logo
The Great Salt Lake Is Drying. Can Utah Save It?

The Great Salt Lake Is Drying. Can Utah Save It?

New York Times05-05-2025

Three years ago, when Utah's Great Salt Lake was at its lowest levels, state lawmakers were alarmed enough to try what may be impossible: save the lake from drying up.
If Utah succeeds, it would be the first place in the world to reverse a saline lake's decline. The salt lake — the largest in the Western Hemisphere — once covered an area larger than Rhode Island. Today, more than half its water is gone. About 800 square miles of lake bed sits exposed, baking in the desert heat, sometimes billowing toxic dust plumes across the state's urban core.
'Fast crises often get more attention than slow crises,' said Brian Steed, the state's newly appointed Great Salt Lake commissioner, tasked with developing a strategic plan for the lake. 'And in this case, it's been a slow crisis until 2022, when we realized how dire the situation was.'
That year, Joel Ferry, then a lawmaker in the Utah House of Representatives, called for emergency action, saying the depleted lake was an 'environmental nuclear bomb.' A flurry of bills overhauled water laws dating to the pioneer era.
But the measures the state is pursuing will take decades to reap results, if ever. Critics now say the pace and scale of the efforts must greatly increase. What is at stake, they warn, is a public health disaster, the collapse of an ecosystem that supports millions of migrating birds, and a devastating blow to the state's tourism, skiing, mining and real estate industries.
The effects would reach far beyond Utah. Minerals from the lake are used in America's beverage cans and in fertilizer for much of the world's organic fruits and nuts. The lake's brine shrimp eggs support a global seafood industry. Dust laden with arsenic and other heavy metals could blow across other states. And as climate change intensifies drought across the West, it would also bring accelerated evaporation of the lake.
'They've stated they've done enough,' Deeda Seed, a campaigner with the Center for Biological Diversity, a nonprofit group suing the state, said of lawmakers. 'It's not working.'
Utah has a conservative Republican governor and supermajority in the statehouse, and most legislators bristle at regulation.
They have been reluctant to constrain the industries that use the most water. Real estate development is a priority in Utah, one of the five fastest-growing states in the U.S. last year. Agriculture, and one of its primary cash crops, alfalfa, is the basis of much of Utah's rural economy. And the dairy and beef industries rely on alfalfa hay to feed cattle.
Utah policymakers tout $1 billion invested in water conservation in 2022 and 2023. More than a quarter of that was provided by the federal government, mostly from pandemic-era aid. Separately, about $50 million in federal aid meant to restore wetlands and help fund a water-leasing program was paused by the Trump administration. The state recently learned that the money would be released, but it is unclear if there will be any future federal aid for the project.
For now, the lake's 20-year decline has stabilized, although that has nothing to do with action by lawmakers. A recent year of record snow replenished mountain streams and reservoirs, allowing more water to flow to the Great Salt Lake. It currently is five feet higher than its all-time low, but it will need to rise another five to attain a minimum healthy elevation.
To reach that level in five years, Mr. Steed's analysis and strategic plan show, all water users in the Great Salt Lake basin would need to cut their consumption by half. The shift would have enormous consequences for the state's economy.
'I just don't think we have political support for that,' Mr. Steed said, 'nor do I think we would have public support for that kind of drastic action.' He aims instead to reach the goal in 30 years. To do so, the region would need to free up about enough water to support the equivalent of at least a million households annually.
Making real headway could require tens of millions of dollars every year. Gov. Spencer Cox requested $16 million this year for the state to buy water leases for the lake, but lawmakers approved only $1 million. The governor also sought $650,000 to monitor and begin mitigating the lake bed's dust. He got less than a quarter of that.
'The legislative and executive appetite to get water to the lake has absolutely evaporated,' said Ben Abbott, an ecology professor at Brigham Young University and the lead author of a 2023 report warning that the lake could disappear in as little as five years.
For now, the industries most vital to protecting the lake are largely on the sidelines. Some farmers are benefiting from irrigation upgrades partly financed by the state. But only a handful have signed up to lease water that could feed the lake.
