Ultra-processed foods could be linked to thousands of UK deaths a year
Experts believe there is a relationship between people eating UPFs - such as processed meats, ice cream and crisps - and an increased risk of early death.
UPFs often contain high levels of saturated fat, salt, sugar and additives, which researchers said leaves less room in people's diets for more nutritious foods.
The analysis suggested that in 2018-19, some 17,781 premature deaths in the UK could have been linked to UPFs.
Such foods also tend to include ingredients that are not normally used when people cook from scratch - including preservatives, emulsifiers and artificial colours and flavours.
Other examples of UPFs include mass-produced bread, some breakfast cereals, biscuits, ready meals and fizzy drinks.
UPFs have previously been linked to an increased risk of early death and , including obesity, heart disease, cancer and diabetes.
However, some experts say it is not clear why UPFs are linked to poor and more studies will be needed "to establish the mechanisms involved".
The latest study, published in the American Journal Of Preventive Medicine, calls on governments to issue dietary recommendations aimed at cutting consumption of UPFs.
In analysing data from eight countries, it was found UPFs made up 53% of people's energy intake in the UK - the second highest after 55% in the US.
In Colombia, which has a lower consumption of UPFs, premature deaths attributable to these types of foods was 4%.
But premature deaths from UPFs jumped to 14% for the UK and the US, according to the research.
Read more from Sky News:
Lead researcher Eduardo Nilson, from the scientific body the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation in Brazil, said the study found "each 10% increase in the participation of UPFs in the diet increases the risk of death from all causes by 3%".
Nerys Astbury, associate professor from the University Of Oxford, said it is known that consuming diets higher in calories, fat and sugar can have detrimental effects on health, including premature mortality.
"More research is needed to ascertain a causal link between UPF and disease and to establish the mechanisms involved," she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
4 hours ago
- Newsweek
Kids Who Eat More Fruit and Vegetables Share Key Character Trait
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Children who are caring and kind may be more likely to develop healthy eating habits in adolescence, a new study has found. The findings, published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, indicate that encouraging so-called "prosocial behavior" during childhood could serve as a potential approach to support healthy eating habits. Researchers led by social epidemiologist professor Farah Qureshi of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health analyzed data from the UK's Millennium Cohort Study—a nationally representative longitudinal study that tracked children from birth through adolescence. By examining data from children aged five to 17, researchers found a consistent and meaningful link between prosocial behaviors—like caring for others, cooperating and helping—and greater consumption of fruits and vegetables during the teen years. "Too often, we focus on what is going wrong in young people's lives," Qureshi said. "But what we hear from them time and time again is that they are tired of that narrative. They want us adults to pay more attention to what is going right." Smiling loving African American mother and little daughter prepare healthy delicious salad in kitchen. Smiling loving African American mother and little daughter prepare healthy delicious salad in kitchen. fizkes According to the study's findings, kids who were regularly described by parents as helpful and kind at ages five, seven and 11 were more likely to report healthier dietary habits at 14 and 17. The researchers suggest that these prosocial tendencies could provide psychological benefits—like improved mood and resilience—that help drive better decision-making around food. "Prosocial behaviors... can influence health by strengthening children's social ties and improving psychological functioning," explained senior author and psychologist professor Julia K. Boehm of Chapman University. She added: "All of these, in turn, serve as resources that may inform health-related choices, as is evidenced by our latest findings." While the study adjusted for factors like socioeconomic status, parental marital status and earlier eating behaviors, the researchers acknowledge that some family dynamics may still have influenced the results. Still, the long-term data and large sample size make the findings particularly compelling. "Supporting prosociality in childhood may be a promising health promotion strategy for future consideration," said paper co-author and social and behavioral scientist professor Laura D. Kubzansky of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health. She called for more asset-based approaches that leverage children's strengths—like empathy, cooperation and compassion—in public health interventions. Dr. Qureshi put it simply: "This study offers us an important reminder about the power of kindness and compassion not only for those who receive it, but also for those who give it." Do you have a health story to share with Newsweek? Do you have a question about nutrition? Let us know via health@ Reference Qureshi, F., Woodward, K. P., Kubzansky, L. D., & Boehm, J. K. (2025). Kind kids, healthy teens: Child prosociality and fruit and vegetable intake. American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
You can double your weight loss by ditching this cancer-causing food from your diet: study
Looking to double down on weight loss? A new study suggests that eliminating one food group can significantly enhance weight loss and lower cancer risk. Participants lost twice as much weight when they adhered to a diet of minimally processed foods (MPFs) compared to one that included ultra-processed foods (UPFs). UPFs — billed as ready to eat or heat — typically undergo several processing steps, feature additives and preservatives and contain high levels of sodium, refined sugars and cholesterol-spiking fats. A recent study linked UPF exposure to 32 poor health outcomes, including a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, metabolic syndrome, obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Type 2 diabetes and even premature death. In this latest trial, the UPFs were relatively 'healthy.' Items included store-bought breakfast cereal, granola bars, fruit snacks, flavored yogurt cups, instant noodles and ready-made lasagna. By contrast, participants on the MPF diet were fed catered meals of overnight oats with fresh fruit, plain yogurt with toasted oats and fruit, handmade fruit and nut bars, freshly made chicken salad, homemade stir fry and spaghetti Bolognese. While processing levels differed wildly between the two diets, portions and nutritional content were similar. Researchers matched the diets for calories, sugar, fat, fiber and micronutrients. Both aligned with dietary guidance from the UK government, called the Eatwell Guide (EWG). Participants lost weight on both diets, but considerably more when they abstained from UPFs. At the end of the eight-week trial, participants on the MPF diet lost 2% of their body weight compared to a 1% loss from the UPF diet. The results were published this week in the journal Nature Medicine. While these numbers are small, the trial period was relatively short. When extrapolated over a year, participants on an MPF diet would lose between 9% and 13% of their weight, while those who adhered to the UPF diet would drop 4% to 5%. In addition to more pounds shed, the MPF diet also correlated to more fat loss, fewer cravings and lower triglycerides. 