Power disconnection stayed, flats get time to install STPs
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The decision follows a directive from high court, offering a breather to the affected residential buildings.
KSEB issued disconnection notices to 71 residential apartment complexes across the city for failing to install STPs in compliance with PCB guidelines. The decision, which threatened to cut off electricity to over 1,500 households within a week, sparked widespread concern among residents.
When high court considered the suo motu case regarding the pollution of Thevara – Perandoor Canal, it also took into account the impleading petitions filed by different associations of affected apartment complexes and asked PCB to consider granting the petitioners reasonable time.
"Considering the main purpose of initiating suo motu petition is to address the environmental hazards caused by the accumulation of filth and garbage in the canal, as regards the grievance of the applicant noticees concerning the short time given by pollution control board for compliance, we direct that if an undertaking (along with resolutions in case of companies/societies) is submitted by the noticees (even other than the applicants) seeking reasonable time for compliance, the pollution control board will consider granting such reasonable time, provided the undertaking expresses a genuine intention of compliance," said the court order.
In the backdrop of the court order, the Consortium of Flat and Villa Owners Association, Kerala will convene a meeting of the affected families residing in 71 apartment complexes soon and each family will approach PCB with an affidavit or seek time for installing STPs. "Only three or four affected parties approached court. But the order is applicable to all. So, we have decided to approach PCB seeking extension of time.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Each apartment association can demand time as per their requirement. We will coordinate the activities," said Saju Abraham, chairman of the consortium.
A senior official of KSPCB told TOI that they decided to accept undertakings from affected parties and KSPCB would grant proper time after examining conditions given in the undertakings.
HC will consider the case at the next hearing on Sept 11, and the consortium is planning to sort out the issues by submitting the undertakings to PCB before the date.
T J Vinod, MLA, strongly criticised KSEB, PCB and the municipality for issuing the notice. He said that he would bring the issue to the notice of chief minister. "PCB does not even have a list of approved agencies to establish STPs. Some flats received notice last month and are in the process of setting up sewage treatment systems, which could take up to 12 months to complete," said the MLA. All the flats that received the notice were built when these regulations were not in place.
The municipality's action of leaving these residents, who trusted the occupancy certificate provided by the municipality and started living in the flats, was unacceptable, stated the MLA.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
8 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
HC rejects plea to shift Hadapsar waste facility, directs strict compliance by PMC, PCB
The Bombay High Court has dismissed a petition seeking the relocation of the waste processing facility operating at the Hadapsar industrial estate in Pune. The order came in response to two petitions challenging the continued use of the Hadapsar site by PMC and PCB. (REPRESENTATIVE PHOTO) In its order dated August 5, the court directed the Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) and the Pune Cantonment Board (PCB) to ensure that no mixed solid waste is dumped on any part of the 28-acre site, and that all operations strictly comply with environmental regulations. The HC bench Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Judge Sandeep V Marne stated that while the existing facility can continue operations, PMC and PCB must ensure strict adherence to the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, and the conditions laid down in the environmental authorisation. 'PCB and PMC shall ensure that the municipal solid waste transported to the site is processed and disposed of either by composting of wet waste, recycling and reuse of dry waste, and transportation of non-biodegradable and unusable waste to a sanitary landfill. PCB and PMC shall take all necessary measures to suppress and control foul odour, toxic gases, dust, etc., emanating from the waste processing facility and adopt modern techniques to ensure the health of nearby residents is not adversely affected,' the order stated. The court also directed the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board (MPCB) to enforce strict compliance. If PMC, PCB, or their contractors fail to meet the conditions, the MPCB must initiate appropriate legal action. Further, the court clarified that PMC and PCB may approach the state government for identification and allocation of additional land for setting up or expanding waste management infrastructure. However, it is for the state government to decide in accordance with the law. The order came in response to two petitions challenging the continued use of the Hadapsar site by PMC and PCB. The petitioners alleged that mixed solid waste was being dumped at the site, leading to toxic emissions, foul odour, and air pollution affecting the health of residents living nearby. The first petition—a Public Interest Litigation (PIL)—was filed by the Hadapsar Industries Association and St Patrick's Town Co-operative Society Ltd. The petitioners sought a complete discontinuation of waste processing at the site and its relocation outside city limits, citing violations of the Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016, and a government resolution dated September 11, 2018. They also claimed the land, bearing Survey No. 120-298 and measuring about 28 acres, was not suitable for garbage processing. The PIL noted that while PCB had used the land for over 100 years, it was doing so merely as a 'lessee holding over' and did not own the property. The petitioners referred to a suit filed by 61 claimants asserting ownership and seeking PCB's eviction. Although the suit was dismissed in 2009, an appeal is pending. The second petition, a writ petition, was filed by five senior citizens from the Sopan Baug area, who alleged exposure to foul-smelling and toxic air for nearly six hours daily due to operations at the site. They, too, demanded that the waste facility be moved outside city limits. Respondents included the PCB, PMC, MPCB, the Pune District Collector, and the State of Maharashtra.
