UC students find home, support at school centers. But Ohio law to likely shut them down
Their "home away from home," they said, will likely be stripped away from them.
As the university dismantles its diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives to comply with President Donald Trump's executive order and the recently passed Ohio Senate Bill 1, student identity centers are at high risk of closing.
The university has not explicitly said the centers will close, but students and staff believe their futures are bleak.
SB 1, which Gov. Mike DeWine signed into law March 28, prohibits state universities from "the continuation of existing diversity, equity, and inclusion offices or departments" at any state institution of higher education.
The bill also says state universities are not allowed to create new DEI offices or departments or replace DEI offices or positions with ones for the same or similar purposes. Supporters of the bill say it will create an inclusive environment, one that includes conservative voices, and provides equal opportunity to all students.
The bill doesn't define diversity, equity and inclusion, also known as DEI, so it's unclear whether the identity centers fall under this term. But similar legislation in other states has caused schools there to close such centers.
UC's African American Cultural & Resource Center, commonly called the AACRC, the LGBTQ Center, the Women's Center and Ethnic Programs & Services provide resources for the identities they serve.
Friendship. Mentorship opportunities. A safe space. Support. Advocacy. Opportunities to develop confidence. Visibility. Internships. Feeling less alone at a big university. To the students The Enquirer spoke to, this is what the identity centers give them.
Although the resources offered by each center are focused on the needs of specific groups, students say they are open to everyone.
For Mickell Owusu-Korkor, a fifth-year student studying biomedical engineering, the African American Cultural & Resource Center ensured she had the "college experience." She became involved in the center's peer mentoring program called Transitions.
"I've seen a lot of things where people are like, 'Oh, I went to school and it was like, I'd never had that college experience, I never got to know people,'" she said. "I feel like joining Transitions and coming to the center from the beginning definitely erased that from happening to me."
While UC has not yet released plans for the identity centers, administrators have met with "those most impacted," according to a statement from Nicole Mayo, vice provost for student affairs.
"The most important thing I would wish to convey is our foundational commitment to individual student success. We will welcome every qualified student and provide them with the caring support they deserve – all while meeting our compliance obligations," the statement reads.
She said the university will announce a plan as soon as possible.
The African American Cultural & Resource Center played a large role in why Genesis Anderson, a third-year pre-law student of Caribbean and African descent, chose to attend the university. "When I was first coming here to UC, my biggest concern was, 'Where is the space for people that look like me?'" he said.
He found the AACRC and "immediately" got involved. Anderson said the staff make sure the students there feel safe, advocated for and taken care of.
The center also gives students a platform to become student leaders. Kuamka is the center's leadership competition. The Transitions Program offers leadership training, workshops and social and academic activities.
Anderson says the African American Cultural & Resource Center helps minority students like him feel seen through its Black Student Graduation Celebration, Tyehimba. The ceremony honors Black graduates before the campuswide ceremony.
"I think that ... people fail to recognize it can be challenging on a campus where you're the minority, right?" Anderson said. Not everybody can handle that level of stress, he said, so with Tyehimba, those who "made it through" are acknowledged.
SB 1 eliminates diversity, equity and inclusion programs and scholarships, along with preventing faculty from striking and universities from taking a stand on 'controversial beliefs.'
It's not clear, according to the language of the bill, whether the African American Cultural & Resource Center and other identity centers count as offices 'designated for the purpose of diversity, equity, and inclusion,' because the bill does not define DEI.
Mel Searle, a sophomore who described UC's women's center and LGBTQ center as her "home on campus," said she's not optimistic about the survival of either center.
Other universities in the Greater Cincinnati area announced changes. Miami University will close its Center for Student Diversity and Inclusion and relocate its staff within the university. Northern Kentucky University, which is affected by a similar bill in Kentucky, is repurposing its Center for Student Inclusiveness. The center will be renamed the Center for Community and Connections and will be directed to the entire student community, the university said in a release. The departments within the center – African American Student Initiatives, Latino Student Initiatives and LGBTQA+ Student Initiatives − will be dissolved.
More: Republicans want to eliminate DEI offices on campus. What do they do?
Ohio State University announced April 17 that it would keep its Hale Black Cultural Center and programs open, despite closing two diversity, equity and inclusion offices.
Sen. Jerry Cirino, the bill's primary sponsor, said he doesn't "have a definition of DEI particularly," though it "tends" to be "divisive." The Enquirer asked Cirino if there's a pathway for the centers to stay open if they are inclusive.
'It's likely that they would be OK,' said Cirino, though he clarified that he didn't know enough about UC's identity centers to say whether that's the case.
More: Despite DEI closures, Ohio State to keep Hale Black Cultural Center and programs open
'If it's proven to be a divisive organization, if it's eliminating and restricting who can participate, you know, then they may have some problems," he said.
Students like Anderson were firm that the AACRC does not exclude other students. "Everyone," Anderson said, "is welcome here."
