EU hits food delivery company Delivery Hero with 329 mn-euro-fine
EU regulators concluded Delivery Hero used its stake in Glovo between 2018 and 2022 to limit competition by exchanging sensitive information, agreeing not to poach each other's employees, and to divide among themselves national markets for food delivery.
Based in Germany, Delivery Hero has held a 94 percent stake in Spain's Glovo since July 2022, but the EU's formal probe -- launched last year -- focuses on the period before it took sole control.
They are two of the biggest food delivery companies in Europe, delivering meals from restaurants, grocery shopping and other non-food products to customers at home ordering via their apps or websites.
The European Commission, which acts as the EU's competition watchdog, said the two companies admitted their involvement in the cartel and agreed to pay the fines to settle the case.
"Cartels like this reduce choice for consumers and business partners, reduce opportunities for employees and reduce incentives to compete and innovate," it said.
Delivery Hero will have to pay a fine worth 223 million euros, while Glovo must pay around 106 million euros, the commission said.
"This case is important because these practices were facilitated through an anticompetitive use of Delivery Hero's minority stake in Glovo," EU competition chief Teresa Ribera said in a statement.
The two companies had agreed not to actively steal each other's employees, initially covering managers before it was extended to all staff including logistics experts.
Their agreement did not cover delivery drivers who were not employees at the time of the infringements, but classified as self-employed.
The EU's decision is the first where the commission finds a cartel in the labour market and Ribera said it was "also the first time the Commission is sanctioning a no-poach agreement, where companies stop competing for the best talent and reduce opportunities for workers".
Cartel by WhatsApp
The two companies exchanged commercially sensitive information regarding prices and costs via email as well as WhatsApp chats where, for example, officials would discuss which markets to enter.
The commission said Delivery Hero and Glovo agreed to avoid entering countries where one company was already present, and coordinated which one should enter in markets where neither had a presence yet.
As of July 2020, the two companies had fully ceased to compete with each other by carefully avoiding being present in the same markets, reducing consumer choice and thus contributing to higher prices.
Delivery Hero confirmed it had reached a settlement agreement with the commission in the antitrust probe, saying it had already set aside a provision for the fine.
"Today's settlement allows Delivery Hero to address the European Commission's concerns while allowing stakeholders to move on swiftly," it said in a statement.
Delivery Hero provides its services in more than 70 countries worldwide including 16 from the European Economic area (EEA) including the EU's 27 states as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
13 hours ago
- Euronews
Top EU court rules migrants with minors not aiding illegal immigration
The Court of Justice of the European Union on Tuesday ruled in favour of migrants' rights in a case filed by an Italian court regarding what can be considered aiding and abetting illegal immigration. The court ruling noted that, in the case of a third-country national entering the EU irregularly accompanied by a child in their care, their conduct "cannot be regarded as aiding and abetting illegal immigration." "In fact, the parent in this case assumes an obligation related to his or her personal responsibility towards the child in accordance with fundamental rights, in particular respect for family life and the child," the president of the EU's highest legal authority, Koen Lenaerts, explained in his judgment. With this preliminary ruling, the court agrees with the Court of Bologna, which filed the proceedings in July 2023 following the entry into Italy of a Congolese citizen in 2019. The woman entered the country at the airport border of Bologna with two minors — her daughter and niece, over whom she had actual care following the death of the niece's mother — using false documents. She said she fled Congo after receiving threats from her ex-partner and took the two minors with her because she feared for their physical well-being. She was arrested and is being prosecuted for facilitating unauthorised entry into Italy. The Italian court had asked the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) whether the 2002 directive on the facilitation of illegal immigration was compatible with the Charter of Fundamental Rights. The referring court doubted whether the directive provides for humanitarian assistance as a justification for making the crime of aiding and abetting not punishable. In other words, it was asking the EU court about the scope of the general offence of facilitation of unauthorised entry, provided for by EU law. "The court answers that the conduct of a person who, in breach of the rules governing the movement of people across borders, brings into the territory of a member state minors who are third-country nationals and are accompanying him or her, and over whom he or she exercises actual care, does not fall within the scope of that offence," the ruling on Tuesday said. It added that this conduct "does not constitute facilitation of illegal immigration, which EU law seeks to combat" but rather "the exercise by that person of his or her responsibility stemming from the family relationship and the actual care over those minors." Lenaerts went further, stating that the interpretation is necessary, also in light of the fundamental right to asylum. He explained that, because the woman had made an application for international protection, she could not be regarded as staying illegally on the territory. This is the case so long as no decision has been given on her application at first instance, Lenaerts explained. Police in the Hungarian capital issued an order on Tuesday denying a request to hold an pro-LGBTQ+ event in Budapest, a consequence of recent steps by the right-wing government aimed at banning the popular Budapest Pride march. The police's decision to prohibit the event planned for later this month came after Hungary's parliament passed legislation in March that allowed the government to ban public events by LGBTQ+ communities. That was followed a month later by a constitutional amendment banning such events. Both moves were slammed by legal