'I certainly don't want to see the lake dry up and disappear,' said Jason Westover, a farmer who has not joined the leasing effort. 'But I also don't want my industry that I've grown up with and love to be impacted just to prolong the inevitable.'
For developers, it's mostly business as usual. Lawmakers earmarked $40 million in 2022 for a lake trust meant, in part, to help preserve its wetlands. At the same time, they created an Inland Port Authority that has offered state incentives for industrial developers to pave over wetlands in at least four crucial areas.
Brad Wilson, Utah's Republican former House speaker, who spearheaded many of the policy changes benefiting the Great Salt Lake, is also a prominent real estate developer — a third of the Legislature has ties to the industry. Housing affordability and water supply will remain the state's top challenges in perpetuity, he said in an interview.
'We should continue to have a strategy to ensure we have enough water for our growth,' Mr. Wilson said, 'so our kids and grandkids can live here.'
Refilling the Lake
Water flows to the Great Salt Lake through three rivers that collect snow runoff and scour minerals from the Uinta and Wasatch Mountains. It leaves the lake through evaporation, but the minerals remain, making the lake saltier than the ocean.
While climate change has contributed to extensive water shortages in the Southwest, the Great Salt Lake's decline is mostly human-caused. Agriculture uses 71 percent of the water that would otherwise flow to the lake, and cities use around 17 percent, according to research compiled by the Great Salt Lake Strike Team, a group of climate scientists, policy analysts and state regulators.
Utah lawmakers put a system in place to incentivize water rights holders — especially farmers — to repair the watershed. They provided subsidies for more efficient irrigation equipment. The legislators also made it possible for the state, nonprofits or private entities to pay farmers for a temporary lease of the resulting surplus water. In theory, the transaction should be a win-win. The farmer has an incentive to use less water without taking a financial hit — potentially even making a bigger profit — while helping the lake recover.
Lawmakers also funded watershed improvements. The National Audubon Society and the Nature Conservancy manage the trust — worth $40 million, most of that already spent — and last year secured 69,000 acre-feet of wetlands for the lake, enough water to support about 140,000 households per year. Nearly a third came from a donation by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, which has a vast real estate portfolio.
'This is new,' said Marcelle Shoop, who is helping oversee the trust. 'We're all trying to figure out the best way to make these voluntary transactions work, both for the farmer and for the environmental purposes.'
While the state grants for irrigation proved popular among farmers, so far, hardly any have agreed to lease their water rights.
'We're tired of getting a black eye,' said Trevor Nielson, general manager of the Bear River Canal Company, which holds the rights for about 2,000 farmers. 'Yeah, we use the most water, but we're also the ones who are literally changing how we do business.'
Agriculture is challenging in Utah, an arid state with terrain that varies from hot deserts to cool mountain valleys. About 65 percent of its land is owned by federal agencies. Farmers have found alfalfa hay, and the cattle that feed on it, to be the most sustainable and profitable food products to produce.
But alfalfa has become a scapegoat. Some urban residents have called on Utah lawmakers to buy out alfalfa farmers to 'let the water flow,' without scrutinizing their own beef and dairy consumption habits.
Others have suggested encouraging farmers to transition to other crops, like wheat. But farmers are trying to compete in a national and international market, where their alfalfa fetches higher prices than grain.
There's also a learning curve. For an individual farmer, it would be equivalent to asking a rocket manufacturer to start building cars, said Mr. Ferry, the former legislator and now the state's natural resources director, as well as a farmer himself. 'All those things make it really difficult to flip a switch,' he said.
And while beef and dairy cattle, along with their feed, are the leading cause of water depletions in both the Great Salt Lake basin and the Colorado River, researchers say that alfalfa is one of the few crops that can help watersheds recover. It can go dormant for up to a year if farmers choose to lease their water, and it improves soil health, requiring few, if any, polluting chemicals.