Students see ramifications of the law, even though it doesn't go into effect until June. Tyehimba is one of the programs already affected.
Typically, the graduation celebrates Black students at Fifth Third Center. This year, however, the University of Cincinnati is not allowed to host the ceremony due to "recent and forthcoming legislative changes at the federal and state levels," the university officials said in the letter. Instead, the local organization Light of the World Church is hosting a similar event at Hughes High School.
Owusu-Korkor said the new venue means she can only invite five people to the ceremony. In previous years, students had an unlimited number of tickets. Tyehimba was a chance for students to invite family and friends who would not attend the university-wide commencement, which has a limited number of tickets.
Anderson is dreading this change. 'Especially in communities like the Black community, when someone is winning in a family, everybody wants to show up to support," he said. By removing Tyehimba, he said, it's restricting the joy and level of togetherness.
Ohio legislators who passed SB 1 maintained that the bill would make Ohio's universities and colleges a more welcoming place for all students. But for Anderson, what drew him to the university is disappearing.
'My younger brother's considering going here," Anderson said. 'All the big things that I was excited to share with him if he were to come here are not here anymore."
This article originally appeared on Cincinnati Enquirer: Future of University of Cincinnati's centers unclear amid Ohio DEI law
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
European Leaders to Join Zelenskiy for Meeting With Trump
(Bloomberg) -- European leaders will join Volodymyr Zelenskiy at his high-stakes meeting with Donald Trump on Monday in Washington, a show of support as Ukraine's leader faces growing US pressure to agree to a quick peace deal with Russia that involves ceding swaths of territory. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron have confirmed their participation. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni will join the talks as well, according to an official. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome The move comes as European nations shift their focus toward providing Ukraine with robust security guarantees that will be discussed during a video call of the so-called coalition-of-the-willing countries on Sunday afternoon. 'We must have strong security guarantees to protect both Ukraine and Europe's vital security interests,' von der Leyen told reporters in a joint news conference with Zelenskiy in Brussels ahead of the call. There can be no limitation on the country's military and 'its borders cannot be changed by force,' she added. 'These are decisions to be made by Ukraine and Ukraine alone,' she said. 'And these decisions cannot be taken without Ukraine at the table.' Trump said after his talks with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday that he'll urge Zelenskiy to make a quick deal, and sounded receptive to the Russian president's demands that Ukraine give up large areas of land in the east of the country. European leaders are skeptical that a peace agreement can be rapidly reached, or that Putin even wants one. Monday's talks will include, among other things, security guarantees, territorial issues, and continued support for Ukraine in its defense against Russian aggression, according to a German statement. It'll be Zelenskiy's first visit in the White House since February, when his Oval Office encounter with Trump turned into a public shouting match and led to US briefly pausing military aid to Ukraine. While the two leaders patched up their relationship since then, the Ukrainian president needs all the support he can muster as the US president presses for a fast peace deal, and Putin sticks to his maximalist demands. Zelenskiy and von der Leyen welcomed president Trump's willingness to contribute to security guarantees with Europe. Trump and Putin agreed at their summit in Alaska that the US would be able to offer Ukraine security guarantees, Steve Witkoff, Trump's special envoy, said on Sunday. The Kremlin hasn't commented on the potential arrangement. The specifics of a US contribution to any security guarantees for Ukraine are unclear. The discussions have touched upon the possibility of granting Kyiv assurances from some allies — similar to those of NATO's Article 5 collective defense clause — which commits members to defend each other if attacked, said the people. The people spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations, and cautioned that a NATO-like mechanism would be difficult. An alternative would be bolstering, through US commitments, earlier plans coordinated by the UK and France, which included reassurance forces, monitoring and air-cover, the people said. 'It is important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine.' Zelenskiy said. 'But there are no details how it'll work and what America's role will be, what Europe's role will be, what the EU can do.' 'We need security to work in practice like Article 5 of NATO. And we consider EU accession to be part of security guarantees,' he said. Trump also indicated he could be looking to organize a meeting between the Russian and Ukrainian leaders as early as within a week, the people said. Zelenskiy has said repeatedly that he's willing to meet Putin. The Kremlin has yet to provide a similar commitment, and many European officials doubt he wants to end Russia's invasion of Ukraine, which is halfway through its fourth year. Ahead of the meeting with Putin, Trump told allies that reaching a ceasefire would be his key demand. He also threatened to walk out and impose tough new punitive measures on Moscow and countries buying its oil if it wasn't met. Yet Trump signaled on Friday that he wasn't in a rush to implement fresh penalties on Russia's trading partners. Following his calls with Zelenskiy and European leaders early Saturday, Trump said in a Truth Social post that it had been 'determined by all' that the best way to end the war was to achieve a peace dal and 'not a mere Ceasefire Agreement.' Trump told Zelenskiy and European leaders that Putin wants Ukraine to cede control of the entire Donbas region in Ukraine's east, renewing earlier demands, Bloomberg previously