scholars and critics decried it as another step towards authoritarianism by what they call an autocratic government. In its justification for prohibiting the Budapest event, which organisers requested to take place on 28 June, the city's police argued that "it cannot be ruled out, or is even inevitable, that a person under the age of 18 will be able to engage in legally prohibited conduct" if attending the proposed march. The police also contended that the march could result in "passive victims," who, "because of the assembly's march-like nature, did not wish to attend the assembly but, because of its public nature, nevertheless become a bystander." In a statement, the organisers called the police decision "a textbook example of tyranny." "The police did not ban Pride but the rainbow parade that was originally allowed but in our opinion this is legally absurd," Amnesty International spokesperson Áron Demeter, one of the organisers of the march, told the news outlet. The ban on LGBTQ+ events, which the government says ensures children's rights to moral, physical and spiritual development, allows for fines on people organising or taking part in Pride events and the use of facial recognition software to identify them. Hungary's contentious "child protection" legislation prohibits the "depiction or promotion" of homosexuality to anyone under the age of 18. Hungarian officials have given contradictory statements as to whether or not the new policies amount to a full ban on Budapest Pride. In a speech to supporters in February, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán advised organisers "not to bother organising this year's parade," calling it "wasted money and time." The Budapest Police attached photographs and videos to its statement depicting scenes from previous Budapest Pride events, ostensibly as evidence to corroborate its view that the march was likely to violate the new laws banning public displays of homosexuality. France, Germany and Spain were among at least 20 European Union nations who last month called on Hungary to revise its legislation banning LGBTQ+ events, expressing concern that it runs contrary to the fundamental values of human dignity, freedom, equality and respect for human rights enshrined in EU treaties. Organisers of Budapest Pride, which draws tens of thousands annually and is celebrating its 30th anniversary this year, have vowed that the event will go ahead as planned despite the threat of legal sanctions.
Euronews
16 hours ago
- Euronews
Six months without a new EU privacy chief, and still no deal in sight
Six months after the mandate of the privacy watchdog of the EU institutions – the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) – expired, EU lawmakers and national governments still can't agree on who will lead the authority. And the decision on who will take over from the current EDPS, Poland's Wojciech Wiewiórowski, is no closer to being taken, according to people familiar with the matter. The selection process has been plagued by delays. Hearings, which were due before 5 December, when Wiewiórowski's mandate ended, were pushed back by the Commission to January because of delays with approving a shortlist of candidates. After that, politicians failed to agree on a successor, with both the European Parliament and the member states backing different candidates from the four contenders picked by the Commission following hearings in January. A special working group with representatives from both institutions was set up, which met a few times, but those meetings were inconclusive, and no further meeting has been convened on the issue. The Parliament's Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs Committee, LIBE, voted to appoint long-time Commission official Bruno Gencarelli, from Italy, while the member states are backing Wiewiórowski to stay on for another mandate. In March, think tank Centre for AI & Digital Humanism and a group of privacy academics wrote to the Parliament and Commission presidents, signalling Gencarelli ought to be conflicted from the role. Appointing him would be 'a violation of the constitutionally protected complete independence of EDPS and of the principle of good administration. This would also undermine the European system of checks and balances, in favour of the Commission,' the letter said, adding that the next privacy chief should be a 'candidate whose independence is beyond doubt.' The EDPS job has never been held by a former Commission official: Wiewiórowski, as well as his predecessors Peter Hustinx (2004-2009 and 2009-2014) and Giovanni Buttarelli (2014 -2019) all previously worked at national supervisory authorities. Established in 2004, the EDPS is unable to fine tech giants for breaches of EU privacy rules — that's a competence of the national data protection authorities — it publishes opinions on legislative proposals and weighs in on upcoming digital legislation. In the absence of a new head of the watchdog, Wiewiórowski is continuing his work. For example, earlier this month the EDPS office published an opinion on rules proposed by the Commission to establish a common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the EU. His advice was to carry out an in-depth fundamental rights impact assessment 'to better identify and mitigate potential risks." Isabelle Roccia, Managing Director, Europe of privacy professional's organisation IAPP, told Euronews that the role of the EDPS has developed much more than was anticipated when it created 20 years ago. 'It [now] oversees compliance for close to 80 EU entities and has built a significant role in EU policymaking over time,' Roccia said. 