One holdup with water leasing is that Utah has yet to build a comprehensive system that can track leased water and ensure it makes it from the farm to the lake without being diverted by another user. But the state's biggest hurdle may be earning farmers' trust.
To stay profitable, farmers now often must expand their footprint, renting land from neighbors. If the state can pay more to lease water than the farmer, it could take that property out of production, bankrupt the farmer and put tractor mechanics, seed wholesalers and irrigation pipe suppliers out of business.
'Our biggest fear is that long-term leasing of water shares may be the death of agriculture,' said Nathan Daugs, a farmer and the manager of the Cache Water District.
Utah's farmers have long watched farmland that goes out of production get gobbled up by subdivisions, warehouses and strip malls with lawns. 'Developers will pay more for water than I can pay,' said Mitch Hancock, a farmer in Box Elder County.
'Everything We Can'
Advocacy groups, including the Center for Biological Diversity, don't feel Utah is moving fast enough on saving the Great Salt Lake. Several filed a lawsuit in 2023, arguing the state has a responsibility to ensure the saline lake's survival. The same concept — called the public trust doctrine — was central to a successful lawsuit involving Mono Lake in California in the 1980s.
The Los Angeles water department had bought and dried all the farmland around Owens Lake, in an arid valley east of the Sierra Nevada, and piped the water more than 200 miles south to support the growing city. The lake dried up, becoming the largest source of human-caused dust pollution in the nation. After Los Angeles began doing the same to Mono Lake, near Yosemite Park, California's Supreme Court ruled that the city had to curb its water diversions to protect it.
But that suit, brought in a liberal state more open to regulation, involved a single diverter — the water department — not the tens of thousands of water rights holders, often banding together in canal companies, in the farmland and cities of the Great Salt Lake basin. And it has not resulted in Mono Lake, also saline, rising to the mandated level all these decades later. Mono and Owens are a small fraction of the Great Salt Lake's size.
Utah's lawmakers know that story. 'We've done everything we can within the bounds of private property rights,' said Rep. Casey Snider, a Republican state lawmaker. 'Once you put people in the courtroom, you send people to their corners and they can't work together.'
In March, a judge rejected the state's motion to dismiss the public trust lawsuit, and appeared to rebuke the state for implying it had the right to let the Great Salt Lake dry and fill it in if it so chose. But she also denied the plaintiffs' request that the state restrict upstream water rights until the lake refills.
While industry-friendly, Utah's lawmakers have acted against some businesses considered harmful to the lake.
They have blocked mineral companies from siphoning away more lake water to harvest lithium, which is in demand for electric vehicle batteries. Regulators have cracked down on US Magnesium — the country's only domestic source of the mineral — refusing to allow the company more access to the receding lake. They also denied an application to build a massive landfill on the shore that would have potentially accepted toxic coal ash from coal-fired power plants in other states.
Even so, lawmakers continue to encourage development that takes a toll on the state's natural resources, including water. Among several major projects, they have spent more than $1 billion moving the state prison to the lake's southern shore in 2022. There, new roads, power lines and water pipes have since opened a vast swath of land to industrial growth.
Lawmakers created a quasi-government body, the Inland Port Authority, that has pushed development there and in three other counties around the lake with sensitive wetlands — although Ben Hart, the executive director, said he was encouraging builders to embrace less water-intensive and ecologically damaging projects.
Critics say that state funds earmarked to fuel development would be better spent helping the Great Salt Lake refill. 'I'd like to see us quit spending money to promote growth that's already happening faster than we can handle it,' said Rep. Doug Owens, a Democratic state lawmaker.
He introduced a bill this session that would have limited grass in residential construction. A second called for more water-wise drip irrigation in new developments. The first bill never made it to committee. The second died on the House floor.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15
Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Republican Senator Co-Sponsors Bill To Raise The Minimum Wage To $15

Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri proposed a bill Tuesday that would raise the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour, his latest move to frame himself as a new kind of pro-worker Republican. Hawley's legislation is not in any danger of actually becoming law — his fellow Republicans hold a majority in the Senate and have been blocking minimum wage increases for years. But the proposal aligns him with a core Democratic demand and further separates Hawley from the traditional anti-union, free-market wing of the GOP when it comes to labor policy. 'Right now, working families, I mean, they haven't gotten a real wage raise in years, and they can't afford anything,' Hawley told HuffPost. 'Right now, the federal minimum wage, if you index it for inflation, or relative to inflation, it's the lowest level since the 1940s.' The federal minimum is just $7.25 per hour and hasn't been raised in more than 15 years, by far the longest such stretch since it was created during the Great Depression. It prevails in the 21 states that currently don't mandate a higher one, many of them clustered in the South. Right now, working families, I mean, they haven't gotten a real wage raise in years, and they can't afford Josh Hawley of Missouri (R) Hawley's bill, co-sponsored by Democratic Sen. Peter Welch of Vermont, would raise the wage floor to $15, then tie it to an inflation index so that it goes up with the cost of living — a common feature in more progressive legislation. Such a hike would force increases in all but the mostly blue states where the wage floor has already been raised above that level. Hawley did not pretend that his proposal stands much chance of becoming law. 'I will try to move it. I mean, I'd love to get a vote on it,' he said. The proposal puts Hawley far ahead of other Republicans, but still behind Democrats on the issue. Most Democratic lawmakers are now pushing for a $17 minimum wage, arguing that $15 — the rallying cry of the Fight for $15 labor campaign, which began in the fast food industry in 2012 — has become inadequate as a living wage due to inflation. Although he supports a more aggressive raise, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) seemed pleased to see Hawley separate himself from other Republicans on the issue. 'I think every Democrat, last month, voted to raise the minimum wage to $17, and I'll look forward to working with Sen. Hawley,' Sanders told HuffPost on Tuesday, referencing an April vote on an amendment to a symbolic budget resolution. The amendment failed by a vote of 47 to 52 with every Republican except Hawley voting no. Hawley said that if the Republican Party wants to brand itself as the party of working people — which it does, according to statements from President Donald Trump and other leaders — then Republicans need to back policies that benefit the working class. 'This is what President Trump ran on. I mean, if we're going to be a working party, we have to do something for working people, and working people haven't gotten a raise in years,' Hawley said. Hawley's positioning himself as a populist, pro-worker conservative has drawn plenty of suspicion from progressives who fear it's a ploy to further drain the Democratic Party's working-class support. Hawley is not the first Republican to back a minimum wage increase. Back in 2021, Sen. Tom Cotton (Ark.) and then-Sen. Mitt Romney (Utah) proposed a boost from $7.25 to $10. But the bill included an immigration measure that would have mandated nationwide use of e-Verify to crack down on undocumented workers, a poison pill for Democrats that isn't part of Hawley's legislation. Earlier this year, Hawley released a policy platform dubbed a 'Pro-Worker Framework.' It included some pro-labor reforms typically associated with Democrats, like putting limits on mandatory 'captive audience' meetings, in which employers pressure workers not to form unions. Then, in March, he joined Democratic Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.) in proposing a bill that would speed up the process for workers to secure their first union contracts, the sort of legislation a typical Republican wouldn't go near. As with Vice-President J.D. Vance, Hawley's positioning himself as a populist, pro-worker conservative has drawn plenty of suspicion from progressives who fear it's a ploy to further drain the Democratic Party's working-class support. But when it comes to maybe moving legislation, lawmakers like Sanders like the idea of having a Republican to work with. 'It would be great if we could get some other Republicans,' the Vermont senator said. '$7.25 federal minimum wage is a national disgrace. We've got to raise it.'

