Who is the judge in the Karen Read trial? What to know about Beverly Cannone.
The
Karen Read case
has gained national attention, with her second trial now underway in Dedham, Massachusetts. So who is the judge? Here's what to know about Norfolk Superior Court Judge Beverly Cannone.
Cannone oversaw Read's first trial, which ended in a
mistrial due to a hung jury
. She's back for the second trial.
Cannone grew up in Massachusetts and went to the University of Massachusetts, followed by New England School of Law.
For 24 years, Cannone worked as a public defender for the Committee for Public Counsel Services. Cannone was attorney-in-charge for the Dedham office. In 2002, she received the Massachusetts Bar Association's Access to Justice Defender of the Year award.
In 2009, Cannone was appointed by Gov. Deval Patrick as a judge in Quincy District Court. Patrick then appointed her to Norfolk Superior Court in 2014.
Read's defense attorneys have frequently been at odds with Cannone in the courtroom. During a hearing in July 2023, Alan Jackson asked Cannone to recuse herself from the case, claiming she was unable to be impartial.
Jackson presented a message between
witness Jennifer McCabe's
brother-in-law Sean McCabe and a reporter in which Sean McCabe purportedly wrote, "Auntie Bev??? Whose seaside cottage do you think we're gonna bury your corpse under?"
Cannone
declined to recuse herself
, then rebuked the defense's allegations against her.
"That simply is not the truth," Cannone said about accusations that she knew people involved in the case. "I can tell both parties I don't know Sean McCabe. As far as I know, I have never spoken to him, or had any contact with him. I've never interacted with him and certainly I've never socialized with him or any family members, or any witnesses who have been said here in court."
Defense attorneys also took issue with Cannone's handling of deliberations in the first trial. Jurors have said they were unanimous in a vote behind closed doors to acquit Read on charges of second-degree murder and leaving the scene of personal injury and death. Jurors said they remained deadlocked on the charge of manslaughter while operating under the influence of alcohol.
Cannone declared a mistrial, but Read's defense argued two of the charges should be dismissed because of double jeopardy. They have appealed the case to the
U.S. Supreme Court
after several unsuccessful lower level appeals.
In advance of Read's second trial, Cannone clashed with Jackson again, this time over crash reconstruction witnesses who testified during the first trial and are expected to testify again as defense witnesses in the second trial.
Cannone admonished the defense team during the March pretrial hearing for
"repeated misrepresentations"
to the court, though she declined to remove any attorneys from the case.
While on the bench at Norfolk Superior Court, Cannone oversaw another trial that ended in a
mistrial
and subsequent second trial.
Cannone was the judge in the trial of Emanuel Lopes, who was charged with killing Weymouth Police
Sgt. Michael Chesna
and innocent bystander Vera Adams in 2018.
Jurors deliberated in Norfolk Superior Court for days after getting the case in 2023, but could not decide whether Lopes was a murderer or mentally ill. Cannone declared a mistrial and dismissed the jurors.
In early 2024, not long before Read's first trial got underway, Cannone oversaw Lopes' second trial. After six days of deliberations, jurors found Lopes guilty of murder.
WBZ-TV legal analyst
Katherine Loftus said
it is not uncommon for judges to stay on for retrials after overseeing a mistrial.
Loftus said normally, Superior Court judges rotate every three months. But in Read's case, Cannone was specially appointed to retain jurisdiction by the Chief of Courts.
"It makes the most sense for the judge who understands what happened through the first trial to stay on it," Loftus said. "I don't think it's about wanting to stay on the case. I think it's about the logistics of it. It's fairly common with serious Superior Court jury trials for the judge to retain jurisdiction from the first trial to the second trial."
Retired Massachusetts judge Jack Lu told WBZ's Kristina Rex that Cannone is presiding over a unique case when it comes to Read's trial.
"Judge Cannone is presiding over a first. Social media conspiracy theories click-free driven has now entered the Massachusetts criminal system," Lu said.
Lu said Cannone's handling of the case is a key moment in her career.