New Indian Express
3 days ago
- New Indian Express
Container Road remains pitch dark as NHAI, KSEB spar over two transformers
KOCHI: A long-pending demand to light up 'accident-prone' Container Road, connecting Kalamassery to Vallarpadam, is yet to be realised despite the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) installing as many as 1,106 streetlights along a 17.12km stretch of NH 966A. The reason? A bone of contention between the NHAI and the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) over the setting up of a couple of power transformers. While the stretch, which is undergoing renovation works worth Rs 100 crore, already has two transformers, the KSEB has insisted on the setting up of another two as a condition for providing power. Both agencies are now placing the onus on each other, resulting in the 'delay'. In a recent statement in Parliament, Road Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari said the installation of streetlights on NH 966A had been completed at a cost of Rs 7.78 crore. 'The NHAI said in its reply that it is awaiting connection from the KSEB and expects to receive it by the end of July. Streetlights have been installed in accordance with the board's standards, the standards of the Indian Roads Congress, a leading technical guideline body, and best practices,' Gadkari said, in response to a query raised by Ernakulam MP Hibi Eden.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
3 days ago
- First Post
PCB bans players from WCL over India-Pakistan match controversy
The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has imposed a ban on its players' participation in future World Championship of Legends (WCL) tournaments, citing bias and political interference after India forfeited matches. read more Lahore, Aug 3: The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) on Sunday announced a blanket ban on its players' participation in future editions of the World Championship of Legends (WCL), accusing the tournament organisers of being 'biased' and lacking sporting integrity. The decision follows a sequence of events in which the Indian team forfeited both their group-stage clash and semifinal against Pakistan, citing the country's stand against bilateral sporting ties with the neighbouring country after the gruesome Pahalagam terror attack. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) announces that it is issuing a blanket ban from future participation in the World Championship of Legends (WCL),' the PCB said in a statement after its board of governors meeting held virtually under the chairmanship of Mohsin Naqvi. The PCB also took strong exception to the WCL's decision to award points to India despite the forfeiture, calling it 'tainted with hypocrisy and bias.' India and Pakistan had been slated to meet in the group stage, but the Indian side – featuring Shikhar Dhawan, Yuvraj Singh, Irfan Pathan, Suresh Raina, and Harbhajan Singh – refused to play, citing national sentiment following the terror attack and India's subsequent 'Operation Sindoor'. With India also pulling out of the semifinal, Pakistan advanced directly to the final. 'The PCB reviewed with considerable disappointment WCL's appalling conduct of awarding points to a willfully forfeiting team, and the content of the press releases of the WCL announcing the cancellation of the scheduled India vs. Pakistan legends matches, which were tainted with hypocrisy and bias.' Criticising the tournament's handling of the situation, the PCB said, 'The cancellation was not based on cricketing merit but on appeasing a specific nationalistic narrative. This sends an unacceptable message to the international sporting community.' The board further stated that it could not allow its players to participate in events where 'the spirit of the game is overshadowed by skewed politics that undermine the very essence of sportsmanship and the gentleman's game.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The WCL, which is co-owned by Bollywood actor Ajay Devgn, had earlier issued an apology for 'hurting the feelings of many and stirring emotions' following the cancellation of the group stage match. 'We sincerely apologise again for hurting the sentiments and hope people will understand that all we ever wanted was to bring a few happy moments to the fans,' the WCL had said. The PCB, however, termed the apology 'farcical,' accusing the organisers of caving to 'a specific nationalistic narrative.' 'The WCL's apology for 'hurting the sentiments', whilst being farcical, inadvertently acknowledges that the cancellation was not based on cricketing merit, but rather on succumbing to a specific nationalistic narrative,' the PCB said. 'This bias, masquerading as sensitivity, sends an unacceptable message to the international sporting community.' PCB said it had no choice but to implement the ban. 'In light of this unfortunate development, which underscores a clear and intolerable pattern of external influence and a disregard for the principles of sporting neutrality, the Pakistan Cricket Board is compelled to take a firm stance. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The PCB can no longer condone participation in an event where the fundamental principles of fair play and unbiased administration are compromised by external pressures,' it added. Sources in the know of things have indicated that WCL's Indian promoters were already considering dropping the Pakistan team from future editions of the tournament.