Who is ahead in the NJ governor race on primary election day?
Who is ahead in the NJ governor race on primary election day?

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Who is ahead in the NJ governor race on primary election day?

The Brief Voters in New Jersey will select Democratic and Republican candidates for governor on Tuesday. Nearly a dozen candidates are competing for the chance to succeed Gov. Murphy. Polls close at 8 p.m. Voters in New Jersey will have the chance to choose the Democrat and Republican candidates who will fight to succeed Phil Murphy as governor. Along with the governor, Tuesday is also the primaries for the state General Assembly and the uncontested special primaries in state Senate District 35. Here's a look at each candidate for governor, who's ahead for each party and when we can expect results. ***Click on each name to jump to their section. Mikie Sherrill Josh Gottheimer Ras Baraka Steve Fulop Sean Spiller Steve Sweeney Jack Ciattarelli Bill Spadea Jon Bramnick Mario Kranjac Justin Barbera Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill survey: According to a May survey, 28% of registered New Jersey Democratic voters said they would vote for U.S. Rep, Mikie Sherrill, as Jersey City Mayor Steven Fulop, Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, and U.S. Rep. Josh Gottheimer each had 11% of Democratic responders' support. A month ahead of the primary, 24% of Dem voters said they were undecided. SurveyUSA: According to a poll conducted in May, voters showed slightly more favorable options for Sherrill compared to the rest of the field. Gottheimer was a close second. Fundraising numbers: Gottheimer has had a slight edge in fundraising, with about $9.1 million in contributions, followed by Sherrill and Fulop, each with about $8.9 million raised for their campaigns, according to the Associated Press. Emerson College Polling/PIX11/The Hill survey: According to a May survey, 44% of registered New Jersey Republican voters said they would vote for former state Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, while 18% support talk radio host Bill Spadea. A month ahead of the primary, 23% of GOP voters said they were undecided. SurveyUSA: The poll conducted in May only asked voters about Ciattarelli, who "has favorability ratings of 40%-36% among the broader electorate and 63%-19% among Trump voters," accordin gto the New Jersey Globe. Trump endorsement: President Donald Trump endorsed Ciattarelli in May and campaigned for him in a virtual rally. What they're saying "We've seen an increasing lead for Mikie Sherrill in public pre-election polling throughout the past few months," Ashley Koning, director of Eagleton Center for Public Interest Polling at Rutgers University, told FOX 5 NY's Morgan McKay on Politics Unusual. "But I would still say that potentially it may be almost anyone's game on the Democratic side, still, because again, we're talking about a primary election where these are low engagement, low turnout and we don't know exactly who is necessarily going to turn out to vote come Election Day." Turning to the Republican side, Koning calls Ciattarelli the "presumed frontrunner." "Yeah, he's the presumed frontrunner, and he's been leading by double digits for months now in any of the public pre-election polling," Koning said. "Again, you know, New Jersey is, we get pinged as this blue state because of our voting at a federal level since probably around the Clinton era, but let's remember that New Jersey is actually much more purple under the hood." How big of a role did President Trump play in the race? "So Trump is going to loom large over this race very much so," Koning said. "When we pulled this 46% of Republican registered voters in New Jersey told us that an endorsement from the president would make them more likely to go for that candidate." Dig deeper Nearly a dozen candidates are competing in New Jersey for the chance to succeed term-limited Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy. Sherrill is a former federal prosecutor and U.S. Navy helicopter pilot. She has represented the 11th District, which includes parts of Essex, Morris and Passaic counties, since her 2018 election. She has since won reelection three times. Gottheimer, a former speechwriter for Bill Clinton and adviser to the head of the Federal Communications Commission, toppled conservative Republican Rep. Scott Garrett in 2016. Gottheimer represents the state's 5th Congressional District, which spans parts of Bergen, Passaic and Sussex counties. Baraka is the current mayor of Newark. First elected mayor in 2014, Baraka has spent over a decade leading Newark through economic and social changes, including reductions in crime and homelessness, and improvements in infrastructure. Most recently, he was arrested outside the Delaney Hall federal immigration detention center while protesting its opening. Fulop, the third-term Democratic mayor of the state's second-biggest city, is a former Marine who served in Iraq after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. Back in January, Fulop floated the idea of a 'reverse congestion pricing' toll in an appearance on Good Day New York. Fulop suggested New Jersey could implement similar fees, capitalizing on the state's opportunities for cross-border tolling. Spiller is the president of the New Jersey Education Association and former mayor of Montclair. Spiller began as a science teacher before rising through the ranks of the New Jersey Education Association, becoming its president in 2021 after eight years on the executive board. Sweeney has centered his gubernatorial campaign on reforming New Jersey's budget process and addressing the state's housing challenges. With 20 years of public office experience, including more than a decade as Senate president, Sweeney is banking on his experience and commitment to tackling systemic issues. Ciattarelli, a Somerville native and business founder, is making another run for New Jersey governor. This time, he has the backing of President Trump. Ciattarelli nearly unseated Murphy back in 2021 and finished second in the 2017 GOP primary. This time, he says he is focused on tackling New Jersey's affordability crisis, citing rising taxes, tolls, and fees. Spadea is an entrepreneur and host of the Bill Spadea Show on NJ101.5 FM. Spadea says he's focused on New Jersey's budget and ending the illegal immigration crisis, which he claims costs taxpayers too much. Bramnick says he wants to create a government efficiency panel with private residents and business leaders to identify waste and areas for improvement. He's been in the State Senate since 2022 and was an Assemblyman for nearly two decades prior from 2003-2021. Kranjac is the former mayor of Englewood Cliffs, serving from 2016 to 2024. He calls himself a political outsider determined to change Trenton. Since leaving office, he has continued as a corporate attorney and venture capitalist. Barbera is a contractor and real estate developer from Burlington County. A Marlton native, Barbera's career includes work as a general contractor, insurance claim mitigator, freight carrier, and owner-operator of a CDL A flatbed and commercial snow service operation. By the numbers In the 2024 presidential election in New Jersey, the first results the AP reported came from Hudson County at 8:01 p.m. ET, one minute after polls closed. Vote tabulation ended for the night at 4:21 a.m. ET in Burlington County with about 95% of votes counted.