"Judge Cannone was a widely respected defense lawyer, having received an award for Defender of the Year. She has many years in trial experience from before she was a judge, defending the most difficult cases," Lu said. "This case is Judge Cannone at the top of her game, an apex for her life's work so far."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Defense in Karen Read case accuses special prosecutor of misleading jury about damaged hoodie evidence
Karen Read defense attorney Robert Alessi moved for a mistrial again Monday over special prosecutor Hank Brennan's handling of John O'Keefe's hoodie during cross-examination of a defense expert witness. "Your honor, the defense moves for a mistrial with prejudice Based upon intentional misconduct that just occurred before the court and before the jury," Alessi said. He said the motion came in response to representations Brennan made while questioning Dr. Daniel Wolfe, a crash reconstructionist from a firm called ARCCA. Brennan, while cross-examining Wolfe about damage to O'Keefe's hoodie, showed him the actual piece of clothing, which had a series of holes in the back. Jury Skepticism Of Experts Could Determine Outcome In Karen Read Murder Trial: Former Judge Alessi contended that the holes were created by a criminologist during lab testing and that they did not exist when police took the sweatshirt. Read On The Fox News App Read is accused of killing her boyfriend O'Keefe, a Boston police officer, by clipping him with her 2021 Lexus LX 570 SUV on Jan. 29, 2022, and leaving him to die on the ground in a record-setting blizzard. Before jurors arrived, Judge Beverly Cannone heard motions regarding rebuttal testimony and to preclude or limit expert witnesses. WATCH: Karen Read defense moves for a mistrial again She said she would hold an additional evidentiary hearing to determine what Dr. Elizabeth Laposata, a Rhode Island forensic pathologist and professor at Brown University, can testify in front of jurors. David Yannetti, one of Read's defense lawyers, told the court that her legal team believes O'Keefe was "placed" on the ground near a flagpole outside 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Massachusetts. Laposata is expected to discuss O'Keefe's injuries and how and where he could have suffered them. The home is about 20 miles south of Boston. Read, O'Keefe and others went there for an after-party on Jan. 28, 2022. Dr. Daniel Wolfe, the reconstructionist from a firm called ARCCA, testified last week that damage to Read's SUV is inconsistent with the type of impact that prosecutors allege left O'Keefe dead early the following morning. 'Cannon' Test Boosts Karen Read's Defense, Showing Taillight Damage Consistent With Thrown Bar Glass GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE True Crime Hub But on cross-examination, he conceded that flying fragments of a taillight could have been the source of injuries to O'Keefe's face and nose before he suffered a fractured skull from what prosecution experts testified was a backward fall. Read has pleaded not guilty to charges of second-degree murder, drunken driving manslaughter and leaving the scene. Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X Sign Up To Get The True Crime Newsletter Her defense maintains that her vehicle never struck O'Keefe and that his injuries were caused in some other manner after she left. Read could face life in prison if convicted of the top charge. Jurors deadlocked at her first trial last year on the same article source: Defense in Karen Read case accuses special prosecutor of misleading jury about damaged hoodie evidence
USA Today
17 hours ago
- USA Today
Karen Read trial live updates: Crash expert testifies, defense prepares to wrap case soon
Karen Read trial live updates: Crash expert testifies, defense prepares to wrap case soon Show Caption Hide Caption Karen Read's second murder trial begins with new jury Karen Read is starting her second trial after being prosecuted for the 2022 death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, last year. Karen Read's second murder trial entered its eighth week Monday, with more testimony from a defense accident reconstruction expert who says Read's SUV never hit John O'Keefe. On Friday, Daniel Michael Wolfe showed jurors crash-test videos he created to simulate how Read's Lexus could have struck O'Keefe and what damage his body would have caused to the vehicle at different speeds. Wolfe said that the shattered plastic patterns created on the car's taillight during the tests did not match the cracks found on Read's car. Catch up: Karen Read trial: Can crash reconstruction expert help the defense? Prosecutors accuse Read, 45, of backing into O'Keefe, her Boston police officer boyfriend, in a drunken rage and then leaving him to die in the snow outside the home of another cop after a night drinking with friends. She has been charged with second-degree murder, vehicular manslaughter while intoxicated and leaving the scene of a collision resulting in death. Read's defense team maintains that she was framed for O'Keefe's 2022 death. They say O'Keefe was beaten by law enforcement officers who were having a house party inside the home, then bitten by a dog and thrown outside in the middle of a blizzard. The defense's case largely rests on accusations that the investigation into O'Keefe's death was mired by deceit, incompetence and bias. A jury will soon deliberate over Read's fate – again. Her first trial ended in July 2024 in a mistrial after the jury could not come to a unanimous verdict. Read told local media the defense in this case could wrap up its testimony by Tuesday, June 10. Jury instructions filed by Read's lawyers suggest that the Massachusetts woman may not testify in the retrial. They include a section informing the jury of Read's Fifth Amendment right not to testify, telling them they 'may not hold that against her.' Christopher Dearborn, a law professor at Suffolk University in Boston who has followed the case closely, said the instructions are likely a 'harbinger' that Read's attorneys are not going to call her to the stand, though he noted that they could change their mind. 