans might find themselves fighting off more than just the Democrats—and Democrats might need to finally, actually, get their act together. So, here's to the chaos. May it force both parties to remember that voters deserve better than a rerun of 2016. And if not, maybe we'll just end up on Mars with Musk's new political party. At least the view will be interesting.

Trump says Elon Musk has 'lost his mind' as feud fallout mounts
Trump says Elon Musk has 'lost his mind' as feud fallout mounts

LBCI

time5 hours ago

  • LBCI

Trump says Elon Musk has 'lost his mind' as feud fallout mounts

U.S. President Donald Trump said Friday that Elon Musk had "lost his mind" but insisted he wanted to move on from the fiery split with his billionaire former ally. The blistering public break-up between the world's richest person and the world's most powerful is fraught with political and economic risks all around. Trump had scrapped the idea of a call with Musk and was even thinking of ditching the red Tesla he bought at the height of their bromance, White House officials told AFP. "Honestly I've been so busy working on China, working on Russia, working on Iran... I'm not thinking about Elon Musk; I just wish him well," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One en route to his New Jersey golf club late Friday. Earlier, Trump told U.S. broadcasters that he now wanted to focus instead on passing his "big, beautiful" mega-bill before Congress -- Musk's harsh criticism of which had sparked their break-up. But the 78-year-old Republican could not stop himself from taking aim at his South African-born friend-turned-enemy. "You mean the man who has lost his mind?" Trump said in a call with ABC, when asked about Musk, adding that he was "not particularly" interested in talking to the tycoon. Trump later told Fox News that Musk had "lost it." Just a week ago, Trump gave Musk a glowing send-off as he left his cost-cutting role at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) after four months working there. While there had been reports of tensions, the sheer speed at which their relationship imploded stunned Washington. After Musk called Trump's spending bill an "abomination" on Tuesday, Trump hit back in an Oval Office diatribe on Thursday in which he said he was "very disappointed" by the entrepreneur. Trump's spending bill faces a difficult path through Congress as it will raise the U.S. deficit, while critics say it will cut health care for millions of the poorest Americans. The row then went nuclear, with Musk slinging insults at Trump and accusing him without evidence of being in government files on disgraced financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump hit back with the power of the U.S. government behind him, saying he could cancel the Space X boss's multi-billion-dollar rocket and satellite contracts. Trump struck a milder tone late Friday when asked how seriously he is considering cutting Musk's contracts. "It's a lot of money, it's a lot of subsidy, so we'll take a look -- only if it's fair. Only if it's to be fair for him and the country," he said. Musk apparently also tried to de-escalate social media hostilities. The right-wing tech baron rowed back on a threat to scrap his company's Dragon spacecraft -- vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station. And on Friday, the usually garrulous poster kept a low social media profile on his X social network. But the White House denied reports that they would talk. "The president does not intend to speak to Musk today," a senior White House official told AFP. A second official said Musk had requested a call. AFP

Musk floats ‘The American Party' after Trump tiff
Musk floats ‘The American Party' after Trump tiff

Ya Libnan

time5 hours ago

  • Ya Libnan

Musk floats ‘The American Party' after Trump tiff

Elon Musk floated a new political party on Friday after falling out with President Trump over the big, beautiful bill. He launched a Thursday poll on the social platform X, which he owns, asking about whether or not the country needed a new faction for political nominees. 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle! And exactly 80% of people agree. This is fate,' Musk wrote, citing numbers from his survey . He followed up with a potential name for the group, ' The America Party .' In recent days, Musk has railed against Trump for suggesting the United States increase its national debt by $4 trillion as proposed in the bill. The tech giant said it 'undermines' all the work he did at the Department of Government Efficiency, geared towards reducing government spending. However, Trump said the Tesla CEO was mad over slashes to electric vehicle incentives instead of other clauses in the legislation. 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. … He had no problem with it,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the EV mandate, because that's billions and billions of dollars,' he added. Still, Musk, who served as a White House adviser for over 100 days in the Trump administration, backed a call for Trump to be impeached and replaced by his own vice president. The president has publicly questioned Musk's motives for slamming his leadership right after leaving his role in the administration. 'I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress. It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that. I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Musk also credited himself for Republicans' successful trifecta in November capturing the White House, in addition to majorities in the House and Senate. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said in a post on his social platform X . 'Such ingratitude,' he added. Florida Republican Rep. Jimmy Patronis cast doubt on Musk's claim of creating 'The America Party' in Friday comments, suggesting the two will be 'hanging around again' shortly. 'Elon Musk is not gonna create a new political party,' Patronis told NewsNation's Blake Burman during an appearance on 'The Hill.' 'Trump knows that sometimes you're going to have falling out with those that you trust, you like, that you're friends with. It happens with us in DC all the time. So again. Mark my words. About a month from now, these guys will be hanging around again. The Hill

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store