reported. Zelenskiy has repeatedly ruled out giving up all of Donetsk and Luhansk provinces, which comprise Donbas. Moscow's forces only partially control the region, having failed to take it militarily after more than a decade of fighting that predated Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Russia would also halt advancing its claims over the parts of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions it doesn't now control, effectively freezing the battle lines there. The Kremlin could also potentially withdraw troops from other regions such as Sumy and Kharkiv in Ukraine's northeast, areas near the Russian border where Kremlin forces control only small pockets of land. According to an assessment by the UK defense ministry, it would take Russia more than four years to fully occupy the four Ukrainian regions it laid claim to in 2022. That would come at a cost of nearly 2 million additional Russian casualties based on current battlefield advances, the ministry said on X. While maintaining that any territorial decisions are for Zelenskiy to make, Trump has repeatedly signaled that a peace agreement would include land 'swaps,' and has urged the Ukrainian president to make a deal. 'The constitution of Ukraine makes it impossible to give up territory or trade land,' Zelenskiy said Sunday and reiterated his call for a trilateral leaders summit. 'So far Russia gives no sign the trilateral will happen,' he said. 'If Russia refuses, then new sanctions should follow.' --With assistance from Kati Pohjanpalo, Stephan Kahl, Samy Adghirni and Max Ramsay. (Updates with Zelenskiy and von der Leyen remarks starting in the fourth paragraph.) What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates How Syrian Immigrants Are Boosting Germany's Economy Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio


Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Ukraine Responds to Putin's Reported Demands to Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. It would be "totally unacceptable" for Kyiv to give up its eastern regions for a peace deal, a senior Ukrainian politician has said, as Ukrainian officials prepare to meet President Donald Trump and European leaders in Washington on Monday. Reuters reported on Sunday that Russia had said it would offer slivers of land it currently controls in Ukraine in exchange for Kyiv ceding chunks of land in the east that Russia does not currently control, citing sources briefed on the Kremlin's thinking. Under the proposal, Ukraine would fully withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, with the current front lines in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions to the south frozen in place, according to the report. For Ukraine, it is politically and militarily off the table to consent to losing the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, Oleksandr Merezhko, the chair of Ukraine's parliamentary foreign affairs committee and a member of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky's party, previously told Newsweek. President Donald Trump greets Russian President Vladimir Putin as he arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Alaska. President Donald Trump greets Russian President Vladimir Putin as he arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025, in Anchorage, Kremlin declared in fall 2022 that Ukraine's Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions were now part of Russia after referendums widely condemned as a sham. Russia had seized Crimea, to the south of the mainland, from Ukraine in 2014. Moscow does not control all of the four mainland Ukrainian regions, but has long focused on asserting its grip on Donetsk and Luhansk. They are collectively known as the Donbas, and form much of Ukraine's industrial heartland. The current proposal is a "provocation" from the Kremlin chief, and one to which Ukraine can never agree, Merezhko said. Kyiv has repeatedly said it is against the country's constitution to give land away to Moscow. The Russian and Ukrainian positions on what the Kremlin would control in any ceasefire agreement or peace deal have always been far apart, and there is little hint that this has changed on either side. But what may have shifted is President Donald Trump's patience to entertain steadfast Russian demands. The Republican had in recent months expressed increasing frustration with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but said off the back of the two leaders' first meeting of Trump's second term that the summit was "useful." No deal was announced, and Trump pivoted his position on a ceasefire, saying he would move straight to a permanent peace deal. Zelensky said on Saturday Russia's refusal to sign a ceasefire "complicates the situation." Russia is not in a position to seize Donetsk through military means, and, for Ukraine, the region has huge strategic importance, Merezhko said. Close to three-and-years of full-scale war has seen Russia gain control of large areas of Luhansk and Donetsk, but much of the latter still remains in Ukrainian control. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a U.S.-based think tank that tracks the daily changes to the front lines in the conflict, said earlier this month Ukraine still controls roughly 6,500 square kilometers of territory in Donetsk—equivalent to a quarter of the region. Russia's slow but steady gains, concentrated in Donetsk, have come at an eyewatering human cost, according to Ukrainian and Western assessments. Crucially, west of the front lines, in Ukrainian-held Donetsk, are several cities known as "fortress settlements" that are vital to Ukraine's defenses. The region is a "bulwark" for Ukraine to shield its other regions, Merezhko said. After the Anchorage summit, Trump told European leaders that he backed a plan in which Ukraine would cede territory it still controlled to Russia, The New York Times reported, citing two senior European officials. Several European leaders will travel to participate in Zelensky's meeting at the White House on Monday, including British Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer.


CNN
23 minutes ago
- CNN
Tapper on whether Trump changed the course of Russia's war in Ukraine
CNN's Jake Tapper reflects on the summit between US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska and whether Trump made peace in Ukraine less likely.