'Frankly, I don't think it would make a lot of sense to call her at this point,' Dearborn said, noting the number of public statements Read has made that could be used against her. The court has already heard from Read in the trial through clips prosecutors played of interviews conducted in which she questioned whether she 'clipped' O'Keefe and admitted to driving while inebriated. Dearborn told USA TODAY that there are two schools of thought around whether to include a section on a defendant's right not to testify in jury instructions. Some defense lawyers don't include the section because they don't want to "draw a bull's eye" around the fact that the defendant didn't testify and cause jurors to "speculate," Dearborn said. Other times, he said, it is the "elephant in the room" and the specific instructions telling the jury they can't hold the defendant's lack of testimony against them are necessary. CourtTV has been covering the case against Read and the criminal investigation since early 2022, when O'Keefe's body was found outside a Massachusetts home. You can watch CourtTV's live feed of the Read trial proceedings from Norfolk Superior Court in Dedham, Massachusetts. Proceedings begin at 9 a.m. ET.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Jury skepticism of experts could determine outcome in Karen Read murder trial: former judge
Whenever there's a battle of the experts, it's the jurors who hold the winning hand, according to a retired Massachusetts judge. And that's shaping up to be the case in Karen Read's retrial on murder charges in the death of her former boyfriend, 46-year-old Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. Read, 45, is accused of hitting him with an SUV and leaving outside a house party at 34 Fairview Road in Canton, Massachusetts, as he died of a skull fracture and hypothermia during a blizzard on Jan. 29, 2022. Cross-examination Exposes Gaps In Defense Expert's Crash Testing For Karen Read Dr. Daniel Wolfe, a director at the ARCCA crash reconstruction firm, testified that the results of numerous tests he conducted to try and reconstruct the alleged crash that killed O'Keefe came back with "inconsistent" results. But special prosecutor Hank Brennan tore into the validity of his methods during cross-examination, noting he used a dummy that was significantly smaller than O'Keefe, alternated between different types of dummy arms without noting that under direct examination and conducted only one test at each speed rather than multiple tests to check for consistent results. Read On The Fox News App A key moment in his testimony came not while discussing his findings, but when Brennan asked him about something Read said in a video clip played earlier in the trial, according to Jack Lu, a retired Massachusetts Superior Court Judge and Boston College law professor. Karen Read Denis Noticing Confrontation Between Deceased Boyfriend And Atf Agent "There's Brennan's theory – the taillight 'impaled' [O'Keefe] on the nose," he told Fox News Digital. "Read picked glass out of [his] nose, and [his] nose bled – from her video statement." Brennan played video from one of Wolfe's accident reconstructions that showed plastic fragments flying away from the vehicle after impacting a crash dummy's arm. "When the taillight is shattered and it spreads through the air, does it have the potential to impale a person, for example, on their nose?" Brennan asked. "I think that would be unlikely," Wolfe replied. Follow The Fox True Crime Team On X As part of the prosecution's case, Brennan played a clip of Read telling an interviewer she pulled a "piece of glass" out of O'Keefe's nose and that it started bleeding. Wolfe's task has been to discredit the prosecution's core allegation that Read slammed into O'Keefe in reverse with her 2021 Lexus LX 570 SUV and left him to die on the ground in a blizzard on Jan. 29, 2022. Sign Up To Get The True Crime Newsletter "Juries have great powers of observation, and a fundamental depth of experience seldom seen in American life," Lu told Fox News Digital. "Partially because of how many jurors there are. I predict that the jury will conclude that both accident reconstructionists' conclusions are not worthy of belief in a jury trial." GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE True Crime Hub The defense is also aiming to sow reasonable doubt in the prosecution's crash experts, Dr. Judson Welcher and Shanon Burgess from a firm called Aperture. Welcher testified last week that he believes "[O'Keefe's injuries are] consistent with being struck by a Lexus and also contacting a hard surface, such as frozen ground." Wolfe found that the injuries were inconsistent when stacked up against the damage to Read's SUV as well as the damage to O'Keefe's clothing – which prosecutors allege had fragments of taillight plastic embedded in it. Lu said that he expects jury instructions to include a note that the experts don't decide the facts – jurors do. "Juries are not in the least bit cowed by experts," he said. "To the contrary, they view them with skepticism." Especially "hired guns," he added. Jurors will be looking at the case as a whole, but while Lu said he believes Brennan scored a victory on the day, the defense has a significant advantage. "The defense need not prove anything; they merely must establish reasonable doubt," said Mark Bederow, a New York City defense lawyer who is representing Canton blogger and Read ally Aidan Kearney. "But over the course of a few hours, Dr. Wolfe cast serious doubt by methodically dismantling the key premise of the prosecution case – through multiple scientific examinations and effective video he offered support for his opinion that the damage to the taillight was not consistent with the collision alleged by the prosecution." Read's team is expected to rest their case next week. She could face up to life in prison if convicted of the top article source: Jury skepticism of experts could determine outcome in Karen Read murder trial: former judge