'Choosing less processed options such as whole foods and cooking from scratch, rather than ultra-processed, packaged foods or ready meals, is likely to offer additional benefits in terms of body weight, body composition and overall health,' said senior study author Rachel Batterham from the UCL Centre for Obesity Research. Researchers believe some of the weight loss can be attributed to people eating less on the MPF diet since UPFs are 'hyperpalatable.' Despite the known risks, UPFs can be a tough habit to kick since they have been engineered for convenience and cravings, with a combination of flavors and additives designed to encourage addictive eating behavior. Comparatively, participants scored the MPF diet lower in taste and flavor ratings, suggesting that they ate less because the food was less compelling and addictive. Still, researchers noted that people were able to lose weight on the UPF diet, contradicting previous claims that UPFs inhibit weight loss. Batterham maintains that this is owed in part to this particular UPF diet following nutritional guidelines. 'The best advice to people would be to stick as closely to nutritional guidelines as they can by moderating overall energy intake, limiting intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat and prioritizing high-fiber foods such as fruits, vegetables and nuts,' she said. One situation in which UPFs may edge out their whole food competition? Plant-based meat replacement products. The new study findings come as packaged foods and frozen meals persist in US diets, with recent research revealing that a shocking 60% of Americans' daily caloric intake comes from UPFs. While UPFs may not completely sabotage weight loss, they can contribute to a slew of health problems. A recent study suggested that some UPFs may contain a disturbing amount of microplastics, which are potentially harmful to respiratory, reproductive and mental health. UPF consumption has also been linked to an increased risk of lung cancer.
New York Post
3 days ago
- New York Post
You can double your weight loss by ditching this cancer-causing food from your diet: study
Looking to double down on weight loss? A new study suggests that eliminating one food group can significantly enhance weight loss and lower cancer risk. Participants lost twice as much weight when they adhered to a diet of minimally processed foods (MPFs) compared to one that included ultra-processed foods (UPFs). UPFs — billed as ready to eat or heat — typically undergo several processing steps, feature additives and preservatives and contain high levels of sodium, refined sugars and cholesterol-spiking fats. 3 Participants in a new study lost twice as much weight when they adhered to a diet of minimally processed foods (MPFs) compared to one that included ultra-processed foods (UPFs). beats_ – A recent study linked UPF exposure to 32 poor health outcomes, including a higher risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer, metabolic syndrome, obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Type 2 diabetes and even premature death. In this latest trial, the UPFs were relatively 'healthy.' Items included store-bought breakfast cereal, granola bars, fruit snacks, flavored yogurt cups, instant noodles and ready-made lasagna. By contrast, participants on the MPF diet were fed catered meals of overnight oats with fresh fruit, plain yogurt with toasted oats and fruit, handmade fruit and nut bars, freshly made chicken salad, homemade stir fry and spaghetti Bolognese. While processing levels differed wildly between the two diets, portions and nutritional content were similar. Researchers matched the diets for calories, sugar, fat, fiber and micronutrients. Both aligned with dietary guidance from the UK government, called the Eatwell Guide (EWG). Participants lost weight on both diets, but considerably more when they abstained from UPFs. At the end of the eight-week trial, participants on the MPF diet lost 2% of their body weight compared to a 1% loss from the UPF diet. 3 Participants lost weight on both diets but considerably more when they abstained from UPFs. ISO101 – The results were published this week in the journal Nature Medicine. While these numbers are small, the trial period was relatively short. When extrapolated over a year, participants on an MPF diet would lose between 9% and 13% of their weight, while those who adhered to the UPF diet would drop 4% to 5%. In addition to more pounds shed, the MPF diet also correlated to more fat loss, fewer cravings and lower triglycerides. 'Choosing less processed options such as whole foods and cooking from scratch, rather than ultra-processed, packaged foods or ready meals, is likely to offer additional benefits in terms of body weight, body composition and overall health,' said senior study author Rachel Batterham from the UCL Centre for Obesity Research. Researchers believe some of the weight loss can be attributed to people eating less on the MPF diet since UPFs are 'hyperpalatable.' Despite the known risks, UPFs can be a tough habit to kick since they have been engineered for convenience and cravings, with a combination of flavors and additives designed to encourage addictive eating behavior. Comparatively, participants scored the MPF diet lower in taste and flavor ratings, suggesting that they ate less because the food was less compelling and addictive. 3 While processing levels differed wildly between the two diets, portions and nutritional content were similar. Allistair F/ – Still, researchers noted that people were able to lose weight on the UPF diet, contradicting previous claims that UPFs inhibit weight loss. Batterham maintains that this is owed in part to this particular UPF diet following nutritional guidelines. 'The best advice to people would be to stick as closely to nutritional guidelines as they can by moderating overall energy intake, limiting intake of salt, sugar and saturated fat and prioritizing high-fiber foods such as fruits, vegetables and nuts,' she said. One situation in which UPFs may edge out their whole food competition? Plant-based meat replacement products. The new study findings come as packaged foods and frozen meals persist in US diets, with recent research revealing that a shocking 60% of Americans' daily caloric intake comes from UPFs. While UPFs may not completely sabotage weight loss, they can contribute to a slew of health problems. A recent study suggested that some UPFs may contain a disturbing amount of microplastics, which are potentially harmful to respiratory, reproductive and mental health. UPF consumption has also been linked to an increased risk of lung cancer.