'Understandably, MEPs and member states are carefully gauging how the next Supervisor could navigate data protection vis-à-vis other areas of law, new technology, security and geopolitics, at a time when the Commission is focused on competitiveness and simplification,' she added. The Commission did not reply before publication to a request for a comment. French artificial intelligence (AI) start-up H Company, which launched last year and raised hundreds of millions of euros in investment before it had even released its first product, brought out three new AI agents on Tuesday. "We are all in on the agentic race, that's our path. We are even potentially ahead with really good results in computer use technologies," Charles Kantor, the company's CEO and co-founder, told Euronews Next. Agentic AI models, or AI agents, do not just process information but also try to plan and complete tasks and solve problems. However, Kantor said that humans would 'always be at the centre' of their AI models, so that if the agent wrote an email, it would just be a draft and only the human would be able to send the message. The three models that H has released are called Runner H, Tester H, and Surfer H. H said that the three products reflect the company's vision for a "trusted, action-oriented AI that delivers task execution beyond traditional chatbots". It claims that it achieves a 92.2 per cent success rate while reducing costs by up to 5.5 times against competitors such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. Runner H allows users to automate workflows and streamline tasks. Kantor said it was "a more advanced version of Manus," he said, referring to the Chinese AI agent. It is aimed at consumer use. Surfer H allows you to surf the web and navigate browser environments, and the company claims the model achieved a 92.2 per cent task completion accuracy on the WebVoyager benchmark at $0.13 (€0.11) per task. This is much cheaper than competitors, such as OpenAI's Operator agent, which costs $200 (€175) per month for its Pro subscription plan. "It's really like almost an agent acting on your behalf, using planning to visual capabilities to recognise interfaces, clicking, scrolling, acting, fetching information, and so on," Kantor said. Tester H is the final new model, which is built more for enterprise use with one of the big things it can do being software testing. But it can also do things such as smart email replies. You can ask the agent to read your recent emails, and it can draft template answers. But the agent will not hit send; only the human can do this. H said that the three products reflect the company's vision for a 'trusted, action-oriented AI that delivers task execution beyond traditional chatbots'. All the models are trained on synthetic data, which means it uses artificially generated data designed to mimic real-world data, allowing the company to meet Europe's GDPR rules on data protection. According to Kantor, he personally uses H's AI models for the interconnection between tools such as emails and documents to prepare information, such as for billing or drafting emails. But he also uses it for preparing company content that is then reviewed, such as for ads and markets. 'When you start to review the work of an agent, you start to feel the productivity,' he said. H Company created a buzz when it launched last year. Kantor was a university professor at Stanford while the start-up's other co-founders came from DeepMind. Meanwhile, investment came from LVMH's CEO Bernard Arnault, Iliad founder Xavier Niel, Amazon, Samsung, and former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, among others. But just several months after launch, three of the co-founders - Daan Wierstra, Karl Tuyls, and Julien Perolat - quit due to 'operational differences,' the company said in a LinkedIn post. For Kantor, the situation surrounding their departure is "in the past". "We had this kind of strategic disalignment, but now they are ambassadors of the company, and H's vision is really clear," he said. "We want to be at the state of the art in terms of action models and the agentic space, and we want this technology to benefit humanity". The company now has around 70 employees in Paris and the United Kingdom and has a big research and engineering department. "It's kind of the concerto of age. You need to be able to really orchestrate in the right manner: Product, research, and engineering synergies to build category-defining AI," he said. For Kantor, agentic AI is the next phase of AI, which will be vital to physical AI, which NVIDIA spoke of at length two weeks ago. "We're gonna see a lot of companies thriving worldwide, but also in France, in robotics. I think Agent AI is gonna be the heart, the gist, I may say, of many fields," Kantor said, referring to computer games, simulated worlds, and robotics. "The software part of robotics is gonna be based on agentics, superintelligence. The opportunities are numerous".
France 24
16 hours ago
- France 24
Germany's Merz defends migration crackdown after court setback
The Berlin court said Monday that German border officials cannot turn away asylum seekers before it was determined which country should process their cases under EU rules. The decision, in response to a challenge brought by three Somali nationals refused entry to Germany, dealt a blow to the crackdown Merz launched when he took power last month. But his government insists it is legal to continue turning away asylum seekers while it tries to challenge the ruling, and conservative leader Merz reiterated that stance. The court decision could "limit our room for manoeuvre a little", he acknowledged in a speech to a gathering of local government officials in Berlin. But he insisted the ruling was "preliminary", adding: "We know that we can continue with pushbacks." "We will do it to protect public safety and order in our country and to prevent cities and municipalities from becoming overwhelmed." He said the policy, which has caused tensions with some of Germany's neighbours, would be carried out "within the framework of existing European law". The measures were temporary until security at the European Union's external borders "is significantly improved", he stressed. While the court said the reasoning behind its ruling could be applied to other cases, Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt argued the decision only directly affected the three individuals who brought the case. Merz's coalition partners from the centre-left Social Democrats (SPD) called for the impact of the ruling to be examined in detail. While the ruling was not final it needed to be "taken very seriously", the SPD's parliamentary leader Matthias Miersch said at a press conference. "This must now be examined," Miersch said, agreeing with Merz that it had the potential to limit the government's ability to act. Miersch said it was vital to provide "legal certainty" for law enforcement in order for them to do their job well. "We cannot afford to let these issues play out at the expense of police officers," he said. Pushing back undocumented migrants at Germany's borders, including almost all asylum seekers, was one of Merz's key campaign pledges ahead of February elections. That vote saw the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) score its best-ever result of just over 20 percent, and Merz insists that action on migration is the only way to halt the party's growth. But Merz's junior coalition partners, the centre-left SPD, have been uneasy with the crackdown.