Protests over immigration raids popping up across the country with more planned
Protests over immigration raids popping up across the country with more planned

Los Angeles Times

timean hour ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Protests over immigration raids popping up across the country with more planned

AUSTIN, Texas — Protests that sprang up in Los Angeles over immigration enforcement raids and prompted President Trump to mobilize National Guard troops and Marines have begun to spread across the country, with more planned into the weekend. From Seattle to Austin to Washington D.C., marchers have chanted slogans, carried signs against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency and snarled traffic through downtown avenues and outside federal offices. While many were peaceful, some have resulted in clashes with law enforcement as officers made arrests used chemical irritants to disperse crowds. Activists plan more and even larger demonstrations in the coming days, with so-called 'No Kings' events across the country on Saturday to coincide with Trump's planned military parade through Washington. The Trump administration said it would continue its program of raids and deportations despite the protests. 'ICE will continue to enforce the law,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem posted Tuesday on social media. A look at protests sprouting up across the country: Four Austin police officers were injured and authorities used chemical irritants to disperse a crowd of several hundred demonstrators Monday night that moved between the state Capitol and a federal building that houses an ICE office. State officials had closed the Capitol to the public an hour early in anticipation of the protest. Austin police used pepper spray balls and state police used tear gas when demonstrators began trying to deface the federal building with spray paint. The demonstrators then started throwing rocks, bottles and other objects at a police barricade, Austin Police Chief Lisa Davis said. Three officers were injured by 'very large' rocks and another hurt a shoulder while making an arrest, she said. Austin police arrested eight people, and state police arrested several more. Davis said her department is prepared for Saturday's planned protest downtown. 'We support peaceful protest,' Davis said. 'When that protests turn violent, when it turns to throwing rocks and bottles .... That will not be tolerated. Arrests will be made.' A protest that drew hundreds to a rally on a city bridge lasted for several hours Monday night before Dallas police declared it an 'unlawful assembly' and warned people to leave or face possible arrest. Dallas police initially posted on social media that officers would not interfere with a 'lawful and peaceful assembly of individuals or groups expressing their First Amendment rights.' But officers later moved in and local media reported seeing some in the crowd throw objects as officers used pepper spray and smoke to clear the area. At least one person was arrested. 'Peaceful protesting is legal,' Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican, posted on X. 'But once you cross the line, you will be arrested.' About 50 people gathered outside the immigration court in downtown Seattle on Tuesday, chanting with drums and holding up signs that said 'Free Them All Abolish ICE' and 'No to Deportations.' The protest was initially peaceful but protesters began putting scooters in front of the entryways to the building before police arrived. Mathieu Chabaud, with Students for a Democratic Society at the University of Washington, said they were there in solidarity with the protesters in Los Angeles, 'and to show that we're opposed to ICE in our community.' Legal advocates who normally attend the immigration court hearings as observers and to provide support to immigrants were not allowed inside the building. Security guards also turned away the media. The hearings are normally open to the public. In Santa Ana near Los Angeles, armored vehicles blocked the road Tuesday morning leading into the Civic Center, where federal immigration officers and numerous city and county agencies have their offices. Workers swept up plastic bottles and broken glass from Monday's protests. Tiny shards of red, black and purple glass littered the pavement. Nearby buildings and the sidewalk were tagged with profane graffiti slogans against ICE and Trump's name crossed out. A worker rolled paint over graffiti on a wall to block it out. National Guard officers wearing fatigues and carrying rifles prevented people from entering the area unless they worked there. Vertuno writes for the Associated Press. AP writers Martha Bellisle in Seattle and Amy Taxin in Santa Ana contributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store